Hey you wanna touch me?

Nigger

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.

lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.

You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol

I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.

lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

I can really only see a Independent being the only thing besides a Republican or Democrat making it in a Federal Election

now a State or Local election is a different story

Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.

Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.

Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.

You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol

I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.

lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

I can really only see a Independent being the only thing besides a Republican or Democrat making it in a Federal Election

now a State or Local election is a different story

Lol I'm not saying you're giving in, I'm saying in the long run all you are doing is taking votes away from one of the 2 possible candidates that is the most relevant to your positions. So fine it's not a waste, a better term is a misuse of your vote.

It is not a misuse... Thinking like yours is why everyone thinks there are only 2 candidates. I feel sad for you

Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.

Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.

Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.

You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol

I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.

lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

I can really only see a Independent being the only thing besides a Republican or Democrat making it in a Federal Election

now a State or Local election is a different story

Unfortunately voting for them is essentially throwing your vote away when you could vote for the candidate that mostly reflects your opinions of the 2 major competing ones.

You know why it's useless? Because 90% of the people (dramatic exaggeration) would vote for them, but they know it would be useless to vote for them, for no one would vote for them knowing it would be useless; it's an endless cycle!

Essentially yes you're right, unfortunately that's also why people have to make the best out of a bad situation, the whole idea of starting a political revolution and getting more and more people to vote for third party candidates is nice, but it won't happen. Look at Ron Paul, one of the most supported and influential of the candidates outside the traditional 2, and he still didn't come close to having a chance at the polls.

Just because you vote for someone you know wont win doesnt mean the vote is thrown away. Your vote is your voice, and i will not give in.

Lol I'm not saying you're giving in, I'm saying in the long run all you are doing is taking votes away from one of the 2 possible candidates that is the most relevant to your positions. So fine it's not a waste, a better term is a misuse of your vote.

It is not a misuse... Thinking like yours is why everyone thinks there are only 2 candidates. I feel sad for you

Thinking pragmatically about the situation is what makes you feel sad for me? Explains your thought process though.

No the reason there is only two candidates is because not many other sources can create the capital, the experience, or the support it takes to get to the serious level. Do I like that it usually is up to only 2 candidates? Absolutely not, I would love to have a plethora of choices and let someone who has the best ideas win, however the situation would most likely end with the same two people getting the majority of the votes. Sure "the rent is too damn high!" guys would get some votes by people who think it's funny, but otherwise we would have most of the votes condensed to roughley 2-3 people.

So no, thinking like me makes the best out of a bad situation and even gets someone into office that can actually get certain things done. I realize I won't have a candidate that completely agrees with me but I can vote for one I share the large issues with.

People who vote for third parties are very petty with the fact they say "I know this person won't win but I'll still vote for them" this just enforces their ability to say "I didn't vote for him" when the current president fucks up, but they don't realize they could have used their vote to stop them being elected.

/rant.

Again, you make me sad... just because these 2 parties dominate the media and have all the money to get on a "serious level" doesn't mean that they have earned your vote. It is your duty as a voter to do your homework and find the best candidate, not the richest. You are still foolish sir.

Sigh, wow it's almost like you didn't read a thing I wrote. I do my homework and often do find a better candidate (Like this election, I really wish Paul Ryan ran by himself, I would have voted for him. Or Bush's brother if he ran this year), however I am not voting for the richest, as I said I am making the best out of a bad situation, and not putting a veil over my eyes like you are when taking my vote seriously.

I'm not foolish, I am practical. You are delusional in thinking your vote is purely used for the candidate you find is the best, there are other factors to take into consideration, and seeing which candidates are going to be the most influential and attract the most votes is one of those variables. You have alot to learn about the political system mate.

You are delusional sir, thinking that votes for others don't matter. I am done with you, you can't argue with a retard because they make up the dumbest crap. I bid you good day. Oh and pic related... its a slightly classier you lol

I never said they didn't matter, I said they have to be used correctly. Something granted many of the masses who vote for the 2 parties do not do, and unfortunately informed voters have to take this into consideration, something obviously you do not do.

Cute having to resort to calling me retarded, unfortunately nothing I have said is dumb nor wrong. It is not my fault if you ignore it or simply just don't understand it.

and you should know the backstory before insulting me, that horse stole my wife and killed my pet gerbil.

lol, why dont you scroll on up and see that first response you gave me... You are frustratingly ignorant. Now i said GOOD DAY!

That was a condensed version of the more in-depth ones I just provided. Really not that hard to understand mate.

I can really only see a Independent being the only thing besides a Republican or Democrat making it in a Federal Election

now a State or Local election is a different story

yay! I get to use this pic for something slightly relevant!

nowories, bet you thought you'd never be strait, did you?

I dont think i make any sense either....

"Dumb bitch gets lynched, no one cares, tonight at 7!"

noworries bro it'll happen some day.

I love you

WE SHALL PREVAIL WE SHALL SMITE THY WITH OUR DIAHRIAH CUASING BURRITOS YOU SHALL NOT SURVIVE

pardon my spelling