Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

onyxleigion

Rank #33835 on Comments
no avatar Level 112 Comments: Funny Junkie
Offline
Send mail to onyxleigion Block onyxleigion Invite onyxleigion to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:5/20/2013
Last Login:12/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#33835
Highest Content Rank:#13903
Highest Comment Rank:#9337
Content Thumbs: 2 total,  6 ,  8
Comment Thumbs: 174 total,  522 ,  348
Content Level Progress: 3.38% (2/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (4/5)
Level 112 Comments: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Comments: Funny Junkie
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1005
Total Comments Made:459
FJ Points:175

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#227 - Not usable oxygen. The oxygen our bodies use is O2. That's CO2… 12/05/2014 on Hide and seek 0
#114 - Considering there's no oxygen you would suffocate. Good try though.  [+] (6 new replies) 12/04/2014 on Hide and seek 0
User avatar #224 - nudybooty (12/04/2014) [-]
...there is oxygen in it.
#227 - onyxleigion (12/05/2014) [-]
Not usable oxygen. The oxygen our bodies use is O2. That's CO2. The carbon makes the oxygen useless.
#133 - funnygiggles (12/04/2014) [-]
There is actually plenty of oxygen in the vapor cloud.
Normal air is only 20% oxygen.
#137 - funnygiggles (12/04/2014) [-]
lmgtfy.com/?q=Diffusion+of+gases

Displacement by a more gas denser than air will only occur in a closed container. Not only is he in a kitchen, there are tons of places for it to leak out.
#140 - bobbysnobby (12/04/2014) [-]
Stick your head under a sink and breath in, after all there are lots of places for that water to go.

Position and proximity matter. If you stand directly below a source of something producing an abundance of CO2 you really risk asphyxiation.
#386 - I said that a single shot in the leg won't take every single p…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/03/2014 on Citation needed -1
User avatar #387 - byobgraffpro (12/03/2014) [-]
which I would agree with. i never disagreed with that fact
#120 - I never said don't kill people. I said a shot in the hand is l…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -1
User avatar #124 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
your original argument was that a shot in the leg would not take someone out, now you start saying that it would kill people. Its just confusing when you start contradicting yourself. Now youre telling me you were just saying a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Well no fucking duh, i never said it wasnt less lethal. I was talking about in the case of a policeman firing on a subject, the leg is the best target to take someone out. Not arguing that it isnt fatal, but a solid alternative to the chest. Why are you so dumb. I would ask you to think before you type but you do not possess the ability to think
#386 - onyxleigion (12/03/2014) [-]
I said that a single shot in the leg won't take every single person on the earth down. Yet again, actually read before you type.
User avatar #387 - byobgraffpro (12/03/2014) [-]
which I would agree with. i never disagreed with that fact
#116 - First, an artery is a blood vessel. Second, arm, hand, shoulde…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -1
User avatar #119 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
Im not arguing that the leg is the best place to shoot, its better than 11 shots in the chest. I was simply stating that there are better solutions than instant kills shots. and because you are dumb, i dont have to prove anything because none of your comments align with your previous comment. way to change what you were saying. First it was kill everyone, now its dont shoot them in the leg shoot them in the hand. Youre so dumb
#120 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
I never said don't kill people. I said a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Actually read before you type.
User avatar #124 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
your original argument was that a shot in the leg would not take someone out, now you start saying that it would kill people. Its just confusing when you start contradicting yourself. Now youre telling me you were just saying a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Well no fucking duh, i never said it wasnt less lethal. I was talking about in the case of a policeman firing on a subject, the leg is the best target to take someone out. Not arguing that it isnt fatal, but a solid alternative to the chest. Why are you so dumb. I would ask you to think before you type but you do not possess the ability to think
#386 - onyxleigion (12/03/2014) [-]
I said that a single shot in the leg won't take every single person on the earth down. Yet again, actually read before you type.
User avatar #387 - byobgraffpro (12/03/2014) [-]
which I would agree with. i never disagreed with that fact
#111 - I said you can. Not that you should.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -8
#112 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
got me on that one
#110 - Also, there is are major blood vessels in your leg that can ca…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -3
User avatar #113 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
first off its an artery. I never said it wasnt lethal. why are you so dead set on trying to prove me wrong? youre being childish. if a policeman chooses to use a fire arm, they should try to pick the least lethal spot to shoot i.e. the leg in most cases. it potentially incapacitates the target, without killing them, most of the time. this is the case with knives and other weapons of that sort. 11 shots to the chest has a 100% chance of death, while a shot in the leg can be recoverable. Can your smart brain wrap itself around that logic? or do i need to spell it out in simpler terms for you?
#116 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
First, an artery is a blood vessel. Second, arm, hand, shoulder, foot. Just a few places that are less lethal than a leg. And because you are wrong. I don't have to prove anything.
User avatar #119 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
Im not arguing that the leg is the best place to shoot, its better than 11 shots in the chest. I was simply stating that there are better solutions than instant kills shots. and because you are dumb, i dont have to prove anything because none of your comments align with your previous comment. way to change what you were saying. First it was kill everyone, now its dont shoot them in the leg shoot them in the hand. Youre so dumb
#120 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
I never said don't kill people. I said a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Actually read before you type.
User avatar #124 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
your original argument was that a shot in the leg would not take someone out, now you start saying that it would kill people. Its just confusing when you start contradicting yourself. Now youre telling me you were just saying a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Well no fucking duh, i never said it wasnt less lethal. I was talking about in the case of a policeman firing on a subject, the leg is the best target to take someone out. Not arguing that it isnt fatal, but a solid alternative to the chest. Why are you so dumb. I would ask you to think before you type but you do not possess the ability to think
#386 - onyxleigion (12/03/2014) [-]
I said that a single shot in the leg won't take every single person on the earth down. Yet again, actually read before you type.
User avatar #387 - byobgraffpro (12/03/2014) [-]
which I would agree with. i never disagreed with that fact
#107 - That wasn't an opinion. The fact that you are physically able …  [+] (3 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -8
#109 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
But its is an opinion that i should. I like my judging hat shit free
#111 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
I said you can. Not that you should.
#112 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
got me on that one
#105 - You can shove your judging hat up your ass.  [+] (5 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -10
#106 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
#107 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
That wasn't an opinion. The fact that you are physically able to shove a hat up your ass is a fact.
#109 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
But its is an opinion that i should. I like my judging hat shit free
#111 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
I said you can. Not that you should.
#112 - goonzooz (12/01/2014) [-]
got me on that one
#104 - And even at that point you're wrong. A single gunshot does not…  [+] (10 new replies) 12/01/2014 on Citation needed -3
User avatar #108 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
oh hey, heres a fucking thought. Shoot them in the leg, they stop. if they get back up, oh i dont know, shoot them in the other leg. God youre so fucking dumb. 11 shots in the chest because of "adrenaline" is overboard. who would have thought, that I didnt mean one and done, theres always more bullets in the clip. But to just jump to "fire as many kill shots as we can at this guy because he has tard strength and a knife" is dumb and youre wrong so get over it dumbass
#144 - anonymous (12/01/2014) [-]
>Shoot them in the leg, they stop.

Assuming a LOT there, and still not listening to a damn thing he said about adrenaline or tard strength.

Just give it up faggot, you're wrong. Stop crying and own up to it like a fucking man.
#110 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
Also, there is are major blood vessels in your leg that can cause you to bleed out in less than two minutes. One shot there is risky as far as rupturing those blood vessels, but then another shot only increases the risk. Learn something about human anatomy before claiming that shooting someone in the leg is such a non-lethal thing to do to a person.
User avatar #113 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
first off its an artery. I never said it wasnt lethal. why are you so dead set on trying to prove me wrong? youre being childish. if a policeman chooses to use a fire arm, they should try to pick the least lethal spot to shoot i.e. the leg in most cases. it potentially incapacitates the target, without killing them, most of the time. this is the case with knives and other weapons of that sort. 11 shots to the chest has a 100% chance of death, while a shot in the leg can be recoverable. Can your smart brain wrap itself around that logic? or do i need to spell it out in simpler terms for you?
#116 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
First, an artery is a blood vessel. Second, arm, hand, shoulder, foot. Just a few places that are less lethal than a leg. And because you are wrong. I don't have to prove anything.
User avatar #119 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
Im not arguing that the leg is the best place to shoot, its better than 11 shots in the chest. I was simply stating that there are better solutions than instant kills shots. and because you are dumb, i dont have to prove anything because none of your comments align with your previous comment. way to change what you were saying. First it was kill everyone, now its dont shoot them in the leg shoot them in the hand. Youre so dumb
#120 - onyxleigion (12/01/2014) [-]
I never said don't kill people. I said a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Actually read before you type.
User avatar #124 - byobgraffpro (12/01/2014) [-]
your original argument was that a shot in the leg would not take someone out, now you start saying that it would kill people. Its just confusing when you start contradicting yourself. Now youre telling me you were just saying a shot in the hand is less lethal than a shot in the leg. Well no fucking duh, i never said it wasnt less lethal. I was talking about in the case of a policeman firing on a subject, the leg is the best target to take someone out. Not arguing that it isnt fatal, but a solid alternative to the chest. Why are you so dumb. I would ask you to think before you type but you do not possess the ability to think
#386 - onyxleigion (12/03/2014) [-]
I said that a single shot in the leg won't take every single person on the earth down. Yet again, actually read before you type.
User avatar #387 - byobgraffpro (12/03/2014) [-]
which I would agree with. i never disagreed with that fact

user's friends

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)