Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

ompalomper

Rank #937 on Comments
ompalomper Avatar Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Offline
Send mail to ompalomper Block ompalomper Invite ompalomper to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:5/12/2011
Last Login:12/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#937
Highest Content Rank:#3533
Highest Comment Rank:#406
Content Thumbs: 648 total,  844 ,  196
Comment Thumbs: 27133 total,  32556 ,  5423
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 51 Content: Sammich eater → Level 52 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 52.2% (522/1000)
Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 325 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:1
Content Views:46089
Times Content Favorited:165 times
Total Comments Made:8086
FJ Points:7742
Favorite Tags: are (2) | story (2) | The Game (2)

latest user's comments

#19 - that is some "i have no mouth and i must scream" …  [+] (3 new replies) 11/05/2014 on Wolverine Comp 0
User avatar #44 - ompalomper (11/06/2014) [-]
wow...

this guy is da real MVP
User avatar #20 - guardianatreyu (11/05/2014) [-]
Nope, he's dead in there.

It's from 'Death of Wolverine'. Wolverine lost his healing factor and now he's dead as door nails.
#15 - is that a fumble bee  [+] (2 new replies) 11/05/2014 on Toy Story 2 Bloopers +47
#32 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
Oh, beehave!
User avatar #16 - ojezcola (11/05/2014) [-]
You magnificent basterd.
#17 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2014 on I'm 7mins old and what is this +48
#36 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
Ugly baby.
#42 - **ompalomper rolls 533** 11/05/2014 on Will Smith 0
#72 - he is actually pretty ok in this. the movie is good,… 11/05/2014 on cool ass tank prototype 0
#25 - "YOU CAN'T BE AN ATHEIST AND NOT BE AGAINST MISOGYNY IN T… 11/05/2014 on GaymerGays +1
#55 - the more you know. speaking of tanks, have you watche…  [+] (13 new replies) 11/05/2014 on cool ass tank prototype 0
User avatar #56 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
I have not sadly. It looks interesting, and I've only herd good things about it.
But, I bloody HATE Shia la freaking beouf. Can't even give you a reason as to why.
Hopefully the tank action will make up for it having him in it.
User avatar #72 - ompalomper (11/05/2014) [-]
he is actually pretty ok in this.

the movie is good, has it's share of bad moments but the tank action is the best the movie industry has probably ever done. there are some "oh come on" moments when the guys should have gotten their asses incinerated but as a whole, good movie. i recommend it
#60 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Oh and this.
User avatar #59 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
If you're a tank nerd you'll hate it. I don't even want to watch it when I saw that the Sherman they drive (17pdr mounted but still, hull is the same) bounced off a Tiger shell almost point blank.
#86 - sephirothpwnz (11/05/2014) [-]
They aren't using the 17 pounder, if you look it is simply a E8 with the 76mm M1 gun which couldn't punch through the front of the tiger even at close range, learn to history nerd. The 17lb could only be put into the sherman sideways, and in the movie, and with all E8's the 76mm is in right side up.
User avatar #189 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Sorry then, I was wrong. But still, the gun on the Sherman plays no part in Tiger shooting it.
User avatar #64 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
They had the 17pdr? That'd make it a Sherman Firefly.
Regular M4 Sherman hull with the British Quick Firing 17 Pounder, which actually had more penetration than the "Short" 88mm on the Tiger.
That said, the Sherman Firefly were able to penetrate the Tiger at ranges in excess of 500 meters.
User avatar #66 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Yes, I know. But that is not the point. The point is that the M4 bounced the Tiger's shot from 10m or so in the trailer, go watch it.
The difference between Sherman and Firefly is only the 17pdr gun.
User avatar #87 - sephirothpwnz (11/05/2014) [-]
no the tiger didn't bounce, it graced the armor of the sherman there is a difference
User avatar #71 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
I suppose if they ran into a working Porsche Tiger they would have problems frontally.
The Porsche designed tiger had up 200mm of armor, but, I don't think even 50 hulls were made, let alone made into Tigers.
I know a few of the hulls were made into the Ferdinand tank destroyers, but only one was actually assembled as a tank.

As for the trailer, yeah, that was shite. Neither of those shells should of bounced.
The Tiger had far more than enough penetration to go through the Sherman's piddly amount of armor.
As for the Tiger bounce... I suppose if the hit the thicker armor on the front of the Tiger's gun mountlet plate, it could of absorbed it...
But that looked like they hit it dead on, which should of penetrated.
User avatar #73 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
I'm talking about Tiger shooting the Sherman from a small distance, not vice versa.
Please don't take this a bad way but it seems to me that you're just using any chance to write whatever you know as much as possible, even if it's very remotely related to the topic.
In the trailer, Tiger shoots Sherman, it bounces off, Sherman drives around and shoots it in the side, Tiger dead.
User avatar #75 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
Very true, I talk quite freely about history, it's one of the few subjects I actually enjoy.
Shut the hell up no one cares about your tank blathering. Talk like a normal human.
Yes, the Tiger should of killed the Sherman twice over. Plain and simple.
When the Shermans were backing away after their friend got blown to shit they would of been dead shortly after.
No way in hell a Tiger crew would of missed a shell at that tiny distance. Those guns can kill a Sherman at 2km, 200 meters would be nothing.
User avatar #187 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Exactly. Tiger were assigned only to experienced crews that have seen the battlefield many times. Tiger's flaw was slow turret rotation so a popular strategy is to drive around it and shoot it in the butt. But in the trailer the Tiger shot the front of the Sherman so it means it had a lead on target.
#52 - maybe it's a railgun tank and the barrle is shaped like that t…  [+] (16 new replies) 11/05/2014 on cool ass tank prototype 0
User avatar #54 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
"The primary weapon of the PL-01 is a 105 or 120 mm caliber gun fitted within the unmanned turret."
A railgun would make this an effective stealth tank, gut the opponent before they can ask for help.
Sadly I think our closest development of a railgun is something like 5lb weights going about 100fps.
You'd have to ask the Navy RnD department.
User avatar #152 - RiflemanFunny (11/05/2014) [-]
If a railgun actually was feasible on a tank, then stealth would be rendered obsolete. Even if they saw it, it would shove a tungsten metallic shell right up their asses before they reacted.
User avatar #55 - ompalomper (11/05/2014) [-]
the more you know.

speaking of tanks, have you watched "FURY" yet? if yes did you like it?
User avatar #56 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
I have not sadly. It looks interesting, and I've only herd good things about it.
But, I bloody HATE Shia la freaking beouf. Can't even give you a reason as to why.
Hopefully the tank action will make up for it having him in it.
User avatar #72 - ompalomper (11/05/2014) [-]
he is actually pretty ok in this.

the movie is good, has it's share of bad moments but the tank action is the best the movie industry has probably ever done. there are some "oh come on" moments when the guys should have gotten their asses incinerated but as a whole, good movie. i recommend it
#60 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Oh and this.
User avatar #59 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
If you're a tank nerd you'll hate it. I don't even want to watch it when I saw that the Sherman they drive (17pdr mounted but still, hull is the same) bounced off a Tiger shell almost point blank.
#86 - sephirothpwnz (11/05/2014) [-]
They aren't using the 17 pounder, if you look it is simply a E8 with the 76mm M1 gun which couldn't punch through the front of the tiger even at close range, learn to history nerd. The 17lb could only be put into the sherman sideways, and in the movie, and with all E8's the 76mm is in right side up.
User avatar #189 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Sorry then, I was wrong. But still, the gun on the Sherman plays no part in Tiger shooting it.
User avatar #64 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
They had the 17pdr? That'd make it a Sherman Firefly.
Regular M4 Sherman hull with the British Quick Firing 17 Pounder, which actually had more penetration than the "Short" 88mm on the Tiger.
That said, the Sherman Firefly were able to penetrate the Tiger at ranges in excess of 500 meters.
User avatar #66 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Yes, I know. But that is not the point. The point is that the M4 bounced the Tiger's shot from 10m or so in the trailer, go watch it.
The difference between Sherman and Firefly is only the 17pdr gun.
User avatar #87 - sephirothpwnz (11/05/2014) [-]
no the tiger didn't bounce, it graced the armor of the sherman there is a difference
User avatar #71 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
I suppose if they ran into a working Porsche Tiger they would have problems frontally.
The Porsche designed tiger had up 200mm of armor, but, I don't think even 50 hulls were made, let alone made into Tigers.
I know a few of the hulls were made into the Ferdinand tank destroyers, but only one was actually assembled as a tank.

As for the trailer, yeah, that was shite. Neither of those shells should of bounced.
The Tiger had far more than enough penetration to go through the Sherman's piddly amount of armor.
As for the Tiger bounce... I suppose if the hit the thicker armor on the front of the Tiger's gun mountlet plate, it could of absorbed it...
But that looked like they hit it dead on, which should of penetrated.
User avatar #73 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
I'm talking about Tiger shooting the Sherman from a small distance, not vice versa.
Please don't take this a bad way but it seems to me that you're just using any chance to write whatever you know as much as possible, even if it's very remotely related to the topic.
In the trailer, Tiger shoots Sherman, it bounces off, Sherman drives around and shoots it in the side, Tiger dead.
User avatar #75 - carbohydrates (11/05/2014) [-]
Very true, I talk quite freely about history, it's one of the few subjects I actually enjoy.
Shut the hell up no one cares about your tank blathering. Talk like a normal human.
Yes, the Tiger should of killed the Sherman twice over. Plain and simple.
When the Shermans were backing away after their friend got blown to shit they would of been dead shortly after.
No way in hell a Tiger crew would of missed a shell at that tiny distance. Those guns can kill a Sherman at 2km, 200 meters would be nothing.
User avatar #187 - toncheky (11/05/2014) [-]
Exactly. Tiger were assigned only to experienced crews that have seen the battlefield many times. Tiger's flaw was slow turret rotation so a popular strategy is to drive around it and shoot it in the butt. But in the trailer the Tiger shot the front of the Sherman so it means it had a lead on target.
#30 - jesus man. keep that **** to yourself 11/05/2014 on rub those pony nuts +11
#29 - ******* ... god dammit 11/05/2014 on rub those pony nuts +32
#59 - you are of course correct but that doesn't stop me from thinki… 11/05/2014 on Not mine: Seen on Facebook +1
#13 - Picture 11/05/2014 on Do you know what time it is ? 0
#42 - >cake farting  [+] (5 new replies) 11/04/2014 on Tumblr Comp +27
User avatar #49 - killergranddad (11/04/2014) [-]
It is literally farting on cakes.
User avatar #73 - misanthrizzle (11/04/2014) [-]
That's actually less horrifying than I had in mind, I was going off that one gif of a woman twirling an egg beater around in her cake batter filled asshole
#82 - thetallbeverage (11/05/2014) [-]
User avatar #83 - misanthrizzle (11/05/2014) [-]
You're implying you get off to that, you know?
User avatar #84 - thetallbeverage (11/05/2014) [-]
That's not even the top of my strange list, boy.
#48 - hey! don't insult bricks like that! 11/04/2014 on Dumb as a brick 0
#39 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 11/04/2014 on Edna planned it all +4
User avatar #46 - schneidend (11/04/2014) [-]
Fukken saved.
#16 - i feel sick i have read **** but this st… 11/04/2014 on I can't think of a good title. +8
#93 - Picture 11/04/2014 on Large Breasted Anime Girls 0
#86 - I first thought that you where just trolling but your comment …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/04/2014 on Not sure who's more awesome. 0
User avatar #87 - bensho (11/04/2014) [-]
Have you ever actually seen one of these flamboyant people in person? That's just the over-the-top stereotype, and I've never seen that in real life. It's like seeing a unicorn; it never happens.
#85 - Anyone who goes around screaming about their love for cock/god… 11/04/2014 on Not sure who's more awesome. 0
#13 - so my gut has a sixth sense when it comes to boobs in anime … 11/03/2014 on bankrupt by 4chan +5
#8 - i feel like i need source for some ******* reason  [+] (8 new replies) 11/03/2014 on bankrupt by 4chan +1
User avatar #11 - ibashfunnyjunk (11/03/2014) [-]
Rail wars the guy above is a major train nerd who gets his own harem and manages to find a new girl to fall in love with him every episode, his face always manages to come in contact with a pair of big boobs
User avatar #60 - supercookieduster (11/04/2014) [-]
worth the watch?
User avatar #128 - ibashfunnyjunk (11/04/2014) [-]
Not the worst I've watched, some episodes were decent and actually quite funny but then you get a few episodes which are extremely boring and full of ecchi. If you're watching it for trains then don't
#84 - anonymous (11/04/2014) [-]
not really, imo
User avatar #82 - abysmalshadow (11/04/2014) [-]
Not even remotely.
Half of it isn't even about trains.
User avatar #13 - ompalomper (11/03/2014) [-]
so my gut has a sixth sense when it comes to boobs in anime

well there are worse superpowers
#10 - ibashfunnyjunk has deleted their comment.
#9 - zapon (11/03/2014) [-]
Source of that image is rail wars. its about trains i think?
#29 - ok, true, normal people aren't close to as awesome as he is 11/03/2014 on Not sure who's more awesome. +1
#18 - better phrased: he doesn't act like a flamboyant peacock who n…  [+] (9 new replies) 11/03/2014 on Not sure who's more awesome. +232
User avatar #84 - bensho (11/04/2014) [-]
So, "normal" means straight? We're all okay with NPH because he acts like a straight person? Well, duh.
User avatar #86 - ompalomper (11/04/2014) [-]
I first thought that you where just trolling but your comment below makes me realize that you are actually serious.

Does a person that dresses in a bright blue tanktop 4 sizes too small, short shorts and plateau shoes while screaming that they are queer and I should just accept that while I am minding my own business looking at my phone normal? No it fucking isn't! You don't see straight people on the streets going about how they live the genitals of the opposite sex. They go around in the clothes they want to ware thinking to themselves "boy, I sure like sex with the opposite". Can you give me one damn reason why homosexuals (or whatever the most polite term is) can't just go around, dressed as they want, thinking QUIETLY TO THEMSELVES "boy I sure like sex with the same gender"? I am genuinely asking because I don't see why not.
User avatar #87 - bensho (11/04/2014) [-]
Have you ever actually seen one of these flamboyant people in person? That's just the over-the-top stereotype, and I've never seen that in real life. It's like seeing a unicorn; it never happens.
#63 - vanillaholler (11/03/2014) [-]
Today I learned that funny junk is filled with homophobes
User avatar #85 - ompalomper (11/04/2014) [-]
Anyone who goes around screaming about their love for cock/god/ponies/anime/whatever to everyone who doesn't give a shit deserves to have a XL "chance the stallion" made out of sand paper up their ass until they learn how to function in society.
#83 - bensho (11/04/2014) [-]
You're right, though. Saying "I don't care that you're gay, as long as I don't have to see it" is similar to outright saying you're not okay with gay people. If you're only okay with the aspects that relate to you, but not okay with the aspects that homosexuality truly entails, then you're not actually okay with it. An exaggerated example of a similar statement would be, "I don't care that older men are molesting young children, as long as they look like a father and son/daughter in public, I'm okay with it." Like I said, this is exaggerated. My example brings the issues of consent and legality into the mix. It was meant to attract attention to the absurdity of the statement.

Then there's the counter-argument: "Well, I don't like seeing hetero couples holding hands and kissing in public either."
To which I say: Yes, but you're not offended or disgusted by it; you're just some form of jealous. Seeing a same sex couple kiss urks some people, and those are the same people that go on to say my initial quote. We won't get into the double standards between lesbians/gay men and lesbians/unattractive lesbians (Because as we all know: watching chicks kiss is awesome, but only when they're hot.).

Idgaf about thumbs, but this has to be said by someone.

tl;dr: You're either okay with gays or you're not. There is no "if I can't see it, I'm fine with it"
User avatar #27 - ieatbengay (11/03/2014) [-]
well no he doesn't that's exactly why he's famous
User avatar #29 - ompalomper (11/03/2014) [-]
ok, true, normal people aren't close to as awesome as he is
#24 - anonymous (11/03/2014) [-]
Exactly.
#55 - more or less what the quinnspiracy evolved to. #gamergate beca…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/02/2014 on Gamergate/Colbert... 0
User avatar #93 - nightlove (11/04/2014) [-]
Ah okay, thanks ompalomper you're awesome!
#348 - ruined the joke though... oh well 11/02/2014 on A Secret revealed +2

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #122 - tavafanduvill (10/29/2014) [-]
Thanks for the idea. I will definitely reupload it now.
User avatar #123 to #122 - ompalomper (10/29/2014) [-]
good luck and leave cred or i molest you dressed as fred flintstone

Yabba Dabba Do ************
#117 to #116 - ompalomper (06/24/2014) [-]
thou art a man of thine word evilhomer

i salute thee
User avatar #115 - revengeforfreeze (12/27/2013) [-]
I gryningsljuset flammar brand
Jag ser ett öde, fruset land
Jag ser och ber för min själ
User avatar #109 - admonistratur (04/13/2013) [-]
Heya
posttwo here
User avatar #111 to #110 - admonistratur (04/13/2013) [-]
Check the thread where we talked yesterday
Why the **** did I get banned?
User avatar #112 to #111 - ompalomper (04/13/2013) [-]
you where banned?
weird, i don't remember seeing anything that could get a person banned yesterday.
anyway the comment is too old for me to read again. what was it we talked about?
User avatar #113 to #112 - admonistratur (04/13/2013) [-]
Twilight r34
User avatar #114 to #113 - ompalomper (04/13/2013) [-]
ah, that is nice stuff
User avatar #106 - sinery (03/06/2013) [-]
Well that was quite pleasant, one of the most awesome threads I've participated in.
User avatar #107 to #106 - ompalomper (03/06/2013) [-]
i think so to, it was certainly fun.

may we practice this again some day
User avatar #108 to #107 - sinery (03/06/2013) [-]
Indeed, I hope we will.
User avatar #72 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
Would you mind sharing your feel images, I can share my feel folder if you wish as compensation.
#87 to #72 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
that was it, sorry that so muck was pony but this is all of my feel's

here is a feel good story to finish it up

have a good morning/day/evening sir/madame
User avatar #90 to #87 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
I meant the pony.
#92 to #90 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
then i guess i did something right
#95 to #92 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
Surprised you had no MLD though.
#96 to #95 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
me to now that you mention it i have this one thing
#97 to #96 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
I have a folder and need to rid myself of one... 'suggestive' image.

Oh, and I have that one as well.
User avatar #99 to #97 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
lay it on me. ain't gonna get any sadder at this point
User avatar #102 to #101 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
i can't seem to open them :/
User avatar #103 to #102 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
You have to unzip them. The .rar folder is just for the mass image transport.
User avatar #104 to #103 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
and how do i do that?
User avatar #105 to #104 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
Download winrar and extract it.
#80 to #72 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
most powerful one i have
User avatar #81 to #80 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
I can't save that one because of personal reasons.
User avatar #88 to #81 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
wanna talk about it?
User avatar #89 to #88 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
I know I shouldn't say it like this but I still do. I should have a niece and nephew plus people are forgetful assholes.
User avatar #91 to #89 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
i am sorry for the loss, i truly am. but i can't blame them, forgetting is the easy solution.

but you decide to remember and for that you are a much better human being then me. my grand mother has Alzheimer and in now in the state that she is just a husk. i barely think of her anymore and i cant remember the last time i visited her.

so i agree with you, people (most of them at least) suck
User avatar #93 to #91 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
Let me message you a story, please give me a moment.
User avatar #94 to #93 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
take your time
User avatar #98 to #94 - marceau (09/09/2012) [-]
Oh, I forgot to say I sent it if it even matters to mention it here.
User avatar #100 to #98 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
no i got it.
#73 to #72 - ompalomper (09/09/2012) [-]
ok here you go
User avatar #64 - phanact (09/01/2012) [-]
How does a pony have tits?

Thread maxed out
User avatar #59 - userq (05/15/2012) [-]
I had to make friends with you after this lol www.funnyjunk.com/channel/ponytime/Honest+mistake+Fluttershy/uxRTGhk/7#7
User avatar #58 - userq (05/15/2012) [-]
Hey, nice to meet you!
#60 to #59 - ompalomper (05/15/2012) [-]
likewise :D

any reason for the spontaneous friend request? or perhaps you know me?

have we talked before?

who am i?

where am i?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!
User avatar #62 to #61 - userq (05/15/2012) [-]
Hopefully that is a good enough reason, you seem funny and I want to have more people to chat in the status updates ,which i just notice you dont have any :(
User avatar #61 to #61 - userq (05/15/2012) [-]
I raed your mind
User avatar #63 to #62 - ompalomper (05/16/2012) [-]
dude, if someone where to read my mind they would leave in a maximum of five seconds due to the sheer amount of ****** up **** that i keep there
#39 - mrcrocodile (04/29/2012) [-]
I saw your bioshock reference, and I must say I am impressed.
#40 to #40 - ompalomper (04/29/2012) [-]
thank you :D

doctor steinman and sander cohen are my favorite characters in bioshock (after andrew ryan of course)
#34 - tariv (04/21/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#35 to #35 - ompalomper (04/21/2012) [-]
tnx man :)

why the sudden hug? not that im complaining :D
#37 to #36 - tariv (04/22/2012) [-]
You got rolled.
You got rolled.
#38 to #38 - ompalomper (04/22/2012) [-]
how do we change the world?

one act of random kindness at a time

tnx for helping to change the world for the better :D
#24 - mikehuntismoist (03/18/2012) [-]
I don't like ponies at all. Sorry for the spam, the doubles demand it.
#20 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #25 to #21 - ompalomper (03/18/2012) [-]
huh. sucks to be me i guess.

at least im a brony already
#26 to #26 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 to #27 - ompalomper (03/18/2012) [-]
meh. i have seen some really ****** up stuff. some pony r34 is no big deal
#29 to #29 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #30 to #30 - ompalomper (03/18/2012) [-]
ok now in just disappointed.

not even ONE r34 pic so far. people sure are lazy
#31 to #31 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #32 to #32 - ompalomper (03/18/2012) [-]
har, har, har
#33 to #33 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#14 - dogsbane **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #15 to #15 - ompalomper (01/24/2012) [-]
im embarrassed to admit it but when it comes to name giving ponies im next to worthless. ill try to figure something out today at school but don't expect much
#16 to #16 - dogsbane **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 to #17 - ompalomper (01/24/2012) [-]
i love the name! both of em!

buck my horrible imagination, i cant i make names like that?
#18 to #18 - dogsbane **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #19 to #19 - ompalomper (01/24/2012) [-]
lucky you. most of my friensd are non-gay community.
living in sweden does that to you
User avatar #12 to #11 - ompalomper (12/18/2011) [-]
nice, thanks!

merry x-mas :-)
#9 - anonymous (12/18/2011) [-]
Merry Christmas! I rolled you too... Well, I'm an Anon.. Sooooo, have a nice day.
User avatar #11 to #10 - ompalomper (12/18/2011) [-]
thank you anon
merry x-mas to you too :-)
 Friends (0)