Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

nathanbiggs

Rank #4830 on Comments
nathanbiggs Avatar Level 270 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Offline
Send mail to nathanbiggs Block nathanbiggs Invite nathanbiggs to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:12/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4830
Highest Content Rank:#6115
Highest Comment Rank:#660
Content Thumbs: 112 total,  193 ,  81
Comment Thumbs: 7366 total,  9456 ,  2090
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 9 Content: New Here → Level 10 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 2% (2/100)
Level 270 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 271 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:0
Content Views:16360
Times Content Favorited:33 times
Total Comments Made:2100
FJ Points:7126

latest user's comments

#56 - Apparently the FBI are dealing with Sarkeesian, not the SFPD.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/12/2014 on CAN'T STOP THE HAPPENING... +6
#82 - fatalhermit (09/12/2014) [-]
doesn't necessarily mean that she's the one who made the report, i remember seeing quite a few posts on /v/ and /pol/ about reporting it to the fbi through the tips section of their website
#147 - Huh, I remember watching the stream they did announcing the du…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/10/2014 on Kiru ra kiru 0
User avatar #150 - Mr Unsmiley (09/10/2014) [-]
Beats me. I watched an episode on a school computer once I googled it, so I don't know where it's coming from.
#55 - Wait, since when did the dub come out?  [+] (3 new replies) 09/09/2014 on Kiru ra kiru 0
User avatar #98 - Mr Unsmiley (09/09/2014) [-]
it started a while ago
as far as I know, it's only around episode 4
User avatar #147 - nathanbiggs (09/10/2014) [-]
Huh, I remember watching the stream they did announcing the dub and the trailer but never followed when they were actually going to start releasing episodes. Is it airing anywhere, or are they just releasing them on their website or something?
User avatar #150 - Mr Unsmiley (09/10/2014) [-]
Beats me. I watched an episode on a school computer once I googled it, so I don't know where it's coming from.
#74 - >running a fight club You deserved it 09/07/2014 on PVP in a nutshell +5
#22 - >Shulk >Robin >Lucina >Rosalina &g…  [+] (10 new replies) 09/05/2014 on (untitled) +44
#76 - anonymous (09/05/2014) [-]
get rid of Rosalina, pac-man, wiifit trainer, villager, change greninja with mewtwo. then it would be good
User avatar #72 - yisumad (09/05/2014) [-]
>miis
User avatar #23 - wertologist (09/05/2014) [-]
Compared to how many brawl brought in? Some of those characters seem unneeded. There's a girl is is essentially Marth but her attacks are with the end of her sword rather than the edge like Marth. Pac-Man was brought in just because they needed a third iconic character. I like some, but a good chunk seem like they will suck. I like Villager, Mega Man, and Little Mac. I feel they belong. The others seem out of place. They should branch out into the games side characters more instead of adding new Mario characters. Most of the characters are already in Brawl. I just hope they add more actual interesting/good characters and not clone characters.
#53 - anonymous (09/05/2014) [-]
You've got the differences between Marth and Lucina backwards, by the way. Marth does his best damage when striking with the tip of the sword, while Lucina's damage is spread equally along the length of the blade.
#26 - senyorcable (09/05/2014) [-]
I don't get this "not-as-many-characters-as-in-Brawl" thing.

There will be other characters not revealed yet, right? Did I miss something?
User avatar #27 - wertologist (09/05/2014) [-]
I heard a while ago that they filled all the slots. Then I find out now they added a new character. With the release date almost here, I don't think they can fit in too many more characters.
User avatar #39 - bluenapalm (09/05/2014) [-]
every character has three variants on each of their directional skills. Sure you cant use it in online with strangers, but online with friends or even by yourself.. the move variants and character equipment should be interesting.
#29 - senyorcable (09/05/2014) [-]
Oh, my...

I hope not. I like the new characters, but being a game made only once in a generation, they better include a lot which they didn't just revealed.
User avatar #67 - RisenLichen (09/05/2014) [-]
there's probably gonna be dlc and shit
User avatar #81 - kloudianorici (09/05/2014) [-]
No no no, thats EA you're think of.
#82 - It was easy enough to tell how good someone was by just checki… 09/05/2014 on Videogame market today +2
#74 - >Reach murdered the online competitive system. No more high…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/05/2014 on Videogame market today +1
User avatar #80 - armsdealer (09/05/2014) [-]
You don't have to re-quote everything I said, just type like a normal human being. I know how to read.
"Invisible true skill" is nice and all, but Highest Skill was a damn easy way to know ahead of time if you're playing against good/shitty people; being invisible does nobody any good. Not to mention there was no competition thanks to the matchmaking being about as good as a child throwing people into random games with random people. Oh, and need I bring up the "quit ban?" That was quite possibly the dumbest shit to hit any online shooter. Ever.

Oh and you're implying firefight was ANY good after ODST. You could edit the settings, which immediately made it loose any kind of difficulty that it had in ODST.

Oh, and do you seriously think 343 put out Reach? That was Bungie, and as a long time Bungie fan, it was seriously disappointing. Hence the "That shit is unacceptable."

Halo 4 scored higher for me, and that game was just a disappointment. Not bad, just disappointing
User avatar #82 - nathanbiggs (09/05/2014) [-]
It was easy enough to tell how good someone was by just checking their k/d ratio and maxed out commendations. Obviously Truskill was easier, but it wasn't that hard to check in Reach. The easiest way I found to not have a problem with the quit ban was to not quit games. Obviously you will occasionally have to quit a game or your internet will kick you out of game, but these should only be occasionally. If they actually cause you to get a quit ban then it's an issue on your end. In my 1100 hours of Reach I never once got quit banned.

Firefight was fun in Reach. I preferred ODST's firefight, and if it had matchmaking it would have been close to perfection, but Reach's was still nice. Plus I don't ever really find customization a bad thing.

Obviously Bungie made Reach, put it was 343i that took over less than a year after launch. It was 343i that put out a god awful TU that fixed none of Reach's actual problems and only really managed to unbalance the sandbox even more. Plus they shit all over Jeremiah's playlists. As a long time Bungie fan, I was more than satisfied with Reach.

4 was more of a disappointment for me, why 343i thought it was a good idea to turn Halo into a class based shooter with perks and killstreaks is beyond me, and that's only one of 4's many problems.
#65 - The skill based matchmaking was still there, it was just hidde… 09/05/2014 on Videogame market today 0
#56 - >implying Reach was bad It had a couple issues here and…  [+] (7 new replies) 09/04/2014 on Videogame market today 0
User avatar #73 - armsdealer (09/05/2014) [-]
Reach murdered the online competitive system. No more highest skill means that if you play the fucking campaign enough you could become the highest online rank. That shit is unacceptable. Reach gets 6/10 IMHO
User avatar #85 - rasorburn (09/05/2014) [-]
Except the leveling through campaign was so incredibly slow that no, you could not
User avatar #74 - nathanbiggs (09/05/2014) [-]
>Reach murdered the online competitive system. No more highest skill means that if you play the fucking campaign enough you could become the highest online rank.
Which means jack shit because matchamaking was still based on an invisible truskill. It would be hell to get to the highest rank on anything other than Matchmaking/Firefight. Plus there was always Arena to play, but it never seemed to get the attention it deserved.
>That shit is unacceptable.
I too like exaggerations.
>Reach gets 6/10 IMHO
It was a solid 9/10 for me
User avatar #80 - armsdealer (09/05/2014) [-]
You don't have to re-quote everything I said, just type like a normal human being. I know how to read.
"Invisible true skill" is nice and all, but Highest Skill was a damn easy way to know ahead of time if you're playing against good/shitty people; being invisible does nobody any good. Not to mention there was no competition thanks to the matchmaking being about as good as a child throwing people into random games with random people. Oh, and need I bring up the "quit ban?" That was quite possibly the dumbest shit to hit any online shooter. Ever.

Oh and you're implying firefight was ANY good after ODST. You could edit the settings, which immediately made it loose any kind of difficulty that it had in ODST.

Oh, and do you seriously think 343 put out Reach? That was Bungie, and as a long time Bungie fan, it was seriously disappointing. Hence the "That shit is unacceptable."

Halo 4 scored higher for me, and that game was just a disappointment. Not bad, just disappointing
User avatar #82 - nathanbiggs (09/05/2014) [-]
It was easy enough to tell how good someone was by just checking their k/d ratio and maxed out commendations. Obviously Truskill was easier, but it wasn't that hard to check in Reach. The easiest way I found to not have a problem with the quit ban was to not quit games. Obviously you will occasionally have to quit a game or your internet will kick you out of game, but these should only be occasionally. If they actually cause you to get a quit ban then it's an issue on your end. In my 1100 hours of Reach I never once got quit banned.

Firefight was fun in Reach. I preferred ODST's firefight, and if it had matchmaking it would have been close to perfection, but Reach's was still nice. Plus I don't ever really find customization a bad thing.

Obviously Bungie made Reach, put it was 343i that took over less than a year after launch. It was 343i that put out a god awful TU that fixed none of Reach's actual problems and only really managed to unbalance the sandbox even more. Plus they shit all over Jeremiah's playlists. As a long time Bungie fan, I was more than satisfied with Reach.

4 was more of a disappointment for me, why 343i thought it was a good idea to turn Halo into a class based shooter with perks and killstreaks is beyond me, and that's only one of 4's many problems.
User avatar #63 - fauxshores (09/05/2014) [-]
My main beef with it was the sudden lack of skill based matchmaking. Halo 2 and 3 had 50's i dont see why they needed to take it out.
User avatar #65 - nathanbiggs (09/05/2014) [-]
The skill based matchmaking was still there, it was just hidden. Bungie wanted to try something new with Arena, which could have been really fun if handled properly.
#7 - It really is fantastic  [+] (5 new replies) 09/04/2014 on Borderline Personality... +7
#8 - krando (09/04/2014) [-]
it gave me feels i never feeled before.
#30 - jeitron (09/05/2014) [-]
I found the show kinda boring, some people say that they liked the "drama" and the cringe humor but I thought it was meh.

User avatar #32 - krando (09/05/2014) [-]
First time i attempted to watch it, I couldn't wasn't in the mood. tried it again a few months later, and found it really good.
#35 - jeitron (09/05/2014) [-]
Some people I talked to took this show way too seriously and saw it as a cautionary tale or even related to some of the events but I felt nothing, it was a plain show with awkward people and after that it felt like a chore to get through the 24 eps it had..

There's another anime that's similar to it but went more for the comedy route instead of drama called watamoe(I don't like it either).
User avatar #37 - krando (09/05/2014) [-]
Haven't seen that.

Then this genre prob isn't for you then.
#116 - I realize that, but it's pretty pointless to compare a console…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/04/2014 on the evolution of man 0
User avatar #117 - Tazdingo (09/04/2014) [-]
Well if you're looking for cost efficiency then yeah, but the premise of the picture is that you're looking for the most powerful gaming platform.
#97 - I've never understood the point of this graph, any graphics ca…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/04/2014 on the evolution of man +1
User avatar #115 - Tazdingo (09/04/2014) [-]
You can always pick a card that is within your price range since there are so many.
User avatar #116 - nathanbiggs (09/04/2014) [-]
I realize that, but it's pretty pointless to compare a console to a graphics card that costs more than the console itself.
User avatar #117 - Tazdingo (09/04/2014) [-]
Well if you're looking for cost efficiency then yeah, but the premise of the picture is that you're looking for the most powerful gaming platform.
#26 - The whole game was **** , it wasn't just the ending 09/04/2014 on Insert EA joke here +1
#1046281 - Have you tried looking into the Halo series' lore?  [+] (1 new reply) 09/03/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1046345 - adunsaveme (09/03/2014) [-]
Yeah. Read most of it.
#135 - >Gurren Lagann >bad  [+] (1 new reply) 09/02/2014 on chinese cartoons +3
User avatar #236 - brobafett (09/03/2014) [-]
>No, my big dumb robot is bigger: The show.

I don't even like anime and i know that's babby tier shit.
#1045378 - If a game gets 10/10's across the boad then the gameplay bette…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/02/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
#1045387 - anonymous (09/02/2014) [-]
*cough* gone home not saying it has a good story but that's what a lot of people claim *cough*
#1045371 - You know you want one.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/02/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1045373 - guardianatreyu (09/02/2014) [-]
No thanks. I already have a PS4 anyway.
#1045367 - You should give the Halo series another chance with the MCC. …  [+] (3 new replies) 09/02/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1045369 - guardianatreyu (09/02/2014) [-]
I don't want an Xbone.
User avatar #1045371 - nathanbiggs (09/02/2014) [-]
You know you want one.
User avatar #1045373 - guardianatreyu (09/02/2014) [-]
No thanks. I already have a PS4 anyway.
#27 - I downloaded Fable 3 through Games with Gold and still felt ri… 09/01/2014 on Fable III +4
#12 - Guess i'll post it again 08/31/2014 on Fucking Swedes +6
#176 - If we're calling something a new console that easily than the …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... 0
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
#126 - So we're just going to ignore the Gameboy Advance now?  [+] (3 new replies) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... 0
#128 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The gameboy adcance was a different console entirely. I don't understand what you're getting at
User avatar #176 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
If we're calling something a new console that easily than the New 3DS is a new console as well.
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
#28 - >people are still surprised/pissed about this Nintendo …  [+] (18 new replies) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... +30
#88 - anonymous (08/30/2014) [-]
they do it every 2-3 years
#72 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The only thing remotely close to this done before was the DSI, and that only had a few mostly shitty e-store titles.

This one is going to have actual games, and I wouldn't be surprised if they put things like the Majoras mask remake on it to sell more consoles.

I wouldn't be annoyed if it were a new console completely. But this is just a middle finger to early adopters. I don't want to shell out another €150 to play a few games that only work on this version.
User avatar #126 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
So we're just going to ignore the Gameboy Advance now?
#128 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The gameboy adcance was a different console entirely. I don't understand what you're getting at
User avatar #176 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
If we're calling something a new console that easily than the New 3DS is a new console as well.
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
User avatar #94 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
I think you are forgetting the Gameboy Advanced SP.
#95 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
What did it add?
User avatar #96 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
The Game Boy Advance SP is much smaller, and has a flip-up screen.
The screen on the Game Boy Advance SP is lit.
There is a rechargeable battery in the Game Boy Advance SP.
User avatar #179 - superblade (08/31/2014) [-]
at least the gameboy sp had a fuking light screen
#97 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
None of that affects games. The new 3ds has games that won't be available on the regular and XL 3ds.

Also the regular GBA had a rechargeable battery.
User avatar #99 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
I never said it affected games, nor did nathanbiggs, he said that nintendo has been following the same pattern for making handhelds, which is that after a few years they make a new stronger version, you stated that the only other thing they did like this was the DSi, I reminded you of the Gameboy Advanced. You were the one who brought up console exclusives.
#100 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But this is entirely different than the others. The rest were literally just cosmetic changes aside from the SP's backlight.

People are pissed that they bought a console, and now a slightly better, but not next generation better, version is coming out, meaning they have to shell out another $200 for a slightly bigger games library, all the while rewarding those who didn't buy early, while leaving those who supported the 3ds at a loss.

The DSi was the only "stronger" update of a handheld, and that really had nothing good on it exclusive wise. Just a few crappy estore timewasters. This on the other hand already has xenoblade confirmed, which is a hugely loved Wii game that's very difficult to get a reasonably priced copy of due to engineered rarity. Along with that, it's likely to see more first or second party titles using the extra power
User avatar #104 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
Once again I'll stress that this is not about exclusives it's about the fact that nintendo always does this and nobody should be surprised or upset as it was completely prodictable
#148 - vorigan (08/30/2014) [-]
Are you even reading his comments? No-one could give two dicks of a sausage if this new console had the cure to cancer attached to it. It's the fact that this has nearly exactly the same name and aesthetics as the normal 3DS but somehow, that warrants exclusive titles for this particular system.

I was fine with this newest revision until I found out Xenoblade would be released for it and thus finding out it would be only for the "New 3DS".
User avatar #135 - mutzaki (08/30/2014) [-]
No, it's not fucking about Nintendo doing the same thing they've always done. Actually read what the guy is saying. This time is different, due to new exclusives and that's why people are pissed.
#109 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But they haven't always done this. They have always made cosmetic changes. Nobody gives two shits about how different this new 3ds looks. They are pissed over the games
#69 - anonymous (08/30/2014) [-]
3 years
#89 - Picture 08/30/2014 on Pacific Rim +3
#4 - >b-but he could have just shot him in the leg! You can …  [+] (2 new replies) 08/27/2014 on #ferguson +1
User avatar #5 - rdrake (08/27/2014) [-]
An arrow to the knee?
#6 - hellsno (08/27/2014) [-]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 - jackmaccone ONLINE (11/01/2014) [-]
hey, sorry to ambush you that hard but i saw in a content that you own a xbox one too.    
 I wanted to ask that you can maybe accept my friends request on xbox so we can play together
hey, sorry to ambush you that hard but i saw in a content that you own a xbox one too.
I wanted to ask that you can maybe accept my friends request on xbox so we can play together
User avatar #14 to #13 - nathanbiggs (11/01/2014) [-]
Yea, why not. What's your gamertag?
User avatar #15 to #14 - jackmaccone ONLINE (11/01/2014) [-]
JackMaccone
User avatar #16 to #15 - nathanbiggs (11/01/2014) [-]
Alright, I just added you.
User avatar #9 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
**** you
#8 - angryturnip (02/05/2012) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
#4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** <--- You.
#5 to #4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** That made no sense. Let's try it again.
#3 - angryturnip (09/03/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #2 - igotsunshineinabag (07/09/2011) [-]
its onnnn
User avatar #1 - angryturnip (06/07/2011) [-]
I popped your profile comments cherry, ho.
 Friends (0)