Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

newsmyrna

Rank #15865 on Comments
newsmyrna Avatar Level 244 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to newsmyrna Block newsmyrna Invite newsmyrna to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/08/2012
Last Login:12/25/2014
Location:China
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#15865
Highest Content Rank:#9517
Highest Comment Rank:#1465
Content Thumbs: 502 total,  596 ,  94
Comment Thumbs: 4602 total,  5665 ,  1063
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 50 Content: Sammich eater → Level 51 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 62% (62/100)
Level 244 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:23318
Times Content Favorited:11 times
Total Comments Made:1536
FJ Points:2035

latest user's comments

#29 - Who is Arcanine i need to know for scientific purposes.  [+] (2 new replies) 10/30/2013 on Celebrity Pokemon 0
User avatar #32 - hugsforfree (10/30/2013) [-]
You know, i was just about to ask that exact same thing.
User avatar #31 - mutantpanda (10/30/2013) [-]
Christina Hendricks, the experiments will be fruitful, but not as well as you hope
#92 - I don't get it your immortal go eat some bacon what are they g…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/30/2013 on Nope 0
User avatar #101 - althalus (10/30/2013) [-]
no your taste buds would alter so that bacon probably tasted horrible, or just not the same, but i guess you could still eat gammon?
#42 - old greg 10/25/2013 on most peaceful country 0
#173 - WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR ME I AM THE LAW! *shoots gun*  [+] (1 new reply) 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best +6
#344 - punishlife (10/23/2013) [-]
I'm proud of you guys
#168 - Yes. It's the law.  [+] (3 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best +4
#171 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
THE LAW!! WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR YOU?
#173 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR ME I AM THE LAW! *shoots gun*
#344 - punishlife (10/23/2013) [-]
I'm proud of you guys
#164 - Send the meet wagon we got one for the iso-cubes and one for recyc  [+] (5 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best +3
#167 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
do you really think you can kill me?
#168 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Yes. It's the law.
#171 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
THE LAW!! WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR YOU?
#173 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR ME I AM THE LAW! *shoots gun*
#344 - punishlife (10/23/2013) [-]
I'm proud of you guys
#162 - Interrupting a Judge during sentencing is an obstruction of ju…  [+] (7 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best +5
User avatar #163 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
not guilty, motherfucker.
#164 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Send the meet wagon we got one for the iso-cubes and one for recyc
#167 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
do you really think you can kill me?
#168 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Yes. It's the law.
#171 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
THE LAW!! WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR YOU?
#173 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR ME I AM THE LAW! *shoots gun*
#344 - punishlife (10/23/2013) [-]
I'm proud of you guys
#137 - Defense noted. Driving under the influence, mandatory 5 years …  [+] (9 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best +7
User avatar #159 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
nah you screwed it up, its "i knew you would say that" then whatever retaliation is necessitated in that situation
#162 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Interrupting a Judge during sentencing is an obstruction of justice charge. Mandatory 18 months in the iso-cubes.
User avatar #163 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
not guilty, motherfucker.
#164 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Send the meet wagon we got one for the iso-cubes and one for recyc
#167 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
do you really think you can kill me?
#168 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
Yes. It's the law.
#171 - jacksipian (10/23/2013) [-]
THE LAW!! WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR YOU?
#173 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE FOR ME I AM THE LAW! *shoots gun*
#344 - punishlife (10/23/2013) [-]
I'm proud of you guys
#134 - If you read the article she wasn't driving when arrested she w… 10/23/2013 on Cops at their best 0
#98 - For some reason I said NA instead of NATO 10/23/2013 on Makes sense though. 0
#90 - America's allies aren't the UN. You're looking for NA  [+] (2 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Makes sense though. +2
User avatar #97 - butwhynot (10/23/2013) [-]
You are right. The coalition during the Gulf War was an assortment of countries from the middle east, the UK, Canada and France together with the US.
User avatar #98 - newsmyrna (10/23/2013) [-]
For some reason I said NA instead of NATO
#156 - I used to live in one of those remote places your talking abou… 10/23/2013 on he has a point 0
#85 - Holy ******* **** dude I'm not tryin… 10/22/2013 on Metric +3
#330 - I could understand an American not recognizing the English fla… 10/22/2013 on British Problems 0
#322 - Because **** you that's why. 10/22/2013 on British Problems 0
#78 - Picture 10/20/2013 on Afghanistan in the 60s +40
#73 - wtf happened  [+] (9 new replies) 10/20/2013 on Afghanistan in the 60s 0
#298 - anonymous (10/20/2013) [-]
while I don't know much about what happened in afganistan, I know a decent ammount about what happened in iran and what is happening here in the arabic countries. it's still the basic idea though:
>revoloution happens
>everyone participates to get a better world
>president/regime falls
>somehow, while everyone else is still picking up themselves from the fight, extreemists rise and take the rule (either by "democracy" or by force)
>from the begining of their rule, the members of other politcal parties are hunted up and disjointed
>and voila! you have an extreemist system.
>after a while, allmost everyone, is most likey to forget that the country was ever a good place.
it's happening in most of the arabic countries that had had their revolutions. in tunisia, and lybia reenabled marrying 4 women. in syria, the areas where the opposition had taken over already have shari'a laws enforced: wearing kumar, no men and women talking.. etc. we have the outside intrusion to thank for that x)
User avatar #281 - elcreepo (10/20/2013) [-]
Jihad.
#102 - silentwarrior (10/20/2013) [-]
The soviets invaded starting a spiral of destruction and war that is still destroying the country to this day.
#76 - itsbendingtime (10/20/2013) [-]
The US supplied religious extremists with training and advanced weaponry.
#106 - angelusprimus (10/20/2013) [-]
They were already getting both from other arab countries, USA was trying to limit the damage by training and arming the mudjahedin (who are extremist but less so) to give them power to counter rising power of the tribal Taliban, and keep them fighting against soviets.
And NONE of that would have happened, at all, if soviet union didn't invade.
For fucks sake learn history.
User avatar #121 - Fgner (10/20/2013) [-]
For fucks sake, learn history.

The Soviets didn't invade - they were invited through a Treaty of Friendship, established by the People's Government during the most prosperous time in Afghanistan's history. The reason the Soviet's were militarily established was for defense against those crazy fucking extremists.

"The Communists were trying to change the law of God. They wanted to destroy
Islamic traditions -- to rid Afghanistan of poverty and make everyone
equal. This is against the law of Islam -- God has decided who is rich
and who is poor. It can't be changed by Communists. It's beyond
imagination." - Sahar Gu

Let's not forget ^this^. We were giving aid to the people trying to destroy a government wanting to rid the country of poverty and inequality. You know who the U.S. could have aided? The westernized side. The one giving women rights, distributing the wealth to the working class, providing public services like free and good education amungst all people. The one that, I don't know, didn't prosecute for religious beliefs and believed that all humans have innate rights.

The U.S. could have "limited the damage" by training and armying the PEOPLE'S GOVERNMENT. Not religious extremists revolts that could have easily been crushed if someone replaced "gotta kill dem curmunists" with "maybe we should help this country on it's fast track to success, regardless of our current ideology, instead of supporting religious extremists that think God hates equality and the reduction of poverty."
#284 - anonymous (10/20/2013) [-]
Then why did the Soviets kill the Afghan President? OH BECAUSE HE WAS A AN AMERICAN SPY! We know the Soviets were just as full of shit as the U.S., they could give a fuck about being friendly, they just didn't like how shit was being run and wanted access to India, so they kill the president and gain a puppet government. OH SHIT now they can enter into the country in the name of PEACE! This was always the way it was that last fucker who denied the Soviets was just a spy. You should also note that the democratic process you speak of was changed after a short time of Communist rule in the country.

So yes the United States saw this as an opportunity to try out some missile systems and fuck with some Russians, not a big surprise the Russians did the same shit whenever the U.S. got in a war.
User avatar #155 - fgtometer (10/20/2013) [-]
THANK YOU. So much fucking ignorance in this comment section.
#78 - newsmyrna (10/20/2013) [-]
#6 - It's sad because Bill Cosby's only son was murdered like 16yrs…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/13/2013 on Nice Sweater +1
#7 - anonymous (10/13/2013) [-]
Whoa what? Dude that's awful.
#22 - 你知道普通话哪里在中国吗 10/11/2013 on 我听说你喜欢普通话? +1
#63 - To most people you are right Red Skin means a team from Washin… 10/10/2013 on That's Racist 0
#60 - They didn't choose anything what other way is there to interpr…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/10/2013 on That's Racist 0
#62 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people the marketed term "Red Skin" means a football team from Washington. They assume it is similar to some kind of an Indian (Im not super familiar with all the different tribes anymore). It doesn't mean to harm or demean anyone in any way. And the only reason I am arguing at all is because I am sick of this overbearing liberal view so many people seem to have today. I am a tolerant understanding person that won't put up with blatant racism or the demeaning of any social class. However, hearing people like you rant about insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable. If you sit and draw a racist conclusion to every little thing like this then it make people take the entire issue less seriously.
User avatar #63 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people you are right Red Skin means a team from Washington. Only a fucking retard would think that there was an actual tribe called the fucking red skins that would be like the English calling them selves the white skins. Your second point it doesn't matter whether the intention is to harm a group or not the fact is that it does harm a group by perpetuating a racial slur. Third what liberal view all liberals believe in is a large government and a social safety net Conservatives believe small government a libertarian ideals of self reliance and hard work. neither of those groups touts the merits of overt racism I am neither liberal nor conservative I'm more centrist if you must know so don't give me that leftist bullshit that your mommy and daddy bitch about over the dinner table. Forth you may be a very tolerant person I don't doubt it, but ask yourself unless you are a fan of the Red Skins why do you believe so strongly about a fucking sports mascot especially if the mascot in and of itself is inherently racist and demeaning to a group that has been utterly obliterated by the other group that is making fun of it for no other reason than to make a buck off of some tee shirts. Fifth hearing people like me rant against insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable makes little to no sense. I don't have that kind of power to sway large swaths of public opinion, and what other group on this planet has gotten fucked over more than the Native Americans. And finally you still haven't answered my question how else can Red Skin be interpreted.
#56 - No that is different. That is a corporation taking a moral sta…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/10/2013 on That's Racist 0
#57 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
The point you are missing is you are part of a minority that CHOOSES to interpret their team name as something bad. The meaning of words develop over time. I am sorry that most people don't give a flying fuck about anyone's skin color, gender, sexual orientation...ETC . They want everyone to be able to live their life and STFU about they tiny amount of pathetic morons who bigoted idiots for whatever reason. I am sick of hearing about these insignificant complaints
User avatar #60 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
They didn't choose anything what other way is there to interpret RedSkin you tell me I'd love to hear it, and if you don't give a flying fuck then why are you arguing so hard for it to remain the way it is? It isn't insignificant to people of native american origin they care and if you don't care then you STFU and worry about other things.
#62 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people the marketed term "Red Skin" means a football team from Washington. They assume it is similar to some kind of an Indian (Im not super familiar with all the different tribes anymore). It doesn't mean to harm or demean anyone in any way. And the only reason I am arguing at all is because I am sick of this overbearing liberal view so many people seem to have today. I am a tolerant understanding person that won't put up with blatant racism or the demeaning of any social class. However, hearing people like you rant about insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable. If you sit and draw a racist conclusion to every little thing like this then it make people take the entire issue less seriously.
User avatar #63 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people you are right Red Skin means a team from Washington. Only a fucking retard would think that there was an actual tribe called the fucking red skins that would be like the English calling them selves the white skins. Your second point it doesn't matter whether the intention is to harm a group or not the fact is that it does harm a group by perpetuating a racial slur. Third what liberal view all liberals believe in is a large government and a social safety net Conservatives believe small government a libertarian ideals of self reliance and hard work. neither of those groups touts the merits of overt racism I am neither liberal nor conservative I'm more centrist if you must know so don't give me that leftist bullshit that your mommy and daddy bitch about over the dinner table. Forth you may be a very tolerant person I don't doubt it, but ask yourself unless you are a fan of the Red Skins why do you believe so strongly about a fucking sports mascot especially if the mascot in and of itself is inherently racist and demeaning to a group that has been utterly obliterated by the other group that is making fun of it for no other reason than to make a buck off of some tee shirts. Fifth hearing people like me rant against insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable makes little to no sense. I don't have that kind of power to sway large swaths of public opinion, and what other group on this planet has gotten fucked over more than the Native Americans. And finally you still haven't answered my question how else can Red Skin be interpreted.
#54 - Well Football Is a large part of American Culture and culture …  [+] (6 new replies) 10/10/2013 on That's Racist 0
#55 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
The reason people don't want to change the name is because rational people choose to look at the Redskins as a football team. They look at the Redskins as a team they like that plays football. Your argument sounds as retarded as the idiots that were complaining how Nabisco supported homosexuals and started swearing off Oreos...
User avatar #56 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
No that is different. That is a corporation taking a moral stance behind an issue that no one forced them to do. This is a football team named after a racial slur, and don't act like this is a national debate because it isn't it all come down to one guy Dan Snyder. He owns the team He can change the name any time he wants to with an ok from Rodger Goodell, which would happen in a heartbeat. It has nothing to do with Rational or Irrational people. It has to do with a group of people who have to sit down and explain to their children we lost the war and our constant suffering on this hell hole of a reservation in North Dakota is rewarded by having a team play in our native land and home that by its very name mocks us and our suffering. Do you think it would be cool if after ww2 America kept what it won in Europe and the nfl made the French White flags. The english you guys are so fucking lucky japan bombed us. And the Berlin Reich.
#57 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
The point you are missing is you are part of a minority that CHOOSES to interpret their team name as something bad. The meaning of words develop over time. I am sorry that most people don't give a flying fuck about anyone's skin color, gender, sexual orientation...ETC . They want everyone to be able to live their life and STFU about they tiny amount of pathetic morons who bigoted idiots for whatever reason. I am sick of hearing about these insignificant complaints
User avatar #60 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
They didn't choose anything what other way is there to interpret RedSkin you tell me I'd love to hear it, and if you don't give a flying fuck then why are you arguing so hard for it to remain the way it is? It isn't insignificant to people of native american origin they care and if you don't care then you STFU and worry about other things.
#62 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people the marketed term "Red Skin" means a football team from Washington. They assume it is similar to some kind of an Indian (Im not super familiar with all the different tribes anymore). It doesn't mean to harm or demean anyone in any way. And the only reason I am arguing at all is because I am sick of this overbearing liberal view so many people seem to have today. I am a tolerant understanding person that won't put up with blatant racism or the demeaning of any social class. However, hearing people like you rant about insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable. If you sit and draw a racist conclusion to every little thing like this then it make people take the entire issue less seriously.
User avatar #63 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people you are right Red Skin means a team from Washington. Only a fucking retard would think that there was an actual tribe called the fucking red skins that would be like the English calling them selves the white skins. Your second point it doesn't matter whether the intention is to harm a group or not the fact is that it does harm a group by perpetuating a racial slur. Third what liberal view all liberals believe in is a large government and a social safety net Conservatives believe small government a libertarian ideals of self reliance and hard work. neither of those groups touts the merits of overt racism I am neither liberal nor conservative I'm more centrist if you must know so don't give me that leftist bullshit that your mommy and daddy bitch about over the dinner table. Forth you may be a very tolerant person I don't doubt it, but ask yourself unless you are a fan of the Red Skins why do you believe so strongly about a fucking sports mascot especially if the mascot in and of itself is inherently racist and demeaning to a group that has been utterly obliterated by the other group that is making fun of it for no other reason than to make a buck off of some tee shirts. Fifth hearing people like me rant against insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable makes little to no sense. I don't have that kind of power to sway large swaths of public opinion, and what other group on this planet has gotten fucked over more than the Native Americans. And finally you still haven't answered my question how else can Red Skin be interpreted.
#52 - (prepare for all caps) JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE OFFENDED DOESN'T M…  [+] (8 new replies) 10/10/2013 on That's Racist 0
#53 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
Dude it is the name of a Football Team.. I am sure every time people see the Washington Redskin's name they are just thinking "yeah...Fuck those bastard indian fags. We hate their kind and they better keep knowing it because we put an ancient racial slur no one uses anymore as the name of a football team." There are a lot of things to be outraged about, like a shooting, how fucking ignorant or government appears to be, or how fucked our healthcare system is. Not what people decided they want their sport team's mascot to be..
User avatar #54 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
Well Football Is a large part of American Culture and culture dictates how people see the world and each other. Sure there are more important matters than the name of the football team, but your argument doesn't make any sense what do any of those things have to do with football or the name of a football team you will never hear a senator go ok we will worry about health care after we deal with the name of this team. This is completely separate from the government. Besides people can do more than one thing at a time so don't come throwing me your shitty strawman and red herring responses. It is offensive plain and simple and the only reason they don't wanna change the name is because it is an established brand and to change the brands name would cost millions of dollars to re-market a new brand. It's that simple that is why it won't change and you by default arguing for them are nothing more than an unpaid corporate shill. Congrats
#55 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
The reason people don't want to change the name is because rational people choose to look at the Redskins as a football team. They look at the Redskins as a team they like that plays football. Your argument sounds as retarded as the idiots that were complaining how Nabisco supported homosexuals and started swearing off Oreos...
User avatar #56 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
No that is different. That is a corporation taking a moral stance behind an issue that no one forced them to do. This is a football team named after a racial slur, and don't act like this is a national debate because it isn't it all come down to one guy Dan Snyder. He owns the team He can change the name any time he wants to with an ok from Rodger Goodell, which would happen in a heartbeat. It has nothing to do with Rational or Irrational people. It has to do with a group of people who have to sit down and explain to their children we lost the war and our constant suffering on this hell hole of a reservation in North Dakota is rewarded by having a team play in our native land and home that by its very name mocks us and our suffering. Do you think it would be cool if after ww2 America kept what it won in Europe and the nfl made the French White flags. The english you guys are so fucking lucky japan bombed us. And the Berlin Reich.
#57 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
The point you are missing is you are part of a minority that CHOOSES to interpret their team name as something bad. The meaning of words develop over time. I am sorry that most people don't give a flying fuck about anyone's skin color, gender, sexual orientation...ETC . They want everyone to be able to live their life and STFU about they tiny amount of pathetic morons who bigoted idiots for whatever reason. I am sick of hearing about these insignificant complaints
User avatar #60 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
They didn't choose anything what other way is there to interpret RedSkin you tell me I'd love to hear it, and if you don't give a flying fuck then why are you arguing so hard for it to remain the way it is? It isn't insignificant to people of native american origin they care and if you don't care then you STFU and worry about other things.
#62 - sloot (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people the marketed term "Red Skin" means a football team from Washington. They assume it is similar to some kind of an Indian (Im not super familiar with all the different tribes anymore). It doesn't mean to harm or demean anyone in any way. And the only reason I am arguing at all is because I am sick of this overbearing liberal view so many people seem to have today. I am a tolerant understanding person that won't put up with blatant racism or the demeaning of any social class. However, hearing people like you rant about insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable. If you sit and draw a racist conclusion to every little thing like this then it make people take the entire issue less seriously.
User avatar #63 - newsmyrna (10/10/2013) [-]
To most people you are right Red Skin means a team from Washington. Only a fucking retard would think that there was an actual tribe called the fucking red skins that would be like the English calling them selves the white skins. Your second point it doesn't matter whether the intention is to harm a group or not the fact is that it does harm a group by perpetuating a racial slur. Third what liberal view all liberals believe in is a large government and a social safety net Conservatives believe small government a libertarian ideals of self reliance and hard work. neither of those groups touts the merits of overt racism I am neither liberal nor conservative I'm more centrist if you must know so don't give me that leftist bullshit that your mommy and daddy bitch about over the dinner table. Forth you may be a very tolerant person I don't doubt it, but ask yourself unless you are a fan of the Red Skins why do you believe so strongly about a fucking sports mascot especially if the mascot in and of itself is inherently racist and demeaning to a group that has been utterly obliterated by the other group that is making fun of it for no other reason than to make a buck off of some tee shirts. Fifth hearing people like me rant against insignificant shit like this makes the people who are actually getting discriminated seem less believable makes little to no sense. I don't have that kind of power to sway large swaths of public opinion, and what other group on this planet has gotten fucked over more than the Native Americans. And finally you still haven't answered my question how else can Red Skin be interpreted.
#7 - Comment deleted 10/07/2013 on I'm scared guys 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - pvtgoblin (03/01/2013) [-]
So what made you post this kind of **** ?
#5 to #4 - newsmyrna (03/03/2013) [-]
lots and lots of this. sorry it took so long to respond i was banned
 Friends (0)