Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

nickmandemon    

no avatar Level 177 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to nickmandemon Block nickmandemon Invite nickmandemon to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 29
Date Signed Up:7/06/2009
Last Login:9/09/2014
Location:connecticut
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 865 total,  1407 ,  542
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 177 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 178 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:395
FJ Points:772

latest user's comments

#320 - Lol I smoke weed and i hate it when people say that. They are …  [+] (25 new replies) 04/24/2013 on all natural -6
#326 - Womens Study Major (04/24/2013) [-]
You know someone had a convincing argument when the first and last word is "lol".

Frankly, weed is dangerous. Not as much as cocaine, but probably a close to alchohol.
#331 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Shut the fuck up anon. I'm warning you that after this i will not comment again. Frankly, I'm sick of trying to argue with dumb asses like you, because I've learned from experience that you will never admit you're wrong. If you think that weed is anywhere near as dangerous as alchohol, then you're fucking retarded. The only reason i put the "lols" is so that people wouldn't think I was some butthurt offended stoner, because I'm not. I was simply agreeing with this post.
User avatar #349 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
You sound a hell of a lot like a butthurt offended stoner to me.


It isn't as bad as alcohol, but sure as hell isn't good for you, so stop acting like it is just because it isn't the most efficient way of killing yourself in your childish search for a different state of consciousness just because you can't find satisfaction with the one you're in.


Then again, I don't even smoke, so.....
#357 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
That sir. Is THE MOST ignorant assumption that people make about weed smokers. Congratulations, you won the prize. I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know smokes weed to escape from reality. It's just a fun thing people do with their friends. You're letting propaganda like Above The Influence get to you too much. And weed doesn't kill you by the way... even most anti weed people accept that as fact...
User avatar #363 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
Congratulations, you just won the award for being a pissed of little prick
#366 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
#368 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
User avatar #362 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, you fucking idiot, that isn't it at all.


Weed IS finding a different state of consciousness. Day-dreaming is a different state of consciousness. Spinning around in circles on the playground is a different state of consciousness. Seeking them out is a natural thing that all people do in some way or another.

It's the fact that you haven't grown up enough that you still so desperately NEED to find a more pleasurable state of consciousness than the one you are already in, like how children do in the playground or a person does when faced with an incredibly arduous task, not because you have work to do, but because you are still that much of a fucking kid, that I find it sad.


It isn't an assumption, it's a simple fact.
#365 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Okay. I never said that weed wasn't finding a different state of conciousness. It's the fact that you ASSUME ( <--- check it out it's that word we were talking about) that we need to. Like i said, it's for fun.
User avatar #367 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
" I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know smokes weed to escape from reality. "

This is a direct copy paste of you claiming that smoking weed isn't entering a different state of consciousness, i.e. escaping from reality.

It's for fun, but it also kills you; That isn't fun. There's a hell of a lot of things that are not only fun for you, they are good for you too, as well as legal, and bring on a hell of a lot more of a rush than weed ever will.

Ever try Fencing? Rock climbing? Writing a novel, reading one, or survivalist camping?

Now THAT is fun. This is my problem; There are plenty of ways to have fun that don't risk being caught by the authorities and don't cause damage to your body, yet, as we've established before, you're too childish to see passed that, because smoking pot is an easier way to enter a different state of consciousness.
#374 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Entering a different state of consciousness is a completely different thing than escaping from reality, for one reason. The word escape implies that we need to run away from reality, like reality is bad or something. You're trying to make it seem like if you ever smoke weed, then after that your entire life revolves around it and you always need to be high. That's not true at all. I have no problem with reality. My girlfriend doesn't smoke weed, but i love going on dates with her because she makes me happy. That's part of my reality. Why would i need to escape from that? And no one uses weed for a "rush". Weed makes you calm, not in a rush. And using the "its illegal argument" is just plain stupid. The government is not always right. Remember how slavery used to be legal? The reason you keep calling me childish is because you're mad you can't come up with any good arguments. By the way; people who die from smoking weed every year: 0, average number of people who die from rock climing every year: 25. Dumb fuck. Do some research before you come at me with a retarded argument like that. And by the way, implying that i don't read? Insulting. I love reading. Fuck you. And even if everything you said was true (which its definately not) why do you have to yell at me? What did I, weed, or other weed smokers ever do to you to make you so mad?
User avatar #375 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, actually, it's not. The word escape implies exactly what it means, that you've left that state of consciousness. It doesn't mean or say that reality is bad, it says you're trying to leave it, and you do.

You're missing the point; when I say 'rush' I'm not claiming weed excites you, I'm claiming that these other activities are more fun.

By the way; People who die from smoking weed every year; Isn't 0. No one ODs on weed, but it is a proven carcinogen, meaning every pothead who has died of lung cancer, which is plenty, have all died from smoking weed. Indirectly you say? Yeah, about as indirectly as cigarettes, even if weed is less potent.

The 'illegal' argument isn't stupid, it's regarding basic moral fiber. Yeah, the government isn't always right, but flouting the law because you think it's wrong IS wrong. You don't break the rules set by society just because you don't like them, and if you do, you get your ass tossed in jail. That's what I'm saying, and that proves further that I'm not calling you a child because I can't make a good argument, I'm calling you a child because you're willing to break the law and risk years in jail for the sake of having a little fun.


By the way, I wasn't implying that you don't read, I was implying that reading is a more productive way to spend your time and have fun than smoking pot.

Not to mention, what the hell do you mean do some research? I didn't come at you with an argument about people dying from weed, I came at you with an argument about weed being a shitty way to have fun. Are you signing out so you can comment as an anonymous so it seems like more people are on your side?

Really though, if I didn't think I was making a good argument, why would I argue at all? My points are valid, none of them have you once disproven rather than angrily stated your opinion about, and you're calling them bad arguments without refuting any of them properly doesn't make them so.
#403 - nickmandemon (04/30/2013) [-]
Escape implies that you need to get away. I don't know how to explain that differently. And if you smoke pot you would understand that all this "leaving reality" stuff that you're talking about is a little ridiculous. Thats a better argument against something like lsd or something like that. And great for you if you think that those activities are more fun. Thats what you like to do and I'm not going to criticize you for it, unlike the way you're treating me for smoking "pot". And for you're information, weed has never killed anyone. That is one of the biggest arguments for its legalization. And regarding the legal issue; I don't know where you live, but I live in America, which was FOUNDED on the belief that if there is a law that the majority of the country doesn't agree with, then we have the right to change it. And if i enjoy smoking marijuana, I'm not gonna fucking wait for the government lollygagging and taking forever with legalization. And if flouting the law because you don't agree with it is wrong... are you calling people like Harriet Tubman bad people? Of course, I'm not comparing myself to her, I'm just asking you to defend what you said. And if you've admitted that you've never smoked weed, how do you know it's a shitty way to have fun? You sound like a person with a very narrow minded manner of thinking. And if I'm childish for having fun with risks, rather than spending my life surrounded by caution and metaphorical pillows, then so be it. Fun's best when it's spiked with danger. Maybe one day you will realize this, and i believe that day will be a great turning point in your life. I don't know why other people doing what they like to do bothers you so much, but maybe you should think about how it would feel if someone just started yelling at you and criticizing you about the way you live your life when they don't even know you as a person. And by the way, I've deftly refuted every argument you've presented. I literally address everything you say.
#361 - Womens Study Major (04/24/2013) [-]
Show one case of a person dying directly from weed.
User avatar #364 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No one directly dies from anything. You don't die from a car accident, you die from your lungs collapsing when your ribs get smashed IN the accident.

You don't die from a bullet, you die from bleeding out or severe trauma CAUSED by the bullet.

Weed has been proven to have carcinogens in it. Go find a case of someone who has lung-cancer that also smokes pot. I'm sure there's plenty of them. All of them died, and it can be linked to weed. Is it the direct cause? Is it even the main cause? No, but it did directly make things worse.
#369 - Womens Study Major (04/24/2013) [-]
"No one dies directly from anything"
So, deadly lung cancer isn't directly tied to smoking cigarettes? Literally overdosing on cocaine, or heroin, or meth or any other drug that is actually dangerous doesn't count as a direct death?
Yea, no shit there's people who have lung cancer and smoke pot, doesn't take a fuckin genius to figure that out. But if the weed didn't cause the cancer, why is there a problem? Why are cigarettes widely available and even subsidized by the government when they directly cause 100's of thousands of people to die each year? Yet weed, which (believe it or not) doesn't have a single death associated with it ever, is still illegal?
User avatar #370 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
Deadly lung cancer is directly tied to smoking cigarettes, but it's the AFFECTS of lung cancer that kills you, not the cancer itself, just like an overdose's AFFECTS kill you, the overdose doesn't.

But you're the one who decided to be a technical asswipe about it and asked for one case of a person dying directly from smoking weed.


Weed has had deaths associated with it, as I said, it's been proven a carcinogen, and hence has ties to lung cancer. If a man who smokes pot gets lung cancer, he likely got lung cancer from smoking pot, even if that isn't what it says on the tin.

Cigarettes are widely available and subsidized by the government because they are a major cash crop, and in addition to that so many people are addicted to them now that if they were made illegal, we'd just see Prohibition all over again, crime and smuggling rates would sky-rocket, and they'd be back in two years anyhow. That's why.

The weed DID cause the cancer, in the same way that cigarettes cause cancer, in that they introduce carcinogens to the body. The only difference is the potency levels, but that doesn't mean that a man who smokes that dies from lung cancer died from cigarettes directly, it means he died from lung cancer caused by cigarettes, just how people die from lung cancer caused by weed.
User avatar #371 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
EFFECTS. ** My bad.
#334 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
#336 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Whatever... I guess i just have to accept that the majority of the people on this site are just ignorant and very adamant about staying that way. I don't understand why people who smoke weed get so much hate on this site. What is your problem? Did your dad smoke weed and like not pay enough attention you you? God I am sick of this.
User avatar #341 - mrastrozombie (04/24/2013) [-]
I smoke weed, but you don't see me comparing it to gays getting hated on. That shit is nothing compared to the low level of intolerance that stoners get. No one I know was killed because he liked smoking weed.
#348 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
I didn't compare the treatment gay people get to the treatment stoners get at all. In any way. You made that assumption yourself. I'm saying that you can't categorize a whole group of people by the stupid things that some of the people in that group do. That's all.
User avatar #373 - mrastrozombie (04/24/2013) [-]
my bad i read that shit wrong, but I still stand by what I said.
User avatar #340 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
Calm the fuck down bro, I didn't even argue against you
#352 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
#52 - Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because y… 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
#50 - No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#48 - Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#46 - I realize that if vegito and gohan fought, vegito would win, b…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #47 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
BUT the Potara earrings are permanent making the users 1 person, unlike the Fusion which is reversable. The only reason Vegito de-synced was because they were absorbed by Buu and became two different beings
#48 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him. Thats still two people whether the fusion was permanent or not. If mystic Gohan used the potara earrings with either goku or vegeta, the result would be stronger than vegito. Vegito is a fusion. I don't know what's hard to understand about that.
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#44 - All i was trying to say is that gohan is the strongest. Not ss…  [+] (8 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #45 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
But, he does exist AND lets say he didn't exist Vegito is stronger than Mystic Gohan
#46 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
I realize that if vegito and gohan fought, vegito would win, but that's not really fair. Vegito is 2 people. Vegito is the strongest fusion, gohan is the strongest person. And no, you're mistaken, ssj4 does not exist in dragon ball.
User avatar #47 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
BUT the Potara earrings are permanent making the users 1 person, unlike the Fusion which is reversable. The only reason Vegito de-synced was because they were absorbed by Buu and became two different beings
#48 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him. Thats still two people whether the fusion was permanent or not. If mystic Gohan used the potara earrings with either goku or vegeta, the result would be stronger than vegito. Vegito is a fusion. I don't know what's hard to understand about that.
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#42 - ....yyyeah. That's kind of the definition of non cannon. Not b…  [+] (10 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #43 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
K dude just you do you
#44 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
All i was trying to say is that gohan is the strongest. Not ssj4 because it doesn't exist.
User avatar #45 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
But, he does exist AND lets say he didn't exist Vegito is stronger than Mystic Gohan
#46 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
I realize that if vegito and gohan fought, vegito would win, but that's not really fair. Vegito is 2 people. Vegito is the strongest fusion, gohan is the strongest person. And no, you're mistaken, ssj4 does not exist in dragon ball.
User avatar #47 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
BUT the Potara earrings are permanent making the users 1 person, unlike the Fusion which is reversable. The only reason Vegito de-synced was because they were absorbed by Buu and became two different beings
#48 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him. Thats still two people whether the fusion was permanent or not. If mystic Gohan used the potara earrings with either goku or vegeta, the result would be stronger than vegito. Vegito is a fusion. I don't know what's hard to understand about that.
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#39 - It wasn't made by akira toriyama, so it's not dragon ball. Its…  [+] (12 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -1
User avatar #40 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
A lot of comics have different writers and artists should they be considered non cannon?
#42 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
....yyyeah. That's kind of the definition of non cannon. Not by the original creator.
User avatar #43 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
K dude just you do you
#44 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
All i was trying to say is that gohan is the strongest. Not ssj4 because it doesn't exist.
User avatar #45 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
But, he does exist AND lets say he didn't exist Vegito is stronger than Mystic Gohan
#46 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
I realize that if vegito and gohan fought, vegito would win, but that's not really fair. Vegito is 2 people. Vegito is the strongest fusion, gohan is the strongest person. And no, you're mistaken, ssj4 does not exist in dragon ball.
User avatar #47 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
BUT the Potara earrings are permanent making the users 1 person, unlike the Fusion which is reversable. The only reason Vegito de-synced was because they were absorbed by Buu and became two different beings
#48 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him. Thats still two people whether the fusion was permanent or not. If mystic Gohan used the potara earrings with either goku or vegeta, the result would be stronger than vegito. Vegito is a fusion. I don't know what's hard to understand about that.
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#35 - ssj4 is not cannon. GT is gay .  [+] (14 new replies) 04/22/2013 on Well did you? -3
User avatar #37 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
Not the best but still, pretty awesome
#39 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
It wasn't made by akira toriyama, so it's not dragon ball. Its just a shitty american cartoon with characters who look like and have the same names as the people from dragon ball.
User avatar #40 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
A lot of comics have different writers and artists should they be considered non cannon?
#42 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
....yyyeah. That's kind of the definition of non cannon. Not by the original creator.
User avatar #43 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
K dude just you do you
#44 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
All i was trying to say is that gohan is the strongest. Not ssj4 because it doesn't exist.
User avatar #45 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
But, he does exist AND lets say he didn't exist Vegito is stronger than Mystic Gohan
#46 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
I realize that if vegito and gohan fought, vegito would win, but that's not really fair. Vegito is 2 people. Vegito is the strongest fusion, gohan is the strongest person. And no, you're mistaken, ssj4 does not exist in dragon ball.
User avatar #47 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
BUT the Potara earrings are permanent making the users 1 person, unlike the Fusion which is reversable. The only reason Vegito de-synced was because they were absorbed by Buu and became two different beings
#48 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but it was still goku and vegeta who COMBINED to make him. Thats still two people whether the fusion was permanent or not. If mystic Gohan used the potara earrings with either goku or vegeta, the result would be stronger than vegito. Vegito is a fusion. I don't know what's hard to understand about that.
User avatar #49 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
OK, what about the movies? Are those Cannon? If so Mystic Gohan could not even touch Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon, while goku super saiyan 3 beat him
#50 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
No the movies are not cannon for your information. And even if they were, im pretty sure Gohan wasn't mystic at that point. If you think ssj3 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then why do you think that the kai's would even bother making gohan mystic when goku could already do ssj3?
User avatar #51 - jeudyfeo (04/22/2013) [-]
In the end the thing that killed Kid Buu was the Spirit Bomb and Goku was super saiyan 1 when he did so your argument is invalid. Gohan at one point was the strongest then he was surpassed by Vegito, Kid Buu, and then Super saiyan 4 Goku and Vegeta, same with Baby. And Gt was cannon damn it
#52 - nickmandemon (04/22/2013) [-]
Umm we discussed this. You can't make GT cannon just because you're mad that you're wrong. It's not cannon. It wasn't by the creator of dragon ball. Retard. And the spirit bomb that killed buu had EVERYONE FROM PLANET EARTHS ENERGY IN IT. Including Gohan you fucktard. If you think that ssj1 goku is stronger than mystic gohan, then you know nothing about dragon ball and you should take that picture of goku away from your username, because you don't deserve it. I fucking hate it when stupid ass kids go "DERP your argument is invalid" like it makes them sound smart or something. Here's a hint. When you're completely wrong about something, don't say that. It only makes you look more stupid.
#515 - You proved absolutely nothing. just another idiot on the inter… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#513 - Thats kind of a dumb statement. I just figured that you were a… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#510 - Let me go on /b/ and ill get back to you in a few days with my… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#509 - This is about a drug survey. They do this with everything. Thi… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#506 - Make a word document looking like a college roster. Make it in… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#504 - Yeah this proves nothing to me. If you are even half as compet… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#502 - I only say that because there have been little to no con troll… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#501 - Ok suddenly you're in medschool. I'm guessing that there's abo… 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#499 - I wouldn't listen to everything you see on the internet dude. … 04/22/2013 on Marijuana 0
#496 - ...are you serious? Acid burns holes in your brain.... 04/21/2013 on Marijuana -1
#490 - Obviously not everything moron. If you actually took that to h…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/21/2013 on Marijuana -1
User avatar #493 - mouthwash (04/21/2013) [-]
But... But I've never given anyone cancer...
#489 - "You would know if you did any independent research that … 04/21/2013 on Marijuana 0
#176 - I meant an actually significant amount. ***************… 04/21/2013 on Marijuana -4
#170 - The only two possibilities were that you were wrong, or i was … 04/21/2013 on Marijuana 0
#163 - Ok, so the link says that marijuana can promote inflammatory i… 04/21/2013 on Marijuana 0
#160 - Oh. Well going by minuscule chances and technicalities, you sh…  [+] (10 new replies) 04/21/2013 on Marijuana 0
#187 - fordun (04/21/2013) [-]
You would know if you did any independent research that goes against the status quo you would find that those carcinogens are present in such low amounts that the vast majority of them would take years to cause cancer.

In fact. The only real cause for alarm in tobacco smoke are carcinogens labeled as "nitrosamines" They are naturally occuring where ever nicotine is found. Not just in tobacco. And because your going to ask for sources i will list them at the bottom.

Hell most of the current problems with smoking that have been backed up by real science (Not the FDA or Surgeon General) without a political bend has found to be at fault of the tobacco companies using curing methods and and additives that harm people.

I'm not saying tobacco causes cancer. Because it has and can. I'm asking you to look past the junk science and try and take in new information similar to how stoners treat scientific evidence for pot.

And i'm not saying don't smoke marijuana. I am currently high on marijuana. I'm saying like everything else marijuana has risks. They might not be likely. But they have risks.

www.forces.org/evidence/download/fennel.pdf
http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/f-w00/nitrosamine.html
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1855903
http://www.forces.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=363&t=3805&sid=af1b9c111c83abd40a6f8 f1996067b2f
#489 - nickmandemon (04/21/2013) [-]
"You would know if you did any independent research that goes against the status quo you would find that those carcinogens are present in such low amounts that the vast majority of them would take years to cause cancer"- my point exactly....
Im not saying marijuana doesn't have risks, im just not trying to let stupid people convince other stupid people that marujuana can kill, because that makes stoners look bad. If you smoke ALOT of marijuana all the time you can get chronic coughing, and even bronchitis. I've had it at one point. But it will never give you cancer.
#241 - Womens Study Major (04/21/2013) [-]
marijuana smoke has never been linked to lung cancer, mouth cancer, or any type of cancer at all. never.

to say that all smoke causes cancer, regardless of its chemical makeup is like saying that all liquid will get you drunk, regardless of its chemical makeup.

some liquid may get you drunk, some may kill you after years of drinking it, some may kill you instantly. smoke is no different. it's a physical state and chemical composition is everything when talking about carcinogens.

the more you know.
#247 - fordun (04/21/2013) [-]
Regardless of both of our information marijuana has physical risks like anything else.
User avatar #263 - sonicserver (04/21/2013) [-]
the burned plant matter, of course. but the chemicals that get you high from inhalation themselves are not (according to current research) harmful in the long-term
#265 - fordun (04/21/2013) [-]
So? That doesn't benefit your argument. Burnt plant matter is part of consuming marijuana (Outside extracts, edibles in the like which only a fraction of people take advantage of.
User avatar #275 - sonicserver (04/21/2013) [-]
vaporizers, edibles, extracts are exactly what i am talking about. once i could afford a vape, i had an extremely noticeable increase in lung capacity and overall health. i had significantly less lethargy as a result of my improved lung function.

the vast majority of people are hurting their lungs by burning pot and inhaling it, absolutely. but i'm saying that it doesn't have to be that way, and in fact it's not fair to say that getting high from marijuana (in the sense of using the chemicals to put yourself into an altered state, which is why anyone uses it) is harmful physically in every case.

i can't smoke anymore. but i can still have my opinion
#278 - fordun (04/21/2013) [-]
Okay then i can agree with that when it comes to medical. I'm pretty sure there were reports floating around weed forums for sometime that marijuana can bring schizophrenia out on people with a family history of it.
User avatar #282 - sonicserver (04/21/2013) [-]
it has been shown to bring that out in adolescent teens. one of many studies done on the negative effects of pot on developing minds and bodies.

i'm very much against teen use of mj. like alcohol and tobacco, weed shouldn't be consumed by people who are still physically and mentally becoming fully formed adults.

should be at least 18 yrs old to use. i'd rather it be 21 though, just to keep it out of high schools.
#292 - fordun (04/21/2013) [-]
Well our policy with alcohol has worked out great. We have a culture with alcohol that says you can't have a drop until your 21. But it already realizes that kids drink in high school. And its nearly encouraged in while in college.

Then your 21st birthday you nearly required to get dangerously intoxicated. And stay that way until your 22 in which some how you are supposed to be able to enjoy alcohol in a responsible manner.

We have a culture that celebrates degeneracy. Where defecating yourself, violence, loose restrictions regarding sexuality, getting in trouble, are all common occurrences and thought of as part of the experience. And labels people that don't submit to this culture weird and anti-social.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - MrDeadiron ONLINE (04/30/2014) [-]
I added you because I really enjoyed how you told that guy off. Didnt want you to think I was some weirdo.
#2 to #1 - nickmandemon (04/30/2014) [-]
Lol thanks dude i enjoyed the friend request
 Friends (0)