x
Click to expand

nywrestler

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/18/2011
Last Login:5/25/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2446
Comment Ranking:#2355
Highest Content Rank:#286
Highest Comment Rank:#321
Content Thumbs: 9410 total,  10210 ,  800
Comment Thumbs: 7872 total,  8995 ,  1123
Content Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 170 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 171 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 47% (47/100)
Level 261 Comments: Pure Win → Level 262 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:453513
Times Content Favorited:583 times
Total Comments Made:1326
FJ Points:13257
Favorite Tags: Yep (9)

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 44440
    Thumbs Up 1324 Thumbs Down 54 Total: +1270
    Comments: 99
    Favorites: 78
    Uploaded: 06/15/14
    Makes sense Makes sense
  • Views: 37848
    Thumbs Up 1126 Thumbs Down 48 Total: +1078
    Comments: 81
    Favorites: 59
    Uploaded: 05/05/14
    Hodor Hodor
  • Views: 35878
    Thumbs Up 928 Thumbs Down 44 Total: +884
    Comments: 63
    Favorites: 55
    Uploaded: 06/11/14
    Awesome picture from summit Awesome picture from summit
  • Views: 29028
    Thumbs Up 754 Thumbs Down 34 Total: +720
    Comments: 185
    Favorites: 21
    Uploaded: 05/06/14
    No coloreds No coloreds
  • Views: 29945
    Thumbs Up 715 Thumbs Down 32 Total: +683
    Comments: 48
    Favorites: 27
    Uploaded: 05/05/14
    LEGO CAR LEGO CAR
  • Views: 25124
    Thumbs Up 659 Thumbs Down 46 Total: +613
    Comments: 44
    Favorites: 15
    Uploaded: 05/05/15
    PacMan PacMan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > [ 46 ]

YouTube Videos

Funny Gifs

  • Views: 18706
    Thumbs Up 478 Thumbs Down 55 Total: +423
    Comments: 45
    Favorites: 28
    Uploaded: 07/17/14
    The Russia-Ukraine situation The Russia-Ukraine situation
  • Views: 1902
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +12
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/06/14
    White gurlz White gurlz
  • Views: 1908
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +12
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/05/14
    Its a ghost Its a ghost
  • Views: 2152
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +8
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/11/14
    Lion King, GRRM style Lion King, GRRM style
  • Views: 1098
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +6
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/06/14
    Fucking jaguarrrrr Fucking jaguarrrrr
  • Views: 1050
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +6
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 05/06/14
    Simple derp Simple derp
1 2 > [ 7 ]

latest user's comments

#46 - Picture 05/23/2015 on Jim Carrey looks insane 0
#45 - Picture 05/23/2015 on Jim Carrey looks insane 0
#60 - Obligatory: What the **** did you just …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/19/2015 on dumb nigga +1
#76 - collnorthwyl (05/19/2015) [-]
#11 - This video is ******* stupid. 05/19/2015 on Feminist logic fail #5 -3
#34 - Which part do you mean that I should add to the wiki? The info…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/19/2015 on You were thinking too simply. 0
#38 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
I'm saying you should voice all those concerns in the wiki-talk section of the AE911Truth wiki article with a mind towards having a "Criticisms" section added to the article and Contents list.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth

Or you could just add a criticisms page and see what happens. Assuming the article isn't totally locked down due to vandalism.
#47 - anonymous (05/19/2015) [-]
Wikipedia tends to classify pointing out how hilarious ill-informed or poorly educated people are as bias and then they remove it.
#49 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
If the sum of your argument is a complaint about a resume, then it's rightly rejected.
#51 - anonymous (05/19/2015) [-]
If someone who isn't qualified is pretending to be an expert in a field and is peddling nonsense then it absolutely should be pointed out. The problem with wikipedia is that it'll have 'Paul Blar, structural engineer suggests x, y, z' and therefore because it's technically an oppinion, albeit disguised as an argument for authority, it's allowable.

If you instead wrote 'x, y, z is true' then it wouldn't be allowed because it's presented as actual fact. The nuances of this can be lost on people though and they think the first and 2nd hold the same weight.
#53 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
Yeah you're right anon, wiki is all lies. I should rely on the the official press releases instead. You're really set me on the right path. Thanks.

>.>
#55 - anonymous (05/20/2015) [-]
How the fuck you pulled that point out of what I wrote i have no idea. It's like you're going out of your way to seem as stupid as possible. The point beind made was that wikipedia has odd policies when it comes to protecting the less well-informed *ahem you* from oppinions dressed up as actual knowledge.

This is why actually looking through citations, rather than go 'jeepers, that sure is a lot of links!' is important.
#31 - AE911Truth is an organization founded by Richard Gage where pe…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/19/2015 on You were thinking too simply. 0
#32 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
If you can back up those assertions I suggest you add them to the wiki. I don't even see a criticisms heading, and I'm sure there are some. Otherwise I just don't care. Why don't I care? Because whoever did it, won. Conspirators or terrorists. The bad guys, whoever they are, got their way.
User avatar #34 - nywrestler (05/19/2015) [-]
Which part do you mean that I should add to the wiki? The information about guy from the Board of Directors? That's actually on their website, his name is Tom Spellman. You generally don't need to look too hard to find lack of credentials or blatant craziness from scientists who back up conspiracy theories.

I was watching a youtube video about how eyewitnesses to 9/11 were saying that the plane was silver, looked like a military jet, couldn't have been a airline plane, etc. They had a picture of the engine that smashed through the building and landed on the street in NYC and said "this could not possibly be the engine from a United Airlines 767" and they had an expert interviewed to prove it. He went through an entire litany of reasons as to why it had to be from a military jet, or something other than a commercial plane.

After googling his name, you see that he is actually a retired Air Force pilot, many years of service, seeming like a person who would be totally knowledgeable about these things. And then you go to his website and read about he also thinks that there are bases on the moon, that there are mining operations taking place on the moons of Jupiter, and a whole bunch of other nonsensical bullshit.

Long story short I guess, sometimes smart people are dumb too.
#38 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
I'm saying you should voice all those concerns in the wiki-talk section of the AE911Truth wiki article with a mind towards having a "Criticisms" section added to the article and Contents list.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth

Or you could just add a criticisms page and see what happens. Assuming the article isn't totally locked down due to vandalism.
#47 - anonymous (05/19/2015) [-]
Wikipedia tends to classify pointing out how hilarious ill-informed or poorly educated people are as bias and then they remove it.
#49 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
If the sum of your argument is a complaint about a resume, then it's rightly rejected.
#51 - anonymous (05/19/2015) [-]
If someone who isn't qualified is pretending to be an expert in a field and is peddling nonsense then it absolutely should be pointed out. The problem with wikipedia is that it'll have 'Paul Blar, structural engineer suggests x, y, z' and therefore because it's technically an oppinion, albeit disguised as an argument for authority, it's allowable.

If you instead wrote 'x, y, z is true' then it wouldn't be allowed because it's presented as actual fact. The nuances of this can be lost on people though and they think the first and 2nd hold the same weight.
#53 - innomen (05/19/2015) [-]
Yeah you're right anon, wiki is all lies. I should rely on the the official press releases instead. You're really set me on the right path. Thanks.

>.>
#55 - anonymous (05/20/2015) [-]
How the fuck you pulled that point out of what I wrote i have no idea. It's like you're going out of your way to seem as stupid as possible. The point beind made was that wikipedia has odd policies when it comes to protecting the less well-informed *ahem you* from oppinions dressed up as actual knowledge.

This is why actually looking through citations, rather than go 'jeepers, that sure is a lot of links!' is important.
#43 - At this point, anyone still parroting the $0.77 thing is eithe… 05/19/2015 on misogynist +12
#5 - Souce: 05/19/2015 on Definitely Not The Brightest +11
#4 - Picture 05/19/2015 on Definitely Not The Brightest 0
#3 - Yeah I enjoyed Wildboyz. It was basically what you really want… 05/19/2015 on Definitely Not The Brightest +14

user's friends

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - Lightclaw (09/14/2011) [-]
stickied by nywrestler
**Lightclaw rolled a random image** This is my face when I'm raping you.


(Roll game)
#3 - murrlogic (05/12/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
 Friends (0)