Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Rank #6155 on Comments
Level 261 Comments: Pure Win
Send mail to oosime
Invite oosime to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 125 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 126 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress:
Level 261 Comments: Pure Win → Level 262 Comments: Pure Win
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
What people say about oosime
Not a Skyrim Fan, But Found This...
Olde Time Fap
the man who transcended
project veritas part ii
NUKE MEGA COMP
America 101: How...
Fake Hate Crimes...
How Fake News is...
Give us another one
You know you want it
Various types of...
latest user's comments
6h ago on
- what up with flag graphics often having that dirty effect? loo…
6h ago on
6h ago on
Down by the river
- "communism is the ultimate form of libertarianism." …
No state, no money, no private property. True freedom, nobody to answer to but yourself and your duty to your community.
Libertarians think that by making the state smaller you will somehow be free. Even though you still have to worry about your basic survival and the opressors when it comes to private property. Communism is meant to introduce true freedom by not only abolishing the state but also forced work.
has deleted their comment.
idealogically they're close, but in practice aw hell naw
you couldn't be further from the truth
- muslims blowing **** up gets old fast.
When you haven't been to FJ...
- well he's clearly not talking about willing classification. he…
/pol/hack needs a drink
So am I. Shake their labels. Be classic liberal against their us vs them dynamic.
Even needing to qualify it as "classical" means you have already lost the Semantics War. "Shake their labels," is a meaningless enjoiner unless you are attempting to "reclaim" an epithet, such as pushing for "Nerfherder Pride," or "I'm here; I'm queer" or some other attempt by a denigrated group to control a former insult, as an autonym.
You are going to be labeled as a "Nazi" if you stand in opposition in anyway, so, if you happen to support free movement for all, you will be subjected to continual demands to "justify the Holocaust," or other ridiculous tasks directly counter to your actual ideology. This is not "accepting" their deliberately obfuscating mislabeling of you, this is merely how you are going to be discussed by those who oppose you, and those they have captive within their narrative structure. This is an additional obstacle for you to overcome, when you are out arguing against sexual guardianship and racial segregation, if you call yourself a "liberal" then you will be perceived as their supporter; iif not, you WILL be labeled as ...whatever is the epithet of choice (they are increasing muddled and interchangeable).
Refusing to accept their label for you has no actual bearing on their use of it.
Almost any label or symbol you do accept is going to be redefined, by your opponent, for you, or expanded to include someone who is much easier to argue against, than you.
...and many people who support your opponents, dispite sharing your aims, which should place them in direct opposition to the same opponents, will be taught, by those who control the narrative, that, for example "the out dated feminist addenda" (by which label, they are attempting to present the Women's Liberation movement as their precursor, rather than what they are trying to roll back) "pushed an ineffectual and selfish form of feminism, based on individual empowerment," whereas the True Feminism believes in solidarity and commitment to the enlightened collective action dictated by their leaders. What right thinking person would oppose guardianship? Do you want to deprive women of their right to be protected from violence, consequences, and rape?
Define yourself however you wish, or not at all. If you oppose the paradigm being nurtured by those who control the conversation, you are going to be labeled a "nazi" for opposing ghettos, or whatever misleading appellation they hang on you.
Them doing so is not you "willfully accepting" it, and attempting to reclaim a label that does accurately describe any existing group, no matter how small and irrelevant, is only going to confuse the uninformed more.
Classical Liberal as opposed to Noe-Liberal and Interdependent thinking . You should probably educate yourself on why definitions are used in political thinking before slandering them with trash arguments, it's not semantics if the strict definition is required to maintain a specific coherent viewpoint.
It really doesn't matter if you do or not, most people don't depend on the news to figure out where they stand on the political spectrum. For the MSM "far right" is now anything from slightly left onward, and you'll be labeled by them as such
Actually, anything opposing greater consolidation of power in the hands of the current small group wielding institutional power (in otherwords, anything that meets the original meaning of "left wing") is currently considered "far-right."
It does no good to cling to definitions, when those who have this degree of control over the vocabulary are insistent on redefinitions like this.
- that's like 30 degrees
Voorer Disl Hentagrerl
- is... is terry a cia ******?
FJ, your race
- taco taco burrito but what i want to know is what's the…
FJ, your race
- checking blueness.
Blue and white username info
Show Comments (54)