Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #3678 on Comments
nevolmon Avatar Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win
Send mail to nevolmon Block nevolmon Invite nevolmon to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:9/18/2011
Last Login:9/16/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#3678
Highest Content Rank:#2312
Highest Comment Rank:#577
Content Thumbs: 1811 total,  1955 ,  144
Comment Thumbs: 6016 total,  6516 ,  500
Content Level Progress: 90% (90/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 35% (35/100)
Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win
Content Views:72104
Times Content Favorited:150 times
Total Comments Made:936
FJ Points:6946

latest user's comments

#6 - people get too attached to fictional characters, they really n…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/24/2014 on RA! -3
User avatar #7 - sonnyboii (03/24/2014) [-]
Im so sick of Frozen because of this shit
User avatar #10 - nevolmon (03/24/2014) [-]
that's part of the joke, I hate it too buddy
#2 - man your brain is who you are, I can't imagine what it must be… 03/24/2014 on Can't remember my title. +12
#2 - just a warning, never shave your eyebrows off, they don't alwa…  [+] (6 new replies) 03/24/2014 on Bi-a-itch +10
User avatar #15 - morelazors (03/24/2014) [-]
A friend of mine shaved off all the hair on his head when his father died, and his eyebrows grew back in just fine.
User avatar #16 - nevolmon (03/24/2014) [-]
not everyone's eyebrows grow back, it's a gamble.
User avatar #17 - morelazors (03/24/2014) [-]
I think someone on FJ should shave them off and see what happens.
User avatar #18 - nevolmon (03/24/2014) [-]
we must summon peanutbitter!
User avatar #19 - morelazors (03/24/2014) [-]
...So do we sacrifice one of those giant gummybears or something?
User avatar #14 - deathsn (03/24/2014) [-]
I pluck mine out a little and then shave the area to get rid of the mini hairs. Never had a problem with it.
#7 - Comment deleted  [+] (8 new replies) 03/24/2014 on A realist 0
#38 - lolzordz Comment deleted by nevolmon
#40 - Pena Comment deleted by nevolmon
#41 - lolzordz Comment deleted by nevolmon
#44 - Pena Comment deleted by nevolmon
#39 - derangedstudent Comment deleted by nevolmon
#42 - lolzordz Comment deleted by nevolmon
#43 - nevolmon Comment deleted by nevolmon
#45 - lolzordz Comment deleted by nevolmon
#4 - Picture  [+] (4 new replies) 03/24/2014 on omg, (.)(.) +41
#23 - marstan (03/24/2014) [-]
And a .gif version
#22 - marstan (03/24/2014) [-]
#30 - heretics (03/24/2014) [-]
#5 - mcatheistnuggets (03/24/2014) [-]
#32 - when I did this I started hallucinating and I got really paran…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/24/2014 on Haven't Slept In 65 Hours. +7
#36 - shagtastic (03/24/2014) [-]
Basically the same, Kept seeing thing out of the corner of my eye, Shadows would move randomly, I was about ready to call Dale Gribble.
#27 - I can only imagine the EU's reaction. >"russia pls…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/23/2014 on Europoors +12
User avatar #29 - wthree (03/23/2014) [-]
"Quick! Better put sanctions on their weapons! That'll stop them from entering Canada!"
User avatar #67 - conoriskool (03/23/2014) [-]
Do... do you people want another all out war? Gotta say I
for one don't like the idea of millions of more people dying from all out war
#128 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
As long as those millions don't affect me seems to be a very visible opinion on internet boards.
#22 - because there are too many people making prosthetics to help p… 03/23/2014 on Fisto 0
#20 - it begins.  [+] (11 new replies) 03/23/2014 on Fisto +80
#121 - anonymous (03/24/2014) [-]
sauce on this image please.
#100 - outerfiend (03/24/2014) [-]
how terrifying
#90 - yuukoku (03/24/2014) [-]
I never asked for this.
#85 - anonymous (03/24/2014) [-]
too bad she'd never be able to wear this exoskeleton
#122 - anonymous (03/24/2014) [-]
shut up you nasty fucking slut, or I'll wear your exoskeleton
User avatar #55 - trippytrips (03/24/2014) [-]
where is her nipple
User avatar #80 - derzsahvy (03/24/2014) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 1395633044
just take her nose and move it down to her titty

dont ban me its just a nose..
User avatar #63 - ieatsand (03/24/2014) [-]
That's classified
User avatar #64 - trippytrips (03/24/2014) [-]
#133 - newdevyx (03/24/2014) [-]
User avatar #74 - phantomonkey (03/24/2014) [-]
Maybe her boobs are cross-eyed.
#24 - time to annex canada?  [+] (34 new replies) 03/23/2014 on Europoors +40
User avatar #183 - skullzero (03/24/2014) [-]
Time for Canada to annex South Canada.
#167 - canadianbetamale (03/24/2014) [-]
Just try it yank. I'll rek ya i swear on me mum
User avatar #161 - mutantpanda (03/24/2014) [-]
I would just like to point out that there was a lot of talk of the US annexing part of Canada in the 90's when the Quebec independence movement looked like it might happen. The idea was that if Quebec became a sovereign nation, all the provinces west of Quebec would become Canada, and the provinces east of Quebec (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador) would no longer be physically connected to Canada and would become part of the US.
#26 - thismustbeseen (03/23/2014) [-]
It would put you over but it would start WW3.
#38 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
>implying any country would dare piss off the U.S. or oppose its will
User avatar #54 - thelastamerican (03/23/2014) [-]
Russia. Right now. Literally as we speak.
User avatar #55 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
I mean militaristically. You think any country would take military action against the U.S.?
#71 - thismustbeseen (03/23/2014) [-]
Every other country put together, because it would be a move of unequal imperialism that no one would tolerate. It would mean US leadership has gone completely insane, and would start WW3.

And it's a war the US would ultimately lose on the basis of GDP, population and raw resources.

#78 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
>because it would be a move of unequal imperialism that no one would tolerate

Just like the entire world came together when Japan invaded China, or when Germany annexed Austria, or when Russia took the Eastern Bloc, or when France invaded Vietnam to try to maintain its hold, right? That's assuming that you could convince China and Russia to cooperate with Europe on anything, or that any of the weaker countries would give enough of a shit what we were doing to Canada to risk getting assraped by the U.S.

No other country matches us in military tech, except maybe Russia, and they don't have enough of it for their own military, let alone anybody else's. No other country's GDPPC comes close to ours. We provide all of Japan's military and most of Europe's military power. That right there rules out Europe and Japan. We're China's biggest customers, so they wouldn't go to war since it would crash their economy. Russia would levee sanctions against us probably, but why would they go to war with us over Canada? Nobody gives a shit about Canada internationally, or at least not enough to go to war with the most powerful nation on the planet, and Russia sure as hell wouldn't want to risk the possibility of nuclear war with the U.S. due to past animosities. So what major power does that leave? It's starting to look mighty bare.

The only way they would have a chance would be if India, Nigeria (assuming the warring tribes could chill long enough to actually band together), and India threw conscripts at us until we drowned in poorly armed, untrained farmers and goat herders. However, even if they got all those people together, none of those countries have anywhere close to decent navies, and would have no way to actually get those soldiers to the Americas in order to actually wage a war against us.

Face it, America could annex Canada tomorrow, and everybody would either be too disinterested or too afraid of repercussions to do anything about it.
User avatar #118 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
*A small correction*

I was informed on a different comment that Norway's GDPPC is greater than the U.S.'s, so scratch that comment about no other country's coming close to ours. It is still quite large, but not the largest.
User avatar #94 - hudis (03/23/2014) [-]
I don't think the States' own population would stand for it, personally. American society may be patriotic, militaristic and proud, but it's also home to an immensely large population that is barely held together even now, it's built on ideals that are essentially the opposite of imperialism (the U.S. has not always followed these ideals, true, but the high value of freedom and democracy is still very much present in the U.S.), and it's home to a great many influential intellectuals, scientists and political activists who would see themselves hanged, drawn and quartered before they allowed this to happen.

Lastly, consider all the fighting forces. Consider how large the military actually is. Even with all the discipline in the world I find it hard to imagine that at least half of them wouldn't be rather extremely reluctant to go to war with another western country without very, very good reason - especially one so close both geographically and culturally as Canada.
User avatar #107 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
Of course we wouldn't. As you said, invading and colonizing a country runs deeply counter to our ideals, and we have had peaceful and fruitful relations with Canada for almost two centuries. Why would we fuck that up?

Also right. I was only arguing that the world couldn't stop us, not that we wouldn't stop ourselves (assuming any politician actually argued that we should annex Canada). I mean, almost all of America loves Canada; it'd be like us invading the UK or somewhere similar, and even the staunchest patriot would tell our leaders to fuck off if they tried.
#92 - thismustbeseen (03/23/2014) [-]
> Just like the entire world came together when Japan invaded China ...last I checked none of those countries got to keep what they captured, it did lead to international war, and what they tried capturing had anything on the enormity of Canada
> Nobody gives a shit about Canada internationally ... no.. that's stupid
> No other country matches us in military tech ... no.. that's also stupid

The US could never, and will never annex Canada, because it's leadership, despite being corrupt and pretty dumb, isn't as retarded as you.

Has this turned into a usa-rules circlejerk? Are you butthurt about your collapsing economy or your general level of underdevelopment? Nothing left to be proud of but a giant useless military that's putting you into irrecoverable debt? Fear not! Canada will actually save you, with slightly cheaper oil!
#98 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
The world didn't fight Japan, America did, and that was only after they directly attacked us. Russia was going to get involved, but two countries is hardly an international response to imperialism, especially since they wouldn't be cooperating with each other and would be racing to conquer the most Japan, just as it was in Germany. If it weren't for Japan attacking the U.S. then they would have become the undisputed power of all of East and Southeastern Asia since no one but Russia wanted to challenge them, and Russia did not have the naval capacity to do so. Canada may be enormous, but it has hardly any people, little international significance, and most of its land is locked in ice and permafrost, making one of its few easily accessible or valuable natural resources their cheap oil. There's a reason most of its population live near the U.S. border: it's as far south as they can go.

Who would go to war with the U.S. over Canada? Probably the same ones that are going to war with Russia over Crimea, i.e. none of them. The costs greatly outweigh any of the benefits that would arise from drawing the ire of the U.S., just as taking military action against Russia for their Ukraine tomfoolery would bring too great a cost for the reward of stopping them.

What country matches us in military tech aside from maybe Russia? I gave well explained reasons, but all you have is "dats dum tho". Actually bring up a specific point to refute me.

No, this is a "I actually argued my point instead of just deriding your comments as stupid" circlejerk, and nowhere did I say we should invade Canada. Learn to fucking read. If you can actually ague a rebuttal then I would be glad to hear it, but being mad just because I'm arguing in favor of America is just making you look uninformed a little pathetic. Bringing up points that are entirely unrelated to the discussion at hand is only exacerbating that effect, so maybe you should reconsider.
#127 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
Wouldn't trying to hold an area the size of Canada cost a shitload of both resources and manpower especially with the Middle East's drain on the US military.

I'm just trying to talk 'what ifs' since you seem to have some idea of US and international politics.
User avatar #133 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2014) [-]
It would, but I was only arguing that nobody would stop us from invading and annexing Canada, not that it would be a feasible long term strategy or a good idea for us to do so. It would in fact be a really fucking stupid idea, and even if the government thought it was a good idea, most of the populace would tell them to fuck off and have zero participation in the invasion since our two countries are on such good terms.

No problem; I would hope that I know about U.S. politics and capabilities since I live here and all.
#134 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
But in the long term wouldn't someone seize the opportunity of a weakened US to wreak havoc among your allies first then later you.

Just for the sake of the original going to war with the US argument
User avatar #135 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2014) [-]
Do you mean they would invade Canada, then use that as a stepping stone to invade the U.S., so we should annex Canada to prevent that? I'm not sure I understand the question.
#138 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
No, to start with Europe and parts of South East Asia relies on US support, with the US tied up in Canada what would stop Russia and China from expending into the US sphere of influence.

Obvious targets for China would be to support PRK to invade South Korea, or retaking Taiwan, or just settling the score with Japan.
Those three countries are pretty much necessary to keep China in check.

Russia could do as they are doing now with Crimea just on a much larger scale like trying to restore the country to it's Sovjet or imperial borders.

By the time the US had calmed the situation in Canada they could find themselves pretty alone against enemies who could also have had the time to settle the situation in newly conquered or puppet-ed areas.
User avatar #215 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2014) [-]
Our navy would. An invasion of Canda would be almost entirely ground forces, and our Navy is by far the most powerful in the world. We'd destroy every ship China had and they wouldn't be able to get any of their troops to South Korea, Taiwan or Japan. Southeast Asia would probably be theirs, but they'd still encounter pretty staunch resistance from them, and would have to contend with the huge amount of unexploded mines that litter places like Laos and Cambodia. We also have a huge air base in Japan that would be able to give any assailed country heavy air support.

The PRK would suffer such heavy losses invading South Korea from just the two miles of mines that I have a lot of doubt they would be able to pull it off. More likely they'd launch a short range nuke into Seoul, then start shelling South Korea incessantly, but a ground invasion would be unlikely to succeed without any naval support.

They could, but Canada is such a non-entity militaristically that we would still have our heavy military presence in Europe that would be able to counter any invasions with the help of domestic EU forces until we could mount a counter-offensive. The EU, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, and even the whole world might be mad we invaded Canada, but they would never deny our help against powerful invaders, and would beg us to come to their aid.
#218 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
So basically the entire thing would develop into a massive stalemate? I could see that happening.

Not the Canada invasion, but the consequences.
User avatar #57 - thelastamerican (03/23/2014) [-]
OH, I misunderstood you. Actually, no. China has the manpower, but not the technology. Russia has the technology, but not the manpower. The EU has it's continental defense provided BY the US, and I can't really think of any other country with the stones. Either way, the US military complex is so incredibly massive, that a knockdown punch out with the US would probably last several weeks.
User avatar #62 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
That's fine, I wasn't very clear in the first place. Yeah, that was basically my train of thought on the whole matter as well. If the U.S. really wanted to be an imperial power like some claim, i.e. invading and colonizing foreign states such as Canada, no military on the planet would be able to stop us from it.
User avatar #89 - hudis (03/23/2014) [-]
Thing is, territory isn't as important now as it was 200-300 years ago. The U.S. reinvented imperialism a long time ago, but in the form of economical/industrial imperialism as opposed to colonial/territorial. Right now, U.S.-based companies have their hands in people's pockets all over the globe, and that is where true power lies. Not with congress, the senate or the president - but with big businesses and corporations.

Now, I would never hold any random American responsible for this type of worldwide exploitation, but I do think that the deeply rooted capitalism and individualistic culture of the U.S. makes it significantly easier to keep such a machine running than it would be in a society with a different ideological foundation.

I'm not really fussed either way, personally. People always find ways to accumulate vast power and use it to stand above other people, and corporate imperialism is just the currently most effective way of exercising it on a global level. I just wish that the U.S. would use this immense power to create a nation that can truly be called the best country in the world, the land of freedom and a place where people can truly live, prosper and thrive without doing so on the backs of 50 million people stuck in the gutter.
User avatar #100 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
Yeah, I agree. That's probably why we do new wave imperialism instead of the old styled one.

Probably. Capitalism makes any sort of exploitative deed easier, especially with our prevailing "they could do it too if they worked harder" mentality.

You and me both. Think of what amazing things my country could do if we pulled our heads out of our asses for two seconds and looked at domestic problems instead of other people's.
User avatar #56 - ninjask (03/23/2014) [-]
Russia. China.
User avatar #68 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/23/2014) [-]
Russia doesn't have nearly enough people, and it has almost no navy. It's tech and Air Force are okay, but it's dwarfed by the U.S.'s. China has the people, but most of its tech is severely outdated, it doesn't have enough of it to arm the amount of people they would need to conscript to be a threat, and its Air Force and navy are a joke. They have one aircraft carrier (as does Russia), and last I checked it was in dry dock with major structural issues. The only way either could be a threat would be with nuclear weapons, but no country even considers that as a military option since it would annihilate the entire planet.

TL ; DR: We would fuck them both in the ass in a war.
User avatar #158 - ninjask (03/24/2014) [-]
lithuania would wreck you
#159 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2014) [-]
How could I forget about the almighty Lithuania? Please forgive my hubris.
User avatar #228 - ninjask (03/24/2014) [-]
that's what i thought, kvailas
User avatar #27 - nevolmon (03/23/2014) [-]
I can only imagine the EU's reaction.
>"russia pls stop!"
>"oh god America not you too!"
User avatar #29 - wthree (03/23/2014) [-]
"Quick! Better put sanctions on their weapons! That'll stop them from entering Canada!"
User avatar #67 - conoriskool (03/23/2014) [-]
Do... do you people want another all out war? Gotta say I
for one don't like the idea of millions of more people dying from all out war
#128 - seymion (03/24/2014) [-]
As long as those millions don't affect me seems to be a very visible opinion on internet boards.
#141 - I really need to start leaving my sword to the left of my computer.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/23/2014 on zebras make good cakes 0
#146 - Durricane (03/23/2014) [-]
#89 - what if we photoshop a man's nipples on to a woman's boobs? is it SFW?  [+] (1 new reply) 03/23/2014 on not sexy enough to ban +17
User avatar #105 - nibbero (03/23/2014) [-]
try it for science!
#3 - we hijacked the moon, we can hijack a mythology.  [+] (2 new replies) 03/22/2014 on lol +17
User avatar #9 - hudis (03/22/2014) [-]
This site really reminds me of this video sometimes.
The Rap Battle (PARODY)
#40 - instalation (03/23/2014) [-]
I never thought I'd find the source for such a nearly perfect loop.
#3 - but why? it's awesome! 03/22/2014 on shooting like a pro +1
#5 - I ******* lost it at the crimson chin. 03/22/2014 on Imagine watching these in a... +1
#15 - we're just like ants or termites but much much bigger. 03/22/2014 on Not mine, but wow 0
#14 - Damn, humanity made the earth it's bitch. 03/22/2014 on Not mine, but wow 0
#6 - >tfw i lost the charger for my drone's battery when I could… 03/22/2014 on Drone technology at it's... 0
#3 - we all do scott....we all do...  [+] (1 new reply) 03/21/2014 on for colored text +3
#13 - fatskinnyguy (03/22/2014) [-]
#4 - inb4 the "my balls itch" picture.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/21/2014 on Not So Brilliant +3
#6 - mightypen (03/22/2014) [-]
#3 - >be scavenging for food >wearing hunting camo and wi… 03/21/2014 on The DayZ Experience +24
#27 - every time I use bars of soap it leaves my skin feeling like i… 03/21/2014 on pony rage comics +2
#22 - >mfw I get sick, go to sleep and wake up 5 hours later feel…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/21/2014 on Eat Your Veggies 0
#38 - anonymous (03/21/2014) [-]
No Patrick, being tired is not a sickness.
#4 - while I know that whale sharks don't eat people that first pic… 03/21/2014 on Impeccable timing +12
#50 - I might use them for a little bit of audio editing but for the…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/21/2014 on i dont have itunes or tumblr.. 0
User avatar #52 - kaitora (03/21/2014) [-]
Beyerdynamic DT770 has much better value and comfort imo, might be just a bit pricier atm. Great for studio, and comfy enough for casual listening, the 32ohm version also ain't amp picky.
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 630 / Total items point value: 4750



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)