Oh stop acting like a pwetty wittle pwincess. It is well known that Bethesda games are buggy, so if that is a problem for you then you are an idiot for spending $100. The fact is, Bethesda games are far too massive to thoroughly check for bugs; Despite the bugs they still make some of the best games.

>Wants product that he paid for to function.
>Is called a pretty little princess.

It does function, retard. I'm playing it right now. It just has a few bugs, which is understandable for a game of such scale. The reason why you are acting like a pwetty wittle pwincess is because of your inflated sense of entitlement. You think that they should have done another one or two years of QA before releasing the game, when nearly everyone else is okay with the bugs, they would rather play the game now.

Who cares if you spent $100? Do you know what that means? Either 1: You knew that Bethesda games are buggy, and if that is a problem for you then you are an idiot for still spending your money. or 2: You didn't know that Bethesda games are buggy, and you are an idiot for spending your precious $100 without doing research.

You do have a point there, there's an inconvenient tendency in the video game industry for games to just be not finished upon release.
Still though, Bethesda is notorious for the programming equivalent of duct tape and spray paint, and then having the users/modders fix the problems later.
Long story short, I think I'm just gonna wait two years, then buy it for like 5 % of the original price, download the unofficial patches that inevitably come, and then play it without it breaking a lot.

Well, kiddo, take a seat and I'll tell you about a little thing called "redeeming qualities"...

Well son, let me tell you about a little thing called "I paid $100 for this bit of entertainment so at least I should be able to expect it to function without being disappointed."

Oh stop acting like a pwetty wittle pwincess. It is well known that Bethesda games are buggy, so if that is a problem for you then you are an idiot for spending $100. The fact is, Bethesda games are far too massive to thoroughly check for bugs; Despite the bugs they still make some of the best games.

>Wants product that he paid for to function.
>Is called a pretty little princess.

It does function, retard. I'm playing it right now. It just has a few bugs, which is understandable for a game of such scale. The reason why you are acting like a pwetty wittle pwincess is because of your inflated sense of entitlement. You think that they should have done another one or two years of QA before releasing the game, when nearly everyone else is okay with the bugs, they would rather play the game now.

Who cares if you spent $100? Do you know what that means? Either 1: You knew that Bethesda games are buggy, and if that is a problem for you then you are an idiot for still spending your money. or 2: You didn't know that Bethesda games are buggy, and you are an idiot for spending your precious $100 without doing research.

Problem?

You can be a "scientist" and have no clue what youre talking about.

sun is a star.


so that just proves ops point.

What?
What?
What?
Are you retarded?
What?

fair enough.
I need to sleep more

What's that mean in English?

No.

Basically, eat a lot in the morning, don't small the rest of the day. Keeps your metabolism up.

I accidentally my sentence. replace don't small with eat small.

I said it more in the sense that you can easily find ways to figure out what's wrong with you and find ways to deal with it. A lot of ways to deal with mental issues is exposure, which means you'd be supposed to do or at least try to, the things you have trouble doing.

yeah, I've looked into hawking radiation before. it's a pretty cool concept, however i thought quasars were the point of critical mass a black hole reached, and it basically ripping apart. I was wrong though

Yup, still though, I'm glad you're open to argumentation.

again, fair. I was under the influence they came about at the end of a black holes life.

well that's fair, although obviously some form of mass must be released. a black hole is finite, maybe not through quasars, but even radiation has mass, however small it may be. I'm not saying this story is real because it obviously isnt, however, I believe there are ways the singularity degrades.

They do according to Stephen Hawking.

The theory behind it is really cool too!
Basically, when a radiation field is high enough in energy, you can make particles out of the energy. This usually comes in the form of electron-positron pairs, as they're very light in mass.
If this happens just around the surface of a black hole (the radius of the surface being slightly bigger than the radius from which light cannot escape it), one of the two newly made particles has the possibility to escape it, if the energy it gets is high enough.
This means that the black hole's field loses energy (since the particle escaped), and the only way that can be is if it loses mass inside the black hole.
This is called "Hawking Radiation", and it's really fucking awesome!

The "field" of which I spoke, came from the black body radiation (fancy way of saying warm things glow), and the black hole spinning around itself.

It's really cool stuff.

yeah, I've looked into hawking radiation before. it's a pretty cool concept, however i thought quasars were the point of critical mass a black hole reached, and it basically ripping apart. I was wrong though

Yup, still though, I'm glad you're open to argumentation.

na, but also a black holes life span is finite, they everntually expell their mass in the form of quasars. This is only found in supermassive black holes I believe, however it is still an expulsion of mass.

In other words, it is not the black hole losing mass, it's the black hole gaining it that causes them.

again, fair. I was under the influence they came about at the end of a black holes life.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
See, that's where you're wrong.
From the wiki:

"[...] there is now a scientific consensus that a quasar is a compact region in the center of a massive galaxy surrounding a central supermassive black hole."
They don't expell their mass in the form of quasars.
A quasar's light beam is coming from an active galactic nuclei which is when a shitton of stuff is orbiting around a black hole, becomes dense AROUND the black hole, becomes really hot, ionized and then ejecting a shitload of photons (radio-, micro-, X-rays and that shit), thus loosing kinetic energy and falling further into the black hole (rinse and repeat).

Where do you get these ideas?

well that's fair, although obviously some form of mass must be released. a black hole is finite, maybe not through quasars, but even radiation has mass, however small it may be. I'm not saying this story is real because it obviously isnt, however, I believe there are ways the singularity degrades.

They do according to Stephen Hawking.

The theory behind it is really cool too!
Basically, when a radiation field is high enough in energy, you can make particles out of the energy. This usually comes in the form of electron-positron pairs, as they're very light in mass.
If this happens just around the surface of a black hole (the radius of the surface being slightly bigger than the radius from which light cannot escape it), one of the two newly made particles has the possibility to escape it, if the energy it gets is high enough.
This means that the black hole's field loses energy (since the particle escaped), and the only way that can be is if it loses mass inside the black hole.
This is called "Hawking Radiation", and it's really fucking awesome!

The "field" of which I spoke, came from the black body radiation (fancy way of saying warm things glow), and the black hole spinning around itself.

It's really cool stuff.

yeah, I've looked into hawking radiation before. it's a pretty cool concept, however i thought quasars were the point of critical mass a black hole reached, and it basically ripping apart. I was wrong though

Yup, still though, I'm glad you're open to argumentation.