Upload
Login or register

mrtwilightsparkle

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/16/2011
Last Login:7/10/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 762 total,  919 ,  157
Comment Thumbs: 3608 total,  4526 ,  918
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 63 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 64 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:50586
Times Content Favorited:24 times
Total Comments Made:1458
FJ Points:3872

latest user's comments

#14 - I'm not a huge pokemon fan, but the one with Mewtwo gets me ev… 09/15/2014 on For Stoicnick - The Cubone... +1
#11 - Because we were going for factual accuracy in the OP, right? 09/15/2014 on why banan a is more banana +4
#83 - To be fair, this was the first large-scale terrorist attack on… 09/14/2014 on opinion time 0
#198 - Wow, **** all of you for not appreciating hoop and stick. That…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/13/2014 on the last kid saved it 0
#217 - dronenortle (09/13/2014) [-]
No Mr.Twlightsparkle, YOU should go kill yourself.
#275 - Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "op…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#273 - Because I'm basing my decisions off of opinions and findings o…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#274 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has shown that Adm and Eve never existed and that the flood spoken of in Genesis never happened. When science shows claims to be utterly false, an anecdote and an opinion mean nothing. If you think that now people are not using the bible to make money I must suggest that you open your eyes my friend. One only needs to look at the immense tax-free wealth of religion to baulk at that statement of yours.

User avatar
#275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
User avatar
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#269 - First of all, it's not a threat. Secondly, the idea is that ev…  [+] (5 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#272 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
When someone says that you have to do as I say or I will burn you it is a threat, plain and simple. Saying that verses are misinterpreted is a total cop out. How can you prove that your understanding of the text is somehow superior to any other persons?
User avatar
#273 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Because I'm basing my decisions off of opinions and findings of people who have devoted their entire life to the interpretation of the text, with access to modern resources and revolutionary finds, rather than religious officials 600 years ago who were in the Church for power and money. If claiming misinterpretations is a cop out, how is it any better to use arguments against me based on corrupted ideas meant to generate more wealth back in the Dark Ages?
User avatar
#274 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has shown that Adm and Eve never existed and that the flood spoken of in Genesis never happened. When science shows claims to be utterly false, an anecdote and an opinion mean nothing. If you think that now people are not using the bible to make money I must suggest that you open your eyes my friend. One only needs to look at the immense tax-free wealth of religion to baulk at that statement of yours.

User avatar
#275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
User avatar
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#267 - I'm not saying most Christians are well informed about their o…  [+] (7 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#268 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
How am I hateful? Jesus said that the only way to heaven is through him as well as introducing the idea of endless damnation.

Do you not think that threatening someone with eternal torture is more hateful than just saying that the bible is bullshit?
User avatar
#269 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
First of all, it's not a threat. Secondly, the idea is that everyone, no matter how sinful, or despite what they believe in, according to the Christian faith, goes through Jesus and follows the same path as him to reach Heaven. This is one of those parts of the Bible that is very misinterpreted, much like the verse in the Quran that claims that all infidels must be eradicated.
User avatar
#272 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
When someone says that you have to do as I say or I will burn you it is a threat, plain and simple. Saying that verses are misinterpreted is a total cop out. How can you prove that your understanding of the text is somehow superior to any other persons?
User avatar
#273 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Because I'm basing my decisions off of opinions and findings of people who have devoted their entire life to the interpretation of the text, with access to modern resources and revolutionary finds, rather than religious officials 600 years ago who were in the Church for power and money. If claiming misinterpretations is a cop out, how is it any better to use arguments against me based on corrupted ideas meant to generate more wealth back in the Dark Ages?
User avatar
#274 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has shown that Adm and Eve never existed and that the flood spoken of in Genesis never happened. When science shows claims to be utterly false, an anecdote and an opinion mean nothing. If you think that now people are not using the bible to make money I must suggest that you open your eyes my friend. One only needs to look at the immense tax-free wealth of religion to baulk at that statement of yours.

User avatar
#275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
User avatar
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#71 - And it wasn't her fault for being a ******* slut? 09/12/2014 on sweet revenge 0
#111 - That's probably closer to Agnosticism, really.  [+] (5 new replies) 09/12/2014 on (untitled) -1
#136 - YllekNayr (09/12/2014) [-]
User avatar
#152 - articulate (09/12/2014) [-]
Am I an Agnostic Theist because I like to believe the universe is a great being that we live inside like the bacteria in our own bodies? I don't claim to KNOW it because I KNOW that we cannot truly KNOW things 100% because of how easily our minds are fooled.
User avatar
#153 - YllekNayr (09/12/2014) [-]
Then yes, you are an agnostic theist
User avatar
#154 - articulate (09/12/2014) [-]
Well, glad that's sorted. Feels like Harry Potter.
User avatar
#156 - YllekNayr (09/12/2014) [-]
Heh.
Some people don't really know what agnosticism is, and they think it's a middle ground between atheism and theism, so I throw this chart around a lot.

You don't want to be a gnostic anything. Those are the kind of people nobody likes.