Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

okappadesu

Rank #20530 on Comments
no avatar Level 127 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to okappadesu Block okappadesu Invite okappadesu to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/20/2014
Last Login:12/14/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#20530
Highest Comment Rank:#5837
Comment Thumbs: 341 total,  563 ,  222
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 127 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 128 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:239
FJ Points:278

latest user's comments

#28 - >ITT People who haven't figured out that IQ tests are worthless 11/24/2014 on IQ Test Fail 0
#101 - You've made a post that puts the average funnyjunker in negati…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/24/2014 on starter pack. +4
User avatar #146 - xsap (11/24/2014) [-]
I Watched a lot of lectures about brush, character design and most importantly anatomy. And just met pracracing. I tried optingprofessional work. I see a lot of people who just do low poly individuals models and stay on that level. I push for movie level detailed work. I'd about your learning curve tho. I been doing this for about 7 months And and people say I m at a professional level but I still need to learn more
#157 - "Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because i… 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
#152 - "People are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game … 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
#151 - I am not attacking you and I am providing plenty support for m…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #154 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Provide evidence for them being casual - "People I play with said it was casual" ( translates into, it is casual because it is casual)

provide evidence SC is casual - "SC 2 is casual compared to SC" (translates into, it's casual because I said so and it's casual compared to the first one. That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate)

Provide evidence blizzard is not respected - "They are not respected because people say it's casual" (this translates into, I have no idea what I am talking about and can't provide evidence so I'll just say people say it is casual as if that will make a valid point)

Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual)

I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary. Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games. Done being nice here. I can tell you were publicly educated.
#157 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual) " You are in the same boat. I would've elaborated on any point, but you kept changing the direction instead of actually developing the discussion. I made simple unfundamented statements to try to show you that there were differing ways to view the situation, since you were so far up your own ass that you couldn't comprehend the possibility of things being something else.

The trick is that you're supposed to address the countering views, instead of simply ignoring them and making the same statement you have previously made again.

"That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate" No, but you concluding this is what means that you haven't actually spent time looking at what I say or what's happening.

I compared a later blizzard game with an earlier one and wanted to show that it has been constantly become more and more casual.

"I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary." You have no idea what evidence is in this context. I've been ignoring this, because you've so many other faults that you need to improve on, but if you keep
mistakenly going back to the same faulty argument, I have to point it out.

"Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games." I never implied this.

"Done being nice here." You were never nice. It was always you who kept flaming me.

What you'e supposed to be able to do here, which is understand how biasing is addressed and arguments are made, is something everyone should be able to do. The thing is that you keep listening to your own arguments and simply assume them true and when I propose the alternative views, you deny me doing the same.
#148 - "You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not hav…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #150 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Hell, people are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2. If almost any other studio even mentioned them doing that they would receive so much hatred that they would cancel making it. Imagine if Treyarch said they were working on a game like that, or infinity ward. Hell, even Ubisoft is coming under fire right now. Everyone in the gaming world is taking it in the ass right now outside of smaller studios, Blizzard, and studios like Valve. People have respect for Blizzard. Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
#152 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"People are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2." You're making assumptions here. From what I see, the feelings towards overwatch is that they wish Blizzard would make movies, rather than games.

The feelings toward overwatch on non-blizzard sites are actually very laxed, nobody cares much for them making it, but it looks like it might be another fun game.
User avatar #149 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Okay, I'm going to cut it off here because it's just you attacking me for minute reasons and not providing anything to support your point. I want to point out that Blizzard does not create casual games. If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive. I'm assuming it is because if you think SC is casual then you might be mentally touched. In the end, I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected. I have more respect for them than any other studio and that can be said for many of my gaming friends that don't even play any Blizzard game. You're just making assumptions.
#151 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I am not attacking you and I am providing plenty support for my points, you're trying to avoid addressing them or address them incorrectly.

"If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive." Most arena players that I play with keep in mind, these are high rated and top ladder placing people accept the fact that it is a casual format compared to the alternatives.

"If you think SC is casual" Nobody said SC was casual, but SC2 is considered too casual and simple compared to SC:BW, and Blizzard has only become more casual since then. Keep in mind, these are old games now.

"I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected." I have already addressed this. Blizzard is not respected because their games are considered too simple and "casual". They are acknowledged for their quality in graphics and interface with the player, but this doesn't pull enough weight to make them "quality games".
User avatar #154 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Provide evidence for them being casual - "People I play with said it was casual" ( translates into, it is casual because it is casual)

provide evidence SC is casual - "SC 2 is casual compared to SC" (translates into, it's casual because I said so and it's casual compared to the first one. That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate)

Provide evidence blizzard is not respected - "They are not respected because people say it's casual" (this translates into, I have no idea what I am talking about and can't provide evidence so I'll just say people say it is casual as if that will make a valid point)

Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual)

I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary. Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games. Done being nice here. I can tell you were publicly educated.
#157 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual) " You are in the same boat. I would've elaborated on any point, but you kept changing the direction instead of actually developing the discussion. I made simple unfundamented statements to try to show you that there were differing ways to view the situation, since you were so far up your own ass that you couldn't comprehend the possibility of things being something else.

The trick is that you're supposed to address the countering views, instead of simply ignoring them and making the same statement you have previously made again.

"That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate" No, but you concluding this is what means that you haven't actually spent time looking at what I say or what's happening.

I compared a later blizzard game with an earlier one and wanted to show that it has been constantly become more and more casual.

"I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary." You have no idea what evidence is in this context. I've been ignoring this, because you've so many other faults that you need to improve on, but if you keep
mistakenly going back to the same faulty argument, I have to point it out.

"Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games." I never implied this.

"Done being nice here." You were never nice. It was always you who kept flaming me.

What you'e supposed to be able to do here, which is understand how biasing is addressed and arguments are made, is something everyone should be able to do. The thing is that you keep listening to your own arguments and simply assume them true and when I propose the alternative views, you deny me doing the same.
#146 - I understood what it was in response to. I tried to explain to…  [+] (8 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #147 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth. The fuck are you on? I was replying to something you said, not something I said. How can me replying to something you brought up make it irrelevant to what I was saying? The only argument you seem to be supporting now is a belief that I am childish. That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed. Do you even know what the definition of "acclaimed" is?
#148 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth"." The remark was in the context of gameplay, therefore anything not gameplay isn't relevant.

"Is a belief that I am childish." If you're reasoning is childish, I will remark that it is.

"That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed." Incorrect, the discussion is about whether Blizzard is respected or not.

Blizzard is most certainly acclaimed for it's simplicity and "casual feel", but it is not respected for many reasons.
User avatar #150 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Hell, people are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2. If almost any other studio even mentioned them doing that they would receive so much hatred that they would cancel making it. Imagine if Treyarch said they were working on a game like that, or infinity ward. Hell, even Ubisoft is coming under fire right now. Everyone in the gaming world is taking it in the ass right now outside of smaller studios, Blizzard, and studios like Valve. People have respect for Blizzard. Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
#152 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"People are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2." You're making assumptions here. From what I see, the feelings towards overwatch is that they wish Blizzard would make movies, rather than games.

The feelings toward overwatch on non-blizzard sites are actually very laxed, nobody cares much for them making it, but it looks like it might be another fun game.
User avatar #149 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Okay, I'm going to cut it off here because it's just you attacking me for minute reasons and not providing anything to support your point. I want to point out that Blizzard does not create casual games. If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive. I'm assuming it is because if you think SC is casual then you might be mentally touched. In the end, I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected. I have more respect for them than any other studio and that can be said for many of my gaming friends that don't even play any Blizzard game. You're just making assumptions.
#151 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I am not attacking you and I am providing plenty support for my points, you're trying to avoid addressing them or address them incorrectly.

"If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive." Most arena players that I play with keep in mind, these are high rated and top ladder placing people accept the fact that it is a casual format compared to the alternatives.

"If you think SC is casual" Nobody said SC was casual, but SC2 is considered too casual and simple compared to SC:BW, and Blizzard has only become more casual since then. Keep in mind, these are old games now.

"I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected." I have already addressed this. Blizzard is not respected because their games are considered too simple and "casual". They are acknowledged for their quality in graphics and interface with the player, but this doesn't pull enough weight to make them "quality games".
User avatar #154 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Provide evidence for them being casual - "People I play with said it was casual" ( translates into, it is casual because it is casual)

provide evidence SC is casual - "SC 2 is casual compared to SC" (translates into, it's casual because I said so and it's casual compared to the first one. That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate)

Provide evidence blizzard is not respected - "They are not respected because people say it's casual" (this translates into, I have no idea what I am talking about and can't provide evidence so I'll just say people say it is casual as if that will make a valid point)

Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual)

I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary. Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games. Done being nice here. I can tell you were publicly educated.
#157 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual) " You are in the same boat. I would've elaborated on any point, but you kept changing the direction instead of actually developing the discussion. I made simple unfundamented statements to try to show you that there were differing ways to view the situation, since you were so far up your own ass that you couldn't comprehend the possibility of things being something else.

The trick is that you're supposed to address the countering views, instead of simply ignoring them and making the same statement you have previously made again.

"That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate" No, but you concluding this is what means that you haven't actually spent time looking at what I say or what's happening.

I compared a later blizzard game with an earlier one and wanted to show that it has been constantly become more and more casual.

"I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary." You have no idea what evidence is in this context. I've been ignoring this, because you've so many other faults that you need to improve on, but if you keep
mistakenly going back to the same faulty argument, I have to point it out.

"Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games." I never implied this.

"Done being nice here." You were never nice. It was always you who kept flaming me.

What you'e supposed to be able to do here, which is understand how biasing is addressed and arguments are made, is something everyone should be able to do. The thing is that you keep listening to your own arguments and simply assume them true and when I propose the alternative views, you deny me doing the same.
#144 - I think your problem is that you've abandoned critical thought…  [+] (10 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #145 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Not even reading the rest of your post because you were too stupid to pick up on me saying "warcraft has amazing lore" in response to you saying," but it doesn't get acclaimed as a good RPG or any other type of genre that would imply some depth to it". Literally not worth my time. Then you go on to use a wonderful example of an ad hominem as if it would effect me at all. Also, you provided nothing on the contrary. Hell, I could have summed up everything with you being ignorant as to what "acclaimed" means.
#146 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I understood what it was in response to. I tried to explain to you that your response is unrelated to the issue you were trying to address.

You're being childish in your premises and I was trying to explain to you that this isn't a quality.
User avatar #147 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth. The fuck are you on? I was replying to something you said, not something I said. How can me replying to something you brought up make it irrelevant to what I was saying? The only argument you seem to be supporting now is a belief that I am childish. That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed. Do you even know what the definition of "acclaimed" is?
#148 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth"." The remark was in the context of gameplay, therefore anything not gameplay isn't relevant.

"Is a belief that I am childish." If you're reasoning is childish, I will remark that it is.

"That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed." Incorrect, the discussion is about whether Blizzard is respected or not.

Blizzard is most certainly acclaimed for it's simplicity and "casual feel", but it is not respected for many reasons.
User avatar #150 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Hell, people are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2. If almost any other studio even mentioned them doing that they would receive so much hatred that they would cancel making it. Imagine if Treyarch said they were working on a game like that, or infinity ward. Hell, even Ubisoft is coming under fire right now. Everyone in the gaming world is taking it in the ass right now outside of smaller studios, Blizzard, and studios like Valve. People have respect for Blizzard. Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
#152 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"People are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2." You're making assumptions here. From what I see, the feelings towards overwatch is that they wish Blizzard would make movies, rather than games.

The feelings toward overwatch on non-blizzard sites are actually very laxed, nobody cares much for them making it, but it looks like it might be another fun game.
User avatar #149 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Okay, I'm going to cut it off here because it's just you attacking me for minute reasons and not providing anything to support your point. I want to point out that Blizzard does not create casual games. If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive. I'm assuming it is because if you think SC is casual then you might be mentally touched. In the end, I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected. I have more respect for them than any other studio and that can be said for many of my gaming friends that don't even play any Blizzard game. You're just making assumptions.
#151 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I am not attacking you and I am providing plenty support for my points, you're trying to avoid addressing them or address them incorrectly.

"If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive." Most arena players that I play with keep in mind, these are high rated and top ladder placing people accept the fact that it is a casual format compared to the alternatives.

"If you think SC is casual" Nobody said SC was casual, but SC2 is considered too casual and simple compared to SC:BW, and Blizzard has only become more casual since then. Keep in mind, these are old games now.

"I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected." I have already addressed this. Blizzard is not respected because their games are considered too simple and "casual". They are acknowledged for their quality in graphics and interface with the player, but this doesn't pull enough weight to make them "quality games".
User avatar #154 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Provide evidence for them being casual - "People I play with said it was casual" ( translates into, it is casual because it is casual)

provide evidence SC is casual - "SC 2 is casual compared to SC" (translates into, it's casual because I said so and it's casual compared to the first one. That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate)

Provide evidence blizzard is not respected - "They are not respected because people say it's casual" (this translates into, I have no idea what I am talking about and can't provide evidence so I'll just say people say it is casual as if that will make a valid point)

Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual)

I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary. Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games. Done being nice here. I can tell you were publicly educated.
#157 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual) " You are in the same boat. I would've elaborated on any point, but you kept changing the direction instead of actually developing the discussion. I made simple unfundamented statements to try to show you that there were differing ways to view the situation, since you were so far up your own ass that you couldn't comprehend the possibility of things being something else.

The trick is that you're supposed to address the countering views, instead of simply ignoring them and making the same statement you have previously made again.

"That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate" No, but you concluding this is what means that you haven't actually spent time looking at what I say or what's happening.

I compared a later blizzard game with an earlier one and wanted to show that it has been constantly become more and more casual.

"I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary." You have no idea what evidence is in this context. I've been ignoring this, because you've so many other faults that you need to improve on, but if you keep
mistakenly going back to the same faulty argument, I have to point it out.

"Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games." I never implied this.

"Done being nice here." You were never nice. It was always you who kept flaming me.

What you'e supposed to be able to do here, which is understand how biasing is addressed and arguments are made, is something everyone should be able to do. The thing is that you keep listening to your own arguments and simply assume them true and when I propose the alternative views, you deny me doing the same.
#141 - Consider for instance Diablo 3, at release, Blizzard was hated…  [+] (12 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #143 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Yes, they messed up the release of Diablo 3, but many people that continued to play it said they improved it substantially later on.

Also, now you are showing how little you know about the gaming world. The warcraft universe is, easily, one of the largest lore backed universes in any media platform and if you pay attention WoW does a fucking GREAT job at delivering it to you in an enjoyable way.

www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1160286-Which-game-franchise-has-the-deepest-best-lore/page2

First result is that forum, went through it for like two seconds and already found people voting for the Warcraft universe. You're just digging yourself deeper and deeper man. Almost every forum asking what franchise has the best lore it always ends up being between a few huge names such as LotR, Warcraft, Elder Scrolls, Star Wars, etc. I'm sorry, but you're so terribly wrong about everything you have said that it is making me laugh.
#144 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I think your problem is that you've abandoned critical thought and started manifesting some other peoples opinions as fact. There's a lot of problems in the way that you try to argue for your case, because it relies purely on your assumptions of certain things. Not to mention that you seem unable to keep focus on the thread of your argumentation

For instance, you're not actually relating to what I say, but you're trying to find some points that agree with you, rather than address the issues. That or you just don't know enough about it to understand how you're going in the wrong direction.

When I say "wow is not considered a good RPG", you respond with "warcraft lore is considered really good", which is an unrelated response because the quality of the lore in an RPG is unrelated to the quality of the RPG itself.

You need to work on your argumentation. I will make some assumptions and assume that the reason you're unable to argue is because you're not very old, which in turn means that you have yet to understand that sometimes the world isn't constructed in the one specific way you see it.

Allow me to put it like this. Nobody hates Blizzard games. They're considered fun and simple. But they're never actually respected.

Additionally, when you find the sources you find, you find people who like the games based on certain criteria, but you're not addressing what criteria was used, what the experience of the source is or pretty much anything else. To understand how well respected Blizzard is, you have to go to places where people aren't inherently biased in favor of them and who compare them to other games currently in the market and there you rarely find anyone who respects Blizzard for more than their simplicity.
User avatar #145 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Not even reading the rest of your post because you were too stupid to pick up on me saying "warcraft has amazing lore" in response to you saying," but it doesn't get acclaimed as a good RPG or any other type of genre that would imply some depth to it". Literally not worth my time. Then you go on to use a wonderful example of an ad hominem as if it would effect me at all. Also, you provided nothing on the contrary. Hell, I could have summed up everything with you being ignorant as to what "acclaimed" means.
#146 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I understood what it was in response to. I tried to explain to you that your response is unrelated to the issue you were trying to address.

You're being childish in your premises and I was trying to explain to you that this isn't a quality.
User avatar #147 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth. The fuck are you on? I was replying to something you said, not something I said. How can me replying to something you brought up make it irrelevant to what I was saying? The only argument you seem to be supporting now is a belief that I am childish. That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed. Do you even know what the definition of "acclaimed" is?
#148 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"You were the one that clearly criticized WoW for not having depth"." The remark was in the context of gameplay, therefore anything not gameplay isn't relevant.

"Is a belief that I am childish." If you're reasoning is childish, I will remark that it is.

"That's almost laughable as I clearly opened up with Blizzard being a great studio that is acclaimed." Incorrect, the discussion is about whether Blizzard is respected or not.

Blizzard is most certainly acclaimed for it's simplicity and "casual feel", but it is not respected for many reasons.
User avatar #150 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Hell, people are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2. If almost any other studio even mentioned them doing that they would receive so much hatred that they would cancel making it. Imagine if Treyarch said they were working on a game like that, or infinity ward. Hell, even Ubisoft is coming under fire right now. Everyone in the gaming world is taking it in the ass right now outside of smaller studios, Blizzard, and studios like Valve. People have respect for Blizzard. Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
#152 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"People are extremely happy about Blizzard making a game sort of like TF2." You're making assumptions here. From what I see, the feelings towards overwatch is that they wish Blizzard would make movies, rather than games.

The feelings toward overwatch on non-blizzard sites are actually very laxed, nobody cares much for them making it, but it looks like it might be another fun game.
User avatar #149 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Okay, I'm going to cut it off here because it's just you attacking me for minute reasons and not providing anything to support your point. I want to point out that Blizzard does not create casual games. If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive. I'm assuming it is because if you think SC is casual then you might be mentally touched. In the end, I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected. I have more respect for them than any other studio and that can be said for many of my gaming friends that don't even play any Blizzard game. You're just making assumptions.
#151 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
I am not attacking you and I am providing plenty support for my points, you're trying to avoid addressing them or address them incorrectly.

"If you believe this then you have obviously not competed in high rated arenas in WoW since that is the only game you don't see as being competitive." Most arena players that I play with keep in mind, these are high rated and top ladder placing people accept the fact that it is a casual format compared to the alternatives.

"If you think SC is casual" Nobody said SC was casual, but SC2 is considered too casual and simple compared to SC:BW, and Blizzard has only become more casual since then. Keep in mind, these are old games now.

"I just want to hear from you how blizzard is not respected." I have already addressed this. Blizzard is not respected because their games are considered too simple and "casual". They are acknowledged for their quality in graphics and interface with the player, but this doesn't pull enough weight to make them "quality games".
User avatar #154 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
Provide evidence for them being casual - "People I play with said it was casual" ( translates into, it is casual because it is casual)

provide evidence SC is casual - "SC 2 is casual compared to SC" (translates into, it's casual because I said so and it's casual compared to the first one. That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate)

Provide evidence blizzard is not respected - "They are not respected because people say it's casual" (this translates into, I have no idea what I am talking about and can't provide evidence so I'll just say people say it is casual as if that will make a valid point)

Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual)

I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary. Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games. Done being nice here. I can tell you were publicly educated.
#157 - okappadesu (11/15/2014) [-]
"Every single rebuttal you have had = it is 'x' because it is 'x' (example - it's casual because it's casual) " You are in the same boat. I would've elaborated on any point, but you kept changing the direction instead of actually developing the discussion. I made simple unfundamented statements to try to show you that there were differing ways to view the situation, since you were so far up your own ass that you couldn't comprehend the possibility of things being something else.

The trick is that you're supposed to address the countering views, instead of simply ignoring them and making the same statement you have previously made again.

"That totally throws out everything we have been arguing about because now you're comparing a blizzard game to itself. Nice skills mate" No, but you concluding this is what means that you haven't actually spent time looking at what I say or what's happening.

I compared a later blizzard game with an earlier one and wanted to show that it has been constantly become more and more casual.

"I'm leaving with that because you're just running in circles providing no evidence on the contrary." You have no idea what evidence is in this context. I've been ignoring this, because you've so many other faults that you need to improve on, but if you keep
mistakenly going back to the same faulty argument, I have to point it out.

"Hell, you're even stupid enough to imply that a studio can't be respected because they make casual games." I never implied this.

"Done being nice here." You were never nice. It was always you who kept flaming me.

What you'e supposed to be able to do here, which is understand how biasing is addressed and arguments are made, is something everyone should be able to do. The thing is that you keep listening to your own arguments and simply assume them true and when I propose the alternative views, you deny me doing the same.
#140 - See, the problem is that you're just a butthurt fanboy who imp…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/15/2014 on Login Screen is WoD End Boss 0
User avatar #142 - clannadqs (11/15/2014) [-]
www.gameranx.com/features/id/11469/article/top-20-best-rts-of-all-time-click-click-die/#p12

3 of the top ten RTSs are from Blizzard

chillopedia.com/gaming/20-best-real-time-strategy-games-of-all-time/2/

top two games are from Blizzard

www.videogamer.com/top-games/pc-strategy-games-all-time/3/

number one game is, once again, Blizzard's

www.giantbomb.com/profile/lazyaza/lists/the-10-best-rts-games-of-all-time/23880/

oh wow, another one with Blizzard in first.

compactiongames.about.com/od/topgames/tp/topRTS.htm

Damn, another one. Let's not forget almost every list seen online for best RTS games all include multiple Blizzard games.

Wow-
www.gamesradar.com/best-mmorpg/

Damn, first place.

www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2014/08/10-best-mmos.html

Another one.

You know what, I grow tired of this because almost every article and blog is the exact same. It's always Blizzard running the show. You're an obvious troll or just someone who hates popular games for no reason at all. You have provided nothing on the contrary once again. Please show me evidence that people (and don't go around throwing out metacritic where people troll yet the games I mentioned are still top tier. Would love to hear how these games aren't something special when literally ten of the front page posts over the past few days contained something about WoW alone. Granted it was during its launch, but not even CoD had something like that and people love to hate it. I didn't play Diablo 3 so I can't comment on it, but I do know it's not something you can call a horrible game. Hearthstone is anther example of how amazing the studio is, so thanks for pointing it out. People that don't even play Wow flocked to that game because of how well made it was. They even have dozens of tournaments every month for a fucking online card game that was made just for fun. Still waiting on you to provide factual information about them not being acclaimed outside of just "deye arent acclaimed lol, ur a fgt".
[ 239 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)