Pressing hide all on an anon's comments hides comments from the same IP. You are straight up lying now.

I can clearly have an attitude towards my own commenting habits.

>Thumbing all my comments down from someone agreeing with me. Someone's a sore loser.

But you're not right. You're still wrong. Try telling this to anyone else. I already did (as you so neatly suggested). No one is going to side with you on whether or not to comment is a stance or not. It clearly is. Everything you choose to do is based upon your own personal stance. Whether or not to comment. What you like to eat. Your belief on fetish control.

Insulting my age (even if you happen to be dead wrong) and blocking me (to which I did retaliate) is not going to make you less wrong.

Still wrong.

You already told me to stop commenting you asinine fuckface. You're still wrong.

You're wrong.

You also still clearly have no idea what a stance is. It's possible to have a stance on more than one thing.

Blocking someone because they've blocked you is not the same thing as blocking someone for thumbing you down once. Mine's an equivalent exchange.

Fucking asshole. I blocked one comment of yours that clearly called a reasonable comment ridiculous.

Go back to school and learn what the definition that you literally just told me means.

I use a public VPN, so whatever IP you blocked you blocked the VPN IP. I upvoted the last 2 anon comments on another host to show A) I could downvote if I wanted, but I don't care too and B) I'm using a VPN, if I wasn't I wouldn't be able to upvote my own comments

You didn't answer my question, the last comment on this thread besides my last one is "How old are you" so I really am not sure what you're talking about

What are you even replying to? I stopped replying last night because I'm not gonna waste anymore time

How old are you? I'm gonna guess 14 since you are basically sticking your hands in your ears going "lalala I can't hear what you're saying you're wrong". Seriously, it just makes you look childish. You realize how much worse off you've made yourself look than just saying "yeah you're right my bad"

"Youre wrong! Muh stance is to comment. My attitude is an action. I'm redefining the English language so my argument can be right! Cuz attitudes can be actions right guise???"

I also love how you are downvoting all the anon comments like it actually does something.

For someone who thinks blocking people you disagree with is wrong you sure don't like when your safe space and feelings are damaged

You really proved your point with "you're wrong" friendo.

Was getting BTFO part of your plan?

Maybe next time you should learn the english language before conversing with someone on the internet

Lets try this one last time to see if you can get it through your head. Odds are you're going to make up another abstract argument to avoid being wrong

stance - noun - "the attitude of a person or organization toward something"

Your stance is that you think he is stupid for blocking people he disagrees with. This is your attitude towards him.

Your stance is NOT "I am going to comment and tell him he is stupid." An attitude is not an action. Your attitude towards him does not inherently mean you must comment. These are two completely unrelated topics. You said your "stance" is to comment. An attitude cannot be an action so you are wrong. It is quite literally this simple. Your idea that your attitude is you are going to comment is an impossible one, an attitude cannot and will never be an action. An opinion is not a verb. It is not your opinion to comment. It is your decision and action to comment.

But by all means feel free to continue arguing that your attitude is that you are going to comment. You argue an impossible concept

"reasonable comment ridiculous"

If you honestly believe this you have the reasoning of a child. "Its my opinion whether or not I comment!" Your opinion is your opinion. Your commenting is you acting on that opinion.

A) Do you say i want a glass of water or B) Do you say Its my opinion to decide that I want a glass of water. 99% of the world would choose option A, you and you alone choose option B because you refuse to back down from your incorrect use of a word. This is classic FJ though, say something completely wrong and when proven wrong make up a abstract and ridiculous argument rather than just say "Ok you're right"

I also like how you block me after freaking out about it you sad hypocritical child

Its your attitude on whether or not to comment?

The actual definition of the word clearly doesn't fit in this sentence when you plug it in. I'm actually amazed that you've somehow managed to make your sentence form a logical statement in your head when it so clearly misuses the word.

Pressing hide all on an anon's comments hides comments from the same IP. You are straight up lying now.

I can clearly have an attitude towards my own commenting habits.

>Thumbing all my comments down from someone agreeing with me. Someone's a sore loser.

But you're not right. You're still wrong. Try telling this to anyone else. I already did (as you so neatly suggested). No one is going to side with you on whether or not to comment is a stance or not. It clearly is. Everything you choose to do is based upon your own personal stance. Whether or not to comment. What you like to eat. Your belief on fetish control.

Insulting my age (even if you happen to be dead wrong) and blocking me (to which I did retaliate) is not going to make you less wrong.

Still wrong.

You already told me to stop commenting you asinine fuckface. You're still wrong.

You're wrong.

You also still clearly have no idea what a stance is. It's possible to have a stance on more than one thing.

Blocking someone because they've blocked you is not the same thing as blocking someone for thumbing you down once. Mine's an equivalent exchange.

Fucking asshole. I blocked one comment of yours that clearly called a reasonable comment ridiculous.

Go back to school and learn what the definition that you literally just told me means.

I use a public VPN, so whatever IP you blocked you blocked the VPN IP. I upvoted the last 2 anon comments on another host to show A) I could downvote if I wanted, but I don't care too and B) I'm using a VPN, if I wasn't I wouldn't be able to upvote my own comments

You didn't answer my question, the last comment on this thread besides my last one is "How old are you" so I really am not sure what you're talking about

What are you even replying to? I stopped replying last night because I'm not gonna waste anymore time

How old are you? I'm gonna guess 14 since you are basically sticking your hands in your ears going "lalala I can't hear what you're saying you're wrong". Seriously, it just makes you look childish. You realize how much worse off you've made yourself look than just saying "yeah you're right my bad"

"Youre wrong! Muh stance is to comment. My attitude is an action. I'm redefining the English language so my argument can be right! Cuz attitudes can be actions right guise???"

I also love how you are downvoting all the anon comments like it actually does something.

For someone who thinks blocking people you disagree with is wrong you sure don't like when your safe space and feelings are damaged

You really proved your point with "you're wrong" friendo.

Was getting BTFO part of your plan?

Maybe next time you should learn the english language before conversing with someone on the internet

Lets try this one last time to see if you can get it through your head. Odds are you're going to make up another abstract argument to avoid being wrong

stance - noun - "the attitude of a person or organization toward something"

Your stance is that you think he is stupid for blocking people he disagrees with. This is your attitude towards him.

Your stance is NOT "I am going to comment and tell him he is stupid." An attitude is not an action. Your attitude towards him does not inherently mean you must comment. These are two completely unrelated topics. You said your "stance" is to comment. An attitude cannot be an action so you are wrong. It is quite literally this simple. Your idea that your attitude is you are going to comment is an impossible one, an attitude cannot and will never be an action. An opinion is not a verb. It is not your opinion to comment. It is your decision and action to comment.

But by all means feel free to continue arguing that your attitude is that you are going to comment. You argue an impossible concept

"reasonable comment ridiculous"

If you honestly believe this you have the reasoning of a child. "Its my opinion whether or not I comment!" Your opinion is your opinion. Your commenting is you acting on that opinion.

A) Do you say i want a glass of water or B) Do you say Its my opinion to decide that I want a glass of water. 99% of the world would choose option A, you and you alone choose option B because you refuse to back down from your incorrect use of a word. This is classic FJ though, say something completely wrong and when proven wrong make up a abstract and ridiculous argument rather than just say "Ok you're right"

I also like how you block me after freaking out about it you sad hypocritical child

Its your attitude on whether or not to comment?

The actual definition of the word clearly doesn't fit in this sentence when you plug it in. I'm actually amazed that you've somehow managed to make your sentence form a logical statement in your head when it so clearly misuses the word.

Pressing hide all on an anon's comments hides comments from the same IP. You are straight up lying now.

I can clearly have an attitude towards my own commenting habits.

>Thumbing all my comments down from someone agreeing with me. Someone's a sore loser.

But you're not right. You're still wrong. Try telling this to anyone else. I already did (as you so neatly suggested). No one is going to side with you on whether or not to comment is a stance or not. It clearly is. Everything you choose to do is based upon your own personal stance. Whether or not to comment. What you like to eat. Your belief on fetish control.

Insulting my age (even if you happen to be dead wrong) and blocking me (to which I did retaliate) is not going to make you less wrong.

Still wrong.

You already told me to stop commenting you asinine fuckface. You're still wrong.

You're wrong.

You also still clearly have no idea what a stance is. It's possible to have a stance on more than one thing.

Blocking someone because they've blocked you is not the same thing as blocking someone for thumbing you down once. Mine's an equivalent exchange.

Fucking asshole. I blocked one comment of yours that clearly called a reasonable comment ridiculous.

Go back to school and learn what the definition that you literally just told me means.

I use a public VPN, so whatever IP you blocked you blocked the VPN IP. I upvoted the last 2 anon comments on another host to show A) I could downvote if I wanted, but I don't care too and B) I'm using a VPN, if I wasn't I wouldn't be able to upvote my own comments

You didn't answer my question, the last comment on this thread besides my last one is "How old are you" so I really am not sure what you're talking about

What are you even replying to? I stopped replying last night because I'm not gonna waste anymore time

How old are you? I'm gonna guess 14 since you are basically sticking your hands in your ears going "lalala I can't hear what you're saying you're wrong". Seriously, it just makes you look childish. You realize how much worse off you've made yourself look than just saying "yeah you're right my bad"

"Youre wrong! Muh stance is to comment. My attitude is an action. I'm redefining the English language so my argument can be right! Cuz attitudes can be actions right guise???"

I also love how you are downvoting all the anon comments like it actually does something.

For someone who thinks blocking people you disagree with is wrong you sure don't like when your safe space and feelings are damaged

You really proved your point with "you're wrong" friendo.

Was getting BTFO part of your plan?

Maybe next time you should learn the english language before conversing with someone on the internet

Lets try this one last time to see if you can get it through your head. Odds are you're going to make up another abstract argument to avoid being wrong

stance - noun - "the attitude of a person or organization toward something"

Your stance is that you think he is stupid for blocking people he disagrees with. This is your attitude towards him.

Your stance is NOT "I am going to comment and tell him he is stupid." An attitude is not an action. Your attitude towards him does not inherently mean you must comment. These are two completely unrelated topics. You said your "stance" is to comment. An attitude cannot be an action so you are wrong. It is quite literally this simple. Your idea that your attitude is you are going to comment is an impossible one, an attitude cannot and will never be an action. An opinion is not a verb. It is not your opinion to comment. It is your decision and action to comment.

But by all means feel free to continue arguing that your attitude is that you are going to comment. You argue an impossible concept

"reasonable comment ridiculous"

If you honestly believe this you have the reasoning of a child. "Its my opinion whether or not I comment!" Your opinion is your opinion. Your commenting is you acting on that opinion.

A) Do you say i want a glass of water or B) Do you say Its my opinion to decide that I want a glass of water. 99% of the world would choose option A, you and you alone choose option B because you refuse to back down from your incorrect use of a word. This is classic FJ though, say something completely wrong and when proven wrong make up a abstract and ridiculous argument rather than just say "Ok you're right"

I also like how you block me after freaking out about it you sad hypocritical child

Its your attitude on whether or not to comment?

The actual definition of the word clearly doesn't fit in this sentence when you plug it in. I'm actually amazed that you've somehow managed to make your sentence form a logical statement in your head when it so clearly misuses the word.

Pressing hide all on an anon's comments hides comments from the same IP. You are straight up lying now.

I can clearly have an attitude towards my own commenting habits.

>Thumbing all my comments down from someone agreeing with me. Someone's a sore loser.

But you're not right. You're still wrong. Try telling this to anyone else. I already did (as you so neatly suggested). No one is going to side with you on whether or not to comment is a stance or not. It clearly is. Everything you choose to do is based upon your own personal stance. Whether or not to comment. What you like to eat. Your belief on fetish control.

Insulting my age (even if you happen to be dead wrong) and blocking me (to which I did retaliate) is not going to make you less wrong.

Still wrong.

You already told me to stop commenting you asinine fuckface. You're still wrong.

You're wrong.

You also still clearly have no idea what a stance is. It's possible to have a stance on more than one thing.

Blocking someone because they've blocked you is not the same thing as blocking someone for thumbing you down once. Mine's an equivalent exchange.

Fucking asshole. I blocked one comment of yours that clearly called a reasonable comment ridiculous.

Go back to school and learn what the definition that you literally just told me means.

I use a public VPN, so whatever IP you blocked you blocked the VPN IP. I upvoted the last 2 anon comments on another host to show A) I could downvote if I wanted, but I don't care too and B) I'm using a VPN, if I wasn't I wouldn't be able to upvote my own comments

You didn't answer my question, the last comment on this thread besides my last one is "How old are you" so I really am not sure what you're talking about

What are you even replying to? I stopped replying last night because I'm not gonna waste anymore time

How old are you? I'm gonna guess 14 since you are basically sticking your hands in your ears going "lalala I can't hear what you're saying you're wrong". Seriously, it just makes you look childish. You realize how much worse off you've made yourself look than just saying "yeah you're right my bad"

"Youre wrong! Muh stance is to comment. My attitude is an action. I'm redefining the English language so my argument can be right! Cuz attitudes can be actions right guise???"

I also love how you are downvoting all the anon comments like it actually does something.

For someone who thinks blocking people you disagree with is wrong you sure don't like when your safe space and feelings are damaged

You really proved your point with "you're wrong" friendo.

Was getting BTFO part of your plan?

Maybe next time you should learn the english language before conversing with someone on the internet

Lets try this one last time to see if you can get it through your head. Odds are you're going to make up another abstract argument to avoid being wrong

stance - noun - "the attitude of a person or organization toward something"

Your stance is that you think he is stupid for blocking people he disagrees with. This is your attitude towards him.

Your stance is NOT "I am going to comment and tell him he is stupid." An attitude is not an action. Your attitude towards him does not inherently mean you must comment. These are two completely unrelated topics. You said your "stance" is to comment. An attitude cannot be an action so you are wrong. It is quite literally this simple. Your idea that your attitude is you are going to comment is an impossible one, an attitude cannot and will never be an action. An opinion is not a verb. It is not your opinion to comment. It is your decision and action to comment.

But by all means feel free to continue arguing that your attitude is that you are going to comment. You argue an impossible concept

"reasonable comment ridiculous"

If you honestly believe this you have the reasoning of a child. "Its my opinion whether or not I comment!" Your opinion is your opinion. Your commenting is you acting on that opinion.

A) Do you say i want a glass of water or B) Do you say Its my opinion to decide that I want a glass of water. 99% of the world would choose option A, you and you alone choose option B because you refuse to back down from your incorrect use of a word. This is classic FJ though, say something completely wrong and when proven wrong make up a abstract and ridiculous argument rather than just say "Ok you're right"

I also like how you block me after freaking out about it you sad hypocritical child

Its your attitude on whether or not to comment?

The actual definition of the word clearly doesn't fit in this sentence when you plug it in. I'm actually amazed that you've somehow managed to make your sentence form a logical statement in your head when it so clearly misuses the word.

Pressing hide all on an anon's comments hides comments from the same IP. You are straight up lying now.

I can clearly have an attitude towards my own commenting habits.

>Thumbing all my comments down from someone agreeing with me. Someone's a sore loser.

But you're not right. You're still wrong. Try telling this to anyone else. I already did (as you so neatly suggested). No one is going to side with you on whether or not to comment is a stance or not. It clearly is. Everything you choose to do is based upon your own personal stance. Whether or not to comment. What you like to eat. Your belief on fetish control.

Insulting my age (even if you happen to be dead wrong) and blocking me (to which I did retaliate) is not going to make you less wrong.

Still wrong.

You already told me to stop commenting you asinine fuckface. You're still wrong.

You're wrong.

You also still clearly have no idea what a stance is. It's possible to have a stance on more than one thing.

Blocking someone because they've blocked you is not the same thing as blocking someone for thumbing you down once. Mine's an equivalent exchange.

Fucking asshole. I blocked one comment of yours that clearly called a reasonable comment ridiculous.

Go back to school and learn what the definition that you literally just told me means.

I use a public VPN, so whatever IP you blocked you blocked the VPN IP. I upvoted the last 2 anon comments on another host to show A) I could downvote if I wanted, but I don't care too and B) I'm using a VPN, if I wasn't I wouldn't be able to upvote my own comments

You didn't answer my question, the last comment on this thread besides my last one is "How old are you" so I really am not sure what you're talking about

What are you even replying to? I stopped replying last night because I'm not gonna waste anymore time

How old are you? I'm gonna guess 14 since you are basically sticking your hands in your ears going "lalala I can't hear what you're saying you're wrong". Seriously, it just makes you look childish. You realize how much worse off you've made yourself look than just saying "yeah you're right my bad"

"Youre wrong! Muh stance is to comment. My attitude is an action. I'm redefining the English language so my argument can be right! Cuz attitudes can be actions right guise???"

I also love how you are downvoting all the anon comments like it actually does something.

For someone who thinks blocking people you disagree with is wrong you sure don't like when your safe space and feelings are damaged

You really proved your point with "you're wrong" friendo.

Was getting BTFO part of your plan?

Maybe next time you should learn the english language before conversing with someone on the internet

Lets try this one last time to see if you can get it through your head. Odds are you're going to make up another abstract argument to avoid being wrong

stance - noun - "the attitude of a person or organization toward something"

Your stance is that you think he is stupid for blocking people he disagrees with. This is your attitude towards him.

Your stance is NOT "I am going to comment and tell him he is stupid." An attitude is not an action. Your attitude towards him does not inherently mean you must comment. These are two completely unrelated topics. You said your "stance" is to comment. An attitude cannot be an action so you are wrong. It is quite literally this simple. Your idea that your attitude is you are going to comment is an impossible one, an attitude cannot and will never be an action. An opinion is not a verb. It is not your opinion to comment. It is your decision and action to comment.

But by all means feel free to continue arguing that your attitude is that you are going to comment. You argue an impossible concept

"reasonable comment ridiculous"

If you honestly believe this you have the reasoning of a child. "Its my opinion whether or not I comment!" Your opinion is your opinion. Your commenting is you acting on that opinion.

A) Do you say i want a glass of water or B) Do you say Its my opinion to decide that I want a glass of water. 99% of the world would choose option A, you and you alone choose option B because you refuse to back down from your incorrect use of a word. This is classic FJ though, say something completely wrong and when proven wrong make up a abstract and ridiculous argument rather than just say "Ok you're right"

I also like how you block me after freaking out about it you sad hypocritical child

Its your attitude on whether or not to comment?

The actual definition of the word clearly doesn't fit in this sentence when you plug it in. I'm actually amazed that you've somehow managed to make your sentence form a logical statement in your head when it so clearly misuses the word.