Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

mrmcput

Rank #7802 on Comments
no avatar Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Online
Send mail to mrmcput Block mrmcput Invite mrmcput to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/09/2011
Last Login:12/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7802
Highest Comment Rank:#2984
Comment Thumbs: 2416 total,  2699 ,  283
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:612
FJ Points:2074

latest user's comments

#47 - The Prophet Mohammed married a 6 year old.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/22/2014 on Top kek +3
#111 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
But he didn't.
#26 - To most people, America=US, because nobody is going to say Uni… 09/21/2014 on Don't be fooled 0
#90 - It's not just Americans that call them pussies, and I'm sure t… 09/20/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +2
#58 - I agree, there are just too many important events that the US … 09/19/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... 0
#47 - Who knows what would have happened if the US hadn't joined the…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +1
#50 - franceopplsnerf (09/19/2014) [-]
WW1 leads directly to WW2. A different outcome in WW1 means that WW2 does not happen or is greatly altered. If the Entente won without the US then the peace terms for Germany would have been much harsher, either preventing, heavily delaying, or altering the outcome of the initial stages of WW2. What if there was success with establishing French control over the Rhineland, therefor preventing Germany from using that to invade France in 1940. Without a German success in France they could never succeed in messing up Eastern Europe so much that they could hand it to the Soviets on a silver platter at the end of WW2.

Another possible thing is that if the peace treaty on Germany was too harsh then it could have resulted in a home-grown revolution.

This is just taking one facet of the US not existing and toying around with it, obviously there would be many more important things such as ideological levels, development in the 1800s, technology, ect. ec.t
#135 - anonymous (09/20/2014) [-]
Germany didn't need harsher punishment after WW1, in fact, it was because of the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles that Hitler was able to gain support, leading to WW2.
#137 - franceopplsnerf (09/20/2014) [-]
Not really true. Versailles was by the standards of the era relatively lax - the German Septemberprogram which they did as planning in 1914 was much harsher, and their Treaty of Brest Livock was far harder by comparison (Even the German diplomats were pretty shocked by the terms they were being forced to press for). The real problem was that the Germans were not convinced of their defeat. The greatest harm that was ever done to Germany in the 20th century was not either forcing the German military command to surrender instead of just the politicians, or marching on to Berlin. If that had been done there would never have been the stabbed in the back myth that meant that they thought they could challenge the world if only they were more unified.

Versailles was enough to sting without being enough to cripple. Germany would have always been stung, since there was no way they could be left on their own and this would be unpalatable - Alsace Lorraine needed to return to France, Poland needed to be re-constituted, reparations were going to happen just as they had in 1871. All of the Central Powers were also assigned cause for starting the war. There is no conceivable way the Allies would forgo this. Germany had also rejected reconciliation with France. The only way to deal with Germany was to cripple them, and America was the nation that prevented this from happening at Versailles among the big three. We had our reasons for this, but if there was no America and the Entente still won, then WW2 would not have happened, or it would not have been nearly as initially triumphant as it was for Germany.
#58 - mrmcput (09/19/2014) [-]
I agree, there are just too many important events that the US caused or participated in, regardless of how some people feel about it, for us to even begin to guess how it not existing would have affected history
#6 - And the US is the only reason France doesn't speak Russian. We…  [+] (10 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +136
User avatar #129 - clechyl (09/20/2014) [-]
Apart from Germany of course.
User avatar #86 - hydraetis (09/20/2014) [-]
You may be even, but a shitload of americans still bash France and call them pussies.
#109 - anonymous (09/20/2014) [-]
The French are rude cunts, everyone hates them and they hate everyone.
#90 - mrmcput (09/20/2014) [-]
It's not just Americans that call them pussies, and I'm sure the French talk plenty of shit about Americans as well.
#44 - franceopplsnerf (09/19/2014) [-]
Given that if there wasn't an America there would be a very different global geographical distribution, it is entirely feasible that a state like the USSR would never have existed. On the other hand, while US participation in WW1 is somewhat overstated, the Entente probably would have lost without our material support.
#47 - mrmcput (09/19/2014) [-]
Who knows what would have happened if the US hadn't joined the allies in WW1. Sure Germany was in bad shape, but France and Britain sure as hell weren't doing any better, and Russia was a little too busy fighting itself to be of any use to anyone. Besides, I was talking about WW2.
#50 - franceopplsnerf (09/19/2014) [-]
WW1 leads directly to WW2. A different outcome in WW1 means that WW2 does not happen or is greatly altered. If the Entente won without the US then the peace terms for Germany would have been much harsher, either preventing, heavily delaying, or altering the outcome of the initial stages of WW2. What if there was success with establishing French control over the Rhineland, therefor preventing Germany from using that to invade France in 1940. Without a German success in France they could never succeed in messing up Eastern Europe so much that they could hand it to the Soviets on a silver platter at the end of WW2.

Another possible thing is that if the peace treaty on Germany was too harsh then it could have resulted in a home-grown revolution.

This is just taking one facet of the US not existing and toying around with it, obviously there would be many more important things such as ideological levels, development in the 1800s, technology, ect. ec.t
#135 - anonymous (09/20/2014) [-]
Germany didn't need harsher punishment after WW1, in fact, it was because of the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles that Hitler was able to gain support, leading to WW2.
#137 - franceopplsnerf (09/20/2014) [-]
Not really true. Versailles was by the standards of the era relatively lax - the German Septemberprogram which they did as planning in 1914 was much harsher, and their Treaty of Brest Livock was far harder by comparison (Even the German diplomats were pretty shocked by the terms they were being forced to press for). The real problem was that the Germans were not convinced of their defeat. The greatest harm that was ever done to Germany in the 20th century was not either forcing the German military command to surrender instead of just the politicians, or marching on to Berlin. If that had been done there would never have been the stabbed in the back myth that meant that they thought they could challenge the world if only they were more unified.

Versailles was enough to sting without being enough to cripple. Germany would have always been stung, since there was no way they could be left on their own and this would be unpalatable - Alsace Lorraine needed to return to France, Poland needed to be re-constituted, reparations were going to happen just as they had in 1871. All of the Central Powers were also assigned cause for starting the war. There is no conceivable way the Allies would forgo this. Germany had also rejected reconciliation with France. The only way to deal with Germany was to cripple them, and America was the nation that prevented this from happening at Versailles among the big three. We had our reasons for this, but if there was no America and the Entente still won, then WW2 would not have happened, or it would not have been nearly as initially triumphant as it was for Germany.
#58 - mrmcput (09/19/2014) [-]
I agree, there are just too many important events that the US caused or participated in, regardless of how some people feel about it, for us to even begin to guess how it not existing would have affected history
#35 - There are plenty of American shows with tits and swearing. You…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/19/2014 on Europe +3
#49 - moechler (09/19/2014) [-]
PEGI 18
#17 - funny feels. or not so funny feels 09/18/2014 on we have won 0
#82 - >Be about 6 or 7. >Go to restaurant with my extende… 09/15/2014 on How Anon became an atheist +3
#39 - Merry Christmas.  [+] (3 new replies) 09/13/2014 on my favorite part +8
#46 - Ulmer (09/13/2014) [-]
#41 - CyborgNinja (09/13/2014) [-]
I think you might have taken that too literal...
#91 - inept (09/13/2014) [-]
#6 - That's the point. He's called BAD JOKE Amon.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/12/2014 on Bad Joke Amon 14 +7
User avatar #7 - xehanortscrack (09/12/2014) [-]
I like puns, and other bad jokes. This was funny to begin with but now it's just painful. It'
s almost like reposting the same shitty joke once a day.
#109 - Careful now. You're starting to sound like a filthy commie wit…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/07/2014 on Kiss me if I'm wrong -1
User avatar #116 - nought (09/07/2014) [-]
Amen. Communism = poverty.
#2 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 09/06/2014 on what guru laghima said +3
#3 - minigunwarrior Comment deleted by mrmcput
#76 - **** that gas leak. I had to use half my stimpack… 09/05/2014 on Fallout +2
#33 - Yay!!! MAD for the Win! 09/05/2014 on I played with your heart, 0
#40 - Can't do it. I'm great at whistling normally, but the finger t… 09/04/2014 on helpful post 0
#12 - Dude, going back to the middle ages is an improvement for them. 09/04/2014 on The iron E 0
#160 - You kinda came off as more of a ****** troll than… 09/03/2014 on (untitled) +1
#32 - Wrong. In the wise words of George S. Patton, "The object…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/03/2014 on (untitled) +12
User avatar #111 - Nahyon (09/03/2014) [-]
I'd be really fucking retarded thinking like that, I was kinda sarcastically defending him but i made the mistake to be sarcastic on the internet again.
#160 - mrmcput (09/03/2014) [-]
You kinda came off as more of a shitty troll than sarcastic.
User avatar #82 - gxela (09/03/2014) [-]
"May god have mercy on my enemies, because i won't" - G.S. Patton
We need a president like him...
#52 - It's* 08/31/2014 on if harry potter was in the... 0
#51 - I's been over a year dude.  [+] (1 new reply) 08/31/2014 on if harry potter was in the... 0
#52 - mrmcput (08/31/2014) [-]
It's*
#125 - 1. Same goes for you thumbing down my comment. Hypocrite 2…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/31/2014 on Gangsta 0
User avatar #126 - bestfoxgirl (08/31/2014) [-]
1. I thought you forfeited
2. Are you retarded? One of the most important rules of international law is that a country cannot demand anything from another country under a threat. Nor can it invade it. Countries are equal.
3. Probably less, since Iraq was free from Al Qaeda before US invaded it, now they got a great base of operation, and a second deathtrap for american soldiers, using only insurgents who want their country freed from american oppression.

Also it is not up to you to decide what 'needs' to be done and who 'needs' to do it.
#85 - Not really. The US demanded that the Taliban hand over the peo…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/30/2014 on Gangsta +2
User avatar #87 - bestfoxgirl (08/30/2014) [-]
1. Thumbing me down just because you disagree lowers your credibility

2. US had no right to demand anything from the government of a sovereign country under a threat. It's considered the second most severe violation of international law. Also, if they demanded that the Taliban hand over them, they didn't really even turn to the govenment.

3. "It needed to be done" is not an argument.
#125 - mrmcput (08/31/2014) [-]
1. Same goes for you thumbing down my comment. Hypocrite
2. Are you really that stupid? The US had every right to demand it and the Taliban WAS the government of Afghanistan.
3. "It needed to be done" is an argument. How many more attacks would Al Qaeda have executed if the US did nothing? Doing nothing would have just emboldened them.
User avatar #126 - bestfoxgirl (08/31/2014) [-]
1. I thought you forfeited
2. Are you retarded? One of the most important rules of international law is that a country cannot demand anything from another country under a threat. Nor can it invade it. Countries are equal.
3. Probably less, since Iraq was free from Al Qaeda before US invaded it, now they got a great base of operation, and a second deathtrap for american soldiers, using only insurgents who want their country freed from american oppression.

Also it is not up to you to decide what 'needs' to be done and who 'needs' to do it.
#76 - I wasn't talking about Iraq. 08/30/2014 on Gangsta -2
#18 - Yes, no reason at all to invade.  [+] (14 new replies) 08/30/2014 on Gangsta +6
#83 - bestfoxgirl (08/30/2014) [-]
I'll bite

WTC wasn't work of Afghanistan, but a terrorist group. Saying that actions of a terrorist group justify invading a sovereign country is like saying that I can punch you in the face because a person living in your house threw a plastic cup at me.
User avatar #109 - angelicdemon (08/30/2014) [-]
Source on gif?
#85 - mrmcput (08/30/2014) [-]
Not really. The US demanded that the Taliban hand over the people responsible and the Taliban refused. They gave Al Qaeda safe haven to train new recruits and to plan and conduct attacks against countries around the world. It needed to be done.
User avatar #87 - bestfoxgirl (08/30/2014) [-]
1. Thumbing me down just because you disagree lowers your credibility

2. US had no right to demand anything from the government of a sovereign country under a threat. It's considered the second most severe violation of international law. Also, if they demanded that the Taliban hand over them, they didn't really even turn to the govenment.

3. "It needed to be done" is not an argument.
#125 - mrmcput (08/31/2014) [-]
1. Same goes for you thumbing down my comment. Hypocrite
2. Are you really that stupid? The US had every right to demand it and the Taliban WAS the government of Afghanistan.
3. "It needed to be done" is an argument. How many more attacks would Al Qaeda have executed if the US did nothing? Doing nothing would have just emboldened them.
User avatar #126 - bestfoxgirl (08/31/2014) [-]
1. I thought you forfeited
2. Are you retarded? One of the most important rules of international law is that a country cannot demand anything from another country under a threat. Nor can it invade it. Countries are equal.
3. Probably less, since Iraq was free from Al Qaeda before US invaded it, now they got a great base of operation, and a second deathtrap for american soldiers, using only insurgents who want their country freed from american oppression.

Also it is not up to you to decide what 'needs' to be done and who 'needs' to do it.
#71 - anonymous (08/30/2014) [-]
Explain Iraq then ? where are those weapons of mass destruction ? My country was running like clockwork before you fuckers showed up and its been up in flames since then and now ISIS will make it even worse, I am a christian and they are trying to expel Christians by force
#76 - mrmcput (08/30/2014) [-]
I wasn't talking about Iraq.
User avatar #74 - rollmeanddie (08/30/2014) [-]
Stuck in sandnigger territory? Everyone too busy sitting on their thumbs to help? Here's some tips on how to survive until my country gets off its ass and tries to 'liberate' you again!

1. Don't be a cheska, lord knows you won't survive 'tea boy cuddle time' when the Bulldozer of Fallujah gets his turn with your sweet, prepubescent boy bottom.

2. Blend in. Shit in trenches, wash yourself from other trenches, fuck goats, rape little girls who are already dead inside, get offended at every little thing.

3. Figure out which group makes up the majority around you. Do they like Mohammed's descendants? Did they go full Mormon and try to murder his family so there'd be a different line of prophets? Appeal to their code, but don't get too comfy. As soon as it suits them, they will throw their version of pashtunwali out the window.

4. Keep your head low and move slowly. Sandnigger vision is based on movement.

5. Don't laugh at ISIS's Viet Cong-esque black pajamas.

With these five simple tips, you might get beheaded with something less painful than a dull knife!
User avatar #72 - azumeow (08/30/2014) [-]
>country running like clockwork
Yeah, I'm sure all the people Saddam massacred would agree with that.
#34 - itsbendingtime (08/30/2014) [-]
>saudia arabian masterminds plot for saudi funded terrorist group to attack the US
>US retaliates by attacking Iraq and Afghanistan
#33 - anonymous (08/30/2014) [-]
You can't prove who exactly did that. The U.S. just used it as an excuse.
#50 - anonymous (08/30/2014) [-]
Anthrax letters were sent by US government employee that "commited suicide". It was all US government. We know why, why it was useful.
#28 - JackThePornKing (08/30/2014) [-]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 650

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)