I forgot Assasin's Creed 2. Put it in between GTA 4 and Dead Island.

mfw fire emblem is at 83


Remember kids, Can't spell ignorant without IGN.

The Witcher 2 #78. What the actual fuck? That game got 36/40 in Famitsu. Which is actually best score you can get without paying them. (yep Famitsu reviewers said that they give games bigger scores if get paid.)

Oh god, some Super Mario RPGs are placed higher. I wonder what will be top 10.

Here's a tip:

Real gamers don't pay any attention to IGN. If you want to be a real gamer you must realize that you are the only valid game reviewer/critic alive.

No, not really. Some critics can be spot on.

To you, in some or most situations, yes. The only person that you will always agree with you is you. Your own opinion will never infuriate you.

I hate all career critics. They're people who sat down, thought of all the things that they could do for a living, and decided that having opinions was their best skill.

My opinion infuriates me sometimes.

Most critics actually play the entire game before writing about what actually happened. Some critic sites will actually pair critics with genres that they like. IGN is the only critic site I've encountered so far that has everything wrong with it.

>List of top 100 RPGs
>Includes Legend of Ys at all

Gamers aren't angry because of violent games, they're angry because they accidentally visited IGN.

I don't think Fallout: NV deserves to be very high on the list anyway.

It was a real disappointment form me compared to fallout 3.

Yes, they're different. FONV is exacly what I wanted FO3 to be. More settlements, better story, more sidestory, colorful and ability to make decisions.
Don't get me wrong I love FO3 but NV is so much better.

Inb4 they put RS at #1 just to troll the fuck out of everyone

I always knew IGN was a load of bullshit, and this just proved it even further.

i hope FO3 is in the top ten it deserves to be

ign is a huge bethesda slut, it's guaranteed to be up there

I agree but I think FONV deserves a better place than FO3.

first thing i saw was a Jade Empire char, aww yeaaah

I'm very rustled because Persona is down there

Just to add, I have PX21's and they are pretty good. However the swivel ear cups and broken of me twice. Luckily Turtle Beach was nice and sent me a completely new headset.

Here, www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Main_Page

Not really, it's still more or less the same with more guns, they didn't make any major changes to how it comes across, they didn't add maps that are flooded with fog or things that would change the gameplay up in major ways.

It's not the same at all. Selectable killstreaks, controlable killstreaks, pro perks, way more attachments, more secondary weapons, lock-on launchers. World at war also brought Zombies.

Because they've changed nothing in the grand scheme of things. Look at the differences in say, MW1 to MW3 aside from more killstreaks, different maps and different guns and a slightly better graphics engine, there aren't many I can think of off of my head.

Then take a game, that every time it's got a sequel it's improved massively, lets say Gears of War; GoW1 had mediocre cover and fighting, you also couldn't move when you were down, Gears 2 added a bunch more enemies and weapons, and even the maps they added all had really nifty stuff in them (Changing tramlines, avalanches, flooding) and a few more things. Gears 3 just improved the formula as a whole, made the MP much more playable, added a bunch of nifty new weapons that are used for different things, completely revamped the survival side of their franchise and made moving around a whole lot easier with a couple of little things. The differences from GoW 1 to GoW3 are staggering but the similarities are still there too, which is basically what I want to see from CoD before Activision drive it into the ground.

But isn't that what they did with Modern Warfare 2?

Not really, it's still more or less the same with more guns, they didn't make any major changes to how it comes across, they didn't add maps that are flooded with fog or things that would change the gameplay up in major ways.

It's not the same at all. Selectable killstreaks, controlable killstreaks, pro perks, way more attachments, more secondary weapons, lock-on launchers. World at war also brought Zombies.

The action is still fun to play for a few minutes.
The game is bad because of 2008 graphics, unbalanced guns, shit community.
The gameplay is smooth and fun to play.

I think it doesn't matter what a game is made of as long as it's fun.

I could do that....
But...idk why I should.





Though I do have too many of these codes, get em for free

Because you got them for free :D

How... Teach me your ways...

I get them from my sponsor....

my monitor is 27" and that's my resolution, it supports most games. but i would go for something else i'm only using this because I have nothing else.

go for 1920x1080.

I have a 1366x768 Laptop screen, all of my games run on it. If you find a game that doesn't, you should be able to tone it down to 1280x720 for that game.

720p LCD TVs will have that. Yes they are labeled 720p, but that is their actual resolution. 720p plasmas are usually 1024x768. Not sure why.

Why would you want that resolution though? Only PC would natively support it.

That's quite an odd resolution..? And yeah, Most games will have it, but if they do not have it, they'll 720p with is an inch less of pixels.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxt7vaC-eZw&list=FLCM4m-0riiAvlH_dHE9ezCw&index=11&feature=plpp_video

It`s my montage faggot

Try me

Ok it made me laugh

I`m only prestige level 15 cause I every
kill I get is atleast a 720 no scope

TRY ME FAGGOT

I have a montage on youtube by the way

so fanny

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxt7vaC-eZw&list=FLCM4m-0riiAvlH_dHE9ezCw&index=11&feature=plpp_video

It`s my montage faggot

Try me

Ok it made me laugh

This is a joke, you ruined it.