Most or all of Al Qaeda's explosive power comes from homemade shit, things an American citizen can buy and make with the right knowledge. Remote vehicles are literally a toy in America. Crowds are useless, they defeat themselves with the right weapons.

You can't beat an underground resistance with a bomb, a tank, or an aircraft carrier. Stop acting like you know how warfare works, you massive neckbeard.

I'll take your random insults to my intelligence as you feeling the corner behind your back.

I never said that the explosives weren't things we couldn't buy ourselves or that they were all some sort of fancy military-grade weapons. What comment were you reading? I said those items are what gives the resistance much of its ability to hurt a well-armed invasion force, regardless of how they're acquired. Do guns help Al Qaeda? Sure. But I bet US troops over there were more worried about running into an IED than a guy with an AK.

It also depends on what the goals of an invading force are. Are they trying to "liberate" us or annihilate us?

its okay I understand but no one else cares, you fucked up, and thats all we will remember.
Live your legacy.

That might actually be smart, it could encourage forthcoming entrepreneurs to create new businesses.

I agree that could work.

However,I think we also need to create incentives for these companies to want to come back.

TBH Unions have gotten way way out of hand.

Well, ideally the framework would be in place first or have some sort of grace period for them to reorganize. I'm not trying to boot companies out, just create reasons for them to stay within the borders. Goods might be more expensive, but I'll take a healthy economy and more jobs over slightly cheaper consumerism.

If we're arguing who is the more potent Force-user then we would probably be able to have a lengthy opinionated debate. But in terms of a straight-up lightsaber duel I don't think there's any competition between the two.

Ah, that makes sense. I guess its more of a backlash then anything else.

Bane knows he is going to kill CIA so it doesn't matter if he reveals a "weakness" which is pretty apparent just by looking at him.

"You're a big guy" is CIA goading Bane to try to get more information, "For you" is Bane reversing the jab back at CIA. It's top tier banter.

Well I hate to say, but neither one of our opinions is top-tier banter really... just two people toying with each other because they think they have the upper hand. It's a well-written scene and it works either way, so I'm not too worried about who's right, though I am curious which way the writers meant it.