Upload
Login or register

pappanoodles

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:2/20/2012
Last Login:7/26/2016
Location:The Netherlands
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2805
Highest Content Rank:#8023
Highest Comment Rank:#1121
Content Thumbs: 4 total,  17 ,  21
Comment Thumbs: 6084 total,  7186 ,  1102
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -5 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -2 Content: Sort of disliked
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 248 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:2296
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:1602
FJ Points:4766

  • Views: 944
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 6 Total: 0
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/15/12
    facebook facebook
  • Views: 262
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 13 Total: -10
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/12/13
    found this on my facebook found this on my facebook
  • Views: 1076
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +6
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 06/06/15
    Cute Cute

latest user's comments

#123 - thats exactly why i said it will never happen 9 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate +1
#72 - the thing is with the downdating women will not settle for les… 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate -2
#66 - no i didnt imply you were a woman , these are actually evoluti…  [+] (2 new replies) 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate 0
User avatar
#94 - antiponiesuser (10 hours ago) [-]
also because they bitches man
User avatar
#71 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
The chemical is argued to be for better bonding between partners though. Well maybe its both. Better bonding works as long as he doesn't find out i suppose.
#63 - kinda said a bit on your other comment already , but biologica… 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate +1
#60 - so you cum in 30 seconds? you dont have a penis head? and you …  [+] (5 new replies) 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate 0
User avatar
#62 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
oh, I got it. You implied I was a woman. heh no, I'm just a depressed and lonely betafag who can't get a female companion for the love of god
User avatar
#66 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
no i didnt imply you were a woman , these are actually evolutionary traits to cheat

penis head is designed that way to scoop out sperm of another men , sex takes so long for us because the time needed is needed to scoop it all out. we release a chemical in the brain after sex so we fall asleep and the woman can sleep with the next one. also unsure, but most like why women can have multiple orgasms is so that she can have multiple partners right after each other. never wondered why all women have rape fantasies ? evolution man.
User avatar
#94 - antiponiesuser (10 hours ago) [-]
also because they bitches man
User avatar
#71 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
The chemical is argued to be for better bonding between partners though. Well maybe its both. Better bonding works as long as he doesn't find out i suppose.
User avatar
#61 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
what?
#58 - its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so th…  [+] (2 new replies) 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate -1
User avatar
#67 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
"its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so that last sentence i do not agree with. "
I heard that too, i am not so sure whether i agree. From what I've heard it uses dating site profiles. And in terms of social media and dating sites i do have to admit that women do put more effort into it. So that statistic is sorta inflated by the fact that the 4/10 woman looks like a 5/10 on that site and the guy looks like a 4/10 because he made a quick selfie in whatever he was wearing. Does not apply to all guys, but some. On top of that it is just women picking option two. Their good choice. It takes guys to counter by picking option two to reverse things, fair play on the market.
The body acceptance thing is funny because it just reminded me of this very post (except the two last pictures). If anything i think both of these things are negative option two picks, they make people believe that the other sex is a bit more desperate, making them move their value a slight bit up.
80/20 is i think a big stretch. I am not an expert on this but i do have doubts that one in every five guys is able to properly satisfy (and this is not simply about sex, it is the entirety of the relationship) four women. Some of them will go for the top 40% instead as long as they get one guy for themselves. And heck, some might say they want 2 of the bottom 30%. Personally i don't belive the 80/20 rule, monogamy for the benefit of the man (more than the women, it is of course to some extent both but the difference in extent can be argued) could make sense to me.
User avatar
#72 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
the thing is with the downdating women will not settle for less, then the goal she sets in her head. its also a biological thing , you have to get the best provider and genes. so a man cant be dumber, lesser social status , worse looking or even shorter. except when you have money or are a celebrity of course if you flunk in one of these events you will not get a medal , while a man doesnt look at the lesser things , like her being a bit too dumb for him , or having no job , or bit less pretty , if she will make up for it in the other events.

the 80/20 is based on the pareto principle which is applied to almost anything and widely to this as well , but it is not created on this. perhaps you're right, but the thing is and i've read scientific papers on this, that if left to choose women do not mind sharing a top man , over giving everyone a mate.
#54 - to be fair , we were never made for monogamy  [+] (9 new replies) 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate 0
User avatar
#59 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
Well i don't think we were particularily made for monogamy (or any sort of sexual behaviour) but there are things that are evolutionary more beneficial and as far as i am aware evolutionary beneficial traits often tend to be a little hardcoded into our brains (on average, not into each single one of us). Eating fat would preserve us from starving, even after we have an overabundance of food in some places we still like that stuff. And monogamy is a good trait for mammals, we can't outproduce deaths all that well so we had to make the babies that we made count by having one out of every few survive. Of course, not needed today, but i wouldn't be surprised about people being a bit wired towards monogamy. All speculation though.
User avatar
#63 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
kinda said a bit on your other comment already , but biologically we arent made for monogamy , we have that herd hardwire with alpha males , harems and sneak betas, anatomically and mentally. but yes we do benefit from monogamy , not nature wise but civilization and society wise. it gives everyone a partner
User avatar
#55 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
I was , and even I cheat my right hand with my left
User avatar
#60 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
so you cum in 30 seconds? you dont have a penis head? and you dont fall asleep after sex?
User avatar
#62 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
oh, I got it. You implied I was a woman. heh no, I'm just a depressed and lonely betafag who can't get a female companion for the love of god
User avatar
#66 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
no i didnt imply you were a woman , these are actually evolutionary traits to cheat

penis head is designed that way to scoop out sperm of another men , sex takes so long for us because the time needed is needed to scoop it all out. we release a chemical in the brain after sex so we fall asleep and the woman can sleep with the next one. also unsure, but most like why women can have multiple orgasms is so that she can have multiple partners right after each other. never wondered why all women have rape fantasies ? evolution man.
User avatar
#94 - antiponiesuser (10 hours ago) [-]
also because they bitches man
User avatar
#71 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
The chemical is argued to be for better bonding between partners though. Well maybe its both. Better bonding works as long as he doesn't find out i suppose.
User avatar
#61 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
what?
#48 - although i agree with what you say and trust me i have been do…  [+] (4 new replies) 12 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate +2
User avatar
#51 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
Yeah i don't care, if you manage to be sucessful with girls thats good for you.
I don't think a small percentage makes a difference but 20% isn't small. It would end up with alot of entitled people ending up lonely and self reflecting. I think if you take all sorts of societies across the world you probably find noticeable evidence for standards being different. And i don't think people neccercarily have to try being part of a movement that has a big impact or something like that, i just believe that it is pitiful to complain so much about what is essentially a two way deal. I just say that if you complain while being part of the solution by not being a thirsty bastard then you are being hypocritical. Noone inherently deserves to have a partner or sucess with the other sex . There are plenty of 4/10 girls out there and plenty of 4/10 guys and they all look at 6/10 and higher while complaining about how shitty people are without reflecting on themselves.
User avatar
#58 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so that last sentence i do not agree with.
4/10 men will be happy with anything they can get , but they wont get anything and 4/10 women will still go for that 8/10 men and then complain why they get rejected or start body acceptance. of course there are few exceptions to both.
80/20 rule , if women given a free choice they 80% will go for 20% of the top men. this is why monogamy was actually invented for the benefit of men
User avatar
#67 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
"its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so that last sentence i do not agree with. "
I heard that too, i am not so sure whether i agree. From what I've heard it uses dating site profiles. And in terms of social media and dating sites i do have to admit that women do put more effort into it. So that statistic is sorta inflated by the fact that the 4/10 woman looks like a 5/10 on that site and the guy looks like a 4/10 because he made a quick selfie in whatever he was wearing. Does not apply to all guys, but some. On top of that it is just women picking option two. Their good choice. It takes guys to counter by picking option two to reverse things, fair play on the market.
The body acceptance thing is funny because it just reminded me of this very post (except the two last pictures). If anything i think both of these things are negative option two picks, they make people believe that the other sex is a bit more desperate, making them move their value a slight bit up.
80/20 is i think a big stretch. I am not an expert on this but i do have doubts that one in every five guys is able to properly satisfy (and this is not simply about sex, it is the entirety of the relationship) four women. Some of them will go for the top 40% instead as long as they get one guy for themselves. And heck, some might say they want 2 of the bottom 30%. Personally i don't belive the 80/20 rule, monogamy for the benefit of the man (more than the women, it is of course to some extent both but the difference in extent can be argued) could make sense to me.
User avatar
#72 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
the thing is with the downdating women will not settle for less, then the goal she sets in her head. its also a biological thing , you have to get the best provider and genes. so a man cant be dumber, lesser social status , worse looking or even shorter. except when you have money or are a celebrity of course if you flunk in one of these events you will not get a medal , while a man doesnt look at the lesser things , like her being a bit too dumb for him , or having no job , or bit less pretty , if she will make up for it in the other events.

the 80/20 is based on the pareto principle which is applied to almost anything and widely to this as well , but it is not created on this. perhaps you're right, but the thing is and i've read scientific papers on this, that if left to choose women do not mind sharing a top man , over giving everyone a mate.
#8 - justice league trailer 15 hours ago on zoom...zoom..enhance +1
#29 - its not that i dont agree, but men can easily change this …  [+] (23 new replies) 15 hours ago on Don't Manscriminate +9
User avatar
#101 - yugiohkris (10 hours ago) [-]
That will never happen, way too many betas out there. I met a girl who played league, she had almost every skin in the game plus tons of chests people bought for her. Never spent a single dime. It was all gifted to her for free. She just had a skype pic with a bunch of cleavage and that's all it took.
User avatar
#123 - pappanoodles (9 hours ago) [-]
thats exactly why i said it will never happen
User avatar
#43 - paddypancake (13 hours ago) [-]
It doesn't take all men, it takes the norm to change. If 20% change the norm changes a bit. If 50% change the norm changes by quite a bit. It's supply and demand. Of course there are also such things as difference between real and estimated supply and demand which alter the entire thing.
On top of that, while i agree with the point you made, i completly disagree with the attitude of these posts. The last two are the only ones that make a point. The other ones are only bitching about the market. You don't go in a supermarket and tell the cashier that the cornflakes are too expensive and they have to be made cheaper. You don't go on the streets and tell people that cornflakes are too expensive. You don't burn down a cornflakes factory because cornflakes are too expensive. You don't assasinate the president because cornflakes are too expensive. ok the last two were me mocking my own mantra, but you get my point. . You have three options:
You take the cornflakes, pay and stuff your whore mouth with them so you can't bitch about cornflakes being too expensive.
You don't buy the cornflakes, you make a statement about the market. Cornflakes companies might have to reduce their price because you aren't the only one who disliked them. You made a point by holding out an not giving in, showing that you value your statement more than the product. If you are part of an economically significant group, you cause change. But one asshat who wants cheap cornflakes won't make a change, you get as much of a voice as you deserve. A single one. No more, no less. The value of it depends on your own value on the market.
You eat the cheap cornflakes. Hope its not the sort of cornflakes that complains that cornflakes should be valued more and that understands economics of cornflakes just as badly as the guy who took option one without stuffing his whore mouth with cornflakes. If that is the case, show some dignity and choose option two. You improve the market by making a cornflakes bitch a little more humble about what she deserves.
User avatar
#50 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
except cornflakes are optional

Sex and a companion for life isn't. All men need a respective woman, as well as all women need their partner, so you can't really compare.
And don't start with gays and trannies.

So, yeah, women should stop being such cunts.
User avatar
#57 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
Not very reasonable to downvote people the moment you start a discussion. Whatever, won't stop me and i don't need to resort to the same methods.

Companionship can be made with other people than people that you fuck. You can have friends and stuff.
Sex is optional, you can surivive without it. Sex is not a human right. Now, of course, humans don't live off only what is their basic rights and needs, but you need to pay for it or compensate others for it. And that doesn#t mean you have to give your girlfried gifts so that she fucks you. No. You give your girlfriend gifts, she will be happy and gives you gifts that make you happy. You give her companionship, she gives you companionship. You give her sex, she gives you sex. If what you provide is signficantly less valueable, she might decide to break up. Usually, normal and decent people have some sort of puffer. Some tolerance towards being a bit more providing and they don't mind that things aren't 100% equal. If they are however significantly unequal, of course people will be unhappy.
Why don't start with gays and trannies. Don't they require companionship too? And sex. It is not really optional as you said. So yeah, you should not be such a cunt and start fucking trannies and gay people, they need sex, too.
User avatar
#65 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
I was being general, that's why i left exceptions out. Also, downvoting means disagreement, so yeah.

And no, you can't live without sex. Look at the betafags who end up lonely and losers, and then go and shoot up schools.

Sex is necesarry for a good mental health. Without it, the person, especially a young male, will go awry. So, yeah, they should make public free whores for betafags.
User avatar
#70 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
I don't downvote everything i disagree with. I upvote some stuff i disagree with. I upvote stuff that i believe to be enriching, be it due to comedic value, a good point being made, opening a new perspective towards myself. I downthumb stuff that i deem the opposite, having a bad impact on the site. Whatever, i made my points about what i think and i don't want to stick too long with discussing peanuts. Who cares about them anyways.

This would actually be quite an interesting dating technique. "Hi, i saw your profile on facebook. Might want to have sex with me to make sure i don't snap and shoot up the school?" besides for the obvious issues with such a belief system, aren't you a bit young to be desperate about partners when you are still in school? Unless you are a teacher shooting up a school, that isn't better either.

People are responsible for their own actions. Noone makes you desperate by not having sex with you. You choose to be desperate. There are people who manage without sex. There are people who get a hooker. There are people who fuck less attractive people. There are even people who manage to fuck equally or more attractive people, maybe try to learn from them? It is not impossible for people to get fucked in this world and i am not quite there to call it a human right. Maybe wait for sex robots in the next 20 years?
You can have good mental health without sex. Just jack off if you want to.
Public free whores looks like an interesting way to stimulate the economy.
User avatar
#95 - antiponiesuser (10 hours ago) [-]
I am allergic to peanuts, so I care about them you dip.

Also, now you get at the upvote for clear psychology detectivism.

But my case is the aprox. 15% of possibilities of you missing your guess. I ended school long ago, and I am not a teacher. My personal issue is that I studied hard and ignored my "not so good" classmates when I was in school, under the promise that all the adults made me that when I went to university, better times would come, and it was an absolute lie, which is now breaking me appart everyday, knowing that i've wasted my youth years.

Anyways, I understand where you are coming from. But take into account fear of speaking with the opposite sex, fear of rejection, etc etc...

There are many factors, and my only main point would be: women should stop being such pretentious bitches, and be normal like men, dating men at their level at least, not men minimum 2 points above them, ie. a 6/10 taking into account personality, studies, life and such, not only appearences nowadays usually only dates a dude who is a 8/10 or above.

My main problem is that men always have to settle for less, where women always strive for more, and that is making a huge chism between sexes.

Take away the penis and the vagina, and compare the man and woman of a relationship.

Who earns more? Who has a car? Who is the outgoing one? Who is supporting the other one? Who is the one who provides and cares more? As people, not as sexual things. Without the sexes, just comparing them as if they were gays or smthing, i dont know.

You see my point? Women more often than not give less in the relationship, just because their part of the sex, which both should give, is deemed more important.

Like, men should give all the car and house and money AND sex just because the woman gives sex. It's not fair, in an equal society.
User avatar
#54 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
to be fair , we were never made for monogamy
User avatar
#59 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
Well i don't think we were particularily made for monogamy (or any sort of sexual behaviour) but there are things that are evolutionary more beneficial and as far as i am aware evolutionary beneficial traits often tend to be a little hardcoded into our brains (on average, not into each single one of us). Eating fat would preserve us from starving, even after we have an overabundance of food in some places we still like that stuff. And monogamy is a good trait for mammals, we can't outproduce deaths all that well so we had to make the babies that we made count by having one out of every few survive. Of course, not needed today, but i wouldn't be surprised about people being a bit wired towards monogamy. All speculation though.
User avatar
#63 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
kinda said a bit on your other comment already , but biologically we arent made for monogamy , we have that herd hardwire with alpha males , harems and sneak betas, anatomically and mentally. but yes we do benefit from monogamy , not nature wise but civilization and society wise. it gives everyone a partner
User avatar
#55 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
I was , and even I cheat my right hand with my left
User avatar
#60 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
so you cum in 30 seconds? you dont have a penis head? and you dont fall asleep after sex?
User avatar
#62 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
oh, I got it. You implied I was a woman. heh no, I'm just a depressed and lonely betafag who can't get a female companion for the love of god
User avatar
#66 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
no i didnt imply you were a woman , these are actually evolutionary traits to cheat

penis head is designed that way to scoop out sperm of another men , sex takes so long for us because the time needed is needed to scoop it all out. we release a chemical in the brain after sex so we fall asleep and the woman can sleep with the next one. also unsure, but most like why women can have multiple orgasms is so that she can have multiple partners right after each other. never wondered why all women have rape fantasies ? evolution man.
User avatar
#94 - antiponiesuser (10 hours ago) [-]
also because they bitches man
User avatar
#71 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
The chemical is argued to be for better bonding between partners though. Well maybe its both. Better bonding works as long as he doesn't find out i suppose.
User avatar
#61 - antiponiesuser (12 hours ago) [-]
what?
User avatar
#48 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
although i agree with what you say and trust me i have been doing number 2 for a long time, i do believe in this specific instance that the norm wont change with a small percentage. i think that women will just switch from where they want the attention to come from to where they get the attention from. i've heard about girls having regretted kissing or sleeping with some guys and the only reason they can think of why they did it , was because they were sweet and gave them attention.

and i dont wanna be arrogant or anything , but i notice how much of a difference it requires for me to get a girl relative to my friends and the only reason is because im a good looking asshole that doesnt give a shit about getting sex , cuz i'll get it
User avatar
#51 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
Yeah i don't care, if you manage to be sucessful with girls thats good for you.
I don't think a small percentage makes a difference but 20% isn't small. It would end up with alot of entitled people ending up lonely and self reflecting. I think if you take all sorts of societies across the world you probably find noticeable evidence for standards being different. And i don't think people neccercarily have to try being part of a movement that has a big impact or something like that, i just believe that it is pitiful to complain so much about what is essentially a two way deal. I just say that if you complain while being part of the solution by not being a thirsty bastard then you are being hypocritical. Noone inherently deserves to have a partner or sucess with the other sex . There are plenty of 4/10 girls out there and plenty of 4/10 guys and they all look at 6/10 and higher while complaining about how shitty people are without reflecting on themselves.
User avatar
#58 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so that last sentence i do not agree with.
4/10 men will be happy with anything they can get , but they wont get anything and 4/10 women will still go for that 8/10 men and then complain why they get rejected or start body acceptance. of course there are few exceptions to both.
80/20 rule , if women given a free choice they 80% will go for 20% of the top men. this is why monogamy was actually invented for the benefit of men
User avatar
#67 - paddypancake (12 hours ago) [-]
"its actually proven that men downdate and women do not , so that last sentence i do not agree with. "
I heard that too, i am not so sure whether i agree. From what I've heard it uses dating site profiles. And in terms of social media and dating sites i do have to admit that women do put more effort into it. So that statistic is sorta inflated by the fact that the 4/10 woman looks like a 5/10 on that site and the guy looks like a 4/10 because he made a quick selfie in whatever he was wearing. Does not apply to all guys, but some. On top of that it is just women picking option two. Their good choice. It takes guys to counter by picking option two to reverse things, fair play on the market.
The body acceptance thing is funny because it just reminded me of this very post (except the two last pictures). If anything i think both of these things are negative option two picks, they make people believe that the other sex is a bit more desperate, making them move their value a slight bit up.
80/20 is i think a big stretch. I am not an expert on this but i do have doubts that one in every five guys is able to properly satisfy (and this is not simply about sex, it is the entirety of the relationship) four women. Some of them will go for the top 40% instead as long as they get one guy for themselves. And heck, some might say they want 2 of the bottom 30%. Personally i don't belive the 80/20 rule, monogamy for the benefit of the man (more than the women, it is of course to some extent both but the difference in extent can be argued) could make sense to me.
User avatar
#72 - pappanoodles (12 hours ago) [-]
the thing is with the downdating women will not settle for less, then the goal she sets in her head. its also a biological thing , you have to get the best provider and genes. so a man cant be dumber, lesser social status , worse looking or even shorter. except when you have money or are a celebrity of course if you flunk in one of these events you will not get a medal , while a man doesnt look at the lesser things , like her being a bit too dumb for him , or having no job , or bit less pretty , if she will make up for it in the other events.

the 80/20 is based on the pareto principle which is applied to almost anything and widely to this as well , but it is not created on this. perhaps you're right, but the thing is and i've read scientific papers on this, that if left to choose women do not mind sharing a top man , over giving everyone a mate.