peterdivine
Rank #2711 on Comments
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius Offline
Send mail to peterdivine Block peterdivine Invite peterdivine to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 3/28/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #2711 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #10511 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #2686 |
| Content Thumbs: | 2 total,
2 ,
0  |
| Comment Thumbs: | 2545 total,
3166 ,
621 |
| Content Level Progress: | 8.47% (5/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 39% (39/100) Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 354 |
| Total Comments Made: | 698 |
| FJ Points: | 1940 |
Pictures
- Views: 352
2 0
Total: +2
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 10/10/14
Best of Headline Smasher
user favorites
Korean Alphabet
Feminism
I want to live...
How to commit crimes
Mindgames.
Werds
Daily reminder
Machetes
Amazonians...
All Punslatest user's comments
| #81 - Statistically speaking, if you're lucky enough to win the Powe… | 3 hours ago on naw..but maybe | 0 |
| #33 - You know what needs to happen now, right? Synch it. | 01/09/2016 on heard you talkin shit | +1 |
| #41 - How do you tell him to **** off with the entire sphere … | 01/09/2016 on That's a big truf....come... | +2 |
| #17 - It makes me very nervous when I hear about that cat island in … [+] (1 new reply) | 01/09/2016 on too cute | +1 |
| | ||
| #163 - I confess, I've been reading ahead on your site. … [+] (1 new reply) | 01/07/2016 on Carrot and Pepper Ep. 8 | 0 |
| #71 - Well, naturally OP's got a bias. It's his story, and the peopl… [+] (1 new reply) | 01/07/2016 on Anon The Border Guard | +4 |
 obviously OP's have natural bias...but his bias is incredibly obvious, i mean...lets be honest here. why would he underplay it when he even admitted to him being angered by them? you dont go through all that, meanwhile put them into an underplayed position...yea they were being in the wrong, but for OP to underplay them and overplay himself would not make sense....if you tried this in court, you would do the opposite (overplay them). | ||
| #65 - If you call a serial killer a loser, do no be surprised if he … | 01/07/2016 on Anon The Border Guard | +5 |
| #59 - Oh, sure they weren't. I bet they were docile as kittens and t… [+] (6 new replies) | 01/07/2016 on Anon The Border Guard | +8 |
| you are only listening to ops point of view here in determining how they behaved, take into consideration what OP himself said.. >wetbacks >beaners >stare at them in disbelief and outright anger >team laughs (after choosing cambodia) Couple this, with the fact that he knowingly sent them to the wrong country....you would think that OP would have bias in the way he explained how they behaved. #71 -
peterdivine (01/07/2016) [-] Well, naturally OP's got a bias. It's his story, and the people who have the other viewpoint on it are in no position to deliver one... geographically speaking. We make assumptions on the facts given to us. You want a perfect understanding of the setting before you render a judgment, you're going to be sitting, waiting, and listening for a while. For that matter, what makes you think OP overreacted? Maybe he's underplaying what sort of frothing "sovereign citizen" insanity these people put him through. obviously OP's have natural bias...but his bias is incredibly obvious, i mean...lets be honest here. why would he underplay it when he even admitted to him being angered by them? you dont go through all that, meanwhile put them into an underplayed position...yea they were being in the wrong, but for OP to underplay them and overplay himself would not make sense....if you tried this in court, you would do the opposite (overplay them). | ||
| #52 - **** off, anyone who thinks they can intimidate their w… [+] (19 new replies) | 01/07/2016 on Anon The Border Guard | +16 |
| #59 -
peterdivine (01/07/2016) [-] Oh, sure they weren't. I bet they were docile as kittens and twice as cooperative. You know what they sounded like in OP's post? www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCozh_vbYdM You don't send someone to Cambodia on a lark, man, you do it because they are- and I'm quoting the OP here- "screaming some bullshit clause about they have the right to travel between countries freely because they're not tied to some quasi NAFTA conspiracy of the North American union." The second they got asked for papers, getting into the U.S. WITHOUT border patrol interference was already a non-possibility, so their only options were doing so with border approval. All they had to do was explain that they had no papers, and volunteer their information from there. They didn't. They fought and belittled the system as much as they possibly could, and their contempt was met in kind. you are only listening to ops point of view here in determining how they behaved, take into consideration what OP himself said.. >wetbacks >beaners >stare at them in disbelief and outright anger >team laughs (after choosing cambodia) Couple this, with the fact that he knowingly sent them to the wrong country....you would think that OP would have bias in the way he explained how they behaved. #71 -
peterdivine (01/07/2016) [-] Well, naturally OP's got a bias. It's his story, and the people who have the other viewpoint on it are in no position to deliver one... geographically speaking. We make assumptions on the facts given to us. You want a perfect understanding of the setting before you render a judgment, you're going to be sitting, waiting, and listening for a while. For that matter, what makes you think OP overreacted? Maybe he's underplaying what sort of frothing "sovereign citizen" insanity these people put him through. obviously OP's have natural bias...but his bias is incredibly obvious, i mean...lets be honest here. why would he underplay it when he even admitted to him being angered by them? you dont go through all that, meanwhile put them into an underplayed position...yea they were being in the wrong, but for OP to underplay them and overplay himself would not make sense....if you tried this in court, you would do the opposite (overplay them).  Do they? Because the original post says nothing about that. The fact that they're "from Mexico" is gleaned by the Officer questioning them but that doesn't mean they actually have any documentation there. In fact. It clearly says Homeland Security interviews and cannot find a single bit of info on them. And straight up tells the guys to "pick a country" which they promptly do. I'd agree it was an abuse of power if these guys had some kind of documentation anywhere, but they're literally ghosts in the system. it literally says in the opening statement that they were originally from mexico and brought over to the united states from a young age. This means that there is mexican documentation that they were born in that country. They picked a country and laughed about it later, laughing about already implies they are shitting all over the situation. they are ghosts in the united states, but highly doubt they were ghosts in their homecountry. It was written after the fact, but lets used sterotypes for a second...its highly possible we could pretty much pick out a mexican from a lineup a single mexican and cambodians. choosing cambodia was simply a dick move. and it was not a valid reason...for the same fact that when you deport an immigrant you dont simply throw them into china when they are from honduras for example. You can when they don't have any paperwork to back up their "Claim of COuntry of Origin." IF they had paperwork in Mexico, they'd have been sent to Mexico. Because that's the law. They didn't have any paperwork to prove where they were from so they were sent off to wherever. being sent to "wherever" before finding a country of origin doesnt make sense. but even then, it also makes me doubt the story even happened. A person would first be detained for a while before being deported...so its highly unlikely they were not able to identify the country of origin in the meantime. | ||
| #43 - It's **** that never made it into movie 5 like this whi… [+] (2 new replies) | 01/07/2016 on [ ] not rekt [✓] rekt | 0 |
 I hear what you're saying and I agree for the most part, but I do feel like they did good by the Ministry of Magic part. especially The part where Voldemort tries to posses Harry. That felt really powerful in the movie and its probably the ONLY time i liked the movie interpretation better than the book  That should have been the one they split into 2 parts, since it's the longest and most packed book. | ||
kamikazikraut
volugs
