Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

noworries

Rank #6295 on Subscribers
noworries Avatar Level 219 Content: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to noworries Block noworries Invite noworries to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 27
Date Signed Up:3/29/2011
Last Login:12/13/2014
Location:Atlanta Georgia
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#18987
Highest Content Rank:#287
Highest Comment Rank:#5107
Content Thumbs: 19851 total,  21938 ,  2087
Comment Thumbs: 1386 total,  2200 ,  814
Content Level Progress: 84.3% (843/1000)
Level 219 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:12
Content Views:459750
Times Content Favorited:2175 times
Total Comments Made:612
FJ Points:21278
Favorite Tags: tags (8) | i (5) | are (4) | the (4) | Awesome (3) | dont (3) | matter (3) | These (3) | You (3) | ASS (2) | comp (2) | description (2) | do (2) | here (2) | is (2) | knew (2) | over (2) | want (2)

latest user's comments

#8 - Why are almost all the women different heights in the their se…  [+] (16 new replies) 11/15/2012 on Cross-dressing couples 0
User avatar #24 - dragonhorn (11/15/2012) [-]
Because most of them are wearing heels?
User avatar #127 - noworries (11/16/2012) [-]
Not trolling you, but how do you explain the ones that are taller in the men's shoes.. lol i just dont get it
User avatar #130 - dragonhorn (11/16/2012) [-]
Ha, I guess the only one like that is the next to last one and I can only figure it's because the ground might be higher on that side.
#20 - anonymous (11/15/2012) [-]
in the first photo it's because she's no longer wearing heels
User avatar #11 - thegreatmateusbear (11/15/2012) [-]
It's perception, their clothing is much larger.
User avatar #128 - noworries (11/16/2012) [-]
Looks like you are a fool sir
#14 - noworries (11/15/2012) [-]
You just went full retard
User avatar #15 - thegreatmateusbear (11/15/2012) [-]
The male's clothing is much larger than the girl's. When she wears them, she appears smaller.
User avatar #22 - zarcos (11/15/2012) [-]
they are physically shorter it isn't perception.....the chicks aren't wearing heels
User avatar #16 - noworries (11/15/2012) [-]
Ahem.... HEIGHT..... Look back at what i said originally
User avatar #17 - thegreatmateusbear (11/15/2012) [-]
When I say "small" and "large," I'm referring to the perception of size, which yes, includes height.
#18 - noworries (11/15/2012) [-]
I asked about height... why would you reply with other stuff? I am done with you
User avatar #19 - thegreatmateusbear (11/15/2012) [-]
I can see you're having trouble understanding:
smaller = shorter
larger = taller
Larger clothing on a smaller sized person make the person appear smaller (AKA shorter).
#21 - noworries (11/15/2012) [-]
Larger clothing doesnt make someone seem taller.... Also, smaller and larger are not interchangeable with shorter and taller.
User avatar #10 - opvv (11/15/2012) [-]
It could be the lack of heels.
User avatar #13 - noworries (11/15/2012) [-]
But they grow taller in some cases with the mens shoes... without heels... I dont know lol
#5 - ok? i assume its for a bag of gummi bears... how is that wrong…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/14/2012 on Seems Legit +2
User avatar #8 - slossboss (11/14/2012) [-]
15 bears, supposed to be life-sized i guess
#2 - What the hell are you talking about??  [+] (3 new replies) 11/14/2012 on Seems Legit 0
User avatar #4 - slossboss (11/14/2012) [-]
it says 15 bears
User avatar #5 - noworries (11/14/2012) [-]
ok? i assume its for a bag of gummi bears... how is that wrong, weird, or funny in any way??
User avatar #8 - slossboss (11/14/2012) [-]
15 bears, supposed to be life-sized i guess
#10 - What now Bitch!  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2012 on game logic +10
User avatar #12 - TheSock (11/14/2012) [-]
i played later mario games before that one, so i always knew he hit the block with his hand...
so when everyone like, freaked out about it, i had no idea what why
#30 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2012 on Bags of Pee +1
#33 - anonemous Comment deleted by noworries
#6 - Do you have a public server this is on? or do you just play offline? 11/11/2012 on Lighthouse 0
#5 - Make it larger at the base and smaller at the top like a real … 11/11/2012 on Lighthouse +3
#11 - Picture 11/09/2012 on so much win +1
#25 - Dont let this post fool you, Harry Potter grew up to be a 5ft … 11/02/2012 on magical +1
#50 - Agreed 10/27/2012 on Dick riding +1
#41 - oh... Gross  [+] (3 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Dick riding +1
User avatar #47 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Hey you wanna touch me?
User avatar #44 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
Don't touch him
You'll get aids
User avatar #50 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
Agreed
#36 - what is nig nog?  [+] (6 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Dick riding 0
User avatar #38 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
A nigger
User avatar #41 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
oh... Gross
User avatar #47 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Hey you wanna touch me?
User avatar #44 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
Don't touch him
You'll get aids
User avatar #50 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
Agreed
User avatar #37 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Nigger
#33 - and what is a nog nog? lol  [+] (8 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Dick riding 0
User avatar #34 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
An African term for nig nog
User avatar #36 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
what is nig nog?
User avatar #38 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
A nigger
User avatar #41 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
oh... Gross
User avatar #47 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Hey you wanna touch me?
User avatar #44 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
Don't touch him
You'll get aids
User avatar #50 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
Agreed
User avatar #37 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Nigger
#29 - who is this person?  [+] (10 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Dick riding 0
User avatar #32 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
Phanact is a huge nog nog
User avatar #33 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
and what is a nog nog? lol
User avatar #34 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
An African term for nig nog
User avatar #36 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
what is nig nog?
User avatar #38 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
A nigger
User avatar #41 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
oh... Gross
User avatar #47 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Hey you wanna touch me?
User avatar #44 - shesaidshewaslegal (10/27/2012) [-]
Don't touch him
You'll get aids
User avatar #50 - noworries (10/27/2012) [-]
Agreed
User avatar #37 - phanact (10/27/2012) [-]
Nigger
#88 - Picture 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... 0
#80 - lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... +2
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#73 - You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't m…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... 0
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.
#80 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#67 - Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominat…  [+] (7 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... -2
User avatar #72 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.
#73 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.
#80 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#69 - whyisthissohard has deleted their comment.
#55 - It is not a misuse... Thinking like yours is why everyone thin…  [+] (9 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... +1
User avatar #57 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.
User avatar #67 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.
User avatar #72 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.
#73 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.
#80 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#69 - whyisthissohard has deleted their comment.
#46 - Just because you vote for someone you know wont win doesnt mea…  [+] (12 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... +9
User avatar #47 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Lol I'm not saying you're giving in, I'm saying in the long run all you are doing is taking votes away from one of the 2 possible candidates that is the most relevant to your positions. So fine it's not a waste, a better term is a misuse of your vote.
User avatar #55 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
It is not a misuse... Thinking like yours is why everyone thinks there are only 2 candidates. I feel sad for you
User avatar #57 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.
User avatar #67 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.
User avatar #72 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.
#73 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.
#80 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#69 - whyisthissohard has deleted their comment.
#54 - anonymous (10/23/2012) [-]
You people are what's wrong with this country.
#44 - You do realize there are like 8 other candidates to vote for...  [+] (16 new replies) 10/23/2012 on How I feel about our up... +8
User avatar #45 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Unfortunately voting for them is essentially throwing your vote away when you could vote for the candidate that mostly reflects your opinions of the 2 major competing ones.
User avatar #64 - fedegon (10/23/2012) [-]
You know why it's useless? Because 90% of the people (dramatic exaggeration) would vote for them, but they know it would be useless to vote for them, for no one would vote for them knowing it would be useless; it's an endless cycle!
User avatar #68 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Essentially yes you're right, unfortunately that's also why people have to make the best out of a bad situation, the whole idea of starting a political revolution and getting more and more people to vote for third party candidates is nice, but it won't happen. Look at Ron Paul, one of the most supported and influential of the candidates outside the traditional 2, and he still didn't come close to having a chance at the polls.

User avatar #46 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
Just because you vote for someone you know wont win doesnt mean the vote is thrown away. Your vote is your voice, and i will not give in.
User avatar #47 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Lol I'm not saying you're giving in, I'm saying in the long run all you are doing is taking votes away from one of the 2 possible candidates that is the most relevant to your positions. So fine it's not a waste, a better term is a misuse of your vote.
User avatar #55 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
It is not a misuse... Thinking like yours is why everyone thinks there are only 2 candidates. I feel sad for you
User avatar #57 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.
User avatar #67 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.
User avatar #72 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.
#73 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.
#80 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!
User avatar #86 - noblexfenrir (10/23/2012) [-]
That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.
#88 - noworries (10/23/2012) [-]
#69 - whyisthissohard has deleted their comment.
#54 - anonymous (10/23/2012) [-]
You people are what's wrong with this country.
#83 - Lego marks aside... that foot is disgusting  [+] (1 new reply) 10/20/2012 on Is your joke still funny? +20
#101 - frysandaburger (10/20/2012) [-]
yay! I get to use this pic for something slightly relevant!
#4 - mormonslayer bet you never thought you would get mentioned in …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/20/2012 on How banks work +1
#5 - TheAnonymousRebel has deleted their comment.
#36 - I dont think i make any sense either.... 10/18/2012 on Real v. Cartoon +2
#35 - The artist puts the same cloths on the characters, but they re…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/18/2012 on Real v. Cartoon +2
User avatar #36 - noworries (10/18/2012) [-]
I dont think i make any sense either....
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - anonymous (08/16/2012) [-]
You are awesome!
Have a great day :)
User avatar #3 to #2 - noworries (08/16/2012) [-]
Thank you!!! Whoever you are!!
 Friends (0)