Rank #20033 on CommentsLevel 223 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to ncsutroll Block ncsutroll Invite ncsutroll to be your friend
latest user's comments
|#116 - people don't dislike lebron for being the best player alive, t…||06/21/2014 on Overpaid Athletes||0|
|#6 - AoD gifs make me happy..||06/17/2014 on have you been working out?||0|
|#29 - i'd play the **** out a mario themed shooter. [+] (1 new reply)||06/17/2014 on Game Types Shown At This...||+2|
|#17 - cheap ass black people||06/17/2014 on Praise the god||-4|
|#16 - the first sentence of that is correct... but the cop reacting … [+] (11 new replies)||06/17/2014 on police brutality||+242|
#161 - letting (06/17/2014) [-]
"don't get paid that much" Some get paid over 100k a year and are expected to act above normal citizens, they are not supposed to lash back at criminals in a criminal manner just because they "started it". That is both childish and ridiculous. Police believe that they are above the law because they enforce it. This is not the case and needs to change.
#177 - collateraldamageco (06/17/2014) [-]
1. You need to be on the force for like 20 years to even be able to make that much
2. Yelling at someone isn't criminal
3. Not all police believe they are above the law, most become police because they respect law and want to uphold it.
Please educate yourself on matters before commenting on them
#63 - damonisgay (06/17/2014) [-]
The guy on the right is an asshole yes. But police have a sacred responsibility that comes with the powers they receive upon becoming police officers regardless of how much they get paid. There job is to apprehend people who appear to have committed a crime and for the courts to decide whether or not the did commit a crime. With the exception of a circumstance were the lives of the police or a civilian is threatened in which case deadly force may be necessary. Any police officer who takes punishment into his own hands/ abuses this power to harass people when a crime has not been committed should not be a cop. Policing is a shit profession to be in, yes but for those who decide to live a life of service suffering is often required and there sacrifice should be respected. (excuse the grammar)
#89 - damonisgay (06/17/2014) [-]
I'm just putting into context the duties of police in reply to ncstroll in which saying that cops don't get paid much so it's excusable that they aren't always going to deal with people shit. I'm not certain where I stand on cops yelling back if they are yelled at. I don't think I would if I was a cop if only for the reason of it creates a less well defined line of not getting personally involved in a situation other then my official duty's. At the very least its unprofessional.
#102 - poppenhoffer (06/17/2014) [-]
The duty of an officer is to protect the people. That's pretty much it. Hell, according to the Desmedt use of force continuum that's used in the US, the cop could pepper spray the guy for getting in his face like that because according to said continuum, the officer is always allowed to use one level of force greater than the suspect is using (that's to say if suspect takes a swing, cop can taze him. Guy has his own tazer and tries to use it, cop can shoot him, etc.). That whole "cops need to act a certain way" thing is bullshit. If you're dealing with someone who may get violent, the last thing you should be doing is trying to be as polite as possible because they'll think you're weak and then they may take a swing.
#147 - anonymous (06/17/2014) [-]
#90 - solomonkane (06/17/2014) [-]
A cop yelling at someone isnt seen as abusing power or abusing in general cause Cops have set the "abusing power" bar pretty low, So a cop yelling at someone isnt even noticeable. Cause there is a LOT more things they could be doing. Keep in mind, the dude is allowed to have a gun, so if chooses to yell at you, count yourself lucky.
|#157 - if it can be treated fairly quickly it aint a migraine... …||06/17/2014 on Life Hacks Compilation Part 3||+1|
|#24 - was thinking the same thing..||06/11/2014 on Knight Brienne of House Tyson||0|
|#17 - must be in a **** location man i've got friends t…||06/08/2014 on toss me a beer||0|
|#111 - 2-20 dollars was a ******** of money back then. w…||06/08/2014 on Bear with me, guys.||0|
|#51 - that title is deceptive... i am disappoint||06/07/2014 on Obama Left Hanging in Russia||-2|
|#93 - no reason to kill them, except for ya know, eating them, tradi… [+] (2 new replies)||06/07/2014 on Bear with me, guys.||0|
#110 - auryn (06/07/2014) [-]
Survival wasn't dependant upon bears.
And about bear hunting history in North America:
"...In 1818, a “War of Extermination” against wolves and bears was declared in Ohio. Bear pelts were usually sold for 2-20 dollars in the 1860s. Between 1850 and 1920 grizzly bears were eliminated from 95% of their original range,..."
Plus I don't see how killing them for trading their pelts would make it any less immoral.
#111 - ncsutroll (06/08/2014) [-]
2-20 dollars was a shitload of money back then. we have no idea what this man did for a living and it wasn't like you could just go get a job managing a store or something back then, the thought that hunting/killing an animal is hippy BS, if the animal was used, then so be it. As it is today in many areas bears are overpopulated again. TL;DR - bear is delicious
|#90 - you're right... he should have just gone to the grocery store …||06/07/2014 on Bear with me, guys.||+4|
|#19 - will trade my 25k of student loans to pay more for gas any day… [+] (1 new reply)||06/06/2014 on Still Ask For Gas Money||0|
|#1531 - **ncsutroll rolled image **||06/04/2014 on What you got arrested for||0|
|#13 - saw SOAD in 2012 in DC.... ****** awesome, though…||06/04/2014 on \m/ back in my day \m/||0|
|#4 - isnt a third season of that happening fairly soon? [+] (1 new reply)||06/02/2014 on Diffusing||+1|
|#19 - does the robotic velociraptor make anybody else feel just a ta… [+] (1 new reply)||06/02/2014 on Do you think the Moon has...||0|
#30 - anonymous (06/02/2014) [-]
|#43 - glorious c&c master race||05/29/2014 on How to deal with a bitch ex-gf||+3|
|#52 - that **** is massively infuriating... get expensi… [+] (1 new reply)||05/29/2014 on Growler||+1|
|#3663 - **ncsutroll rolled image **||05/29/2014 on Your future wife/hubby||0|
|#31 - I'm not morgan.. jesus christ that got me||05/24/2014 on Seems Legit||+1|
|#32 - ass backwards logic... finished tests first all through highsc…||05/20/2014 on This guy||-1|
|#603 - don't care if you got thumbed down or not... that gave me a laugh [+] (1 new reply)||05/19/2014 on Beard||0|
|#10 - just saying, regardless of the issue of gay marriage - why the… [+] (10 new replies)||05/12/2014 on Gay marriage issues solved||+4|
#26 - sursum (05/12/2014) [-]
Well English classes deal with studies of literature and public speaking, the later of which is usually based upon a current issue or event, of which gay marriage qualifies. As for when they are studying a text, they usually analyse the themes of the piece, which can include gay marriage depending on the text and it's author. They are sticking to the point, English class is much more than just reading Shakespeare.
#18 - biggrand (05/12/2014) [-]
> 8th grade
> overahear 7th graders talking in back
> kid says " in english the teacher asked us all who we was voting for. when she said obama everyone but cindy raised they hand. then when she asked who was voting for mccain cindy raised her hand, I was like ' cindy put yo hand down"
This still pisses me off about my middle school, from what I heard from other kids when I was in highschool it only got worse. The teachers there had no place to talk about that in class or put other kids on the spot, and every year they try going on strike, taking away off days for kids, because they still think they need more benifits in their contracts. I can honestly count on my hands the teachers I had going there who really deserved that.
#21 - biggrand (05/12/2014) [-]
This isn't such a bad thing if the teachers at the school weren't bias towards one side. This makes a lot more sense in highschool when students can think a little more rationally and some have probably done their own research. We had current event papers and debates in our social studies classes which were more rational ways of discussing tha events of the world.
#23 - FiddySpense (05/12/2014) [-]
Age is just a number. A good thinker is a good thinker, no matter what. The platform or assignment doesn't matter either. Rationality is meh, good students can see a teacher's bias, smarter students can get their thoughts together and attack it. Positive stimulation nonetheless.
|#39 - ^^^ this **** right here [+] (1 new reply)||05/05/2014 on Lincoln||0|