See here:

forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.2040

I would reckon, given the scale and complexity of it, that if there was even the slightest damage to the Hypermatter reactor, you might be in over your head. Hell the thing is so big it protrudes from the bottom of the ship! And I wouldn't be surprised if reactors of that scale really do need the shipyard capabilities of a place like Kuat. And I highly doubt that any backup power system would be strong enough to repulse the ship off the ground. In a stable orbit, backup systems could easily keep the ship functioning, but a stationary grounded ship of that size would require an absolutely immense amount of power to get off the ground (hence why they are built in space).

TLR Hypermatter reactor or bust. Probably too hard to repair yourself, so bust.

I dunno. It's like saying if an F-22 raptor crash landed in your backyard that, given enough time, you could make it fly again. Even if there aren't major structural problems, the knowledge of the systems and how to operate/repair them are guarded military knowledge. You, as someone with a shed full of normal tools, would probably not be able to "given enough time" it back into the air. Plus it's all flown electronically, so if the software is damaged in any way you're also rebuilding the software from scratch somehow. I can't even imagine how interconnected the software would have to be on something as massive as a star destroyer. Even if most of it is stored in the bridge, can you imagine the problems you'd have if it detects several systems and their corresponding computers are completely destroyed? I bet it has safeties so that you couldn't even initialize a launch if certain systems are offline. And there's no manual on how to fix it or reprogram it, because it's military property; a military that doesn't even exist anymore.

Well, I don't know if you've ever seen anybody try to repair a car after a really major accident, but it just doesn't work like that usually. The gap between "crashed ship" and "get generators going" could be so monumental it would be a showstopper right there. What if it's destroyed? Are these droids you speak of doing all the technical work? Where are you getting money to replace systems on a capital ship?

And I don't mean to shit on your dreams at all, this is fantasy of course, and having a star destroyer fort would be awesome! But if you've got advanced droids that are capable of rebuilding entire ships, and the money to buy capital ship subsystems, you are obviously a well-off individual capable of running a shipyard. I say turn the star destroyer into scrap and make an awesome functional ship.

I would reckon, given the scale and complexity of it, that if there was even the slightest damage to the Hypermatter reactor, you might be in over your head. Hell the thing is so big it protrudes from the bottom of the ship! And I wouldn't be surprised if reactors of that scale really do need the shipyard capabilities of a place like Kuat. And I highly doubt that any backup power system would be strong enough to repulse the ship off the ground. In a stable orbit, backup systems could easily keep the ship functioning, but a stationary grounded ship of that size would require an absolutely immense amount of power to get off the ground (hence why they are built in space).

TLR Hypermatter reactor or bust. Probably too hard to repair yourself, so bust.

I dunno. It's like saying if an F-22 raptor crash landed in your backyard that, given enough time, you could make it fly again. Even if there aren't major structural problems, the knowledge of the systems and how to operate/repair them are guarded military knowledge. You, as someone with a shed full of normal tools, would probably not be able to "given enough time" it back into the air. Plus it's all flown electronically, so if the software is damaged in any way you're also rebuilding the software from scratch somehow. I can't even imagine how interconnected the software would have to be on something as massive as a star destroyer. Even if most of it is stored in the bridge, can you imagine the problems you'd have if it detects several systems and their corresponding computers are completely destroyed? I bet it has safeties so that you couldn't even initialize a launch if certain systems are offline. And there's no manual on how to fix it or reprogram it, because it's military property; a military that doesn't even exist anymore.

No, I didn't. You're a fucking retard and probably also a virgin. Kthxbai

Mm, good one. Case closed

Do you like this game? I don't think you understand it. You just provided all of the documentation right there to prove that anal sex is physically pleasurable for the receiver; because it is an erogenous zone.

We're not talking about the taboo nature of it, or fetishes, it is the physical sexual pleasure directly derived from stimulating nerve endings, which anal sex satisfies.

No, I didn't. You're a fucking retard and probably also a virgin. Kthxbai

Mm, good one. Case closed

I'm impressed

Provide me reliable documentation about armpit sex being as pleasurable as normal sex physically (not as a fetish, but physically) and I'll follow this rabbit trail. Otherwise, you're just being purposefully contrary and I'll consider this case closed.

Do you like this game? I don't think you understand it. You just provided all of the documentation right there to prove that anal sex is physically pleasurable for the receiver; because it is an erogenous zone.

We're not talking about the taboo nature of it, or fetishes, it is the physical sexual pleasure directly derived from stimulating nerve endings, which anal sex satisfies.

No, I didn't. You're a fucking retard and probably also a virgin. Kthxbai

Mm, good one. Case closed

I'm impressed

"The anus has a relatively high concentration of nerve endings and can be an erogenous zone, which can make anal intercourse pleasurable for both the insertive partner and the receptive partner."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_anus#Sexuality

Provide me reliable documentation about armpit sex being as pleasurable as normal sex physically (not as a fetish, but physically) and I'll follow this rabbit trail. Otherwise, you're just being purposefully contrary and I'll consider this case closed.

Do you like this game? I don't think you understand it. You just provided all of the documentation right there to prove that anal sex is physically pleasurable for the receiver; because it is an erogenous zone.

We're not talking about the taboo nature of it, or fetishes, it is the physical sexual pleasure directly derived from stimulating nerve endings, which anal sex satisfies.

No, I didn't. You're a fucking retard and probably also a virgin. Kthxbai

Mm, good one. Case closed

I'm impressed

I apologize, I should have seen that coming... I mean with the window right there. =P

I'm all for the Zack's Buster Sword, but it totally does

can't wait for your next one man

My dad's job is to specifically overlook these kinds of jobs. Usually they are done in shipyards with dry docks so that the entire ship can be reached without having to go through water and then the dock will be filled back up with water. It is the safest way to do that kind of job. I am sure the people who did this job knew exactly what they were doing, but I am also sure that their asses could have made diamonds out of charcoal as well.
I am not trying to argue and say either of us are the correct ones, I just think that it would have been a safer but much longer job if it was done by dry dock, which now thinking about it, not every shipyard might have the means of doing that.

A ship like that would not be all that effected, it would rock some but no where near to that extent. All I am saying is that it would probably been a much less intense moment if it was in dry dock. A single fuck up there could ruin a captains career

The internet, where both sides can argue about things they have no idea about.

I trust the people who actually build giant ships and launch them know best

My dad's job is to specifically overlook these kinds of jobs. Usually they are done in shipyards with dry docks so that the entire ship can be reached without having to go through water and then the dock will be filled back up with water. It is the safest way to do that kind of job. I am sure the people who did this job knew exactly what they were doing, but I am also sure that their asses could have made diamonds out of charcoal as well.
I am not trying to argue and say either of us are the correct ones, I just think that it would have been a safer but much longer job if it was done by dry dock, which now thinking about it, not every shipyard might have the means of doing that.