Oh.
To be honest, I thought it was your profile picture.

bucky was just hiding by normal means though, and in the comics heimdall could find anyone who wasn't hiding using really powerful magic just by thinking of them, so bucky should not have been any trouble at all.

Except Heimdahl might've had more important things to watch.

more the case of captain america just not asking I guess.

would have taken 30 seconds and a megical textmessage to sort it out otherwise

He can Totally refuse, especially if he views it a trivial matter that might interrupt his true duties.

This comment is just imitating youtube comments on videos of older or non popular/mainstream music.

Damn. I'm retarded.

Perhaps, since the market for music has been growing as the technology to play it has developed to become common household items, and to make it easier to use, combined with the market for clubs and parties, it seems plausible that there is just more music being produced, good and bad. Of course you're not going to get a legendary guitar solo nearly as often as it's an instrument that has fallen to become more of a rhythm instrument in popular music, where it was once a leading, melodic feature.
Of course there is also the chance that you are correct.

I say it depends on who. I know a girl and a guy who both went into sex change. From kindergarten we knew the girls really wasn't a girl, by the way she was, by the way she saw herself, etc.. As for the guy, he was in is mid 20s when he decided to change sex. it was that or the rope, he couldn't live anymore with the feeling of being a girl but seing a guy every time he looked in the mirror

the girl hasn't changed sex yet tho, she wants to wait for the 20s too. but now she does everything like a boy, minus the penis. and honestly, i haven't seem them both better with themselves before they decided to go for it.

Eh, jokes about murder are often humorous.

Oh.
To be honest, I thought it was your profile picture.

Again, this is insinuating that the "right" is doing anything at all itself to offer support. You can't criticize the efforts of one group when yours are nonexistent; it's categorically hypocritical.

See, now you made the fatal flaw that by not arguing for your standpoint, I must be belonging to the other extreme.

You made the fatal flaw of assuming "you" is directed at you, and not the hyperbolic "you" that's been used as the subject thus far.

Nevermind that, I just had a stroke or something, replace the last sentence in my comment with "I can't find a single case where 'you' was not the literal "you" in your original comment."

I see. My bad. You see, I can't find a single case in the other comments where you was not in the literal "you" in your original comment.

If anything the new American government was less than willing to support the new French republic because the debt that we owed them was to the French king and not the republic.

Although Facebook might seem like a shallow medium on which to express our condolences and support, it does not make them any less real and we will continue to support our oldest ally for years to come.

I mean, we are talking about the original two comments, right?

I would wager so, yes.

Whut?

You know how when you shine light through a thin grid onto a wall and several dots appear there? That's because there's a thing called an electric field and a thing called a magnetic field, and light is a sine wave of a magnetic field plus a sine wave of an electric field, meaning that when it goes through a grid, it will create constructive interference at some points on the wall.
That's wave-like behaviour and really fuck'n awesome!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

Diffraction = wave phenomenon.

Whut?

You know how when you shine light through a thin grid onto a wall and several dots appear there? That's because there's a thing called an electric field and a thing called a magnetic field, and light is a sine wave of a magnetic field plus a sine wave of an electric field, meaning that when it goes through a grid, it will create constructive interference at some points on the wall.
That's wave-like behaviour and really fuck'n awesome!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

The former

Indeed.
That was my point though, as a response to your original statement that [...] "if a kid says "I want to drive trains" then the education system may not be the ideal place for that profession", because apparently it's a requirement.

I'd wager it's a tad more specialised than a normal school, though.

The education of which I speak, or the education to which the OP's post references?

The former

Indeed.
That was my point though, as a response to your original statement that [...] "if a kid says "I want to drive trains" then the education system may not be the ideal place for that profession", because apparently it's a requirement.

At some point I heard that "Nothing that carries information moves faster than light" as opposed to "nothing travels faster than light".

Take a point in space, and launch two photons from it in opposite directions. The distance between the two photons increases at twice the speed of light, but the distance doesn't carry information because it's an abstract concept and is a relationship between two objects that do carry information. To find the distance, you need to observe each photon.

I'll have to admit that all I know about light is that it's series of particles moving at a certain speed, but I still don't understand how it's also "waves".

But as I've said, darkness is the idea of absence of light, and apparently can travel at speed higher than the speed of light like you said according to the aforementioned definition.

That is, darkness is still an abstract concept, so I'd guess you can't really observe it directly. I just don't feel like agreeing on it's comparison to a liquid (or a gas) in terms of behavior.

I see.
The manner in which I understood that something can travel faster than light is that light's wavefunction can be described as a wave packet - that is a wave-like package of waves.
In this sense, the package can move at speed c at tops, but the individual waves that it contains can move much faster, but must always be confined to the package.
I think you're right though.

Diffraction = wave phenomenon.

Whut?

You know how when you shine light through a thin grid onto a wall and several dots appear there? That's because there's a thing called an electric field and a thing called a magnetic field, and light is a sine wave of a magnetic field plus a sine wave of an electric field, meaning that when it goes through a grid, it will create constructive interference at some points on the wall.
That's wave-like behaviour and really fuck'n awesome!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

See, that's one way of thinking about it, because that's how light works. Light particles (photons) are separate particles (and waves because quantum mechanics and electrodynamics), but darkness is not. Your description also fits, but darkness being nothing - one easily deformable pile of nothing - means that it can be regarded more like a liquid.
Even slow moving objects through a normal liquid has a tiny gap behind it because the liquid takes a finite time to catch up to it because it has a finite speed, and it takes a finite time for the pressure wave in front of the object to spread out meaning that it takes time for the liquid to notice that it has moved.
Darkness does not take time to catch up to light, implying that it travels at infinite speeds to accommodate the shape it has around the light.

It's an interesting thought I'll give ya that.

At some point I heard that "Nothing that carries information moves faster than light" as opposed to "nothing travels faster than light".

Take a point in space, and launch two photons from it in opposite directions. The distance between the two photons increases at twice the speed of light, but the distance doesn't carry information because it's an abstract concept and is a relationship between two objects that do carry information. To find the distance, you need to observe each photon.

I'll have to admit that all I know about light is that it's series of particles moving at a certain speed, but I still don't understand how it's also "waves".

But as I've said, darkness is the idea of absence of light, and apparently can travel at speed higher than the speed of light like you said according to the aforementioned definition.

That is, darkness is still an abstract concept, so I'd guess you can't really observe it directly. I just don't feel like agreeing on it's comparison to a liquid (or a gas) in terms of behavior.

I see.
The manner in which I understood that something can travel faster than light is that light's wavefunction can be described as a wave packet - that is a wave-like package of waves.
In this sense, the package can move at speed c at tops, but the individual waves that it contains can move much faster, but must always be confined to the package.
I think you're right though.

Diffraction = wave phenomenon.

Whut?

You know how when you shine light through a thin grid onto a wall and several dots appear there? That's because there's a thing called an electric field and a thing called a magnetic field, and light is a sine wave of a magnetic field plus a sine wave of an electric field, meaning that when it goes through a grid, it will create constructive interference at some points on the wall.
That's wave-like behaviour and really fuck'n awesome!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

I think you're right.
Since darkness can be described as a function of "if there's a photon, then it's 0, if not it is 1" as a consequence of not being an actual thing, it is analogous to the dot on the moon.
Thus the phrase "nothing moves faster than light" becomes technically true.

See, that's one way of thinking about it, because that's how light works. Light particles (photons) are separate particles (and waves because quantum mechanics and electrodynamics), but darkness is not. Your description also fits, but darkness being nothing - one easily deformable pile of nothing - means that it can be regarded more like a liquid.
Even slow moving objects through a normal liquid has a tiny gap behind it because the liquid takes a finite time to catch up to it because it has a finite speed, and it takes a finite time for the pressure wave in front of the object to spread out meaning that it takes time for the liquid to notice that it has moved.
Darkness does not take time to catch up to light, implying that it travels at infinite speeds to accommodate the shape it has around the light.

It's an interesting thought I'll give ya that.

At some point I heard that "Nothing that carries information moves faster than light" as opposed to "nothing travels faster than light".

Take a point in space, and launch two photons from it in opposite directions. The distance between the two photons increases at twice the speed of light, but the distance doesn't carry information because it's an abstract concept and is a relationship between two objects that do carry information. To find the distance, you need to observe each photon.

I'll have to admit that all I know about light is that it's series of particles moving at a certain speed, but I still don't understand how it's also "waves".

But as I've said, darkness is the idea of absence of light, and apparently can travel at speed higher than the speed of light like you said according to the aforementioned definition.

That is, darkness is still an abstract concept, so I'd guess you can't really observe it directly. I just don't feel like agreeing on it's comparison to a liquid (or a gas) in terms of behavior.

I see.
The manner in which I understood that something can travel faster than light is that light's wavefunction can be described as a wave packet - that is a wave-like package of waves.
In this sense, the package can move at speed c at tops, but the individual waves that it contains can move much faster, but must always be confined to the package.
I think you're right though.

Diffraction = wave phenomenon.

Whut?

You know how when you shine light through a thin grid onto a wall and several dots appear there? That's because there's a thing called an electric field and a thing called a magnetic field, and light is a sine wave of a magnetic field plus a sine wave of an electric field, meaning that when it goes through a grid, it will create constructive interference at some points on the wall.
That's wave-like behaviour and really fuck'n awesome!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction