Upload
Login or register

nathanbiggs

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:7/27/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7794
Highest Content Rank:#6115
Highest Comment Rank:#660
Content Thumbs: 110 total,  193 ,  83
Comment Thumbs: 10748 total,  14240 ,  3492
Content Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 9 Content: New Here → Level 10 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 13% (13/100)
Level 295 Comments: Post Master → Level 296 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:0
Content Views:16584
Times Content Favorited:32 times
Total Comments Made:3143
FJ Points:9623

latest user's comments

#124 - [citation needed]  [+] (9 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -2
User avatar
#128 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
read the contract
User avatar
#129 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
There's been no concrete evidence that areas were cut to sell as DLC, there's speculation and assumptions and thats it.
#133 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE YOU DUMB CHILD. HISTORY DOESN'T LIE.
User avatar
#144 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never said more than one couldn't be called that, just that Activision hasn't been called it in a while. You went out of your way to argue points that I never made to make it look like Activision was the reason Destiny turned out the way it did, if that's the definition of being a fanboy for a certain company I don't know what is. Destiny doesn't come close to the quality that Halo 5 has. You also didn't answer my question.
User avatar
#137 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Also, pretty much everyone I've been playing Halo with for the last decade agrees with me, none of us like current day Bungie and are glad they left when they did.
User avatar
#136 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Again, assumptions. If it was as clear as you said there should be some articles stating the proof somewhere on the internet. Again, you act more like a Bungie fan than a Halo fan.
#138 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>defending the most infamous and money hungry publisher
there are plenty of articles about activison's anti consumer practices. use your head fam, it's simple logic. the PUBLISHER is the one FORCING DEVELOPERS to split the game up and sell it as expansion packs. activison does that shit all the time. I'm done talking to you because you're just very fucking stupid.
User avatar
#139 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Am I back in 2008? Activision hasn't been known as "anti consumer" in over half a decade, that title was taken by EA. What was the last game that Activision published that they forced the devs to split into pieces for DLC? I also never defended Activision, but you sure as hell went far out of your way to defend Bungie to the death. Can you at least admit that you're a Bungie fanboy?
User avatar
#140 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
more than one corporation can be anti consumer you dumb sack of shit. I've never defended bungie, I'm just saying they made a lot better games than 343i.
#122 - And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talkin…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 +1
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
#118 - It was, and always will be. Halo 2 set up the system still in…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 0
User avatar
#120 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo's multiplayer is a big part of what is, i agree, but if the campaign sucks, then the game shouldn't be considered a "fantastic addition to the franchise"
User avatar
#127 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
When 95% of my playtime is going to take place in multiplayer, and that multiplayer is fantastic, I would consider it a good addition to the series. The campaign isn't even all that bad, people just have a hate boner for anything 343i.
#116 - Read the contract, Bungie has a lot of say over what happens i…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -1
User avatar
#121 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
right, except the most common complaints about destiny was the lack of content. activision chopped up a lot of the game so they could sell tons of dlc and expansions. that's fucking activion's work, not bungie.
User avatar
#122 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talking about the abysmal gameplay, awful multiplayer, and just overall shittyness of everything that isn't VoG, as well as their attitude towards their playerbase and their constant flipflopping on issues. None of that is Activision based, and you're crazy if you somehow think Activision, who has less control than Microsoft, would somehow make Bungie worse. This whole conversation, with you trying to constantly shift blame from Bungie, just goes to show that you were a Bungie fan, not a Halo fan.
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
User avatar
#119 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you clearly are not living in the same reality as i am if you think that's true. The people funding the game always get final say, you dumb nigger child.
#115 - Halo 5's campaign isn't the best, I can give you that, but it'…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 +1
User avatar
#117 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
If you think the main draw of Halo is it's multiplayer, you are not a Halo fan, you're an arena shooter fan
User avatar
#118 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
It was, and always will be. Halo 2 set up the system still in use today for online games, and millions of people played 2, 3, and Reach daily during their primes. The main draw was always the multiplayer, at least post-2. To say otherwise is ignorant of the playerbase you call yourself a part of.
User avatar
#120 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo's multiplayer is a big part of what is, i agree, but if the campaign sucks, then the game shouldn't be considered a "fantastic addition to the franchise"
User avatar
#127 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
When 95% of my playtime is going to take place in multiplayer, and that multiplayer is fantastic, I would consider it a good addition to the series. The campaign isn't even all that bad, people just have a hate boner for anything 343i.
#111 - Never have, 5 is almost as good as 3 in terms of multiplayer t…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -1
User avatar
#114 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I agree that 5's multiplayer was good, but multiplayer should not define a Halo game, the campaign should and the multiplayer should be an added bonus
#110 - Have you not read their contract? Aside from the expansions Bu…  [+] (21 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -1
User avatar
#113 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny

THEY'RE THE ONES FUCKING FUNDING THE DAMN GAME. OF COURSE THEY ALWAYS HAVE FINAL SAY OVER EVERYTHING YOU DUMBASS.
User avatar
#116 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Read the contract, Bungie has a lot of say over what happens in Destiny, Activision took a very hands off approach when it comes to that game.
User avatar
#121 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
right, except the most common complaints about destiny was the lack of content. activision chopped up a lot of the game so they could sell tons of dlc and expansions. that's fucking activion's work, not bungie.
User avatar
#122 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talking about the abysmal gameplay, awful multiplayer, and just overall shittyness of everything that isn't VoG, as well as their attitude towards their playerbase and their constant flipflopping on issues. None of that is Activision based, and you're crazy if you somehow think Activision, who has less control than Microsoft, would somehow make Bungie worse. This whole conversation, with you trying to constantly shift blame from Bungie, just goes to show that you were a Bungie fan, not a Halo fan.
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
User avatar
#119 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you clearly are not living in the same reality as i am if you think that's true. The people funding the game always get final say, you dumb nigger child.
User avatar
#112 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Activision forced Bungie into their "10 year plan" which made them release the game in pieces, all the DLC that came out year 1 of it's release was originally supposed to come out with the original game, both activision and bungie admitted themselves
User avatar
#124 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
[citation needed]
User avatar
#128 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
read the contract
User avatar
#129 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
There's been no concrete evidence that areas were cut to sell as DLC, there's speculation and assumptions and thats it.
#133 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE YOU DUMB CHILD. HISTORY DOESN'T LIE.
User avatar
#144 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never said more than one couldn't be called that, just that Activision hasn't been called it in a while. You went out of your way to argue points that I never made to make it look like Activision was the reason Destiny turned out the way it did, if that's the definition of being a fanboy for a certain company I don't know what is. Destiny doesn't come close to the quality that Halo 5 has. You also didn't answer my question.
User avatar
#137 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Also, pretty much everyone I've been playing Halo with for the last decade agrees with me, none of us like current day Bungie and are glad they left when they did.
User avatar
#136 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Again, assumptions. If it was as clear as you said there should be some articles stating the proof somewhere on the internet. Again, you act more like a Bungie fan than a Halo fan.
#138 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>defending the most infamous and money hungry publisher
there are plenty of articles about activison's anti consumer practices. use your head fam, it's simple logic. the PUBLISHER is the one FORCING DEVELOPERS to split the game up and sell it as expansion packs. activison does that shit all the time. I'm done talking to you because you're just very fucking stupid.
User avatar
#139 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Am I back in 2008? Activision hasn't been known as "anti consumer" in over half a decade, that title was taken by EA. What was the last game that Activision published that they forced the devs to split into pieces for DLC? I also never defended Activision, but you sure as hell went far out of your way to defend Bungie to the death. Can you at least admit that you're a Bungie fanboy?
User avatar
#140 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
more than one corporation can be anti consumer you dumb sack of shit. I've never defended bungie, I'm just saying they made a lot better games than 343i.
#107 - Have you not played Destiny and seen what Bungie has become? …  [+] (27 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -1
User avatar
#109 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
no i have not. bungie sold their soul to the devil (activision) and I'm not going to deny that. But don't sit here and try to say halo 1 - reach is worse than 4 and 5.
User avatar
#154 - deviousdanish (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny's PvP plays a lot like the natural evolution of Reach's multiplayer.
User avatar
#111 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never have, 5 is almost as good as 3 in terms of multiplayer though, if Destiny is anything to go off of Bungie wouldn't have made nearly as good of a game
User avatar
#114 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I agree that 5's multiplayer was good, but multiplayer should not define a Halo game, the campaign should and the multiplayer should be an added bonus
User avatar
#108 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
>implying most of the reason Destiny sucks is because of it's published, activision, not the devs themselves
User avatar
#110 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Have you not read their contract? Aside from the expansions Bungie has a lot of freedom, Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny, so to blame them is just ignorant.
User avatar
#113 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny

THEY'RE THE ONES FUCKING FUNDING THE DAMN GAME. OF COURSE THEY ALWAYS HAVE FINAL SAY OVER EVERYTHING YOU DUMBASS.
User avatar
#116 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Read the contract, Bungie has a lot of say over what happens in Destiny, Activision took a very hands off approach when it comes to that game.
User avatar
#121 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
right, except the most common complaints about destiny was the lack of content. activision chopped up a lot of the game so they could sell tons of dlc and expansions. that's fucking activion's work, not bungie.
User avatar
#122 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talking about the abysmal gameplay, awful multiplayer, and just overall shittyness of everything that isn't VoG, as well as their attitude towards their playerbase and their constant flipflopping on issues. None of that is Activision based, and you're crazy if you somehow think Activision, who has less control than Microsoft, would somehow make Bungie worse. This whole conversation, with you trying to constantly shift blame from Bungie, just goes to show that you were a Bungie fan, not a Halo fan.
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
User avatar
#119 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you clearly are not living in the same reality as i am if you think that's true. The people funding the game always get final say, you dumb nigger child.
User avatar
#112 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Activision forced Bungie into their "10 year plan" which made them release the game in pieces, all the DLC that came out year 1 of it's release was originally supposed to come out with the original game, both activision and bungie admitted themselves
User avatar
#124 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
[citation needed]
User avatar
#128 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
read the contract
User avatar
#129 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
There's been no concrete evidence that areas were cut to sell as DLC, there's speculation and assumptions and thats it.
#133 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE YOU DUMB CHILD. HISTORY DOESN'T LIE.
User avatar
#144 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never said more than one couldn't be called that, just that Activision hasn't been called it in a while. You went out of your way to argue points that I never made to make it look like Activision was the reason Destiny turned out the way it did, if that's the definition of being a fanboy for a certain company I don't know what is. Destiny doesn't come close to the quality that Halo 5 has. You also didn't answer my question.
User avatar
#137 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Also, pretty much everyone I've been playing Halo with for the last decade agrees with me, none of us like current day Bungie and are glad they left when they did.
User avatar
#136 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Again, assumptions. If it was as clear as you said there should be some articles stating the proof somewhere on the internet. Again, you act more like a Bungie fan than a Halo fan.
#138 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>defending the most infamous and money hungry publisher
there are plenty of articles about activison's anti consumer practices. use your head fam, it's simple logic. the PUBLISHER is the one FORCING DEVELOPERS to split the game up and sell it as expansion packs. activison does that shit all the time. I'm done talking to you because you're just very fucking stupid.
User avatar
#139 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Am I back in 2008? Activision hasn't been known as "anti consumer" in over half a decade, that title was taken by EA. What was the last game that Activision published that they forced the devs to split into pieces for DLC? I also never defended Activision, but you sure as hell went far out of your way to defend Bungie to the death. Can you at least admit that you're a Bungie fanboy?
User avatar
#140 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
more than one corporation can be anti consumer you dumb sack of shit. I've never defended bungie, I'm just saying they made a lot better games than 343i.
#103 - True Halo fans realize Bungie leaving was a godsend to the franchise  [+] (35 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -2
User avatar
#105 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I've loved Halo for as long as I can remember, read all the books, bought all the merchandise, and even defended 343 after the shit stain of story telling that was called Halo 4. But if you sit here and say that Halo 5 was a good game and did justice to the Halo franchise, you are a dumbass.

Halo 5's 3-4 hour campaign with no option for splitscreen co-op with shit tier character motivation and any story driven narrative was an ABOMINATION. 343 doesn't have the love for Halo as bungie did, and if you try to deny that, then you're not a "fan" you're a blind fool.

I love Halo and that's why i criticize it when it totally fucking sucks.

That's not to say that i didn't enjoy seeing some events play out in Halo 5. I loved playing as chief and playing a new Halo game, but it's flaws outweighed anything good about it, and in the process destroyed any credibility that i once thought 343 had.
User avatar
#115 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo 5's campaign isn't the best, I can give you that, but it's far from an abomination and a giant step forward in comparison to 4. 5's character motivation is almost literally the same motivation as 3's. What were the glaring flaws in Halo 5? Because multiplayer is fantastic, and that's always been the main draw of Halo.
User avatar
#117 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
If you think the main draw of Halo is it's multiplayer, you are not a Halo fan, you're an arena shooter fan
User avatar
#118 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
It was, and always will be. Halo 2 set up the system still in use today for online games, and millions of people played 2, 3, and Reach daily during their primes. The main draw was always the multiplayer, at least post-2. To say otherwise is ignorant of the playerbase you call yourself a part of.
User avatar
#120 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo's multiplayer is a big part of what is, i agree, but if the campaign sucks, then the game shouldn't be considered a "fantastic addition to the franchise"
User avatar
#127 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
When 95% of my playtime is going to take place in multiplayer, and that multiplayer is fantastic, I would consider it a good addition to the series. The campaign isn't even all that bad, people just have a hate boner for anything 343i.
#104 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you must be joking
User avatar
#107 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Have you not played Destiny and seen what Bungie has become? I trust 343i more than current day Bungie at this point
User avatar
#109 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
no i have not. bungie sold their soul to the devil (activision) and I'm not going to deny that. But don't sit here and try to say halo 1 - reach is worse than 4 and 5.
User avatar
#154 - deviousdanish (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny's PvP plays a lot like the natural evolution of Reach's multiplayer.
User avatar
#111 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never have, 5 is almost as good as 3 in terms of multiplayer though, if Destiny is anything to go off of Bungie wouldn't have made nearly as good of a game
User avatar
#114 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I agree that 5's multiplayer was good, but multiplayer should not define a Halo game, the campaign should and the multiplayer should be an added bonus
User avatar
#108 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
>implying most of the reason Destiny sucks is because of it's published, activision, not the devs themselves
User avatar
#110 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Have you not read their contract? Aside from the expansions Bungie has a lot of freedom, Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny, so to blame them is just ignorant.
User avatar
#113 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny

THEY'RE THE ONES FUCKING FUNDING THE DAMN GAME. OF COURSE THEY ALWAYS HAVE FINAL SAY OVER EVERYTHING YOU DUMBASS.
User avatar
#116 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Read the contract, Bungie has a lot of say over what happens in Destiny, Activision took a very hands off approach when it comes to that game.
User avatar
#121 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
right, except the most common complaints about destiny was the lack of content. activision chopped up a lot of the game so they could sell tons of dlc and expansions. that's fucking activion's work, not bungie.
User avatar
#122 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talking about the abysmal gameplay, awful multiplayer, and just overall shittyness of everything that isn't VoG, as well as their attitude towards their playerbase and their constant flipflopping on issues. None of that is Activision based, and you're crazy if you somehow think Activision, who has less control than Microsoft, would somehow make Bungie worse. This whole conversation, with you trying to constantly shift blame from Bungie, just goes to show that you were a Bungie fan, not a Halo fan.
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
User avatar
#119 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you clearly are not living in the same reality as i am if you think that's true. The people funding the game always get final say, you dumb nigger child.
User avatar
#112 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Activision forced Bungie into their "10 year plan" which made them release the game in pieces, all the DLC that came out year 1 of it's release was originally supposed to come out with the original game, both activision and bungie admitted themselves
User avatar
#124 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
[citation needed]
User avatar
#128 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
read the contract
User avatar
#129 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
There's been no concrete evidence that areas were cut to sell as DLC, there's speculation and assumptions and thats it.
#133 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE YOU DUMB CHILD. HISTORY DOESN'T LIE.
User avatar
#144 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never said more than one couldn't be called that, just that Activision hasn't been called it in a while. You went out of your way to argue points that I never made to make it look like Activision was the reason Destiny turned out the way it did, if that's the definition of being a fanboy for a certain company I don't know what is. Destiny doesn't come close to the quality that Halo 5 has. You also didn't answer my question.
User avatar
#137 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Also, pretty much everyone I've been playing Halo with for the last decade agrees with me, none of us like current day Bungie and are glad they left when they did.
User avatar
#136 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Again, assumptions. If it was as clear as you said there should be some articles stating the proof somewhere on the internet. Again, you act more like a Bungie fan than a Halo fan.
#138 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>defending the most infamous and money hungry publisher
there are plenty of articles about activison's anti consumer practices. use your head fam, it's simple logic. the PUBLISHER is the one FORCING DEVELOPERS to split the game up and sell it as expansion packs. activison does that shit all the time. I'm done talking to you because you're just very fucking stupid.
User avatar
#139 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Am I back in 2008? Activision hasn't been known as "anti consumer" in over half a decade, that title was taken by EA. What was the last game that Activision published that they forced the devs to split into pieces for DLC? I also never defended Activision, but you sure as hell went far out of your way to defend Bungie to the death. Can you at least admit that you're a Bungie fanboy?
User avatar
#140 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
more than one corporation can be anti consumer you dumb sack of shit. I've never defended bungie, I'm just saying they made a lot better games than 343i.
#101 - And true Halo fans realize that MCC hasn't been broken in a lo…  [+] (39 new replies) 07/06/2016 on Halo Fan level 1000 -2
User avatar
#106 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
what is fantastic about Halo 5? it's 3 hour campaign? it's idiotic storyline? or maybe the fact that they advertised it as Locke v. Master chief yet the they barely tussled once and then come to find out that Locke isn't against master chief, he's trying to help him?

tell me what about Halo 5 was unique and good
#198 - huntergriff (07/06/2016) [-]
Forge.
User avatar
#102 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
true halo fans realize there's no hope for the series after bungie left.
User avatar
#103 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
True Halo fans realize Bungie leaving was a godsend to the franchise
User avatar
#105 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I've loved Halo for as long as I can remember, read all the books, bought all the merchandise, and even defended 343 after the shit stain of story telling that was called Halo 4. But if you sit here and say that Halo 5 was a good game and did justice to the Halo franchise, you are a dumbass.

Halo 5's 3-4 hour campaign with no option for splitscreen co-op with shit tier character motivation and any story driven narrative was an ABOMINATION. 343 doesn't have the love for Halo as bungie did, and if you try to deny that, then you're not a "fan" you're a blind fool.

I love Halo and that's why i criticize it when it totally fucking sucks.

That's not to say that i didn't enjoy seeing some events play out in Halo 5. I loved playing as chief and playing a new Halo game, but it's flaws outweighed anything good about it, and in the process destroyed any credibility that i once thought 343 had.
User avatar
#115 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo 5's campaign isn't the best, I can give you that, but it's far from an abomination and a giant step forward in comparison to 4. 5's character motivation is almost literally the same motivation as 3's. What were the glaring flaws in Halo 5? Because multiplayer is fantastic, and that's always been the main draw of Halo.
User avatar
#117 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
If you think the main draw of Halo is it's multiplayer, you are not a Halo fan, you're an arena shooter fan
User avatar
#118 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
It was, and always will be. Halo 2 set up the system still in use today for online games, and millions of people played 2, 3, and Reach daily during their primes. The main draw was always the multiplayer, at least post-2. To say otherwise is ignorant of the playerbase you call yourself a part of.
User avatar
#120 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Halo's multiplayer is a big part of what is, i agree, but if the campaign sucks, then the game shouldn't be considered a "fantastic addition to the franchise"
User avatar
#127 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
When 95% of my playtime is going to take place in multiplayer, and that multiplayer is fantastic, I would consider it a good addition to the series. The campaign isn't even all that bad, people just have a hate boner for anything 343i.
#104 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you must be joking
User avatar
#107 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Have you not played Destiny and seen what Bungie has become? I trust 343i more than current day Bungie at this point
User avatar
#109 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
no i have not. bungie sold their soul to the devil (activision) and I'm not going to deny that. But don't sit here and try to say halo 1 - reach is worse than 4 and 5.
User avatar
#154 - deviousdanish (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny's PvP plays a lot like the natural evolution of Reach's multiplayer.
User avatar
#111 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never have, 5 is almost as good as 3 in terms of multiplayer though, if Destiny is anything to go off of Bungie wouldn't have made nearly as good of a game
User avatar
#114 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
I agree that 5's multiplayer was good, but multiplayer should not define a Halo game, the campaign should and the multiplayer should be an added bonus
User avatar
#108 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
>implying most of the reason Destiny sucks is because of it's published, activision, not the devs themselves
User avatar
#110 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Have you not read their contract? Aside from the expansions Bungie has a lot of freedom, Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny, so to blame them is just ignorant.
User avatar
#113 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>Activision doesn't have any real say over Destiny

THEY'RE THE ONES FUCKING FUNDING THE DAMN GAME. OF COURSE THEY ALWAYS HAVE FINAL SAY OVER EVERYTHING YOU DUMBASS.
User avatar
#116 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Read the contract, Bungie has a lot of say over what happens in Destiny, Activision took a very hands off approach when it comes to that game.
User avatar
#121 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
right, except the most common complaints about destiny was the lack of content. activision chopped up a lot of the game so they could sell tons of dlc and expansions. that's fucking activion's work, not bungie.
User avatar
#122 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And I'm not even talking about the lack of content, I'm talking about the abysmal gameplay, awful multiplayer, and just overall shittyness of everything that isn't VoG, as well as their attitude towards their playerbase and their constant flipflopping on issues. None of that is Activision based, and you're crazy if you somehow think Activision, who has less control than Microsoft, would somehow make Bungie worse. This whole conversation, with you trying to constantly shift blame from Bungie, just goes to show that you were a Bungie fan, not a Halo fan.
User avatar
#123 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're definitely part of the minority of people that feel that way. either way, that's not the same bungie that made halo 1 - reach and that bungie is superior to modern day 343I.
User avatar
#125 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
And we're not talking about that, as stated multiple times. Current day Bungie wouldn't taken an even larger shit on the franchise than 343i could even dream.
User avatar
#126 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you're right, current day bungie would not make a worse game than 343i.
User avatar
#130 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Destiny is leagues worse than Halo 5, especially in the multiplayer department. Bungie wishes they could make a game as good as Halo 5 at this point
User avatar
#134 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THE ONLY PERSON THAT FEELS THAT WAY.
User avatar
#119 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
you clearly are not living in the same reality as i am if you think that's true. The people funding the game always get final say, you dumb nigger child.
User avatar
#112 - bionicpanda (07/06/2016) [-]
Activision forced Bungie into their "10 year plan" which made them release the game in pieces, all the DLC that came out year 1 of it's release was originally supposed to come out with the original game, both activision and bungie admitted themselves
User avatar
#124 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
[citation needed]
User avatar
#128 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
read the contract
User avatar
#129 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
There's been no concrete evidence that areas were cut to sell as DLC, there's speculation and assumptions and thats it.
#133 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE YOU DUMB CHILD. HISTORY DOESN'T LIE.
User avatar
#144 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Never said more than one couldn't be called that, just that Activision hasn't been called it in a while. You went out of your way to argue points that I never made to make it look like Activision was the reason Destiny turned out the way it did, if that's the definition of being a fanboy for a certain company I don't know what is. Destiny doesn't come close to the quality that Halo 5 has. You also didn't answer my question.
User avatar
#137 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Also, pretty much everyone I've been playing Halo with for the last decade agrees with me, none of us like current day Bungie and are glad they left when they did.
User avatar
#136 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Again, assumptions. If it was as clear as you said there should be some articles stating the proof somewhere on the internet. Again, you act more like a Bungie fan than a Halo fan.
#138 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
>defending the most infamous and money hungry publisher
there are plenty of articles about activison's anti consumer practices. use your head fam, it's simple logic. the PUBLISHER is the one FORCING DEVELOPERS to split the game up and sell it as expansion packs. activison does that shit all the time. I'm done talking to you because you're just very fucking stupid.
User avatar
#139 - nathanbiggs (07/06/2016) [-]
Am I back in 2008? Activision hasn't been known as "anti consumer" in over half a decade, that title was taken by EA. What was the last game that Activision published that they forced the devs to split into pieces for DLC? I also never defended Activision, but you sure as hell went far out of your way to defend Bungie to the death. Can you at least admit that you're a Bungie fanboy?
User avatar
#140 - niqqersbeware (07/06/2016) [-]
more than one corporation can be anti consumer you dumb sack of shit. I've never defended bungie, I'm just saying they made a lot better games than 343i.