Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

petagriffeenisafag    

Rank #33534 on Comments
no avatar Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to petagriffeenisafag Block petagriffeenisafag Invite petagriffeenisafag to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/31/2011
Last Login:10/30/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#33534
Highest Comment Rank:#7287
Comment Thumbs: 727 total,  998 ,  271
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:228
FJ Points:796

latest user's comments

#57 - Go ahead and explain your point, because to me it seems like y…  [+] (47 new replies) 09/24/2014 on DYK Comp #66 -3
#58 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Nah. I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out. No point in trying to fix stupid.
#59 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic 'i'm not even going to bother to explain' tactic.

Let's take a look shall we, I posted facts about James Cameron 'plagiarising' Soldier From Tommorow, you replied 'Simpsons did it' and thumbed me down twice, you realise the thumbs are funny and not funny right?

Then you rant on about how it's extremely unlikely you ever have an original thought even though no one was saying anything about that, I was merely pointing out that Cameron settled with Ellison in court and credited him in the actual movie, you just made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

Then your next reply is 'you're missing the point'. Yeah, so far you've made no sense and 'I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out.' makes you sound like an 8 year old.

I bet you're the kind of person who watches Ted talks not for the information but to brag about it to your friends.
User avatar #69 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic.

You rant on about how you don't understand my argument, I was merely pointing out that a court case means nothing in terms of certainty, you just acted like a first year logic student and made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt and that he never stole any intellectual property. Which is entirely false, I readily concede the idea that he COULD have. I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true.

I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is.
(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world)

PS: this argument isn't even original. I've had it before.
PSS: The credit theory you have in #57 is interesting but doesn't hold up: Cameron could easily have just given the credit to shut Ellison up regardless of the truth of the allegation.
#70 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Wow it took you 50 minutes to come up with that shit?

"Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic. "

All I did was addres your points you mongaloid...

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong. "

I even tell you i'm addressing your point in the fucking sentence as well a quote you.

"All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt" "I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true!."

First time i've ever facepalmed in real life. All you said in your comments was 'Simpsons did it' and then went on to explain your theory that it's almost impossible to have an original thought and how it was possible for Cameron to have made the film from that dream.

But no, it's my fault you can't actually say your point without adding layers of bullshit about a fucking cartoon in a failed attempt to sound clever. You don't once say that you have an issue with me stating the court case meant that Cameron couldn't have the film from a dream (and by the way, I never said that making the film from a dream was impossible, I simply provided evidence to why that's more than likely bullshit).

"I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is. " - Holy shit is it possible to be THIS retarded? ... "(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world) " - Ted talks is international, try again.

PS: You're a fucking moron.

#72 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Like how you homed in on the post time. I'm currently at work, proving you wrong in my free time. Honestly didn't read the rest the first line was so stupid i decided not to bother.
#73 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Cool story bro, if you have this much free time at work you probably have a meaningless job, quite fitting for a meaningless human being.
User avatar #74 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
That or it's funny to watch you flounder and it's incredibly easy to ruin your arguments. I did it with one phrase earlier "Simpsons did it". You really ought to figure out what that means before you try to argue against it.
#75 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Yeah bro you showed me, saying 'Simpsons did it' really rekt my argument.

And you're either not at work or you're an unskilled pleb who can afford to be on FunnyJunk for this amount of time during your job.

I floundered so much that you couldn't come up with a single argument to my point, only replying with 'Simpsons did it' or a reaction image with a 'witty' comeback.

The only meaningful reply you gave proved how much of a mong you truly are, you stated that you only had a problem with me saying that Cameron's dream never happened, which isn't true in the first place.

You're such a pleb I feel like my IQ is dropping just replying to you.
#79 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass.
#85 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
There's nothing to explain, and I didn't miss shit.

Literally I was just saying that James Cameron more than likely did not get the idea from a fucking food-poison induced dream about a metallic robot with kitchen knives and exploion as it is identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts.

They settled in court, Ellison is credited and Orion (distribution company) didn't even believe Cameron, and they advised him if he took it to court he would be responible for payout if he lost.

Yet this dumbass refuses tto believe anything other than it came to him in a dream.

Yeah it's possible that it came to Cameron in a dream, but there's clear evidence it did not. But let's go with the crazy theory, right?

Other than that all he mentioned was some bullshit about Southpark and Simpsons both which had no relevancy to what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about having original thoughts I was talking about the evidence that Cameron most likely did not get the idea for Terminator from a fucking food poison induced dream.

Holy shit how do you not get it?
User avatar #91 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
I honestly didn't think a functional human could miss a point harder. This is just fascinating at this point. And arstya is right, your argument is with me, not him/her.
#93 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You still haven't explained your point, when you tried you failed.

Your original post was about Simpsons and how it's almost impossible to have an original thought, when my first comment had nothing to do with any of that, I was just stating it's far more likely it did not come to him in a dream, and doesn't belong in a 'did you know?' comp.
User avatar #95 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
But that's not what you said. May have been what you were trying to say, however your comment is horribly worded if so. Your comment was about how the last thing was FALSE, not improbable, two very different things. You're information about the court case was irrelevant in every way except to suggest that you thought it was true. You even used the word 'proof' in your second comment.
#104 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
I see you choose not to reply to my comment, rather you sit there thumbing Arstya's comments up, and mine down.

Where do you work that you can actually spend this amount of time on FunnyJunk? It's very obvious you're either not at work or you have some unskilled job which would account for the fact you have such a thick skull and refuse to listen to the evidence.

Can't fix stupid, you know?
User avatar #99 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
Still not getting the point of it I see. Look up the word: uncertainty
#97 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Yes, I believe it's not true, and if you don't then you are literally choosing to believe that it came to him in a dream rather than looking at the facts.

And you still haven't stated what your point is, you keep avoiding that at all costs.

Here, i'll copy and paste to refresh your memory:

"It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed. "

The ENTIRETY of the South park/Simpsons bit had nothing to do with what I said in my original comment, yet you refuse to explain what your point was in this entire paragraph.
#87 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much.
#88 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts.
#127 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
If you say so.
User avatar #125 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Well fuck, it's not like I'm going to just go research one obscure court case. I'm simply defending why Helel said what he said. You're being a fool, and THIS is why we're insulting you and saying you're an idiot.

Oh, and I'm calling bullshit on you not logging in to comment. As far as I know you have to be on the site to receive a notification.
#126 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
I wouldn't expect you to research it because I told you about it probably more than 12 times, and this is why you and Helel are such plebs.

You're now seeing that what i'm saying is correct and all I did was constantly repeat myself until you actual gave me an explanation, and when you give me an explanation I debunked it and now you see my side.

But thanks for the confirmation I was right, I can sleep easy now.

Also call bullshit all you want, I just refreshed the page and saw your comment, couldn't be bothered to log-in, what bullshit is there to be called?


Goodnight you humongous plebs.
User avatar #123 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Alright, I'll explain it to you then since you can't see this clear link to what HE said to YOUR post.

You say, "The terminator one isn't true, James Cameron settled a court case with Harlan Ellison because Terminator was identical to Ellison's story "Soldier From Tommorow" This may be true, but that's not the point.

The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays due to the fact that someone somewhere has probably already thought of it.

Now if YOU were James Cameron, and this is assuming he really was inspired by the dream, and people came to you as you were making the movie, what would you do? Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you in order to keep it from ruining any sort of reputation you may have or may have in the future?

This was the reason why Helel made a reference to the South Park. That's it. And he explained it. You missed the point. Done and over with. I care a bit more now because it's just silly now. I was fucking with you before, but Jesus Christ it's gotten ridiculous.
#124 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
Can't be bothered to log in and i'm interrupting sherlock holmes for this, but you're so dumb that I can't resist. "The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays" - Terminator came out in 1984.

"Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you"

That would be a fair point if I didn't explain already that it is literally identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts, even Cameron's own dsitribution company wouldn't back him to take on the lawsuit, so it's not just a case of getting the guy off his back, he literally couldn't have took him on if he wanted to.

So once again we're back to the point that the entire Simpsons thing had no relevance to my original comment, if there was evidence it actually came from Cameron's dream then the South Park thing was applicable, but it's clear parts were plagiarised so it had nothing to do with thinking he had an original idea, like in the South Park ep. k?
#115 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're truly, truly dense if you can't see why he posted what he posted in the beginning. I swear to god man, you're just 8 kinds of fucktard.

I'm aware that I'm being petty, by the way.
#116 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Quick post while i'm waiting for the download.

Tell me how a tv trope about originality links to my original comment? Pro tip: you can't.

You and Helel keep calling me names and hurting my feelings (im actually crying) instead of actually saying anything. I'm still waiting for one of you to actually explain, and there you go being a hypocrite again.

You get involved, say you don't care, reply for more than an hour, call me petty, be petty yourself and now you've taken over the argument for Helel even though you supposedly don't care. Your life must be grand dude, you'll amount to something one day.
User avatar #113 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Read this. tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeendone

In the Western Animation section, the first example of this trope is one from South Park.
#114 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Sigh.

Last time i'm saying this before I go to bed, so maybe you and Helel will finally understand.

That has no relevance to my original comment.

I've seen the episode, like i've told already but you're not into reading facts, right?

Since you seem to have a hard time understanding i'll explain one last time for you. What I said was that the Terminator DYK is false, and even if you believe it wasn't there's plenty of evidence that says it's false. It doesn't belong in this comp, and "Simpsons did it" has no relevance to my original comment.

He wasn't trying to make a witty comment about the whole Cameron and Ellison thing, he thumbed me down because he believes that Terminator came to Cameron in a dream, and now I believe people are thumbing me down because they think he was making some sort of joke when really he was just being an idiot.

Anyway i'll give you time to process that, maybe you can sleep on it. I'm going to watch Sherlock Holmes, have fun.
#109 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're pretty dense, still. We both spoon feed you information, and you refuse to acknowledge it. I'm not even sure if you're being serious or not anymore.

Oh and that first line you quoted? It's called a metaphor, but I'm not going to explain it to you because you probably wouldn't read it.

Picture somewhat related.
#111 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You should work on your metaphors.

You haven't provided any information, and the 'information' Helel provided had no relevance to my original post.

Fact is there's evidence parts of Terminator were plagiarised, Cameron settled cause he would've lost the lawsuit but you both still refuse to aknowledge this.

You act as if I missed the point he was trying to make, I understood the reference and i've seen the episode, it just had zero relevance to anything I was saying.
#106 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Now let me spoon feed you what you replied with after the comment you quoted.

"Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts."

To which I replied, "K then. Run along now~ "

To which you then proceeded to reply, "Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert. "

And this is why I continue to reply. This wasn't really about the original argument in that first place, and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument by bitching about me getting involved. Throughout this conversation, you've commented about the "Simpsons did it." comment that Helal posted once, and I said I don't care about it.

So, yeah. I don't see any contradiction, bud. Picture somewhat unrelated.
#108 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
"and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument"

wat.

And yeah you're still contradicting yourself, if you don't care stop replying, you clearly care about the argument or you would have just left after you told me to run along.

Okay, it wasn't about the original argument in the first pla-- oh wait.

"You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass. "

Totally wasn't about the argument in the first place.

Also you call him stupid for not ignoring me, look at you now.

Also I don't care about your reaction pics man, you're just posting them in a sad attempt at trying to be funny, when you're clearly quite salty.


You got involved without a legitimate point to make, you were wrong and refused to read the facts of the matter and go on and on about how you don't care yet you're still here more than 40 minutes later replying to me.

And you still don't see how you're contradicting yourself? Dear god.
#101 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Not quite sure how I'm contradicting myself, but alright.

And I got involved to see how you two would respond, and let me say, it's been swell.
#102 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Are you serious? Okay let me spoon feed it to you.

"Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much." - Proceeds to reply for the next 20 minutes.

Yeah dude you don't care at all, you're the internet cool guy that gets involved then says 'I dont care', yeah... you don't care oneeeee bit.
#96 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
>Implying I have a life.

Woah there, skippy, let's not get crazy here. In fact, you might really be crazy because you're assuming I know that guy in real life. I just like him more than you do.

Notice how I called both of you stupid. I was honest. I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself.

What I do give a fuck about is the fact that you keep replying, which means I get to keep replying and seeing what you'll say.

If you want me to stop replying, please consult the image included in this comment.
#98 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
'I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself. '

Why get involved then?

Wow you both are literally just typing the first thing that comes into your head. You've been contradicting yourself for like the past 4 posts.

And why would I stop replying to you? It's fun watching you contradict yourself and then repeat the same shit over and over again, you're just making yourself look stupid, so have at it. <3
#92 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Omg, my world is changed. Better go get treatment.

Petty insults, good sir. I do enjoy how pissy you are right now.
#94 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Petty insults? Okay, I called you an autist, a little petty maybe.

What's more petty is you getting involved then stating you don't care and refused to read the facts, and now you're contradicting yourself because you keep replying and 'wasting your time'.

I'm willing to wager you and Helel are friends in real life or something, and he needed backup for his dumb shit argument haha.
User avatar #89 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
K then. Run along now~
#90 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert.
User avatar #80 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Correct!
#81 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Points for at least admitting it.
User avatar #82 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
My problem is that I like to argue when I'm bored.
#83 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Fair 'nuff.

Here, have another gif.
#84 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
User avatar #76 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove it faggot
#77 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove what? Seriously are you missing part of your brain.
User avatar #78 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Anything really, possibly your first comment. But I'ma keep thumbing you down either way.
#52 - I'm sorry man but you're clueless. I should go around stealing…  [+] (49 new replies) 09/24/2014 on DYK Comp #66 -3
#53 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
You're missing the entire point.
#57 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Go ahead and explain your point, because to me it seems like you have none.

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong.

Other than that you made no other rational points, you just ranted on about The Simpsons and thumbed me down for posting facts...
#58 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Nah. I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out. No point in trying to fix stupid.
#59 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic 'i'm not even going to bother to explain' tactic.

Let's take a look shall we, I posted facts about James Cameron 'plagiarising' Soldier From Tommorow, you replied 'Simpsons did it' and thumbed me down twice, you realise the thumbs are funny and not funny right?

Then you rant on about how it's extremely unlikely you ever have an original thought even though no one was saying anything about that, I was merely pointing out that Cameron settled with Ellison in court and credited him in the actual movie, you just made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

Then your next reply is 'you're missing the point'. Yeah, so far you've made no sense and 'I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out.' makes you sound like an 8 year old.

I bet you're the kind of person who watches Ted talks not for the information but to brag about it to your friends.
User avatar #69 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic.

You rant on about how you don't understand my argument, I was merely pointing out that a court case means nothing in terms of certainty, you just acted like a first year logic student and made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt and that he never stole any intellectual property. Which is entirely false, I readily concede the idea that he COULD have. I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true.

I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is.
(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world)

PS: this argument isn't even original. I've had it before.
PSS: The credit theory you have in #57 is interesting but doesn't hold up: Cameron could easily have just given the credit to shut Ellison up regardless of the truth of the allegation.
#70 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Wow it took you 50 minutes to come up with that shit?

"Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic. "

All I did was addres your points you mongaloid...

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong. "

I even tell you i'm addressing your point in the fucking sentence as well a quote you.

"All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt" "I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true!."

First time i've ever facepalmed in real life. All you said in your comments was 'Simpsons did it' and then went on to explain your theory that it's almost impossible to have an original thought and how it was possible for Cameron to have made the film from that dream.

But no, it's my fault you can't actually say your point without adding layers of bullshit about a fucking cartoon in a failed attempt to sound clever. You don't once say that you have an issue with me stating the court case meant that Cameron couldn't have the film from a dream (and by the way, I never said that making the film from a dream was impossible, I simply provided evidence to why that's more than likely bullshit).

"I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is. " - Holy shit is it possible to be THIS retarded? ... "(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world) " - Ted talks is international, try again.

PS: You're a fucking moron.

#72 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Like how you homed in on the post time. I'm currently at work, proving you wrong in my free time. Honestly didn't read the rest the first line was so stupid i decided not to bother.
#73 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Cool story bro, if you have this much free time at work you probably have a meaningless job, quite fitting for a meaningless human being.
User avatar #74 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
That or it's funny to watch you flounder and it's incredibly easy to ruin your arguments. I did it with one phrase earlier "Simpsons did it". You really ought to figure out what that means before you try to argue against it.
#75 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Yeah bro you showed me, saying 'Simpsons did it' really rekt my argument.

And you're either not at work or you're an unskilled pleb who can afford to be on FunnyJunk for this amount of time during your job.

I floundered so much that you couldn't come up with a single argument to my point, only replying with 'Simpsons did it' or a reaction image with a 'witty' comeback.

The only meaningful reply you gave proved how much of a mong you truly are, you stated that you only had a problem with me saying that Cameron's dream never happened, which isn't true in the first place.

You're such a pleb I feel like my IQ is dropping just replying to you.
#79 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass.
#85 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
There's nothing to explain, and I didn't miss shit.

Literally I was just saying that James Cameron more than likely did not get the idea from a fucking food-poison induced dream about a metallic robot with kitchen knives and exploion as it is identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts.

They settled in court, Ellison is credited and Orion (distribution company) didn't even believe Cameron, and they advised him if he took it to court he would be responible for payout if he lost.

Yet this dumbass refuses tto believe anything other than it came to him in a dream.

Yeah it's possible that it came to Cameron in a dream, but there's clear evidence it did not. But let's go with the crazy theory, right?

Other than that all he mentioned was some bullshit about Southpark and Simpsons both which had no relevancy to what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about having original thoughts I was talking about the evidence that Cameron most likely did not get the idea for Terminator from a fucking food poison induced dream.

Holy shit how do you not get it?
User avatar #91 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
I honestly didn't think a functional human could miss a point harder. This is just fascinating at this point. And arstya is right, your argument is with me, not him/her.
#93 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You still haven't explained your point, when you tried you failed.

Your original post was about Simpsons and how it's almost impossible to have an original thought, when my first comment had nothing to do with any of that, I was just stating it's far more likely it did not come to him in a dream, and doesn't belong in a 'did you know?' comp.
User avatar #95 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
But that's not what you said. May have been what you were trying to say, however your comment is horribly worded if so. Your comment was about how the last thing was FALSE, not improbable, two very different things. You're information about the court case was irrelevant in every way except to suggest that you thought it was true. You even used the word 'proof' in your second comment.
#104 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
I see you choose not to reply to my comment, rather you sit there thumbing Arstya's comments up, and mine down.

Where do you work that you can actually spend this amount of time on FunnyJunk? It's very obvious you're either not at work or you have some unskilled job which would account for the fact you have such a thick skull and refuse to listen to the evidence.

Can't fix stupid, you know?
User avatar #99 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
Still not getting the point of it I see. Look up the word: uncertainty
#97 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Yes, I believe it's not true, and if you don't then you are literally choosing to believe that it came to him in a dream rather than looking at the facts.

And you still haven't stated what your point is, you keep avoiding that at all costs.

Here, i'll copy and paste to refresh your memory:

"It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed. "

The ENTIRETY of the South park/Simpsons bit had nothing to do with what I said in my original comment, yet you refuse to explain what your point was in this entire paragraph.
#87 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much.
#88 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts.
#127 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
If you say so.
User avatar #125 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Well fuck, it's not like I'm going to just go research one obscure court case. I'm simply defending why Helel said what he said. You're being a fool, and THIS is why we're insulting you and saying you're an idiot.

Oh, and I'm calling bullshit on you not logging in to comment. As far as I know you have to be on the site to receive a notification.
#126 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
I wouldn't expect you to research it because I told you about it probably more than 12 times, and this is why you and Helel are such plebs.

You're now seeing that what i'm saying is correct and all I did was constantly repeat myself until you actual gave me an explanation, and when you give me an explanation I debunked it and now you see my side.

But thanks for the confirmation I was right, I can sleep easy now.

Also call bullshit all you want, I just refreshed the page and saw your comment, couldn't be bothered to log-in, what bullshit is there to be called?


Goodnight you humongous plebs.
User avatar #123 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Alright, I'll explain it to you then since you can't see this clear link to what HE said to YOUR post.

You say, "The terminator one isn't true, James Cameron settled a court case with Harlan Ellison because Terminator was identical to Ellison's story "Soldier From Tommorow" This may be true, but that's not the point.

The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays due to the fact that someone somewhere has probably already thought of it.

Now if YOU were James Cameron, and this is assuming he really was inspired by the dream, and people came to you as you were making the movie, what would you do? Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you in order to keep it from ruining any sort of reputation you may have or may have in the future?

This was the reason why Helel made a reference to the South Park. That's it. And he explained it. You missed the point. Done and over with. I care a bit more now because it's just silly now. I was fucking with you before, but Jesus Christ it's gotten ridiculous.
#124 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
Can't be bothered to log in and i'm interrupting sherlock holmes for this, but you're so dumb that I can't resist. "The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays" - Terminator came out in 1984.

"Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you"

That would be a fair point if I didn't explain already that it is literally identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts, even Cameron's own dsitribution company wouldn't back him to take on the lawsuit, so it's not just a case of getting the guy off his back, he literally couldn't have took him on if he wanted to.

So once again we're back to the point that the entire Simpsons thing had no relevance to my original comment, if there was evidence it actually came from Cameron's dream then the South Park thing was applicable, but it's clear parts were plagiarised so it had nothing to do with thinking he had an original idea, like in the South Park ep. k?
#115 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're truly, truly dense if you can't see why he posted what he posted in the beginning. I swear to god man, you're just 8 kinds of fucktard.

I'm aware that I'm being petty, by the way.
#116 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Quick post while i'm waiting for the download.

Tell me how a tv trope about originality links to my original comment? Pro tip: you can't.

You and Helel keep calling me names and hurting my feelings (im actually crying) instead of actually saying anything. I'm still waiting for one of you to actually explain, and there you go being a hypocrite again.

You get involved, say you don't care, reply for more than an hour, call me petty, be petty yourself and now you've taken over the argument for Helel even though you supposedly don't care. Your life must be grand dude, you'll amount to something one day.
User avatar #113 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Read this. tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeendone

In the Western Animation section, the first example of this trope is one from South Park.
#114 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Sigh.

Last time i'm saying this before I go to bed, so maybe you and Helel will finally understand.

That has no relevance to my original comment.

I've seen the episode, like i've told already but you're not into reading facts, right?

Since you seem to have a hard time understanding i'll explain one last time for you. What I said was that the Terminator DYK is false, and even if you believe it wasn't there's plenty of evidence that says it's false. It doesn't belong in this comp, and "Simpsons did it" has no relevance to my original comment.

He wasn't trying to make a witty comment about the whole Cameron and Ellison thing, he thumbed me down because he believes that Terminator came to Cameron in a dream, and now I believe people are thumbing me down because they think he was making some sort of joke when really he was just being an idiot.

Anyway i'll give you time to process that, maybe you can sleep on it. I'm going to watch Sherlock Holmes, have fun.
#109 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're pretty dense, still. We both spoon feed you information, and you refuse to acknowledge it. I'm not even sure if you're being serious or not anymore.

Oh and that first line you quoted? It's called a metaphor, but I'm not going to explain it to you because you probably wouldn't read it.

Picture somewhat related.
#111 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You should work on your metaphors.

You haven't provided any information, and the 'information' Helel provided had no relevance to my original post.

Fact is there's evidence parts of Terminator were plagiarised, Cameron settled cause he would've lost the lawsuit but you both still refuse to aknowledge this.

You act as if I missed the point he was trying to make, I understood the reference and i've seen the episode, it just had zero relevance to anything I was saying.
#106 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Now let me spoon feed you what you replied with after the comment you quoted.

"Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts."

To which I replied, "K then. Run along now~ "

To which you then proceeded to reply, "Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert. "

And this is why I continue to reply. This wasn't really about the original argument in that first place, and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument by bitching about me getting involved. Throughout this conversation, you've commented about the "Simpsons did it." comment that Helal posted once, and I said I don't care about it.

So, yeah. I don't see any contradiction, bud. Picture somewhat unrelated.
#108 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
"and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument"

wat.

And yeah you're still contradicting yourself, if you don't care stop replying, you clearly care about the argument or you would have just left after you told me to run along.

Okay, it wasn't about the original argument in the first pla-- oh wait.

"You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass. "

Totally wasn't about the argument in the first place.

Also you call him stupid for not ignoring me, look at you now.

Also I don't care about your reaction pics man, you're just posting them in a sad attempt at trying to be funny, when you're clearly quite salty.


You got involved without a legitimate point to make, you were wrong and refused to read the facts of the matter and go on and on about how you don't care yet you're still here more than 40 minutes later replying to me.

And you still don't see how you're contradicting yourself? Dear god.
#101 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Not quite sure how I'm contradicting myself, but alright.

And I got involved to see how you two would respond, and let me say, it's been swell.
#102 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Are you serious? Okay let me spoon feed it to you.

"Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much." - Proceeds to reply for the next 20 minutes.

Yeah dude you don't care at all, you're the internet cool guy that gets involved then says 'I dont care', yeah... you don't care oneeeee bit.
#96 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
>Implying I have a life.

Woah there, skippy, let's not get crazy here. In fact, you might really be crazy because you're assuming I know that guy in real life. I just like him more than you do.

Notice how I called both of you stupid. I was honest. I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself.

What I do give a fuck about is the fact that you keep replying, which means I get to keep replying and seeing what you'll say.

If you want me to stop replying, please consult the image included in this comment.
#98 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
'I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself. '

Why get involved then?

Wow you both are literally just typing the first thing that comes into your head. You've been contradicting yourself for like the past 4 posts.

And why would I stop replying to you? It's fun watching you contradict yourself and then repeat the same shit over and over again, you're just making yourself look stupid, so have at it. <3
#92 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Omg, my world is changed. Better go get treatment.

Petty insults, good sir. I do enjoy how pissy you are right now.
#94 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Petty insults? Okay, I called you an autist, a little petty maybe.

What's more petty is you getting involved then stating you don't care and refused to read the facts, and now you're contradicting yourself because you keep replying and 'wasting your time'.

I'm willing to wager you and Helel are friends in real life or something, and he needed backup for his dumb shit argument haha.
User avatar #89 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
K then. Run along now~
#90 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert.
User avatar #80 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Correct!
#81 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Points for at least admitting it.
User avatar #82 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
My problem is that I like to argue when I'm bored.
#83 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Fair 'nuff.

Here, have another gif.
#84 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
User avatar #76 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove it faggot
#77 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove what? Seriously are you missing part of your brain.
User avatar #78 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Anything really, possibly your first comment. But I'ma keep thumbing you down either way.
#45 - Not sure why you thumbed me down, and not sure what you're ref…  [+] (51 new replies) 09/24/2014 on DYK Comp #66 -3
User avatar #49 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed.
#52 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
I'm sorry man but you're clueless. I should go around stealing art and selling it to museums under my own name, when asked why, I shall quote "Simpsons did it".

Cameron settled with the guy, early scenes in Terminator were identical to Soldier From Tommorow and Cameron even credited Ellison in the actual movie, but no, let's believe the idea for Terminator came to him through a dream involving metallic robots with kitchen knives and explosions, induced by food poisoning no less. Much more believable.
#53 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
You're missing the entire point.
#57 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Go ahead and explain your point, because to me it seems like you have none.

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong.

Other than that you made no other rational points, you just ranted on about The Simpsons and thumbed me down for posting facts...
#58 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Nah. I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out. No point in trying to fix stupid.
#59 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic 'i'm not even going to bother to explain' tactic.

Let's take a look shall we, I posted facts about James Cameron 'plagiarising' Soldier From Tommorow, you replied 'Simpsons did it' and thumbed me down twice, you realise the thumbs are funny and not funny right?

Then you rant on about how it's extremely unlikely you ever have an original thought even though no one was saying anything about that, I was merely pointing out that Cameron settled with Ellison in court and credited him in the actual movie, you just made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

Then your next reply is 'you're missing the point'. Yeah, so far you've made no sense and 'I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out.' makes you sound like an 8 year old.

I bet you're the kind of person who watches Ted talks not for the information but to brag about it to your friends.
User avatar #69 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic.

You rant on about how you don't understand my argument, I was merely pointing out that a court case means nothing in terms of certainty, you just acted like a first year logic student and made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt and that he never stole any intellectual property. Which is entirely false, I readily concede the idea that he COULD have. I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true.

I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is.
(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world)

PS: this argument isn't even original. I've had it before.
PSS: The credit theory you have in #57 is interesting but doesn't hold up: Cameron could easily have just given the credit to shut Ellison up regardless of the truth of the allegation.
#70 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Wow it took you 50 minutes to come up with that shit?

"Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic. "

All I did was addres your points you mongaloid...

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong. "

I even tell you i'm addressing your point in the fucking sentence as well a quote you.

"All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt" "I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true!."

First time i've ever facepalmed in real life. All you said in your comments was 'Simpsons did it' and then went on to explain your theory that it's almost impossible to have an original thought and how it was possible for Cameron to have made the film from that dream.

But no, it's my fault you can't actually say your point without adding layers of bullshit about a fucking cartoon in a failed attempt to sound clever. You don't once say that you have an issue with me stating the court case meant that Cameron couldn't have the film from a dream (and by the way, I never said that making the film from a dream was impossible, I simply provided evidence to why that's more than likely bullshit).

"I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is. " - Holy shit is it possible to be THIS retarded? ... "(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world) " - Ted talks is international, try again.

PS: You're a fucking moron.

#72 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Like how you homed in on the post time. I'm currently at work, proving you wrong in my free time. Honestly didn't read the rest the first line was so stupid i decided not to bother.
#73 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Cool story bro, if you have this much free time at work you probably have a meaningless job, quite fitting for a meaningless human being.
User avatar #74 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
That or it's funny to watch you flounder and it's incredibly easy to ruin your arguments. I did it with one phrase earlier "Simpsons did it". You really ought to figure out what that means before you try to argue against it.
#75 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Yeah bro you showed me, saying 'Simpsons did it' really rekt my argument.

And you're either not at work or you're an unskilled pleb who can afford to be on FunnyJunk for this amount of time during your job.

I floundered so much that you couldn't come up with a single argument to my point, only replying with 'Simpsons did it' or a reaction image with a 'witty' comeback.

The only meaningful reply you gave proved how much of a mong you truly are, you stated that you only had a problem with me saying that Cameron's dream never happened, which isn't true in the first place.

You're such a pleb I feel like my IQ is dropping just replying to you.
#79 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass.
#85 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
There's nothing to explain, and I didn't miss shit.

Literally I was just saying that James Cameron more than likely did not get the idea from a fucking food-poison induced dream about a metallic robot with kitchen knives and exploion as it is identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts.

They settled in court, Ellison is credited and Orion (distribution company) didn't even believe Cameron, and they advised him if he took it to court he would be responible for payout if he lost.

Yet this dumbass refuses tto believe anything other than it came to him in a dream.

Yeah it's possible that it came to Cameron in a dream, but there's clear evidence it did not. But let's go with the crazy theory, right?

Other than that all he mentioned was some bullshit about Southpark and Simpsons both which had no relevancy to what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about having original thoughts I was talking about the evidence that Cameron most likely did not get the idea for Terminator from a fucking food poison induced dream.

Holy shit how do you not get it?
User avatar #91 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
I honestly didn't think a functional human could miss a point harder. This is just fascinating at this point. And arstya is right, your argument is with me, not him/her.
#93 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You still haven't explained your point, when you tried you failed.

Your original post was about Simpsons and how it's almost impossible to have an original thought, when my first comment had nothing to do with any of that, I was just stating it's far more likely it did not come to him in a dream, and doesn't belong in a 'did you know?' comp.
User avatar #95 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
But that's not what you said. May have been what you were trying to say, however your comment is horribly worded if so. Your comment was about how the last thing was FALSE, not improbable, two very different things. You're information about the court case was irrelevant in every way except to suggest that you thought it was true. You even used the word 'proof' in your second comment.
#104 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
I see you choose not to reply to my comment, rather you sit there thumbing Arstya's comments up, and mine down.

Where do you work that you can actually spend this amount of time on FunnyJunk? It's very obvious you're either not at work or you have some unskilled job which would account for the fact you have such a thick skull and refuse to listen to the evidence.

Can't fix stupid, you know?
User avatar #99 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
Still not getting the point of it I see. Look up the word: uncertainty
#97 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Yes, I believe it's not true, and if you don't then you are literally choosing to believe that it came to him in a dream rather than looking at the facts.

And you still haven't stated what your point is, you keep avoiding that at all costs.

Here, i'll copy and paste to refresh your memory:

"It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed. "

The ENTIRETY of the South park/Simpsons bit had nothing to do with what I said in my original comment, yet you refuse to explain what your point was in this entire paragraph.
#87 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much.
#88 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts.
#127 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
If you say so.
User avatar #125 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Well fuck, it's not like I'm going to just go research one obscure court case. I'm simply defending why Helel said what he said. You're being a fool, and THIS is why we're insulting you and saying you're an idiot.

Oh, and I'm calling bullshit on you not logging in to comment. As far as I know you have to be on the site to receive a notification.
#126 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
I wouldn't expect you to research it because I told you about it probably more than 12 times, and this is why you and Helel are such plebs.

You're now seeing that what i'm saying is correct and all I did was constantly repeat myself until you actual gave me an explanation, and when you give me an explanation I debunked it and now you see my side.

But thanks for the confirmation I was right, I can sleep easy now.

Also call bullshit all you want, I just refreshed the page and saw your comment, couldn't be bothered to log-in, what bullshit is there to be called?


Goodnight you humongous plebs.
User avatar #123 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Alright, I'll explain it to you then since you can't see this clear link to what HE said to YOUR post.

You say, "The terminator one isn't true, James Cameron settled a court case with Harlan Ellison because Terminator was identical to Ellison's story "Soldier From Tommorow" This may be true, but that's not the point.

The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays due to the fact that someone somewhere has probably already thought of it.

Now if YOU were James Cameron, and this is assuming he really was inspired by the dream, and people came to you as you were making the movie, what would you do? Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you in order to keep it from ruining any sort of reputation you may have or may have in the future?

This was the reason why Helel made a reference to the South Park. That's it. And he explained it. You missed the point. Done and over with. I care a bit more now because it's just silly now. I was fucking with you before, but Jesus Christ it's gotten ridiculous.
#124 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
Can't be bothered to log in and i'm interrupting sherlock holmes for this, but you're so dumb that I can't resist. "The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays" - Terminator came out in 1984.

"Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you"

That would be a fair point if I didn't explain already that it is literally identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts, even Cameron's own dsitribution company wouldn't back him to take on the lawsuit, so it's not just a case of getting the guy off his back, he literally couldn't have took him on if he wanted to.

So once again we're back to the point that the entire Simpsons thing had no relevance to my original comment, if there was evidence it actually came from Cameron's dream then the South Park thing was applicable, but it's clear parts were plagiarised so it had nothing to do with thinking he had an original idea, like in the South Park ep. k?
#115 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're truly, truly dense if you can't see why he posted what he posted in the beginning. I swear to god man, you're just 8 kinds of fucktard.

I'm aware that I'm being petty, by the way.
#116 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Quick post while i'm waiting for the download.

Tell me how a tv trope about originality links to my original comment? Pro tip: you can't.

You and Helel keep calling me names and hurting my feelings (im actually crying) instead of actually saying anything. I'm still waiting for one of you to actually explain, and there you go being a hypocrite again.

You get involved, say you don't care, reply for more than an hour, call me petty, be petty yourself and now you've taken over the argument for Helel even though you supposedly don't care. Your life must be grand dude, you'll amount to something one day.
User avatar #113 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Read this. tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeendone

In the Western Animation section, the first example of this trope is one from South Park.
#114 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Sigh.

Last time i'm saying this before I go to bed, so maybe you and Helel will finally understand.

That has no relevance to my original comment.

I've seen the episode, like i've told already but you're not into reading facts, right?

Since you seem to have a hard time understanding i'll explain one last time for you. What I said was that the Terminator DYK is false, and even if you believe it wasn't there's plenty of evidence that says it's false. It doesn't belong in this comp, and "Simpsons did it" has no relevance to my original comment.

He wasn't trying to make a witty comment about the whole Cameron and Ellison thing, he thumbed me down because he believes that Terminator came to Cameron in a dream, and now I believe people are thumbing me down because they think he was making some sort of joke when really he was just being an idiot.

Anyway i'll give you time to process that, maybe you can sleep on it. I'm going to watch Sherlock Holmes, have fun.
#109 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're pretty dense, still. We both spoon feed you information, and you refuse to acknowledge it. I'm not even sure if you're being serious or not anymore.

Oh and that first line you quoted? It's called a metaphor, but I'm not going to explain it to you because you probably wouldn't read it.

Picture somewhat related.
#111 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You should work on your metaphors.

You haven't provided any information, and the 'information' Helel provided had no relevance to my original post.

Fact is there's evidence parts of Terminator were plagiarised, Cameron settled cause he would've lost the lawsuit but you both still refuse to aknowledge this.

You act as if I missed the point he was trying to make, I understood the reference and i've seen the episode, it just had zero relevance to anything I was saying.
#106 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Now let me spoon feed you what you replied with after the comment you quoted.

"Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts."

To which I replied, "K then. Run along now~ "

To which you then proceeded to reply, "Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert. "

And this is why I continue to reply. This wasn't really about the original argument in that first place, and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument by bitching about me getting involved. Throughout this conversation, you've commented about the "Simpsons did it." comment that Helal posted once, and I said I don't care about it.

So, yeah. I don't see any contradiction, bud. Picture somewhat unrelated.
#108 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
"and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument"

wat.

And yeah you're still contradicting yourself, if you don't care stop replying, you clearly care about the argument or you would have just left after you told me to run along.

Okay, it wasn't about the original argument in the first pla-- oh wait.

"You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass. "

Totally wasn't about the argument in the first place.

Also you call him stupid for not ignoring me, look at you now.

Also I don't care about your reaction pics man, you're just posting them in a sad attempt at trying to be funny, when you're clearly quite salty.


You got involved without a legitimate point to make, you were wrong and refused to read the facts of the matter and go on and on about how you don't care yet you're still here more than 40 minutes later replying to me.

And you still don't see how you're contradicting yourself? Dear god.
#101 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Not quite sure how I'm contradicting myself, but alright.

And I got involved to see how you two would respond, and let me say, it's been swell.
#102 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Are you serious? Okay let me spoon feed it to you.

"Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much." - Proceeds to reply for the next 20 minutes.

Yeah dude you don't care at all, you're the internet cool guy that gets involved then says 'I dont care', yeah... you don't care oneeeee bit.
#96 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
>Implying I have a life.

Woah there, skippy, let's not get crazy here. In fact, you might really be crazy because you're assuming I know that guy in real life. I just like him more than you do.

Notice how I called both of you stupid. I was honest. I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself.

What I do give a fuck about is the fact that you keep replying, which means I get to keep replying and seeing what you'll say.

If you want me to stop replying, please consult the image included in this comment.
#98 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
'I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself. '

Why get involved then?

Wow you both are literally just typing the first thing that comes into your head. You've been contradicting yourself for like the past 4 posts.

And why would I stop replying to you? It's fun watching you contradict yourself and then repeat the same shit over and over again, you're just making yourself look stupid, so have at it. <3
#92 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Omg, my world is changed. Better go get treatment.

Petty insults, good sir. I do enjoy how pissy you are right now.
#94 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Petty insults? Okay, I called you an autist, a little petty maybe.

What's more petty is you getting involved then stating you don't care and refused to read the facts, and now you're contradicting yourself because you keep replying and 'wasting your time'.

I'm willing to wager you and Helel are friends in real life or something, and he needed backup for his dumb shit argument haha.
User avatar #89 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
K then. Run along now~
#90 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert.
User avatar #80 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Correct!
#81 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Points for at least admitting it.
User avatar #82 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
My problem is that I like to argue when I'm bored.
#83 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Fair 'nuff.

Here, have another gif.
#84 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
User avatar #76 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove it faggot
#77 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove what? Seriously are you missing part of your brain.
User avatar #78 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Anything really, possibly your first comment. But I'ma keep thumbing you down either way.
#149 - Feminism was never about equality? Okay, explain please? …  [+] (5 new replies) 09/24/2014 on Thank you Based Mom 0
User avatar #161 - jedimindaugas (09/24/2014) [-]
As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women, but rather by high social status women.
You must understand that the differences with employment, education and voting were NEVER due to blatant "I have a penis therefore I can", but social expectations. With women having to spend a huge portion of their time home pregnant or caring for the young - like 8-10 were required for the lineage to survive you know - why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities when men were obligated to provide for their families and needed it more? Of course, the women of the rich families were usually well educated . You can still see a similar situation in the east, where is a saying "Men first, children second, women last". Sure looks like women have the short end of the stick, but men there are obliged by law to provide for their families, while any women's income is her own. Now tell me, whom would you give the job/healthcare/ education to?
My memory is a bit flawed with the property laws at the moment, trying to find the info to refresh it. I do remember that single women and men has the same property rights, but it shifted with marriage.
For a long time,t he wealthy got the vote, which ofc were mostly men as they owned the property and all responsibility of it within marriage. As the amount of land required for the vote was gradually reduced, more and more men were allowed to vote. Still, the vote was not for free. You know the draft? At one point, a group of activists challenged the constitutionality of the draft It may not be doubted that the very conception of a just government and its duty to the citizens includes the reciprocal obligation of the citizen to render military service in the case of need and the right to compel it". Three years later women get the vote with no strings attached. Real equality there.
Feminism was always for women and it always failed to investigate why the differences were there in the first place.
User avatar #167 - gigaidan (09/24/2014) [-]
You sound like you were personally wronged by a woman. So fucking bitter.

"As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women" As well as many others big revolutions... not all changes start with the poor. The rich had also started many, because they usually have the education to see that something is unfair before a crisis strikes.

"why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities" well, if a woman decided that she wanted to work to help her family, or she just didn't want to have children or getting married, then why prohibit it to her? why do you find it so offensive that a woman decided not to follow social standards and work by herlself? if she wanted to be a doctor/engineer/teacher whatever, then why say no? for the sake of the lineage? oh, please. And why is it a "waste"? seriously, what's wrong with you?

"but men there are obliged by law to provide for their families" then change the law. As far as I'm concerned, these places are run by mostly men. If the law is unfair for men, then change it. It's hardly women's fault when they don't have any say in the matter.

"Now tell me, whom would you give the job/healthcare/ education to?" to those who need it, meaning everybody. That's the point.

"Three years later women get the vote with no strings attached. Real equality there" It's the way history goes, when women got the right to vote, and if many of this unfair things were eliminated then what do you want? for women to get the same old rules just for them to feel what is like? what's the point?

Dude, seriously. You don't sound any different than a feminazi. If you are not able to read what you just wrote and see why feminism existed on the first place, then there is nothing I can or want to say to help you understand. I hope you find a decent woman, because for the way you speak, I'll say that you don't know many.
User avatar #171 - jedimindaugas (09/25/2014) [-]
What I hate is fcking idealism. Every single problem feminism ever wanted could be explained reasonably and tackled only then, but it was never done. It was always about everything for women. Have you heard the movement at any point to fight inequality for male benefit? None of the "male privileges" came without a price
Was there inequality to be fought? Sure. Did feminism ever do it the right way? Not as far as I'm aware of.
User avatar #172 - gigaidan (09/25/2014) [-]
Again, you make it sound like is a personal problem for you. Can't you relax?

"Every single problem feminism ever wanted could be explained reasonably and tackled only then", please, do give examples of how unreasonable have been the women movement, and avoid using the feminazi example, because as many real feminist have stated, a bunch of neurotics fats lesbians cunts don't have the right to be called feminists.

" None of the "male privileges" came without a price" apparently you think female privileges came for free. You said it yourself, certain "privileges" demanded to break long established social rules. You really think that shit was easy? or is easy, for that matter?

No, I haven't heard of any movement to fight inequality for male benefit. Perhaps because most men don't see it as an inequality? You use the example of "a man has to provide for his family", is it unfair? it sure sounds unfair, but if the men in that area find it natural and logical, then they don't a fight against it because THEY don't see it as something unfair.

I don't know why aren't any "Male Rights Movement", but I fail to see how is that women's or feminism's fault. Conditions were unfair for women before, and they started their movement to change them. Faulty?, maybe. But at least they started it, and they draw attention into something the found unfair for them. Why aren't any "Male Rights Movement"? the question is, if there are gender unfair matters (there are) against men, then why haven't men started something?

"Did feminism ever do it the right way?" I'm going to ask you something, have you made any research about the "Feminist Movement" evolution for the last years? how they did it, why they did it, what did they accomplish? are you basing your comment in some real data, or are you just biased for the BS you read on the comments? or maybe you've met a feminazi and you are fed up with her crap?
#163 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
'As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women, but rather by high social status women. '

This has absolutely nothing to do with anything, who the movement is started by is just irrelevant.

'education and voting were NEVER due to blatant "I have a penis therefore I can"

Nobody ever said that it was.

'but social expectations. With women having to spend a huge portion of their time home pregnant or caring for the young'

So fighting against these social expectations is not fighting for equality? I don't see your point, the women wanted the same chance at employment and educaton as men, the fact it was a social norm for women to stay at home is exactly what they wanted to change.

'why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities when men were obligated to provide for their families'

Again, this is exactly what they wanted to change, you're just kind of proving my point. I never said that old feminism was based around the ideal of "I have a penis and therefore I can" like you're implying, I said it was all about equality.

Are you going to argue that just because it was the social norm for women to stay at home they're being 'anti-men' for wanting to change that, and have the same social standing as well as equal employment and education chances?


#146 - No, think of it like this. Feminist organisation tak… 09/24/2014 on Thank you Based Mom 0
#145 - You're aware that feminism was a thing before the SJW landwhal…  [+] (7 new replies) 09/24/2014 on Thank you Based Mom +1
User avatar #147 - jedimindaugas (09/24/2014) [-]
I am well aware of the early feminism.
And no, I am including that in as well. Did it have more value? Yes, there were differences that now seem inappropriate and were well underway to change anyway thanks to industrialism. But was feminism ever about equality? No.
#149 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Feminism was never about equality? Okay, explain please?

Early feminim was all about equal rights to employment, education and voting, so I don't understand your point.
User avatar #161 - jedimindaugas (09/24/2014) [-]
As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women, but rather by high social status women.
You must understand that the differences with employment, education and voting were NEVER due to blatant "I have a penis therefore I can", but social expectations. With women having to spend a huge portion of their time home pregnant or caring for the young - like 8-10 were required for the lineage to survive you know - why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities when men were obligated to provide for their families and needed it more? Of course, the women of the rich families were usually well educated . You can still see a similar situation in the east, where is a saying "Men first, children second, women last". Sure looks like women have the short end of the stick, but men there are obliged by law to provide for their families, while any women's income is her own. Now tell me, whom would you give the job/healthcare/ education to?
My memory is a bit flawed with the property laws at the moment, trying to find the info to refresh it. I do remember that single women and men has the same property rights, but it shifted with marriage.
For a long time,t he wealthy got the vote, which ofc were mostly men as they owned the property and all responsibility of it within marriage. As the amount of land required for the vote was gradually reduced, more and more men were allowed to vote. Still, the vote was not for free. You know the draft? At one point, a group of activists challenged the constitutionality of the draft It may not be doubted that the very conception of a just government and its duty to the citizens includes the reciprocal obligation of the citizen to render military service in the case of need and the right to compel it". Three years later women get the vote with no strings attached. Real equality there.
Feminism was always for women and it always failed to investigate why the differences were there in the first place.
User avatar #167 - gigaidan (09/24/2014) [-]
You sound like you were personally wronged by a woman. So fucking bitter.

"As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women" As well as many others big revolutions... not all changes start with the poor. The rich had also started many, because they usually have the education to see that something is unfair before a crisis strikes.

"why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities" well, if a woman decided that she wanted to work to help her family, or she just didn't want to have children or getting married, then why prohibit it to her? why do you find it so offensive that a woman decided not to follow social standards and work by herlself? if she wanted to be a doctor/engineer/teacher whatever, then why say no? for the sake of the lineage? oh, please. And why is it a "waste"? seriously, what's wrong with you?

"but men there are obliged by law to provide for their families" then change the law. As far as I'm concerned, these places are run by mostly men. If the law is unfair for men, then change it. It's hardly women's fault when they don't have any say in the matter.

"Now tell me, whom would you give the job/healthcare/ education to?" to those who need it, meaning everybody. That's the point.

"Three years later women get the vote with no strings attached. Real equality there" It's the way history goes, when women got the right to vote, and if many of this unfair things were eliminated then what do you want? for women to get the same old rules just for them to feel what is like? what's the point?

Dude, seriously. You don't sound any different than a feminazi. If you are not able to read what you just wrote and see why feminism existed on the first place, then there is nothing I can or want to say to help you understand. I hope you find a decent woman, because for the way you speak, I'll say that you don't know many.
User avatar #171 - jedimindaugas (09/25/2014) [-]
What I hate is fcking idealism. Every single problem feminism ever wanted could be explained reasonably and tackled only then, but it was never done. It was always about everything for women. Have you heard the movement at any point to fight inequality for male benefit? None of the "male privileges" came without a price
Was there inequality to be fought? Sure. Did feminism ever do it the right way? Not as far as I'm aware of.
User avatar #172 - gigaidan (09/25/2014) [-]
Again, you make it sound like is a personal problem for you. Can't you relax?

"Every single problem feminism ever wanted could be explained reasonably and tackled only then", please, do give examples of how unreasonable have been the women movement, and avoid using the feminazi example, because as many real feminist have stated, a bunch of neurotics fats lesbians cunts don't have the right to be called feminists.

" None of the "male privileges" came without a price" apparently you think female privileges came for free. You said it yourself, certain "privileges" demanded to break long established social rules. You really think that shit was easy? or is easy, for that matter?

No, I haven't heard of any movement to fight inequality for male benefit. Perhaps because most men don't see it as an inequality? You use the example of "a man has to provide for his family", is it unfair? it sure sounds unfair, but if the men in that area find it natural and logical, then they don't a fight against it because THEY don't see it as something unfair.

I don't know why aren't any "Male Rights Movement", but I fail to see how is that women's or feminism's fault. Conditions were unfair for women before, and they started their movement to change them. Faulty?, maybe. But at least they started it, and they draw attention into something the found unfair for them. Why aren't any "Male Rights Movement"? the question is, if there are gender unfair matters (there are) against men, then why haven't men started something?

"Did feminism ever do it the right way?" I'm going to ask you something, have you made any research about the "Feminist Movement" evolution for the last years? how they did it, why they did it, what did they accomplish? are you basing your comment in some real data, or are you just biased for the BS you read on the comments? or maybe you've met a feminazi and you are fed up with her crap?
#163 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
'As far as I've gathered the movement was not started by poor oppressed women, but rather by high social status women. '

This has absolutely nothing to do with anything, who the movement is started by is just irrelevant.

'education and voting were NEVER due to blatant "I have a penis therefore I can"

Nobody ever said that it was.

'but social expectations. With women having to spend a huge portion of their time home pregnant or caring for the young'

So fighting against these social expectations is not fighting for equality? I don't see your point, the women wanted the same chance at employment and educaton as men, the fact it was a social norm for women to stay at home is exactly what they wanted to change.

'why waste resources giving women education and career opportunities when men were obligated to provide for their families'

Again, this is exactly what they wanted to change, you're just kind of proving my point. I never said that old feminism was based around the ideal of "I have a penis and therefore I can" like you're implying, I said it was all about equality.

Are you going to argue that just because it was the social norm for women to stay at home they're being 'anti-men' for wanting to change that, and have the same social standing as well as equal employment and education chances?


#143 - She was saying that the way they calculated the wage gap didn'…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/24/2014 on Thank you Based Mom 0
User avatar #144 - buttseckss (09/24/2014) [-]
But do people that work more hours per week on average make more per hour?
#146 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
No, think of it like this.

Feminist organisation take the average earnings of females and compare it to the average earnings of males which as stated in the video is $1 for males and 77 cents for females, the reason for this is that men generally work more hours in a week than women and take different job occupations amongst other things mentioned in the video.

The feminist organisations however disregarded this information or simply didn't care and slapped it with the label 'wage gap' when there are legitimate reason for men earning more than women on average.

#38 - Also I feel like I should add that Harlan Ellison's name appea… 09/24/2014 on DYK Comp #66 -3
#34 - The terminator one isn't true, James Cameron settled a court c…  [+] (54 new replies) 09/24/2014 on DYK Comp #66 -4
User avatar #44 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Simpsons did it.
#45 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Not sure why you thumbed me down, and not sure what you're reffering to but okay.
User avatar #49 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed.
#52 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
I'm sorry man but you're clueless. I should go around stealing art and selling it to museums under my own name, when asked why, I shall quote "Simpsons did it".

Cameron settled with the guy, early scenes in Terminator were identical to Soldier From Tommorow and Cameron even credited Ellison in the actual movie, but no, let's believe the idea for Terminator came to him through a dream involving metallic robots with kitchen knives and explosions, induced by food poisoning no less. Much more believable.
#53 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
You're missing the entire point.
#57 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Go ahead and explain your point, because to me it seems like you have none.

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong.

Other than that you made no other rational points, you just ranted on about The Simpsons and thumbed me down for posting facts...
#58 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Nah. I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out. No point in trying to fix stupid.
#59 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic 'i'm not even going to bother to explain' tactic.

Let's take a look shall we, I posted facts about James Cameron 'plagiarising' Soldier From Tommorow, you replied 'Simpsons did it' and thumbed me down twice, you realise the thumbs are funny and not funny right?

Then you rant on about how it's extremely unlikely you ever have an original thought even though no one was saying anything about that, I was merely pointing out that Cameron settled with Ellison in court and credited him in the actual movie, you just made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

Then your next reply is 'you're missing the point'. Yeah, so far you've made no sense and 'I left enough information for anyone intelligent to figure out.' makes you sound like an 8 year old.

I bet you're the kind of person who watches Ted talks not for the information but to brag about it to your friends.
User avatar #69 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic.

You rant on about how you don't understand my argument, I was merely pointing out that a court case means nothing in terms of certainty, you just acted like a first year logic student and made a failed attempt trying to sound smart.

All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt and that he never stole any intellectual property. Which is entirely false, I readily concede the idea that he COULD have. I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true.

I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is.
(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world)

PS: this argument isn't even original. I've had it before.
PSS: The credit theory you have in #57 is interesting but doesn't hold up: Cameron could easily have just given the credit to shut Ellison up regardless of the truth of the allegation.
#70 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Wow it took you 50 minutes to come up with that shit?

"Ah the classic "bitch about the argument and never address the points" tactic. "

All I did was addres your points you mongaloid...

"Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed." Is the only point you've made so far, yet Cameron himself credits Ellison in Terminator and settled in court. So the only point you've made is wrong. "

I even tell you i'm addressing your point in the fucking sentence as well a quote you.

"All your replies have been a failed attempt to assert the idea that my argument somehow absolves Cameron of guilt" "I take issue with your original argument that asserts that due to a court case, the dream couldn't be true!."

First time i've ever facepalmed in real life. All you said in your comments was 'Simpsons did it' and then went on to explain your theory that it's almost impossible to have an original thought and how it was possible for Cameron to have made the film from that dream.

But no, it's my fault you can't actually say your point without adding layers of bullshit about a fucking cartoon in a failed attempt to sound clever. You don't once say that you have an issue with me stating the court case meant that Cameron couldn't have the film from a dream (and by the way, I never said that making the film from a dream was impossible, I simply provided evidence to why that's more than likely bullshit).

"I bet you're the kind of person who actually knows what Ted talks is. " - Holy shit is it possible to be THIS retarded? ... "(I've never even heard of it. Wrong side of the world) " - Ted talks is international, try again.

PS: You're a fucking moron.

#72 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Like how you homed in on the post time. I'm currently at work, proving you wrong in my free time. Honestly didn't read the rest the first line was so stupid i decided not to bother.
#73 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Cool story bro, if you have this much free time at work you probably have a meaningless job, quite fitting for a meaningless human being.
User avatar #74 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
That or it's funny to watch you flounder and it's incredibly easy to ruin your arguments. I did it with one phrase earlier "Simpsons did it". You really ought to figure out what that means before you try to argue against it.
#75 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Yeah bro you showed me, saying 'Simpsons did it' really rekt my argument.

And you're either not at work or you're an unskilled pleb who can afford to be on FunnyJunk for this amount of time during your job.

I floundered so much that you couldn't come up with a single argument to my point, only replying with 'Simpsons did it' or a reaction image with a 'witty' comeback.

The only meaningful reply you gave proved how much of a mong you truly are, you stated that you only had a problem with me saying that Cameron's dream never happened, which isn't true in the first place.

You're such a pleb I feel like my IQ is dropping just replying to you.
#79 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass.
#85 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
There's nothing to explain, and I didn't miss shit.

Literally I was just saying that James Cameron more than likely did not get the idea from a fucking food-poison induced dream about a metallic robot with kitchen knives and exploion as it is identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts.

They settled in court, Ellison is credited and Orion (distribution company) didn't even believe Cameron, and they advised him if he took it to court he would be responible for payout if he lost.

Yet this dumbass refuses tto believe anything other than it came to him in a dream.

Yeah it's possible that it came to Cameron in a dream, but there's clear evidence it did not. But let's go with the crazy theory, right?

Other than that all he mentioned was some bullshit about Southpark and Simpsons both which had no relevancy to what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about having original thoughts I was talking about the evidence that Cameron most likely did not get the idea for Terminator from a fucking food poison induced dream.

Holy shit how do you not get it?
User avatar #91 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
I honestly didn't think a functional human could miss a point harder. This is just fascinating at this point. And arstya is right, your argument is with me, not him/her.
#93 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You still haven't explained your point, when you tried you failed.

Your original post was about Simpsons and how it's almost impossible to have an original thought, when my first comment had nothing to do with any of that, I was just stating it's far more likely it did not come to him in a dream, and doesn't belong in a 'did you know?' comp.
User avatar #95 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
But that's not what you said. May have been what you were trying to say, however your comment is horribly worded if so. Your comment was about how the last thing was FALSE, not improbable, two very different things. You're information about the court case was irrelevant in every way except to suggest that you thought it was true. You even used the word 'proof' in your second comment.
#104 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
I see you choose not to reply to my comment, rather you sit there thumbing Arstya's comments up, and mine down.

Where do you work that you can actually spend this amount of time on FunnyJunk? It's very obvious you're either not at work or you have some unskilled job which would account for the fact you have such a thick skull and refuse to listen to the evidence.

Can't fix stupid, you know?
User avatar #99 - Helel (09/25/2014) [-]
Still not getting the point of it I see. Look up the word: uncertainty
#97 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Yes, I believe it's not true, and if you don't then you are literally choosing to believe that it came to him in a dream rather than looking at the facts.

And you still haven't stated what your point is, you keep avoiding that at all costs.

Here, i'll copy and paste to refresh your memory:

"It's the idea that almost no idea you come up with is original. Even if you came up with it on your own, there exists a probability that someone else came up with something similar well before you did. Southpark made this point using the Simpsons. The Simpsons have been on the air for so long that almost every joke a character could think of (and could air on television) was already in an episode of the Simpsons somewhere. Without having seen, read, or watched every possible piece of human creation you cannot assert true originality. Cameron could have easily come up with "The Terminator" without ever knowing "Soldier From Tomorrow" even existed. "

The ENTIRETY of the South park/Simpsons bit had nothing to do with what I said in my original comment, yet you refuse to explain what your point was in this entire paragraph.
#87 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much.
#88 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts.
#127 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
If you say so.
User avatar #125 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Well fuck, it's not like I'm going to just go research one obscure court case. I'm simply defending why Helel said what he said. You're being a fool, and THIS is why we're insulting you and saying you're an idiot.

Oh, and I'm calling bullshit on you not logging in to comment. As far as I know you have to be on the site to receive a notification.
#126 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
I wouldn't expect you to research it because I told you about it probably more than 12 times, and this is why you and Helel are such plebs.

You're now seeing that what i'm saying is correct and all I did was constantly repeat myself until you actual gave me an explanation, and when you give me an explanation I debunked it and now you see my side.

But thanks for the confirmation I was right, I can sleep easy now.

Also call bullshit all you want, I just refreshed the page and saw your comment, couldn't be bothered to log-in, what bullshit is there to be called?


Goodnight you humongous plebs.
User avatar #123 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Alright, I'll explain it to you then since you can't see this clear link to what HE said to YOUR post.

You say, "The terminator one isn't true, James Cameron settled a court case with Harlan Ellison because Terminator was identical to Ellison's story "Soldier From Tommorow" This may be true, but that's not the point.

The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays due to the fact that someone somewhere has probably already thought of it.

Now if YOU were James Cameron, and this is assuming he really was inspired by the dream, and people came to you as you were making the movie, what would you do? Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you in order to keep it from ruining any sort of reputation you may have or may have in the future?

This was the reason why Helel made a reference to the South Park. That's it. And he explained it. You missed the point. Done and over with. I care a bit more now because it's just silly now. I was fucking with you before, but Jesus Christ it's gotten ridiculous.
#124 - Womens Study Major (09/25/2014) [-]
Can't be bothered to log in and i'm interrupting sherlock holmes for this, but you're so dumb that I can't resist. "The point was that it's incredibly difficult to come up with anything new nowadays" - Terminator came out in 1984.

"Say you plagiarized a story when you think you didn't, or simply settle with the person/persons suing you"

That would be a fair point if I didn't explain already that it is literally identical to Soldier From Tommorow in parts, even Cameron's own dsitribution company wouldn't back him to take on the lawsuit, so it's not just a case of getting the guy off his back, he literally couldn't have took him on if he wanted to.

So once again we're back to the point that the entire Simpsons thing had no relevance to my original comment, if there was evidence it actually came from Cameron's dream then the South Park thing was applicable, but it's clear parts were plagiarised so it had nothing to do with thinking he had an original idea, like in the South Park ep. k?
#115 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're truly, truly dense if you can't see why he posted what he posted in the beginning. I swear to god man, you're just 8 kinds of fucktard.

I'm aware that I'm being petty, by the way.
#116 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Quick post while i'm waiting for the download.

Tell me how a tv trope about originality links to my original comment? Pro tip: you can't.

You and Helel keep calling me names and hurting my feelings (im actually crying) instead of actually saying anything. I'm still waiting for one of you to actually explain, and there you go being a hypocrite again.

You get involved, say you don't care, reply for more than an hour, call me petty, be petty yourself and now you've taken over the argument for Helel even though you supposedly don't care. Your life must be grand dude, you'll amount to something one day.
User avatar #113 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Read this. tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeendone

In the Western Animation section, the first example of this trope is one from South Park.
#114 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Sigh.

Last time i'm saying this before I go to bed, so maybe you and Helel will finally understand.

That has no relevance to my original comment.

I've seen the episode, like i've told already but you're not into reading facts, right?

Since you seem to have a hard time understanding i'll explain one last time for you. What I said was that the Terminator DYK is false, and even if you believe it wasn't there's plenty of evidence that says it's false. It doesn't belong in this comp, and "Simpsons did it" has no relevance to my original comment.

He wasn't trying to make a witty comment about the whole Cameron and Ellison thing, he thumbed me down because he believes that Terminator came to Cameron in a dream, and now I believe people are thumbing me down because they think he was making some sort of joke when really he was just being an idiot.

Anyway i'll give you time to process that, maybe you can sleep on it. I'm going to watch Sherlock Holmes, have fun.
#109 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
You're pretty dense, still. We both spoon feed you information, and you refuse to acknowledge it. I'm not even sure if you're being serious or not anymore.

Oh and that first line you quoted? It's called a metaphor, but I'm not going to explain it to you because you probably wouldn't read it.

Picture somewhat related.
#111 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
You should work on your metaphors.

You haven't provided any information, and the 'information' Helel provided had no relevance to my original post.

Fact is there's evidence parts of Terminator were plagiarised, Cameron settled cause he would've lost the lawsuit but you both still refuse to aknowledge this.

You act as if I missed the point he was trying to make, I understood the reference and i've seen the episode, it just had zero relevance to anything I was saying.
#106 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Now let me spoon feed you what you replied with after the comment you quoted.

"Then don't get involved if you lack the ability to read facts."

To which I replied, "K then. Run along now~ "

To which you then proceeded to reply, "Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert. "

And this is why I continue to reply. This wasn't really about the original argument in that first place, and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument by bitching about me getting involved. Throughout this conversation, you've commented about the "Simpsons did it." comment that Helal posted once, and I said I don't care about it.

So, yeah. I don't see any contradiction, bud. Picture somewhat unrelated.
#108 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
"and you took its wittle baby toe out of the wading pool of the argument"

wat.

And yeah you're still contradicting yourself, if you don't care stop replying, you clearly care about the argument or you would have just left after you told me to run along.

Okay, it wasn't about the original argument in the first pla-- oh wait.

"You're both stupid.

You for completely missing what Helel was trying to explain, and Helel for keeping this crap going by not just ignoring your ass. "

Totally wasn't about the argument in the first place.

Also you call him stupid for not ignoring me, look at you now.

Also I don't care about your reaction pics man, you're just posting them in a sad attempt at trying to be funny, when you're clearly quite salty.


You got involved without a legitimate point to make, you were wrong and refused to read the facts of the matter and go on and on about how you don't care yet you're still here more than 40 minutes later replying to me.

And you still don't see how you're contradicting yourself? Dear god.
#101 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Not quite sure how I'm contradicting myself, but alright.

And I got involved to see how you two would respond, and let me say, it's been swell.
#102 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Are you serious? Okay let me spoon feed it to you.

"Yeah, I'm not reading that after reading everything else. Go argue with Helel more. I don't care THAT much." - Proceeds to reply for the next 20 minutes.

Yeah dude you don't care at all, you're the internet cool guy that gets involved then says 'I dont care', yeah... you don't care oneeeee bit.
#96 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
>Implying I have a life.

Woah there, skippy, let's not get crazy here. In fact, you might really be crazy because you're assuming I know that guy in real life. I just like him more than you do.

Notice how I called both of you stupid. I was honest. I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself.

What I do give a fuck about is the fact that you keep replying, which means I get to keep replying and seeing what you'll say.

If you want me to stop replying, please consult the image included in this comment.
#98 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
'I really don't give a fuck about the argument itself. '

Why get involved then?

Wow you both are literally just typing the first thing that comes into your head. You've been contradicting yourself for like the past 4 posts.

And why would I stop replying to you? It's fun watching you contradict yourself and then repeat the same shit over and over again, you're just making yourself look stupid, so have at it. <3
#92 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
Omg, my world is changed. Better go get treatment.

Petty insults, good sir. I do enjoy how pissy you are right now.
#94 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Petty insults? Okay, I called you an autist, a little petty maybe.

What's more petty is you getting involved then stating you don't care and refused to read the facts, and now you're contradicting yourself because you keep replying and 'wasting your time'.

I'm willing to wager you and Helel are friends in real life or something, and he needed backup for his dumb shit argument haha.
User avatar #89 - arstya (09/25/2014) [-]
K then. Run along now~
#90 - petagriffeenisafag (09/25/2014) [-]
Bro you're so cool, you get involved then act like you don't care, now you're telling me to run along from a comment thread in which I am the original comment.

Autist alert.
User avatar #80 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Correct!
#81 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Points for at least admitting it.
User avatar #82 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
My problem is that I like to argue when I'm bored.
#83 - arstya (09/24/2014) [-]
Fair 'nuff.

Here, have another gif.
#84 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
User avatar #76 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove it faggot
#77 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Prove what? Seriously are you missing part of your brain.
User avatar #78 - Helel (09/24/2014) [-]
Anything really, possibly your first comment. But I'ma keep thumbing you down either way.
#38 - petagriffeenisafag (09/24/2014) [-]
Also I feel like I should add that Harlan Ellison's name appears in the Terminator credits, if you need proof.
#47 - Ok. You know you're retarded when your actual opinion… 09/07/2014 on The bastard wiped off a booger -1
#42 - Also don't say I bag on Beats without trying them, I owned a p… 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#41 - *Says Anon aren't actual people - Check *Uses 'Oldfag' ser… 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#39 - Logitech have some of the best quality headsets around, just l…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
User avatar #44 - envinite (02/09/2014) [-]
I'm no audiophiles so I don't know what the fuck headphones specs actually do, but my friends Logitech headphones (the one with "science wins" in its ads) just sounds really shit to me. The bass feels too punchy and female vocals sounds barely clear.

And also Bose is definitely an overpriced Sennheiser. There's this headphones showroom a while ago and I tried both Sennheiser and Bose, which is $25 more expensive (Bose located next to Sennheiser btw). They actually sounds the same after I tried listening to some musics with them. I don't remember which model is it because it's just a numbers.

But then again, different ears, different taste. Some people might like some bass so they bought Beats or other Monster headphones. Other might like natural sounds so they bought Bose or Sennheiser and some want the durable ones so they bought Phillips. I just don't get it why people get madshit when someone buy a certain product.

P.s. in-ear Beats is indeed the shittiest one in Beats family. And Sennheiser and Logitech not comfortable to my ears.
#33 - Because that was very bad sarcasm. You can tell this … 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -3
#26 - >Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk > ****** …  [+] (6 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#24 - Holy... You're more retarded than I thought. Sorry I'…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#25 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Failing to spell for fuck's sake
>Trying to end the argument by a typical childish insult
I doubt you have any chromosomes at all to steal.
#26 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
>Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk
>fuck's
>for fuck us sake

And no, it wasn't even an argument because you didn't have a side... you just commented numerous times that my sarcasm was leaking, whatever the fuck that means haha.
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#22 - Okay, well good luck with your day and have a nice time at hig…  [+] (15 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#23 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Maybe i n English class
>i n
>I am the one who needs to learn English
User avatar #80 - lordmoldywart (02/09/2014) [-]
Guy adds unnecessary space and you call him out for bad English because of it?

Get your shit together, tanakh, you down syndrome fuck. You made yourself look like a retard with your first comment, the next 10+ only made it worse for you.
#83 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Holy fucking shit I think you're the retard here since you do not realize that I am baiting, And it is so successful.
#90 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
#91 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Stop being a retard and accept that you were actually butthurt and you didn't know that I was trolling you, It's that simple.
#92 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
yfw this entire thread
#24 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Holy...

You're more retarded than I thought. Sorry I'm going to have to end this conversation before you steal a chromosome.
#25 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Failing to spell for fuck's sake
>Trying to end the argument by a typical childish insult
I doubt you have any chromosomes at all to steal.
#26 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
>Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk
>fuck's
>for fuck us sake

And no, it wasn't even an argument because you didn't have a side... you just commented numerous times that my sarcasm was leaking, whatever the fuck that means haha.
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#20 - You really do make no sense, you know that right? Wha…  [+] (17 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#21 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Your lack of sarcasm is leaking fastly.
#22 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Okay, well good luck with your day and have a nice time at high school tommorow, maybe i n English class you'll learn the definition of sarcasm and can use it in a sentence that actually makes sense relevant to the topic.
#23 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Maybe i n English class
>i n
>I am the one who needs to learn English
User avatar #80 - lordmoldywart (02/09/2014) [-]
Guy adds unnecessary space and you call him out for bad English because of it?

Get your shit together, tanakh, you down syndrome fuck. You made yourself look like a retard with your first comment, the next 10+ only made it worse for you.
#83 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Holy fucking shit I think you're the retard here since you do not realize that I am baiting, And it is so successful.
#90 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
#91 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Stop being a retard and accept that you were actually butthurt and you didn't know that I was trolling you, It's that simple.
#92 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
yfw this entire thread
#24 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Holy...

You're more retarded than I thought. Sorry I'm going to have to end this conversation before you steal a chromosome.
#25 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Failing to spell for fuck's sake
>Trying to end the argument by a typical childish insult
I doubt you have any chromosomes at all to steal.
#26 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
>Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk
>fuck's
>for fuck us sake

And no, it wasn't even an argument because you didn't have a side... you just commented numerous times that my sarcasm was leaking, whatever the fuck that means haha.
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#18 - Then by that logic you're saying that a $10 pair of headphones…  [+] (19 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -2
#19 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
By your lack of sarcasm you're basically telling me that alienware is as good as a work laptop?
#20 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
You really do make no sense, you know that right?

What does sarcasm or alienware have to do with anything. This is to do with your statement that $10 headphones compare to other top quality headphones which is plain and simply not true.
#21 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Your lack of sarcasm is leaking fastly.
#22 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Okay, well good luck with your day and have a nice time at high school tommorow, maybe i n English class you'll learn the definition of sarcasm and can use it in a sentence that actually makes sense relevant to the topic.
#23 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Maybe i n English class
>i n
>I am the one who needs to learn English
User avatar #80 - lordmoldywart (02/09/2014) [-]
Guy adds unnecessary space and you call him out for bad English because of it?

Get your shit together, tanakh, you down syndrome fuck. You made yourself look like a retard with your first comment, the next 10+ only made it worse for you.
#83 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Holy fucking shit I think you're the retard here since you do not realize that I am baiting, And it is so successful.
#90 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
#91 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Stop being a retard and accept that you were actually butthurt and you didn't know that I was trolling you, It's that simple.
#92 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
yfw this entire thread
#24 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Holy...

You're more retarded than I thought. Sorry I'm going to have to end this conversation before you steal a chromosome.
#25 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Failing to spell for fuck's sake
>Trying to end the argument by a typical childish insult
I doubt you have any chromosomes at all to steal.
#26 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
>Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk
>fuck's
>for fuck us sake

And no, it wasn't even an argument because you didn't have a side... you just commented numerous times that my sarcasm was leaking, whatever the fuck that means haha.
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#16 - Nah, Anon is right this time. Don't use Beats as the …  [+] (25 new replies) 02/09/2014 on Cool Shirt -1
User avatar #34 - envinite (02/09/2014) [-]
> Logitech
> Quality

Also Bose is just an overpriced Sennheinser with a better look.


Incoming unpopular opinion :
I've tried Beats headphones before and I want to say Beats (all models except the in-ear ones) actually a decent headphone especially if you listen mainly to EDM because its bass is kinda tuned but really smooth. The design is really nice but it's not really comfortable or at least to my ears, and the non-tangible cords are fucking weak as fuck. But then again Beats is not worth its price, I would price it for about 1/3 the original prices. So there's that. I refuse to call Beats a complete garbage nor a top notch headphone. Go ahead and call me have a shit taste in headphones, but at least I ever tried it before I judge it or follow the internet's bandwagons.
#42 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Also don't say I bag on Beats without trying them, I owned a pair of Beats studio and in-ear Beats, even had a pair of a friends old £170 SMS by 50 cent headphones, they were all overpriced garbage, in terms of comfort and quality, I compared them to a pair of Logitech G35s that I owned at the time, only about a £70 headset (not headphones) and I preferred the comfort AND quality.
#39 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Logitech have some of the best quality headsets around, just look on any review site and you'd be challenged to find a pair with less than 4 stars.

And Bose is not overpriced, which leads me to believe you don't really know anything about headphones and I should disregard your statement about Logitech as you seem to get your information from hearing one persons opinion and taking it as fact. Look for yourself...

Travelling headphones from Bose (Quietcomfort 3): £299
Travelling headphones from Seinhesser (MM 550x-Travel) £299

Similar specs, similar use, similar price. Do I need to make a list for you?
User avatar #44 - envinite (02/09/2014) [-]
I'm no audiophiles so I don't know what the fuck headphones specs actually do, but my friends Logitech headphones (the one with "science wins" in its ads) just sounds really shit to me. The bass feels too punchy and female vocals sounds barely clear.

And also Bose is definitely an overpriced Sennheiser. There's this headphones showroom a while ago and I tried both Sennheiser and Bose, which is $25 more expensive (Bose located next to Sennheiser btw). They actually sounds the same after I tried listening to some musics with them. I don't remember which model is it because it's just a numbers.

But then again, different ears, different taste. Some people might like some bass so they bought Beats or other Monster headphones. Other might like natural sounds so they bought Bose or Sennheiser and some want the durable ones so they bought Phillips. I just don't get it why people get madshit when someone buy a certain product.

P.s. in-ear Beats is indeed the shittiest one in Beats family. And Sennheiser and Logitech not comfortable to my ears.
#17 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Beats are quality headphones, they're just overpriced like alienware.
#18 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Then by that logic you're saying that a $10 pair of headphones is the same as any other pair of headphones which I, and anyone else who owns headphones or a headset can tell you, is complete bull.
#19 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
By your lack of sarcasm you're basically telling me that alienware is as good as a work laptop?
#20 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
You really do make no sense, you know that right?

What does sarcasm or alienware have to do with anything. This is to do with your statement that $10 headphones compare to other top quality headphones which is plain and simply not true.
#21 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Your lack of sarcasm is leaking fastly.
#22 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Okay, well good luck with your day and have a nice time at high school tommorow, maybe i n English class you'll learn the definition of sarcasm and can use it in a sentence that actually makes sense relevant to the topic.
#23 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Maybe i n English class
>i n
>I am the one who needs to learn English
User avatar #80 - lordmoldywart (02/09/2014) [-]
Guy adds unnecessary space and you call him out for bad English because of it?

Get your shit together, tanakh, you down syndrome fuck. You made yourself look like a retard with your first comment, the next 10+ only made it worse for you.
#83 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Holy fucking shit I think you're the retard here since you do not realize that I am baiting, And it is so successful.
#90 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
#91 - tanakh (02/10/2014) [-]
Stop being a retard and accept that you were actually butthurt and you didn't know that I was trolling you, It's that simple.
#92 - lordmoldywart (02/10/2014) [-]
yfw this entire thread
#24 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Holy...

You're more retarded than I thought. Sorry I'm going to have to end this conversation before you steal a chromosome.
#25 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>Failing to spell for fuck's sake
>Trying to end the argument by a typical childish insult
I doubt you have any chromosomes at all to steal.
#26 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
>Trying to greentext on FunnyJunk
>fuck's
>for fuck us sake

And no, it wasn't even an argument because you didn't have a side... you just commented numerous times that my sarcasm was leaking, whatever the fuck that means haha.
#43 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
"Using emoticons" Check.
"Is a complete retard" Check.
"Failed to prove his point" Check.
"Tells me to use grammar but fails to use it" Check.
"Goes out of the topic" Check.
What can I say about you? Pure retard confirmed!
#35 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
Anons don't count as people, I thought every oldfag knew this.
Since you lack sarcasm, and you use comebacks that even Call of duty kids can use, and you failed to prove anything, Your reply doesn't count either.
I seriously don't know why you're continuing on being retarded for no reason at all.
#41 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
*Says Anon aren't actual people - Check
*Uses 'Oldfag' seriously - Check
*'Comebacks even Call of Duty kids can use' - That is just a redundant thing to say.
*'Your reply doesn't count' - Well yes, it does. I gave reasons for my side of the argument while you just commented I was 'leaking sarcasm'.

Confirmed kid and now I seriously have to leave, pizzas here. Have fun replying if you want was fun.
#27 - tanakh (02/09/2014) [-]
>This was sarcasm www.funnyjunk.com/Cool+Shirt/funny-pictures/5011158/11#11
>Your lack of sarcasm proved me that you can't sense sarcasm
User avatar #49 - critality (02/09/2014) [-]
this was funny to read
#33 - petagriffeenisafag (02/09/2014) [-]
Because that was very bad sarcasm.

You can tell this by the fact that the only two people that replied to you thought it wasn't sarcasm.

And i'm going to take a wild guess and say you have only just started puberty, using stupid reaction images and trying to greentext, having a total of 34 red thumbs and the general way you carried yourself in these comments.

So have fun with your terrible sarcasm and your FJ greentexting, good luck.

#6 - 'True scientific report' It's a fictional character, …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/20/2013 on laser pointers 0
#7 - Womens Study Major (12/20/2013) [-]
scientists get bored too
#56 - You're pretty disrespectful for someone who didn't actually re… 11/06/2013 on Heuhuehue +1
#41 - Yeah, that. Or the fact neckbeards think fedoras make…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2013 on M'lady~ +2
#50 - orrihaa (11/05/2013) [-]
The autism on this comic makes me annoyed
#36 - Sigh, don't feel bad. A while ago FunnyJunk was full of 'Me Gu…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/29/2013 on Shakespearian Actor +2
User avatar #104 - roderick (06/29/2013) [-]
Guess I'll get rid of it. Aw well.
#152 - Or just highlight the text. 06/11/2013 on Fuck you dad +1
[ 196 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 950

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)