mrwigles
Rank #9763 on Comments
Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry Offline
Send mail to mrwigles Block mrwigles Invite mrwigles to be your friend flag avatar
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 6/08/2015 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #9763 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #4120 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 493 total,
511 ,
18 |
| Content Level Progress: | 6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 10% (1/10) Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 136 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Total Comments Made: | 27 |
| FJ Points: | 351 |
latest user's comments
| #1 - Reminds me of the animation from Flapjack. | 01/07/2016 on lets be single together... | +4 |
| #3 - "We need help with raiders" Literally across the… [+] (9 new replies) | 01/06/2016 on Dammit Kanye not again | +37 |
 I kind of assume some of them get up and wander around sometimes. Yeah, that's complete bullshit. It would've made more sense for settlements with high enough defense to just never need help. Or maybe mention that the troubles happen to people from the settlement who go out to scavenge or traders trying to get there are being bothered by raiders/ghouls/etc.  I think the problem stems from the fact that you have to show up to "help" because the engine would shit and die if it tried to calculate defense of a settlement vs. the offence of an attacking party and render the odds of a win/lose for a different battle across the map while you are doing something else. That said, rolling a simple win/lose based on defense would be better than the game rolling an instant lose any time you don't show up in time to help. Yeah, that's just retarded. To be perfectly honest I don't even bother much with the settlements. But it's still annoying when a settlement "needs help" and you pop in only to find a lone Super Mutant attacking. Or you just straight up can't find the raiders that are supposedly attacking the settlement and end up failing because you just say :fuck it" and leave. Ditto. But since I don't like leaving Quests unfinished I'm gonna end up helping that first settlement and then just say "lol no" when he asks me to be General. | ||
| #10 - All that work and the asker gives him 4/5 [+] (1 new reply) | 12/29/2015 on slaping ya monkey | +34 |
| | ||
| #17 - I don't know what is in eyeliners besides some alcohols, but s… | 12/11/2015 on No wonder she was crying | 0 |
| #26 - You are right. It is not common knowledge that the Calories on… [+] (1 new reply) | 12/03/2015 on Comparing Temperature Systems | 0 |
| #30 -
anon (12/03/2015) [-] Here in the Netherlands it's listed as kcal (joules are also listed). To make matters worse, the kilocalorie is sometimes called the food calorie or big calorie as if it's as legit as the official one. | ||
| #67 - It is a really long polymer. Typically people think of polymer… | 10/14/2015 on science and stuff | 0 |
| #44 - Lol such a good match between you avatar and your username. An… | 10/14/2015 on science and stuff | +1 |
| #43 - Haha I don't think so. I am not into politics. People get too … | 10/14/2015 on science and stuff | +1 |
| #42 - Imo it would not work. The siphoning only works because polyme… [+] (1 new reply) | 10/14/2015 on science and stuff | +4 |
| #6 - It is a self-siphoning gel. Polyethylene oxide (PEO) does form… [+] (25 new replies) | 10/13/2015 on science and stuff | +304 |
 You seem like a smart enough guy. Are you voting for Trump? #37 -
justwantedtosee (10/14/2015) [-] serious question, if you were to have it pulled by tube, upwards to another resivoir above the holding one, would it siphon still? |-----\ | |___| To this one | | |___| From this one #69 -
anon (10/14/2015) [-] To reinforce what mrwigles said, no, it wouldn't work. In order for a fluid, non-Newtonian or otherwise, (or really any type of matter, for the matter) to move from point A to point B, B must have a lower potential energy that A because all systems have a tendency to move from higher energy states to lower energy states. In your example, the higher container has more potential energy, so there is no way for the fluid to move to it naturally. Flow could be accomplished using a pump, but pumping a shear-thickening fluid (that's the type of non-Newtonian fluid shown in the gif) presents a whole host of other problems. Source: the plethora of fluid mechanics classes I had to take to get my engineering degree Imo it would not work. The siphoning only works because polymer that has already exited the beaker is utilizing gravity as the force to pull the rest of the polymer out, therefore, if there wasn't sufficient downward force, there would be no siphon. I have no references to back this up. Good question m8. | ||
