Technically that lever is a sensor

The newer whirpool fridges do have a laser sensor that runs across the bin in the door to detect when the beam is broken/bin full

I can confirm this as well as confirm the fridge in that picture is said whirlpool freezer. I have one.

i like wasting my time, it distracts from life.

The same could have been said about you and replying to my comment.
Why not just hit next?

i like wasting my time, it distracts from life.

something interesting was said in the past? welp that takes care of that we will never need to repeat it again, not to new audiences nothin we just gotta let it die off otherwise we arent original.

Yeah, it's not like we have 10 posts about race and social justice on the front page every day.
Oh wait...

The same could have been said about you and replying to my comment.
Why not just hit next?

i like wasting my time, it distracts from life.

Maybe because he enjoys it and has fun playing it like literally every musically-inclined person with their instruments?

damnit i missed it
what did he say

Something along the lines of "Why the hell is he playing soprano sax?"

Man that guy can rock the saxonet.

Well, I don't know if there's a god or not and I don't hold any belief either way. Wouldn't that make me just an agnostic?

That's agnostic atheist
Atheist is the default position
If you do nothing, you're an atheist

Not really, because your life choices and attitudes towards moral issues would likely reveal whether you think there are supernatural forces at work in the world. If you're living your life as though there is no afterlife for example, then you are likely agnostic atheist (you don't know if god exists, but you're living as though you assume there isn't one). If you follow religious practices but aren't that into them, or are generally superstitious, then you are likely agnostic theist (you don't know if the supernatural exists, but you make choices based on the fact that there probably is).

is this one of those loss edits

promise it isnt

you can't fool me mister man

wait, whats wrong with agnostics?

like they say they are agnostic but dont believe in any higher power? I would consider myself agnostic, just because you cant prove that there isnt any higher power or that there is.

Your logic is sound. Agnostic does literally mean not knowing. But that's only one definition. It has evolved, for lack of better word, to also mean someone who doesn't know if there are gods, but claims neither faith nor disbelief.

In fact one definition of agnostic is literally not holding either of two opposing views on a topic. So to me, to be simply agnostic is to know that it's impossible to know whether there are or are not gods, and not holding a view one way or the other because of that knowledge.

But you're right about agnostic atheist and agnostic theist and whatnot. It seems maybe you assume everyone has "taken a side" on the topic. Either you believe or don't, where in reality you can choose neither. You can be skeptical of the existence, but still understand that fundamentally you can't know, so to say there aren't gods is just as much an act of faith as claiming there are.

Yeah, while I was typing I questioned if not claiming a side would essentially be not believing. And I suppose it is.

Maybe my issues is more that when you say atheist, there's a sense of finality to the word. If someone tells me they're an agnostic atheist, if I don't have a discussion with them about it, my first thought is that they "don't know, so they don't believe" but more sternly than that implies. "Atheist" to me implies a certainty of non existence. Even agnostic atheist, while there is that "we can't know" element to it, it gives an air of "but there is no god." Whereas simply "agnostic" seems more of just "I don't know if there is one." Maybe agnostic lends itself to me as an expression of "we can't know, so it's pointless to claim one way or the other." But again, that brings us back around to if that is the same as not believing.

And I know that this is all just my own perceptions of the words and the weight they carry. On a level without implications of words, I suppose you're right. To be agnostic without claiming a side is to not believe. It's just also not discounting the possibility. So it doesn't really speak to the belief of the individual, only the thought process.

And unfortunately, I do need to be 100% confident in a lot of answers I give haha. I choose my words very carefully as to not deal in absolutes unless I'm certain. I lean on the side of atheism, but know I don't really have evidence of gods not existing. I don't have enough evidence one way or the other to say anything certainly. But I suppose when it comes down to it I don't "believe" there are gods.

Certainly. Yesterday was a weird day for me with a lot of self reflection. I was kind of just thinking out loud at you lol