Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

patronanvers    

Rank #27752 on Comments
patronanvers Avatar Level 120 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to patronanvers Block patronanvers Invite patronanvers to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:5/03/2013
Last Login:11/27/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#27752
Highest Content Rank:#11787
Highest Comment Rank:#10782
Content Thumbs: 10 total,  11 ,  1
Comment Thumbs: 222 total,  351 ,  129
Content Level Progress: 23.72% (14/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 120 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 121 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1787
Total Comments Made:113
FJ Points:252

latest user's comments

#296 - And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just becaus…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#279 - Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want S…  [+] (11 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#268 - That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a hea…  [+] (13 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#262 - Probably Kortrijk  [+] (1 new reply) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #266 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
Yessss that one! i wouldve been born their too but he went to bosnia to live with my mom
#259 - Stop using the word mutilating. So all cut men are mutilated? …  [+] (15 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #263 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
well when the equal procedure is done to a little girl it is mutialtion sologically the same applies to boys.
User avatar #268 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a health benefit. It could easily be that in 20 years cutting women is socially acceptable. But for now it is not so there is no reason to do so. A cut penis is a lot cleaner than an uncut one and hence, less chance for infections because no bacteria can infest under the skin
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#253 - Where is he from?  [+] (3 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #261 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
something like with kort thats all i remember lol
User avatar #262 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Probably Kortrijk
User avatar #266 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
Yessss that one! i wouldve been born their too but he went to bosnia to live with my mom
#252 - Well maybe we should ban al plastic surgery with little kids. …  [+] (17 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #255 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
thats a whole diferent thing fixing a defective ear is not the same as mutilating a fuctional penis.
User avatar #259 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Stop using the word mutilating. So all cut men are mutilated? Well I guess we should all sue our parents ! You are so contra-circumcision for no reason. It's just absurd
User avatar #263 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
well when the equal procedure is done to a little girl it is mutialtion sologically the same applies to boys.
User avatar #268 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a health benefit. It could easily be that in 20 years cutting women is socially acceptable. But for now it is not so there is no reason to do so. A cut penis is a lot cleaner than an uncut one and hence, less chance for infections because no bacteria can infest under the skin
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#245 - Even if the reasons are cultural..what does it matter? I live …  [+] (24 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #250 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
cool my dad is from belgium
User avatar #253 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Where is he from?
User avatar #261 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
something like with kort thats all i remember lol
User avatar #262 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Probably Kortrijk
User avatar #266 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
Yessss that one! i wouldve been born their too but he went to bosnia to live with my mom
User avatar #248 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
like I said a womans body is her choice so a mans body should be his choice ,people should only be strapped to tables and cut if they want to .
User avatar #252 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Well maybe we should ban al plastic surgery with little kids. Like when a kid god flappy ears and they operate it when it's still young so it doesn't bother him/her in it's later life. Or should they also wait untill he is bullied and can make his/her own decision. When a boy is cut, it is because the parents have the best intentions with the kid.
User avatar #255 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
thats a whole diferent thing fixing a defective ear is not the same as mutilating a fuctional penis.
User avatar #259 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Stop using the word mutilating. So all cut men are mutilated? Well I guess we should all sue our parents ! You are so contra-circumcision for no reason. It's just absurd
User avatar #263 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
well when the equal procedure is done to a little girl it is mutialtion sologically the same applies to boys.
User avatar #268 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a health benefit. It could easily be that in 20 years cutting women is socially acceptable. But for now it is not so there is no reason to do so. A cut penis is a lot cleaner than an uncut one and hence, less chance for infections because no bacteria can infest under the skin
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#241 - Well I was 4 years old and it had to be done due to medical re…  [+] (26 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis 0
User avatar #243 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
okay well their are rare medical reason that acceptions can be made but the US cuts 85-90% of babies without medical reason.
User avatar #245 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Even if the reasons are cultural..what does it matter? I live in Belgium and cut/uncut maybe has a ratio of 40/60 but nobody gives a f*ck. They are almost all cut when they were little and it's not like they can't have sex now because they were cut.
User avatar #250 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
cool my dad is from belgium
User avatar #253 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Where is he from?
User avatar #261 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
something like with kort thats all i remember lol
User avatar #262 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Probably Kortrijk
User avatar #266 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
Yessss that one! i wouldve been born their too but he went to bosnia to live with my mom
User avatar #248 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
like I said a womans body is her choice so a mans body should be his choice ,people should only be strapped to tables and cut if they want to .
User avatar #252 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Well maybe we should ban al plastic surgery with little kids. Like when a kid god flappy ears and they operate it when it's still young so it doesn't bother him/her in it's later life. Or should they also wait untill he is bullied and can make his/her own decision. When a boy is cut, it is because the parents have the best intentions with the kid.
User avatar #255 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
thats a whole diferent thing fixing a defective ear is not the same as mutilating a fuctional penis.
User avatar #259 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Stop using the word mutilating. So all cut men are mutilated? Well I guess we should all sue our parents ! You are so contra-circumcision for no reason. It's just absurd
User avatar #263 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
well when the equal procedure is done to a little girl it is mutialtion sologically the same applies to boys.
User avatar #268 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a health benefit. It could easily be that in 20 years cutting women is socially acceptable. But for now it is not so there is no reason to do so. A cut penis is a lot cleaner than an uncut one and hence, less chance for infections because no bacteria can infest under the skin
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#234 - All these comments about how uncut is better than cut... …  [+] (30 new replies) 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis +3
User avatar #240 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it about choosing for youself man your body should morally and ethicaly and legally be you choice.
User avatar #251 - chuca (07/14/2013) [-]
if you wait till you're older, it can lead to alot of medical complications
one of my friends had an uncle who had it done when he was around 12, and his dick basically split open when he was pissing once

idk how common it is, but i know it happens
User avatar #258 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
adults have a bit higher complication rate because babies heal faster. you uncle had a very rare case.
User avatar #241 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Well I was 4 years old and it had to be done due to medical reasons. I am glad my parents didn't wait till I was 16....
User avatar #243 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
okay well their are rare medical reason that acceptions can be made but the US cuts 85-90% of babies without medical reason.
User avatar #245 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Even if the reasons are cultural..what does it matter? I live in Belgium and cut/uncut maybe has a ratio of 40/60 but nobody gives a f*ck. They are almost all cut when they were little and it's not like they can't have sex now because they were cut.
User avatar #250 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
cool my dad is from belgium
User avatar #253 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Where is he from?
User avatar #261 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
something like with kort thats all i remember lol
User avatar #262 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Probably Kortrijk
User avatar #266 - darkdraik (07/14/2013) [-]
Yessss that one! i wouldve been born their too but he went to bosnia to live with my mom
User avatar #248 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
like I said a womans body is her choice so a mans body should be his choice ,people should only be strapped to tables and cut if they want to .
User avatar #252 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Well maybe we should ban al plastic surgery with little kids. Like when a kid god flappy ears and they operate it when it's still young so it doesn't bother him/her in it's later life. Or should they also wait untill he is bullied and can make his/her own decision. When a boy is cut, it is because the parents have the best intentions with the kid.
User avatar #255 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
thats a whole diferent thing fixing a defective ear is not the same as mutilating a fuctional penis.
User avatar #259 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Stop using the word mutilating. So all cut men are mutilated? Well I guess we should all sue our parents ! You are so contra-circumcision for no reason. It's just absurd
User avatar #263 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
well when the equal procedure is done to a little girl it is mutialtion sologically the same applies to boys.
User avatar #268 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
That is because there is no proof that cutting women has a health benefit. It could easily be that in 20 years cutting women is socially acceptable. But for now it is not so there is no reason to do so. A cut penis is a lot cleaner than an uncut one and hence, less chance for infections because no bacteria can infest under the skin
User avatar #274 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wrong cuting women has the e"xact same proof
A cut penis is not cleaner the a uncut one that is false how clean it is depends on he indivuals hygine. plus the foreskin kills certian bacteria that cause many stds according to a recent study from sweedish pediartic society I think is was it may have been norway.
User avatar #279 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Just use a condom and you have no problem? If you don't want STD's then have safe sex. And a cut penis is easier to keep clean. Ofcourse there will be a difference if a cut one never showers and an uncut boy showers 3x a day. And how the hell can a foreskin kill bacteria? Then why do uncut people get infected penis' and cut boys never get it?
User avatar #284 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
wow you are just full of myths .
1. using a condom is a good reason not to cut babies
2. a cut penis takes .5 less seconds to clean
3.cut boys almost equal amout of infections with cut men getting slightly more uninary tract infections plus all these infections are eaisly treated with antibiotics no surgery required.
User avatar #296 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
And you are just annoying. You are against cut men just because it's done when they are babies. But you think it's ok when it's done for medical reasons. That's not really a good point of view I think. Ever considered cut men are thankfull that it has been done when they were babies? I had troath surgery when I was 5. I don't remember shit about it and I thank my parents they did it back then so i don't have to do it now
User avatar #299 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
it is simple when it comes to any body modifications or procedure that is not to fix a defect they should only be done without the persons consent period. the law applies this women why not to men? are we not suppose to be equal ?
User avatar #300 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Hmm wel my almands (or how ever you write it) were removed because there was a slight chance they would go beserk when I was a grown up so my parents decided to have surgery. At that time they still worked perfect. So that would be mutilation 2?
User avatar #305 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
what is a almands ?
User avatar #309 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
Tonsil and that stuff. Well English is not my native language. It's some kind of organ in your throat that you actually don't need
User avatar #340 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
the premature ejaculation kicks in when you are older like 40+ due to the decay of time on your already deadened nerves. a condom prevents 99% of stds so again no need to risk your life and the AAP is under heavy critisim because that have been selling foreskins for millions and thus al thier work is very biased.
User avatar #325 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
ah but that odds of your penis having a disease cause by your foreskin is very very low and their are many negitive side effects such as erectile dysfunction and 500% greater chance of premature ejaculation and and a chance the procedure could kill or seroiusly maim you. the benifits do not out weigh the risks and consequences.
User avatar #333 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
500% greater chance of premature ejaculation hahahaha

U are not using any logic. A cut penis becomes less sensitive so you can have sex a lot longer than uncut men.

Btw just read an article (2012 april) that when you are cut at young age you have 15% less chance of having prostate cancer, 17% less chance to give hummano papillo virus to girls and that it has no negative effect on your sexual efforts. And hey these are things that came from the American Academy of Pediatrics
User avatar #315 - timmywankenobi (07/14/2013) [-]
tonsils well you don't loose really any functions by having them removed and you obviously had a real risk of the swelling up later on so that procedure is acceptable as it was a minor risk and had very minor side effects and a real threat to your well being was present. none of these things are true for genital mutilation 99% of the time.
User avatar #318 - patronanvers (07/14/2013) [-]
They have been removed so I wouldn't have pain/ a disease in the future. The same can be said about a cut penis. What you don't have can't hurt
#197 - Actually, cut people tend to have better sex. Due to the lack … 07/14/2013 on How to describe a penis -1
#20 - you are my hero from now on 06/24/2013 on Was not -1
#79 - My sides ! 06/10/2013 on E3 -2
#53 - Well just so you'd know but Heracles was one bad ass motherf*c… 06/07/2013 on he's right you know 0
#39 - I hope it was a dude cause my dog is a female 06/04/2013 on Forget about that bitch... 0
#36 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 06/04/2013 on Forget about that bitch... 0
#37 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #39 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
I hope it was a dude cause my dog is a female
#34 - Switch seen with eaten and you are right  [+] (4 new replies) 06/04/2013 on Forget about that bitch... 0
#35 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
#36 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
#37 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #39 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
I hope it was a dude cause my dog is a female
#8 - Dalmatians are the best ! This one is mine  [+] (6 new replies) 06/04/2013 on Forget about that bitch... +2
#17 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
paint skillz off the chartz
User avatar #34 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
Switch seen with eaten and you are right
#35 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
#36 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
#37 - funnyjunkforlife (06/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #39 - patronanvers (06/04/2013) [-]
I hope it was a dude cause my dog is a female
#37 - Stop posting Belgian comics on Funnyjunk ! It makes me really … 05/28/2013 on Zat shit cray +1
#21 - Picture 05/25/2013 on You got something in your back 0
#16 - Why not put everything in 1 Pokéball? 05/24/2013 on Mind=Blown 0
#23 - *looks closer* Nowp still a handbag  [+] (2 new replies) 05/24/2013 on Oh no this is not good..... -2
User avatar #28 - whenallelsefails (05/24/2013) [-]
It's eyes are closed...sort of looks like a black version of Falkor from The Neverending Story
User avatar #29 - Falkor (05/24/2013) [-]
i do not have a black brother
#20 - that's a bag?  [+] (4 new replies) 05/24/2013 on Oh no this is not good..... -2
User avatar #21 - whenallelsefails (05/24/2013) [-]
Look closer...
User avatar #23 - patronanvers (05/24/2013) [-]
*looks closer*

Nowp still a handbag
User avatar #28 - whenallelsefails (05/24/2013) [-]
It's eyes are closed...sort of looks like a black version of Falkor from The Neverending Story
User avatar #29 - Falkor (05/24/2013) [-]
i do not have a black brother
#439 - I just saw Chernobyl Diaries 10 min ago. I find this post disturbing. 05/23/2013 on Who is Ready to Learn Some... 0
#143 - You mean Caterpie on steroids? 05/22/2013 on Ima snatch yo lady 0
[ 105 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2400

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)