Hooray for knowing what I'm talking about!

Hotel California

Theory: possible explanation of a part of reality
Law: infinitely repeatable phenomenon

As an example, let's take Newton's third law: Every force creates an equal, opposite counter-force.
That's a law. Reality "obeys" it every time we put it to the test. Poke your finger into your desk and your desk pushes back with the same amount of force.

Now why is that? The atoms of your finger have a certain electrical charge, so do the ones of the desk. When you bring them closer and closer, they will start to repel one another just as magnets of same polarity would.
Your finger is deformed slightly and the desk surface is, too, by a few micrometers.

So what do we have here?
A law is an observation.
A theory is an explanation.
They are not the same.

A better explanation of a law is a theory that has been proven repeatedly throughout the scientific community that describes what would happen with a set of constants and one unknown, how that unknown would be affected.
Newton's first law: First law: If there is no net force on an object, then its velocity is constant. The object is either at rest (if its velocity is equal to zero), or it moves with constant speed in a single direction
We know that there is no net force on an object, which means there is nothing to change the velocity. If we didn't know the net force, we wouldn't be able to say anything conclusive about the velocity.

A theory is just something that has been proven throughout the scientific community repeatedly that covers a wide subject, like evolution. There are tons of working parts and exceptions and changing that affect evolution, so there are tons of unknowns to be determined.

No, no, no.
A theory is a model of reality to explain a phenomenon, not a random confirmed fact.

"A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

Please guys, that was exactly the point I tried to make here.

It was the supporters OF gay marriage, and it's assorted sub-topics.

the ignorance of the supporters?

oh yeah shit ebaums used to actually be funny back in 2006-2008

Some you can only know from reading.
The Book by Ori, for example.

You didn't like Scott Pilgrim, Superbad, or Juno?

Not that I didn't like the movies, I didn't like him.

I'll take my red thumbs and leave then, sir

No need to insult me, I just trust everyone and everything too easily...

My dog's awesome, it will let someone wrap his/her hands around his muzzle without protest. He will only bite you if you hurt him first.

That kind of logic breeds dickery though... I hate when people are dicks to me, so why should I propagate such behavior? Especially when it's not fun for me to do so.