Upload
Login or register

phoenixactual

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/27/2013
Last Login:6/30/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#32294
Highest Content Rank:#5621
Highest Comment Rank:#4296
Content Thumbs: 379 total,  1420 ,  1041
Comment Thumbs: 1880 total,  3152 ,  1272
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 36 Content: Peasant → Level 37 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:6
Content Views:154902
Times Content Favorited:26 times
Total Comments Made:2169
FJ Points:1965
Favorite Tags: doctor (3) | HORMONES (2) | im (2) | Not (2) | tran (2) | trans (2) | Transgender (2)

latest user's comments

#17 - So what gives you the right to judge me, if my life has no imp…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/26/2015 on Reality -7
#28 - anon (10/26/2015) [-]
You're going to get judged if you want people to say "hooray" to you for getting fucked. Like why should they praise you? Get lost. On the other hand, if people want to treat you like shit because you like having sex...then they're just assholes. they're angry at you for one reason or another, and if your choice doesn't impact them then yeah it's a waste of everybody's time. If they think they can rightfully treat you like shit for your lifestyle...well, that's just fucked up isn't it?
#34 - phoenixactual (10/27/2015) [-]
I'm not asking you to like it, I'm just asking you to leave others alone over it. How is that such a hard concept to get through yout thick skull? If somebody makes a choice you don't like, but it harms absolutely nobody else on the face of the planet, what the fuck gives you the right to be a judgemental dick towards that person?
User avatar
#18 - Einsty (10/26/2015) [-]
And how does my opinion of you affect you?

You affect yourself, first and foremost. Then the people close around you.

Hypothetical scenario: If it was up to me, I wouldn't choose a life partner that has spent the last 7 years fornicating with every other passerby. There may be stds involved. The person may not be interested in a long term relationship. The person may not consider morals to be of any particular value, or may simply not be truly looking for a closed relationship. Why should I risk my health and happiness and exert effort with unlikely outcome when there are alternatives with better chances of success?

Let me cite a nice quote I heard around that is fitting this situation:
"People aren't against you. They're in for themselves." --Gene Fowler
You can lead your life the way you do, but remember others have that right as well. And if they want to live without people with your habits, let them.
" Personal freedom, motherfucker, do you get it? " --phoenixactual

#19 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
Then don't be a shitbag to people that have no negative impact on you. You don't have to like it, but you don't have to treat someone else like shit because of it
User avatar
#21 - Einsty (10/26/2015) [-]
You might have had a point there, but it hangs on me being a shitbag, which is false.

Einsty out
User avatar
#20 - awesomedewd (10/26/2015) [-]
Man, you're surely butthurt from all the dicks you've been taking.
#7 - Comment deleted 10/26/2015 on Rekt so hard you end up in... +1
#175 - And now we're back on this. You don't get to say who lives or… 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
#173 - Ok, so now we're getting out of third world countries, and tel…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#174 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
No, I'm saying people that don't try to change their situation don't.
#172 - More than half the continent is covered in desert. What isn't… 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
#169 - Ignoring, of course, the fact that your arguments have almost …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#171 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
I'm basing it more on how they work in their country.
I believe there are people worth saving, no matter where. Like the boy in the African village who built a windmill, or the ones that actually plant the seeds given to them instead of eating it as grain.
Like the hard working North Korean people.
Not like people living off of benefits in a 1st world country without even trying for a job.
#167 - And every African uis a warlord waiting to happen, so they don…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#170 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
No, they really aren't. But who are to deny someone access because of how they made their living?
#166 - So it's not the fault of the international banking system that…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#168 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
The only actual resources being taken from Africa are precious gems and such, which have no use in survival. They have stone and wood, yet live in mud and scrap.
Empires were built on countries with just as much or sometimes less.
#164 - On a side note, deep space exploration is too damn expensive f…  [+] (8 new replies) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#165 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
That's because only scientists and trained astronauts have seen the world from space.
An African Warlord looking at the earth from space would only be changed for the worse.
#175 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
And now we're back on this. You don't get to say who lives or dies, you're not the appointed judge of all humanity
#173 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
Ok, so now we're getting out of third world countries, and telling people in our own damn country they don't deserve to live. Not much better of an argument, buddy. Mainly because it ignores the fact that most of the people living off government assistance have no say over their situation. Are you seriously going to tell me someone who literally can't change their situation deserves to die because of it?
User avatar
#174 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
No, I'm saying people that don't try to change their situation don't.
#169 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
Ignoring, of course, the fact that your arguments have almost entirely been about preventing third world countries from being part of the international scientific community, based solely on geographical point of origin. Again, racist as shit
User avatar
#171 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
I'm basing it more on how they work in their country.
I believe there are people worth saving, no matter where. Like the boy in the African village who built a windmill, or the ones that actually plant the seeds given to them instead of eating it as grain.
Like the hard working North Korean people.
Not like people living off of benefits in a 1st world country without even trying for a job.
#167 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
And every African uis a warlord waiting to happen, so they don't deserve to be part of it? Now we're getting out of nationalism and straight into racism
User avatar
#170 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
No, they really aren't. But who are to deny someone access because of how they made their living?
#162 - This isn't about survival, though, this is about pure scientif…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/26/2015 on YOGURT BURN 0
User avatar
#163 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
I think being able to work with your situation instead of sitting in a straw hut all day making babies because your other children starved to death.
No, it's not their fault their country sucks, but it's their fault for not trying to do anything about it.
#172 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
More than half the continent is covered in desert. What isn't is covered by dense rainforest, there's not much land for cultivation left out of all that. And what does grow, is almost instantly shipped out across the world to other countries, there's more than just shiny rocks coming out of Africa. They just live the way they have for thousands of years, because it's all they can afford. And we pay them next to nothing for labor, mines are basically almost slave camps these days.and that's not their doing, the mines and farms are owned by international corporations that leave almost nothing behind when they take the product.
#166 - phoenixactual (10/26/2015) [-]
So it's not the fault of the international banking system that drags third world countries deeper into debt whenever they have to get help from the international community? It's not because 90% of food crops grown in these countries get shipped across the world, leaving almost nothing for the native inhabitants, or the fact that the system is rigged to pull as many resources as possible from a region, while paying out as little as possible? Nah, it's the fault of the people living in countries that already barely have the natural resources to feed their own people, while getting robbed by exporters that pay next to nothing because it's cheap labor. This isn't their fault, the rest of the world is robbing these people blind at times. How can you say you deserve survival more than they, when they have no say whatsoever in their situation?
User avatar
#168 - heartlessrobot (10/26/2015) [-]
The only actual resources being taken from Africa are precious gems and such, which have no use in survival. They have stone and wood, yet live in mud and scrap.
Empires were built on countries with just as much or sometimes less.