Upload
Login or register

mullacllahdoow

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:7/21/2011
Last Login:12/08/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 26 total,  38 ,  12
Comment Thumbs: 3612 total,  3739 ,  127
Content Level Progress: 42.37% (25/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 94% (94/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:3857
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:577
FJ Points:3116

latest user's comments

#5 - I don't see what you're trying to say... if W=T and W*2 = T^2 …  [+] (17 replies) 05/13/2015 on Happiness -8
User avatar
#13 - icewraithking (05/14/2015) [-]
you failed at math? you dont simplify it that way
User avatar
#14 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
T^2 = T * T

if T = W and T^2 = W*2 then

W*2 = T * T at this point it's obvious that W=T=2 but:

Since W = T we can sub T for W on the right hand side giving

W*2 = W*W

divide through by W to get

2 = W as I stated.
#53 - anon (05/15/2015) [-]
Guys, no one said W=T
User avatar
#19 - icewraithking (05/14/2015) [-]
you divided wrong, its ((w*2)/w)=w , also here is a nifty site to do that, www.wolframalpha.com/
User avatar
#23 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
Also, you might want to check what your own source tells you before you tell me I'm wrong www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28w*2%29%2Fw
User avatar
#24 - icewraithking (05/14/2015) [-]
well shit.
User avatar
#22 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
ok, no... W*2/W = 2

W^2/W = W...

a * denotes multiply.

Source. I have a Maths degree. also... my reply was (clearly a bad) attempt at humour. not intended to be analysed.
#51 - athale (05/14/2015) [-]
i did not understand thanks for explaining
User avatar
#25 - icewraithking (05/14/2015) [-]
i swear im getting retarded everyday, i should stop surrounding myself with retarded people
User avatar
#26 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
no sweat man, maths is my thing, unfair advantage
User avatar
#38 - tolikbro (05/14/2015) [-]
Set W=T
It just depends on whether you decide to do W*W or W+W.
In the first case, two women = T^2
In the second case, two women = 2T

Trouble squared or twice the trouble, all depends on how you want to combine the women.
User avatar
#40 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
and W*2 = W+W... what I said was for
W*2 = W^2 that requires W=2 and hence T=2
again, is was supposed to be a joke... but since everyone is so insistant that I'm wrong.
for a relationship for increasing women linearly to result in exponential growth of trouble you'd require:

let T = trouble and let T=x i.e. a large number representing trouble caused by 1 woman. then:
T = x^W
i.e. for 2 women: T = x^2
for 3 women T= x^3
etc...

The original post said W*2 (i.e. W+W) = T^2. Not mathematically correct if T=W.
#49 - mullacllahdoow has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#48 - racetothebottom (05/14/2015) [-]
jesus christ you're all missing the point
W is not equal to T
W and T are related, but that doesn't mean they're equal
like please point out where the first comment said W=T

W*x = T^x

is that so difficult to understand?
User avatar
#50 - mullacllahdoow (05/14/2015) [-]
Where he said "a woman is trouble" I was literally just making a "funny" (clearly not funny) observation from a mathematical standpoint. I didn't mean to start a debate on the difference between linear and exponential relationships and how to properly define said relationship.

I understood what he was getting at
#52 - athale (05/14/2015) [-]
... math wizards are debating my comment
#6 - athale (05/13/2015) [-]
im saying one woman is trouble but two woman isn't double trouble its trouble squared
#59 - Right... must be it.  [+] (1 reply) 05/12/2015 on 500 words per minute +1
#193 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Bc you're all faggot ass bitches. Cunt.
#49 - In my last job, we tried Spritzing to read technical documents…  [+] (3 replies) 05/12/2015 on 500 words per minute +3
#55 - anon (05/12/2015) [-]
Soooo.... what you're telling me is that you were all too dumb to use Spritzing?
User avatar
#59 - mullacllahdoow (05/12/2015) [-]
Right... must be it.
#193 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Bc you're all faggot ass bitches. Cunt.
#14 - sounds ridiculous...  [+] (1 reply) 05/09/2015 on Cutthroat Buisness or is it 0
User avatar
#15 - Taliesin (05/09/2015) [-]
It totally is, but understandable. Ish.
#12 - Hey I don't disbelieve you, but if this is the case, would the…  [+] (3 replies) 05/09/2015 on Cutthroat Buisness or is it 0
User avatar
#13 - Taliesin (05/09/2015) [-]
Yup, she'd be fined on average around 100-200 dollars for a facial expression. I'm not sure where this happened or who she works for, but the company I worked for fined 200 for facial changes short of smiling, 300-400 for smiling, 600 for frowning, and on from there. It was brutal.
User avatar
#14 - mullacllahdoow (05/09/2015) [-]
sounds ridiculous...
User avatar
#15 - Taliesin (05/09/2015) [-]
It totally is, but understandable. Ish.
#57 - Yes I see, based on your source Red hulk in space, so no gravi…  [+] (1 reply) 05/06/2015 on mjolnir mearly jests 0
User avatar
#61 - jabbathesmut (05/06/2015) [-]
ok so according to Neil deGrasse Tyson mjolnir wheather or not thor is wielding mjolnir which is made of neutron star matter, which means it weighs as much as a herd of 300 billion elephants which is pretty damn heavy when ya think about it, this theory tho has apparently been proven wrong but like i said it is a comic series soo its not exactly scientifically relevant
#53 - Ok, I'm willing to accept I'm wrong, just explaining what I've…  [+] (4 replies) 05/06/2015 on mjolnir mearly jests 0
User avatar
#56 - jabbathesmut (05/06/2015) [-]
in the marvel universe virtually nothing cant be done
User avatar
#54 - jabbathesmut (05/06/2015) [-]
not sayin ur wrong buddy but circumstances affect
User avatar
#57 - mullacllahdoow (05/06/2015) [-]
Yes I see, based on your source Red hulk in space, so no gravity to empower the enchantment and, despite the graphic of hulk holding the hammer unassisted it reads "Hulk was able to both deflect Mjolnir and whack Thor in the face with it. Granted, Thor was still holding onto Mjolnir throughout the brief skirmish, but we'll give Hulk the accomplishment all the same." which is how I thought it had only ever worked in The Hulks case.
User avatar
#61 - jabbathesmut (05/06/2015) [-]
ok so according to Neil deGrasse Tyson mjolnir wheather or not thor is wielding mjolnir which is made of neutron star matter, which means it weighs as much as a herd of 300 billion elephants which is pretty damn heavy when ya think about it, this theory tho has apparently been proven wrong but like i said it is a comic series soo its not exactly scientifically relevant