Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

mysteriouspenguin    

Rank #10933 on Content
mysteriouspenguin Avatar Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to mysteriouspenguin Block mysteriouspenguin Invite mysteriouspenguin to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/10/2011
Last Login:8/27/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#10933
Comment Ranking:#20555
Highest Content Rank:#1155
Highest Comment Rank:#1748
Content Thumbs: 8610 total,  9503 ,  893
Comment Thumbs: 4995 total,  5628 ,  633
Content Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 185 Content: Anon Annihilator → Level 186 Content: Anon Annihilator
Comment Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:4
Content Views:278632
Times Content Favorited:561 times
Total Comments Made:1271
FJ Points:13571
Favorite Tags: funny (7) | a (3) | am (2) | and (2) | are (2) | by (2) | i (2) | skyrim (2) | tag (2) | The Game (2) | You (2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1r2BnVqR6A&feature=related mined set

latest user's comments

#28 - Yah re-reading my post I see I am kinda ambiguous, I am just a…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/22/2014 on Actual pay difference 0
User avatar #30 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
Well sometimes I hate taking more than a minute or two on typing something up...then we get fun things like this which kinda makes about 1/3 to half of my comment 29 pointless.
User avatar #31 - mysteriouspenguin (06/22/2014) [-]
Sorry to waste your time hehe, yah I am just saying that this post is taking a stance on how people understand that stat in a way that is a little off, what it is saying about the misrepresentation of wages is all fine
User avatar #35 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
No, no, man. I just keep reading what you are saying, and either I am completely misunderstanding you or you are very bad at phrasing things.

This post understands people's view of the stat perfectly. It is because of the way people view that stat that this post exists at all. It is showing the typical understanding and then showing why that typical understanding is wrong. This post is not wrong about people's understanding. It is merely here to correct that understanding.
#27 - Ok I see your point, let me clarify. What I am trying to say w…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/22/2014 on Actual pay difference 0
User avatar #29 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
Then why the ell did you say this isn't addressing the pay gap at all? It clearly is. When people say 77 cents to the dollar they do already mean taking all that into account...but they are wrong. This post is saying that they are wrong, not that people mean it is taking the stats across the board. the creator knows very much so that people think that 77 cents per dollar is for the same job/position/etc. And it is because people say this statistic thinking this that he made this post. To disillusion those people and show them that it is ACTUALLY an across the board statistic, not a per job/position/etc statistic.
#21 - All I am saying is that this post is misunderstanding that par…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/22/2014 on Actual pay difference -1
#23 - anonymous (06/22/2014) [-]
Wanna know why it is common knowledge for those people mate? Because it only happened 20+ years ago. It is not at all the way it is now, and saying it is is simply ignorant. And you do need citations, because...guess what...common knowledge =/= correct knowledge.
#17 - This is not addressing the pay gap at all, the idea that women…  [+] (10 new replies) 06/22/2014 on Actual pay difference -2
User avatar #22 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
Seriously man...did you read the top part of this. It says that if you account for occupation, position, education, and job tenure (that is to say that if you compare men and women with the same on all these points), then you find the age gap is reduced to a nickel. 95 center per 1 dollar. It is literally right there are the top. And your response is that this doesn't address that? It is literally the first thing addressed. Then it is continually addressed throughout the rest of the thing, stating how the MYTH of 77 cents per dollar for the same job came about. Because there is a situation where it is 77 cents per dollar, but it is not for the same job. It is actually the average payment for men vs women in all jobs. So it is like saying this guy works a 30 hour week and this other guy works a 40 hour week, but the 30 hour week guy gets less money per week so he must be paid less per hour. Simply not true.
User avatar #28 - mysteriouspenguin (06/22/2014) [-]
Yah re-reading my post I see I am kinda ambiguous, I am just addressing the use of that stat
User avatar #30 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
Well sometimes I hate taking more than a minute or two on typing something up...then we get fun things like this which kinda makes about 1/3 to half of my comment 29 pointless.
User avatar #31 - mysteriouspenguin (06/22/2014) [-]
Sorry to waste your time hehe, yah I am just saying that this post is taking a stance on how people understand that stat in a way that is a little off, what it is saying about the misrepresentation of wages is all fine
User avatar #35 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
No, no, man. I just keep reading what you are saying, and either I am completely misunderstanding you or you are very bad at phrasing things.

This post understands people's view of the stat perfectly. It is because of the way people view that stat that this post exists at all. It is showing the typical understanding and then showing why that typical understanding is wrong. This post is not wrong about people's understanding. It is merely here to correct that understanding.
User avatar #27 - mysteriouspenguin (06/22/2014) [-]
Ok I see your point, let me clarify. What I am trying to say when people say 77 cents to a dollar (at least in any circumstance that I have ever heard it) they already mean taking into account job and occupation and all that business, yet this post seems to take the stance that most people hear that stat and think it just applies across the board. I'm really just making a small semantic point, I'n not attacking the substance of the post
User avatar #29 - mylazy (06/22/2014) [-]
Then why the ell did you say this isn't addressing the pay gap at all? It clearly is. When people say 77 cents to the dollar they do already mean taking all that into account...but they are wrong. This post is saying that they are wrong, not that people mean it is taking the stats across the board. the creator knows very much so that people think that 77 cents per dollar is for the same job/position/etc. And it is because people say this statistic thinking this that he made this post. To disillusion those people and show them that it is ACTUALLY an across the board statistic, not a per job/position/etc statistic.
#18 - anonymous (06/22/2014) [-]
And there is also the opposite happening all over. We just don't bitch about it as much. Hence why the average is at 95 cents to the dollar for the same job. NOT 77 cents. Oh look there is some citation up there...oh look you have no citations.
User avatar #21 - mysteriouspenguin (06/22/2014) [-]
All I am saying is that this post is misunderstanding that particular commentary, and I don't need citation's for this, it's common knowledge to just about anyone 35+, as apposed to the average 10-20 year old on funnyjunk. And you're right progress has been made, the 77 cent figure is from the 80's - 90's
#23 - anonymous (06/22/2014) [-]
Wanna know why it is common knowledge for those people mate? Because it only happened 20+ years ago. It is not at all the way it is now, and saying it is is simply ignorant. And you do need citations, because...guess what...common knowledge =/= correct knowledge.
#971025 - i enjoyed it. had some good stuff in it. 06/19/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#964825 - well your not vary good at your job : /  [+] (1 new reply) 06/11/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
User avatar #964829 - jubnik (06/11/2014) [-]
you say that and yet he is getting a response isnt he?
#964771 - So dose anyone here read Imawabi no Dakini. its not bad in my …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/11/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
User avatar #964845 - yeorgh (06/11/2014) [-]
I like it a lot, especially Dakini and whatsherface with the eye scar.
#65 - Dude. Do it, grab a pick with him normally and this one and ca… 06/03/2014 on He didn't see that coming! +1
#288 - And then OP got colored text for this. 05/28/2014 on Admin lately 0
#42 - These sorts of things are exactly the reason I don't think the… 05/26/2014 on DIY Weapons -1
#25 - Akame ga Kill! 05/22/2014 on mysteriouspenguin's profile 0
#55722 - is good 05/22/2014 on Drawing & Art - drawing... +1
#1 - Picture 05/18/2014 on unsure of how to title this 0
#2 - tunnel snakes rule  [+] (4 new replies) 05/17/2014 on the sharks +114
User avatar #4 - faggotishshit (05/17/2014) [-]
we're the tunnel snakes
User avatar #5 - fullpotatomode (05/17/2014) [-]
that's us and we rule, rule r-r-r-r-r-r-rule
User avatar #36 - badmotorfinger (05/18/2014) [-]
I LIKE TO CYBERSEX
#942187 - Yes,That's another thing I didn't point out. The majority of t… 05/15/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#942165 - Like many people before me, season two will probably not happe…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/15/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
User avatar #942181 - hsm (05/15/2014) [-]
Well when the anime first came out the manga was at 36 or 40 chapters, so we are almost about to reach that mark again. Although if they do make the anime now, we will get more talk and less action. And that can be the turn off for a lot of people.
User avatar #942187 - mysteriouspenguin (05/15/2014) [-]
Yes,That's another thing I didn't point out. The majority of the chapters that follow after where the anime leaves off consists mostly of just talking and less action driven plot development. That's definitely a turnoff for the audience that it produced during its first season.
#16 - Picture 05/11/2014 on Cancer +2
#80 - Picture 05/10/2014 on Sure it's about tanks... 0
#920961 - its a fun show it look promising 04/18/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#920764 - give it two years and i think there will be a season 2 it… 04/17/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#23 - blaze it... 04/15/2014 on gates tho -1
#78 - **mysteriouspenguin rolls 642** 04/08/2014 on Fucking mimes, how do they... 0
#4848758 - Picture 04/08/2014 on Play items 0
#900389 - every time i see it I feel like its a bit more off center 03/21/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#899245 - darker then black was this show that made me start watching an… 03/20/2014 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 60 / Total items point value: 60

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - mysteriouspenguin (02/07/2013) [-]
Katanagatari
User avatar #21 to #19 - mysteriouspenguin (03/13/2013) [-]
KaminomizoShiruSekai
User avatar #16 - mysteriouspenguin (01/24/2013) [-]
Maoyuu Maou Yuusha
User avatar #17 to #16 - mysteriouspenguin (01/26/2013) [-]
Zero no Tsukaima
User avatar #15 - mysteriouspenguin (01/24/2013) [-]
Hidan no Aria
User avatar #23 to #15 - mysteriouspenguin (04/18/2013) [-]
Dansai Bunri no Crime Edge
User avatar #14 - mysteriouspenguin (01/20/2013) [-]
Sengoku Basara
User avatar #22 to #14 - mysteriouspenguin (03/27/2013) [-]
Seitokai Yakuindomo
User avatar #25 to #13 - mysteriouspenguin (05/22/2014) [-]
Akame ga Kill!
 Friends (0)