Upload
Login or register

phunkyzilla

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:4/27/2011
Last Login:12/03/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#9718
Highest Content Rank:#1879
Highest Comment Rank:#2962
Content Thumbs: 3847 total,  4476 ,  629
Comment Thumbs: 5829 total,  8227 ,  2398
Content Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 138 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 139 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 45% (45/100)
Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:3
Content Views:169941
Times Content Favorited:66 times
Total Comments Made:3921
FJ Points:4441

latest user's comments

#115 - yeah but in this illustration it clearly implies that simpleto…  [+] (1 reply) 08/15/2016 on Allegory of the Cave 0
User avatar
#116 - autumnanubis (08/15/2016) [-]
But they were not, the shadows cast on the wall were not of things passing the entrance. I already said this.
#113 - in the original allegory the shadows are casted on the wall by…  [+] (3 replies) 08/15/2016 on Allegory of the Cave 0
User avatar
#114 - autumnanubis (08/15/2016) [-]
It isn't an "oppressing shadowy figure". The shadows on the wall represent the imperial evidence presented by intellectuals, they do not understand it and it is not an observation of their own. The shadows are not cast by the light of the sun and as such means they are not shadowed by and disconnected from philosophy. Objects are passed in front of the light for the purpose of displaying the shadows to the chained ones. Nearly every single illustration of the allegory appears this way.
User avatar
#115 - phunkyzilla (08/15/2016) [-]
yeah but in this illustration it clearly implies that simpletons will blindly sit in the cave listening to the news while those high enough to see that they're false images will leave the cave and find memes. I'm just saying this is not a good illustration of the original one in which the shadows cast on the wall were just from real life passing by the wall's entrance
User avatar
#116 - autumnanubis (08/15/2016) [-]
But they were not, the shadows cast on the wall were not of things passing the entrance. I already said this.
#158 - But not warning the people there???? what's the excuse for tha…  [+] (1 reply) 08/15/2016 on When memes become reality 0
User avatar
#159 - redandgreen (08/15/2016) [-]
Where's your evidence that she is at fault for that? I've seen a lot of claims but again - show evidence.
#86 - another reason it's rape is because a child spanning from the …  [+] (3 replies) 08/13/2016 on gonna get some +1
User avatar
#98 - dehumanizer (08/13/2016) [-]
They were just going on a date what marrige are you talking about? Girls as young as 11 are perfectly healthy for childbirth, its just how nature is.
#102 - anon (08/13/2016) [-]
i don't think an 11 year old is gonna be too successful in nursing a child. Even if they could, they're certainly not suitable to be raising one, with the whole not being able to have a job, and pretty much just starting their own life.
Plus in the comic, there's a panel of the guy having duct tape, handcuffs and rope. It certainly would not have been just a date.
User avatar
#103 - dehumanizer (08/13/2016) [-]
you are missing the point anon just because you dont like what two people do in private doesent mean it should be illegal

they should have included that part here then