Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

nathanbiggs    

Rank #4594 on Comments
nathanbiggs Avatar Level 267 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to nathanbiggs Block nathanbiggs Invite nathanbiggs to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:10/31/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4594
Highest Content Rank:#6115
Highest Comment Rank:#660
Content Thumbs: 112 total,  193 ,  81
Comment Thumbs: 7092 total,  9094 ,  2002
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 9 Content: New Here → Level 10 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 94% (94/100)
Level 267 Comments: Pure Win → Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:16312
Times Content Favorited:32 times
Total Comments Made:2005
FJ Points:6918

latest user's comments

#176 - If we're calling something a new console that easily than the …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... 0
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
#126 - So we're just going to ignore the Gameboy Advance now?  [+] (3 new replies) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... 0
#128 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The gameboy adcance was a different console entirely. I don't understand what you're getting at
User avatar #176 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
If we're calling something a new console that easily than the New 3DS is a new console as well.
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
#28 - >people are still surprised/pissed about this Nintendo …  [+] (18 new replies) 08/30/2014 on It's okay when Nintendo... +29
#88 - anon (08/30/2014) [-]
they do it every 2-3 years
#72 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The only thing remotely close to this done before was the DSI, and that only had a few mostly shitty e-store titles.

This one is going to have actual games, and I wouldn't be surprised if they put things like the Majoras mask remake on it to sell more consoles.

I wouldn't be annoyed if it were a new console completely. But this is just a middle finger to early adopters. I don't want to shell out another €150 to play a few games that only work on this version.
User avatar #126 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
So we're just going to ignore the Gameboy Advance now?
#128 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
The gameboy adcance was a different console entirely. I don't understand what you're getting at
User avatar #176 - nathanbiggs (08/30/2014) [-]
If we're calling something a new console that easily than the New 3DS is a new console as well.
#177 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But it's not. It's to the 3ds what the DSi was to the DS. It'll have a few exclusive titles, but nowhere near enough to call it a next gen system. It's mainly a 3ds just with some more power added on.

It's like how the ps2 required you to use the expansion bay for certain titles like FFXI. Except instead of an addon you need to buy a new console with the addon built in.
User avatar #94 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
I think you are forgetting the Gameboy Advanced SP.
#95 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
What did it add?
User avatar #96 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
The Game Boy Advance SP is much smaller, and has a flip-up screen.
The screen on the Game Boy Advance SP is lit.
There is a rechargeable battery in the Game Boy Advance SP.
User avatar #179 - superblade (08/31/2014) [-]
at least the gameboy sp had a fuking light screen
#97 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
None of that affects games. The new 3ds has games that won't be available on the regular and XL 3ds.

Also the regular GBA had a rechargeable battery.
User avatar #99 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
I never said it affected games, nor did nathanbiggs, he said that nintendo has been following the same pattern for making handhelds, which is that after a few years they make a new stronger version, you stated that the only other thing they did like this was the DSi, I reminded you of the Gameboy Advanced. You were the one who brought up console exclusives.
#100 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But this is entirely different than the others. The rest were literally just cosmetic changes aside from the SP's backlight.

People are pissed that they bought a console, and now a slightly better, but not next generation better, version is coming out, meaning they have to shell out another $200 for a slightly bigger games library, all the while rewarding those who didn't buy early, while leaving those who supported the 3ds at a loss.

The DSi was the only "stronger" update of a handheld, and that really had nothing good on it exclusive wise. Just a few crappy estore timewasters. This on the other hand already has xenoblade confirmed, which is a hugely loved Wii game that's very difficult to get a reasonably priced copy of due to engineered rarity. Along with that, it's likely to see more first or second party titles using the extra power
User avatar #104 - xalbobx (08/30/2014) [-]
Once again I'll stress that this is not about exclusives it's about the fact that nintendo always does this and nobody should be surprised or upset as it was completely prodictable
#148 - vorigan (08/30/2014) [-]
Are you even reading his comments? No-one could give two dicks of a sausage if this new console had the cure to cancer attached to it. It's the fact that this has nearly exactly the same name and aesthetics as the normal 3DS but somehow, that warrants exclusive titles for this particular system.

I was fine with this newest revision until I found out Xenoblade would be released for it and thus finding out it would be only for the "New 3DS".
User avatar #135 - mutzaki (08/30/2014) [-]
No, it's not fucking about Nintendo doing the same thing they've always done. Actually read what the guy is saying. This time is different, due to new exclusives and that's why people are pissed.
#109 - blancka (08/30/2014) [-]
But they haven't always done this. They have always made cosmetic changes. Nobody gives two shits about how different this new 3ds looks. They are pissed over the games
#69 - anon (08/30/2014) [-]
3 years
#89 - Picture 08/30/2014 on Pacific Rim +3
#4 - >b-but he could have just shot him in the leg! You can …  [+] (2 new replies) 08/27/2014 on #ferguson +1
User avatar #5 - rdrake (08/27/2014) [-]
An arrow to the knee?
#6 - hellsno (08/27/2014) [-]
#7 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 08/26/2014 on Noisy Bastard. +53
User avatar #20 - lorddarkskull (08/26/2014) [-]
Knew there was gonna be something eva related.
#44 - Picture 08/26/2014 on This is how sad feminists are +65
#1037417 - >Internet gaming journalism shown to be corrupt…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/24/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1037753 - feferest (08/25/2014) [-]
since that was not mentioned in pastebin link, so ye, I thought they were just fucking and doxxing themselves
User avatar #1037433 - godshandshake (08/24/2014) [-]
lmao vgb should start it's own game review site
#12 - >Cortana's Death >Feels It felt too shoehorned … 08/23/2014 on Video game logic +2
#11 - Picture 08/21/2014 on Boobies +5
#181 - >Hell, if someone even remotely disagreeing or acting viole…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/20/2014 on John Oliver on Ferguson 0
#183 - greyhoundfd (08/20/2014) [-]
That first point was me looking at a different comment, sorry. At the same time, the point is that the law gives officers a lot of methods to deal with criminals, and only one of those is lethal: a firearm. He could've used mace, he could've used a TASER. Hell, he and his partner could've even gotten out of the car and beaten the shit out of the guy. Any of those methods would've resulted in another average case where someone tried to do something illegal and got punished for it. Instead, someone tries something that's threatening and got blown away for it, and we have widespread rioting because a police officer couldn't have been bothered to reach for his baton instead of his Beretta.

My point is that despite the fact that society is armed, the only major incidents that seem to have happened in this town are specifically because the police were armed. Hell, like in the video in the OC, we're giving small towns in minor areas fucking Bearcats as police vehicles. The sort of things we used to ride into Afghanistan through IEDs and minefields. Police do need weapons, but they need to be demilitarized and instructed in de-escalating a situation.
#149 - Considering the autopsy shows Brown was shot front to back, th…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/20/2014 on John Oliver on Ferguson 0
#156 - sexuality (08/20/2014) [-]
Look at the way his arms are laid out for that autopsy. Now stand up and hold your arms at your sides, those bullet wounds on the insides of his arms could have been hit from behind, that much is common sense.

One eyewitness, then a tweet from a reporter saying that a cop told her something? Come on. That's not evidence. That's barely information. Why have none of those people stepped up?

Also, please consider that these people weren't right beside him, being shot at =/= being shot.

I'm not saying I'm right, you're wrong. All I'm saying that all of this is speculation and people need to stop spouting things like "He was charging at the officer! He grabbed his gun!" like it's absolute fact, because it simply isn't. It's he said, she said.

Just keep an open mind, keep digging, look for solid evidence, not media speculation, ya know?
#132 - > Ones which these police officers have clearly shown they …  [+] (3 new replies) 08/19/2014 on John Oliver on Ferguson +3
#178 - greyhoundfd (08/20/2014) [-]
That's exactly the mentality that is so dangerous. These are police officers, not soldiers. Their job is to protect the public, not to kill every single threat to it. Hell, if someone even remotely disagreeing or acting violent towards officers should be shot, why don't we shoot all criminals? Why don't we demote our nation to the civil rights equivalent of a third-world dictatorship? Yes, people do act violent, especially if they feel threatened for whatever reason. No, that doesn't mean we should just blow them away. This is specifically why we give police officers non-lethal weapons, so that they don't have to kill or brutalize people when they're uncooperative. We are a 21st century republic in the first world. We need to treat people with dignity and respect, not put them down like animals like we're in the west during the gold rush.

And yes, we shouldn't just hand out deadly weapons to people who are clearly unable and undeserving to handle them. The fact that you could even consider that normal is actually a really sad statement about our society.
User avatar #181 - nathanbiggs (08/20/2014) [-]
>Hell, if someone even remotely disagreeing or acting violent towards officers should be shot, why don't we shoot all criminals?
That's not what I was saying at all, don't twist my words. Brown attempted to disarm the officer, which is a clear threat on the officers life. The officer has no idea how the person is going to react if they do manage to disarm them and take the gun. Will the person shot them? Will the person just throw the gun away? Considering the way Brown was acting, i'd say the first is more likely.
>Yes, people do act violent, especially if they feel threatened for whatever reason. No, that doesn't mean we should just blow them away.
I agree.
> We need to treat people with dignity and respect, not put them down like animals like we're in the west during the gold rush.
I agree.
>And yes, we shouldn't just hand out deadly weapons to people who are clearly unable and undeserving to handle them. The fact that you could even consider that normal is actually a really sad statement about our society.
What about my post gave you the idea that i'm okay with that? All I said was that we are an armed society, and what comes with that is armed Police Departments. One without the other shouldn't happen.
#183 - greyhoundfd (08/20/2014) [-]
That first point was me looking at a different comment, sorry. At the same time, the point is that the law gives officers a lot of methods to deal with criminals, and only one of those is lethal: a firearm. He could've used mace, he could've used a TASER. Hell, he and his partner could've even gotten out of the car and beaten the shit out of the guy. Any of those methods would've resulted in another average case where someone tried to do something illegal and got punished for it. Instead, someone tries something that's threatening and got blown away for it, and we have widespread rioting because a police officer couldn't have been bothered to reach for his baton instead of his Beretta.

My point is that despite the fact that society is armed, the only major incidents that seem to have happened in this town are specifically because the police were armed. Hell, like in the video in the OC, we're giving small towns in minor areas fucking Bearcats as police vehicles. The sort of things we used to ride into Afghanistan through IEDs and minefields. Police do need weapons, but they need to be demilitarized and instructed in de-escalating a situation.
#57 - Micheal Brown was charging the officer, the story has been cor…  [+] (15 new replies) 08/19/2014 on John Oliver on Ferguson +20
#134 - sexuality (08/19/2014) [-]
Please cite the multiple sources and which ones were eyewitnesses. As true as your picture may be, the same wounds could be inflicted on a stationary individual facing front, with arms raised above their head.

That story has been collaborated by at least three eyewitnesses, including the guy that Michael Brown was walking with.
Source: www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/08/_5_eyewitness_accounts_of_michael_brown_s_shooting.html

Everything now is he said, she said, no solid evidence.

Only facts currently are that an unarmed man was fatally shot by a police officer, everything else is, again, he said she said.
User avatar #165 - commontroll (08/20/2014) [-]
Right, because eyewitnesses are so reliable in the days where by saying you were a witness puts you on TV. People made shit up during the Zimmerman trials too just to get attention and to not seem racist by saying maybe the black guy was a criminal.

People need to stop acting like an unarmed man isn't a threat. Shit man, I can gouge eyes and bite off fingers and deal out concussions easily, that's not even touching on the fact that if I punch somebody in the throat it may very well kill them if they don't get help soon enough.
#172 - anon (08/20/2014) [-]
So are you saying we should consider some eyewitness accounts over others? One kid tweeted about it as it happened, how could he be making it up for media attention?
User avatar #176 - commontroll (08/20/2014) [-]
I'm just saying that odds are people stepping into the spot light to say the opinion the media is behind are very high. And that you have to keep that in mind. The other thing to keep in mind, just like the Martin and Zimmerman case is that ghetto people hate people who kill other ghetto people. They especially hate cops.

The autopsy shows he was shot from the front due to no exit wounds in certain spots and how the exit wound in the head is. When you aim at the body mass (as anybody who is properly trained does) as a 6'4 300 pound male is charging you to tackle you at full speed you will probably fire multiple times, inaccurately and due to their head being lowered you will probably hit their head.

You say they could be covering their head, then one of those rounds would have gone through the hand and into the head, probably into the cranium through the forehead. The fact that a round went from the jaw into the clavicle is definitely proof that he was not just standing covering his face, and the fact that the fatal round went into the top of the head and almost came out of the bottom means it is a shot that simply couldn't be fired into somebody who is 6'4, whether they were on their feet or their knees.

And if the guy who tweeted it really saw it, he probably would have been recording the video. He probably heard gunshots and saw the cops and said "The fuzz just iced this nigga!" Is that what happened? I don't know, and I won't say I'm absolutely right because it's not my job to figure it out. Instead I'm going to say that I trust the FBI to ensure it's a just and fair investigation because they don't let anybody get away with shit. Even former agents who kill criminals.

If they could investigate properly they'd be able to see where the bullets that exited or did not enter went and judge from there how it probably happened.
#188 - anon (08/20/2014) [-]
That's just assuming when his hands went up, they covered his face, rather then his hands being raised above his head.

And honestly, everyone reacts differently ya know?
I would've recorded, that doesn't mean everyone would've recorded.

Also, I'm pretty drunk and also a white male, so my take on the whole situation is biased, I've never been harassed by police before, but I know it does happen to black people (based on stories from my cop brother-in-law).
User avatar #149 - nathanbiggs (08/20/2014) [-]
Considering the autopsy shows Brown was shot front to back, the whole "he was shot while running away from the cop" story that is prevalent in your link null and void.
Citation-www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0

>Please cite the multiple sources and which ones were eyewitnesses. As true as your picture may be, the same wounds could be inflicted on a stationary individual facing front, with arms raised above their head.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=prrydnTAly0
twitter.com/ChristineDByers/statuses/501556693382094848
Plus, the gunshot wounds seem too spread out and wild for someone stationary with their arms raised giving up.
#156 - sexuality (08/20/2014) [-]
Look at the way his arms are laid out for that autopsy. Now stand up and hold your arms at your sides, those bullet wounds on the insides of his arms could have been hit from behind, that much is common sense.

One eyewitness, then a tweet from a reporter saying that a cop told her something? Come on. That's not evidence. That's barely information. Why have none of those people stepped up?

Also, please consider that these people weren't right beside him, being shot at =/= being shot.

I'm not saying I'm right, you're wrong. All I'm saying that all of this is speculation and people need to stop spouting things like "He was charging at the officer! He grabbed his gun!" like it's absolute fact, because it simply isn't. It's he said, she said.

Just keep an open mind, keep digging, look for solid evidence, not media speculation, ya know?
#120 - greyhoundfd (08/19/2014) [-]
Cops are given TASERs, stun guns, and mace for a reason. The gun is only for use in a situation that can't be resolved without lethal force like, say, when someone pulls out their own gun and starts shooting at you. It's a device that uses a highly volatile powder to fire metal slugs thousands of miles per hour through the air to rip through people's bodies. They are not toys, they are privileges. Ones which these police officers have clearly shown they neither deserve nor are ready for.

This seems to be what everyone is ignoring. It's not whether he was complying or not, it's that a police officer used a lethal weapon against an unarmed man instead of the multiple non-lethal alternatives they are provided. Who cares whether or not he committed a crime or tried to take the officer's gun? That's irrelevant. What should be significant is that police are increasingly resorting to lethal options that are unnecessary.
User avatar #132 - nathanbiggs (08/19/2014) [-]
> Ones which these police officers have clearly shown they neither deserve nor are ready for.
How are police going to deal with an armed populace without guns? You realize how stupid saying something like this is, right?

>Who cares whether or not he committed a crime or tried to take the officer's gun? That's irrelevant.
How are they irrelevant? The first helps to show the kind of person that Brown was, and that the behavior described wouldn't be too far fetched. With the second, the police are trained to use lethal force if someone attempts to disarm them. It's common sense, if someone is attacking you and attempting to take your gun away, you put the person down. Micheal Brown shouldn't have reached for the officer's gun, if he would have cooperated he would still be alive today.
#178 - greyhoundfd (08/20/2014) [-]
That's exactly the mentality that is so dangerous. These are police officers, not soldiers. Their job is to protect the public, not to kill every single threat to it. Hell, if someone even remotely disagreeing or acting violent towards officers should be shot, why don't we shoot all criminals? Why don't we demote our nation to the civil rights equivalent of a third-world dictatorship? Yes, people do act violent, especially if they feel threatened for whatever reason. No, that doesn't mean we should just blow them away. This is specifically why we give police officers non-lethal weapons, so that they don't have to kill or brutalize people when they're uncooperative. We are a 21st century republic in the first world. We need to treat people with dignity and respect, not put them down like animals like we're in the west during the gold rush.

And yes, we shouldn't just hand out deadly weapons to people who are clearly unable and undeserving to handle them. The fact that you could even consider that normal is actually a really sad statement about our society.
User avatar #181 - nathanbiggs (08/20/2014) [-]
>Hell, if someone even remotely disagreeing or acting violent towards officers should be shot, why don't we shoot all criminals?
That's not what I was saying at all, don't twist my words. Brown attempted to disarm the officer, which is a clear threat on the officers life. The officer has no idea how the person is going to react if they do manage to disarm them and take the gun. Will the person shot them? Will the person just throw the gun away? Considering the way Brown was acting, i'd say the first is more likely.
>Yes, people do act violent, especially if they feel threatened for whatever reason. No, that doesn't mean we should just blow them away.
I agree.
> We need to treat people with dignity and respect, not put them down like animals like we're in the west during the gold rush.
I agree.
>And yes, we shouldn't just hand out deadly weapons to people who are clearly unable and undeserving to handle them. The fact that you could even consider that normal is actually a really sad statement about our society.
What about my post gave you the idea that i'm okay with that? All I said was that we are an armed society, and what comes with that is armed Police Departments. One without the other shouldn't happen.
#183 - greyhoundfd (08/20/2014) [-]
That first point was me looking at a different comment, sorry. At the same time, the point is that the law gives officers a lot of methods to deal with criminals, and only one of those is lethal: a firearm. He could've used mace, he could've used a TASER. Hell, he and his partner could've even gotten out of the car and beaten the shit out of the guy. Any of those methods would've resulted in another average case where someone tried to do something illegal and got punished for it. Instead, someone tries something that's threatening and got blown away for it, and we have widespread rioting because a police officer couldn't have been bothered to reach for his baton instead of his Beretta.

My point is that despite the fact that society is armed, the only major incidents that seem to have happened in this town are specifically because the police were armed. Hell, like in the video in the OC, we're giving small towns in minor areas fucking Bearcats as police vehicles. The sort of things we used to ride into Afghanistan through IEDs and minefields. Police do need weapons, but they need to be demilitarized and instructed in de-escalating a situation.
User avatar #87 - xjvlezmerised (08/19/2014) [-]
why does that even matter he didnt have a gun the cop could have easily tazed him or rly anything else
User avatar #186 - dammriver (08/20/2014) [-]
He was going for the cops gun. Let's say the officer was right-handed (most are), and the holster was on his right hip. Usually, your less-lethal (including the TASER) are backwards on the opposite hip (so you would have to reach across your body with your dominant hand). Reaching for the TASER would have left his handgun unprotected. Now tell me, would you like to be fumbling for your TASER while someone else has your gun and is about to shoot?

Also, this probably all happened over the course of five seconds. In five seconds, you go into a fight or flight reaction. In this situation, the officer is trained to fight. Also, with it all happening this quickly, the officer probably didn't even have the time to decide on using his TASER.
User avatar #92 - traelos (08/19/2014) [-]
>Just wing him

I assume you've never been in a fight?
#1032268 - It is, though. Exclusives sell consoles and any console manuf…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/19/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1032269 - godshandshake (08/19/2014) [-]
I think the article was more asking why because they obviously spent a load of money on something that isn't permanent
#1032264 - >Why microsoft wanted rise of the tomb raider? Why does…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/19/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar #1032265 - godshandshake (08/19/2014) [-]
ye kinda
User avatar #1032268 - nathanbiggs (08/19/2014) [-]
It is, though. Exclusives sell consoles and any console manufacturer (including Sony) would want more exclusives.
User avatar #1032269 - godshandshake (08/19/2014) [-]
I think the article was more asking why because they obviously spent a load of money on something that isn't permanent
#10 - Why is there just a random picture of Felicia Day?  [+] (1 new reply) 08/17/2014 on Everyone else is doing it... +1
User avatar #32 - listerthepessimist (08/17/2014) [-]
because its one of the wallpapers I have
#67 - >1. Voice acting is higher regarded in japanese culture and… 08/16/2014 on My confession -1
#1027615 - Not really worth owning a PS4 yet, wait until early 2015 once… 08/12/2014 on Video Games Board - console... 0
#57 - >Compared to ps4? Perhaps. Do you have to pay monthly for i… 08/12/2014 on Master Race 0
#49 - Best Console Online Infrastructure Dedicated Servers for a…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/12/2014 on Master Race 0
User avatar #52 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
>Best Console Online Infrastructure
Compared to ps4? Perhaps. Do you have to pay monthly for it? Yes.
>Dedicated Servers for any multiplayer game that wants them
So do pc games. Every pc game has dedicated servers.
>Best Console Controller
Maybe if you are a fan of that controller, but people might like ps4 one better. Won't say it's bad but it's not worth of buying the console.
>MCC
Seriously? Buying a console for a repack of previous generation halos? If you are a xbox fan you've probably played all of them before.
>Sunset Overdrive
No idea about that game but looks childish
>Forza Horizon 2
Generic racing game?
User avatar #65 - kinginyellow (08/12/2014) [-]
You have to pay monthly on PS4 as well, PS+ is required for a lot of online now.
User avatar #66 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Yes i know, i am not defending ps4 either. Xbox one online is better than ps4 but having to pay to play online is not okay.
User avatar #58 - retardedboss (08/12/2014) [-]
Not saying xbox one is the best console, I don't even own one, but disregarding a game because it "looks childish" is pretty stupid. Minecraft "looks childish" TF2 "looks childish" Binding of Issac, Super Meatboy most Legend of Zelda games "look childish", but that's no reason to just brush them off.
User avatar #60 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
That's why i said i have no idea bout that game, maybe its good, but buyin an xbox one for three decent games is not worth it.
User avatar #63 - retardedboss (08/12/2014) [-]
Fair enough. For most people it really just come down to what their friends have. sure, get a gaming PC, but if all your friends have PS4s then you're gonna have a bad time. Unless you only ever game solo, then fuck everything get a PC.
User avatar #67 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
True dat, i play pc because none of my friends play anything lol.
User avatar #57 - nathanbiggs (08/12/2014) [-]
>Compared to ps4? Perhaps. Do you have to pay monthly for it? Yes.
Obviously compared to its main competition, yes. And paying for it monthly doesn't change what I said.
>So do pc games. Every pc game has dedicated servers.
[citation needed]
>Maybe if you are a fan of that controller, but people might like ps4 one better. Won't say it's bad but it's not worth of buying the console.
The DS4 just isn't as good, it's not really all that subjective.
>Seriously? Buying a console for a repack of previous generation halos? If you are a xbox fan you've probably played all of them before.
I can't play CE or 2 online anymore (on console), plus it will hopefully revitalize 3's multiplayer. I didn't play 2's multiplayer online that much and i've never played CE's multiplayer online. Especially not over Dedicated Servers, plus the game comes with an invite to the Halo 5 beta.
>No idea about that game but looks childish
Cartoony=/=childish.
>Generic racing game?
The Horizon games are not generic, and the forza games are some of the best racing games console has to offer.
#31 - >not owning an Xbox One.  [+] (20 new replies) 08/12/2014 on Master Race 0
User avatar #33 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Tell me only one reason to buy a xboxone
User avatar #49 - nathanbiggs (08/12/2014) [-]
Best Console Online Infrastructure
Dedicated Servers for any multiplayer game that wants them
Best Console Controller
MCC
Sunset Overdrive
Forza Horizon 2
User avatar #52 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
>Best Console Online Infrastructure
Compared to ps4? Perhaps. Do you have to pay monthly for it? Yes.
>Dedicated Servers for any multiplayer game that wants them
So do pc games. Every pc game has dedicated servers.
>Best Console Controller
Maybe if you are a fan of that controller, but people might like ps4 one better. Won't say it's bad but it's not worth of buying the console.
>MCC
Seriously? Buying a console for a repack of previous generation halos? If you are a xbox fan you've probably played all of them before.
>Sunset Overdrive
No idea about that game but looks childish
>Forza Horizon 2
Generic racing game?
User avatar #65 - kinginyellow (08/12/2014) [-]
You have to pay monthly on PS4 as well, PS+ is required for a lot of online now.
User avatar #66 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Yes i know, i am not defending ps4 either. Xbox one online is better than ps4 but having to pay to play online is not okay.
User avatar #58 - retardedboss (08/12/2014) [-]
Not saying xbox one is the best console, I don't even own one, but disregarding a game because it "looks childish" is pretty stupid. Minecraft "looks childish" TF2 "looks childish" Binding of Issac, Super Meatboy most Legend of Zelda games "look childish", but that's no reason to just brush them off.
User avatar #60 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
That's why i said i have no idea bout that game, maybe its good, but buyin an xbox one for three decent games is not worth it.
User avatar #63 - retardedboss (08/12/2014) [-]
Fair enough. For most people it really just come down to what their friends have. sure, get a gaming PC, but if all your friends have PS4s then you're gonna have a bad time. Unless you only ever game solo, then fuck everything get a PC.
User avatar #67 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
True dat, i play pc because none of my friends play anything lol.
User avatar #57 - nathanbiggs (08/12/2014) [-]
>Compared to ps4? Perhaps. Do you have to pay monthly for it? Yes.
Obviously compared to its main competition, yes. And paying for it monthly doesn't change what I said.
>So do pc games. Every pc game has dedicated servers.
[citation needed]
>Maybe if you are a fan of that controller, but people might like ps4 one better. Won't say it's bad but it's not worth of buying the console.
The DS4 just isn't as good, it's not really all that subjective.
>Seriously? Buying a console for a repack of previous generation halos? If you are a xbox fan you've probably played all of them before.
I can't play CE or 2 online anymore (on console), plus it will hopefully revitalize 3's multiplayer. I didn't play 2's multiplayer online that much and i've never played CE's multiplayer online. Especially not over Dedicated Servers, plus the game comes with an invite to the Halo 5 beta.
>No idea about that game but looks childish
Cartoony=/=childish.
>Generic racing game?
The Horizon games are not generic, and the forza games are some of the best racing games console has to offer.
User avatar #35 - sharklazers (08/12/2014) [-]
killer instinct, the master chief collection, titanfall (although it's out on pc, xbox one is cheaper than a pc that can run titanfall)
User avatar #38 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
>broken fighting game where you have to buy each character
>4 halos from previous consoles
>generic shooter with mechas

Not enough to make me drop 500$, sorry.
User avatar #39 - sharklazers (08/12/2014) [-]
at this point you're just biased and blinded by your pc master race shit, i play console because to have a pc that can actually play game you have to have money pouring out your ass
User avatar #40 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Not true, a 700$ pc will do fine for most if not all of the new generation games in 1080p and nearly 60fps. I just play on pc because games are cheaper and more variated.
User avatar #42 - sharklazers (08/12/2014) [-]
Still more expensive than a ps4. Console will be guaranteed to run every game coming out for it, PC won't, you'll have to check specs and everything. Not everybody has $700 to shell out. Also you can play local multiplayer party games on your Console, PC? not so much
User avatar #44 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Not many games are available for local party anymore. They used to, but now there's only online multiplayer. Yes, they will run it, not in the highest settings (which doesn't really matter) but first they have to launch some good games, which i have not seen yet.
Anyways, talking about the price, you can get games for a really low price on steam, rather than spending 70$ (or whatever it is in your country) for a single game, 4 games and you topped those 700$
User avatar #47 - sharklazers (08/12/2014) [-]
Honestly, I do think PC is master race in all but price. I'm saving up to switch to pc and i'm thinking about buying this pcpartpicker.com/p/tvXBhM
User avatar #54 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
Yes noice, im not an expert on that field but building the pc by parts its said to be way cheaper.
User avatar #45 - sharklazers (08/12/2014) [-]
um, 70x4 is 280
User avatar #46 - kimilsung (08/12/2014) [-]
500 from the xbox + 280 = 780?
#51 - >Feinstein 08/11/2014 on Ladies and Gentlemen:... 0
#64 - Even if it was enough, Lilith was still dormant. Where are h…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/11/2014 on Seat Thyself Within the... 0
#66 - senjougahara (08/11/2014) [-]
Good point.
#70 - dontread (08/11/2014) [-]
you also have to remember that Steve forgot his bus pass and we all know Steve needs his bus pass to get to places
User avatar #71 - senjougahara (08/11/2014) [-]
Uhh what?
#54 - Any prove of that, I haven't heard that before. Plus Third Im…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/11/2014 on Seat Thyself Within the... 0
User avatar #63 - senjougahara (08/11/2014) [-]
The angel Shinji fought had Adams DNA. You do the math
User avatar #64 - nathanbiggs (08/11/2014) [-]
Even if it was enough, Lilith was still dormant. Where are humanities souls going to go without access to the Chamber of Guf?
#66 - senjougahara (08/11/2014) [-]
Good point.
#70 - dontread (08/11/2014) [-]
you also have to remember that Steve forgot his bus pass and we all know Steve needs his bus pass to get to places
User avatar #71 - senjougahara (08/11/2014) [-]
Uhh what?
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - angryturnip (02/05/2012) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
#4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** <--- You.
#5 to #4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** That made no sense. Let's try it again.
#3 - angryturnip (09/03/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #2 - igotsunshineinabag (07/09/2011) [-]
its onnnn
User avatar #1 - angryturnip (06/07/2011) [-]
I popped your profile comments cherry, ho.
 Friends (0)