Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:2/05/2012
Last Login:10/21/2016
Comment Ranking:#6534
Highest Content Rank:#1048
Highest Comment Rank:#359
Content Thumbs: 3349 total,  3621 ,  272
Comment Thumbs: 26359 total,  28626 ,  2267
Content Level Progress: 60% (60/100)
Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 130 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 28.59% (286/1000)
Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 325 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Content Views:161460
Times Content Favorited:266 times
Total Comments Made:3067
FJ Points:21223
Favorite Tags: 4Chan (2) | dee (2) | di (2) | DURR (2) | greentext (2) | hurr (2) | niggers (2)

latest user's comments

#179 - Picture 01/19/2016 on vidya 0
#23 - At the rate at which the *********** are pouring into scandina…  [+] (1 reply) 01/17/2016 on waffenschein = gun permit +12
User avatar
#53 - iphraem (01/17/2016) [-]
this sentence is so fucked up with the feminist glasses.
#33 - And most definitely would have, had he not had a gun,  [+] (15 replies) 01/17/2016 on protect yourselves +30
#51 - drumandbass (01/17/2016) [-]
Idiots like you are cancer.
Sure they may have injured the boy most likely to knock him out but burglars aren't murderers. They want to make money by selling your stuff, a crime which gets seldom resolved in bigger citys. So what positive points do they have from killing someone? RIIIIIIGHT a manhunt. What don't they want? RIGHT AGAIN TWAT A MANHUNT

and idiots like you have a right to vote. Disgusting.
#168 - mooghens (01/17/2016) [-]
>Niggers get shot trying to rob a home with a 13-year old in it who shoots them and they shoot back at him.
>Argue this is why we shouldn't have guns
>Niggers get into house, subdue unarmed boy and either injure or kill him due to "knocking him out" movie style, while threatning him with guns
>Argue this is why we shouldn't have no guns
>Niggers get into house without guns. Gets shot by kid because he is scared and not taking any chances with a home invader
>Argue this is why we shouldn't have guns because the little boy was racist and #blacklivesmatter and the dindunuffins were fucking saints
>Niggers get into house without guns. They manage to subdue and possibly injure or kill a 13-year old kid due him being a 13-year old kid, and they knock him out "movie style"
>Argue a gun wouldn't have changed anything
You libtards are never pleased.
#98 - dtofj (01/17/2016) [-]
That line of thinking is why buglers get to sue if they're injured while breaking into someone else house/property.

You watch too man damn movies you if you think knocking someone out isn't serious and can lead to bigger medical problems since you dismiss the act so easily. Even more so when its two grown men, hitting a child. Damage will be done. He probably wouldn't have walked it off.

You're defending breaking in, theft and selling stolen property because they normally don't kill?

And you have the gall to call other people idiots?
#76 - anon (01/17/2016) [-]
news flash murders do not equal manhunts, there are tons of those DAILY so one more really wouldnt warrant a manhunt.
#69 - dannyredwizard (01/17/2016) [-]
They had guns and shot at him too, he got lucky and killed them first.
They were 6 time felons, they had guns of their own, if the kid hadn't gotten the gun and shot them, he'd be dead.
User avatar
#56 - quantumranger (01/17/2016) [-]
Or, they go "oh shit someones home" panic, and kill the kid. You are literally saying the better outcome would be a kid getting severely assaulted and potentially killed, all because you have some problem with guns. You are cancer.
#60 - drumandbass (01/17/2016) [-]
You obviously never met a thief

They scout the home's first, if someone's at home they leave. Even when they're in the house. If the situation is that someone just appears in the room they will knock them out and tie them up.

But hey you know it better than actual thieves
also last comment i really don't care for your opinion since you know batshit.
User avatar
#65 - quantumranger (01/17/2016) [-]
You are still arguing that the kid shouldn't have defended himself because you believe they wouldn't have killed him. Which is indeed batshit
#67 - drumandbass (01/17/2016) [-]
You actually are to stupid to check to which comment i responded hm? I neve said he shouldn't have defended himself just stating the fact that burglars aren't murderer and they don't want to be. There is a meter long line between those two kind of people.
Nothing ever is random. You don't go into someone's house and kill them without a reason. Burglars don't have a reason to kill they just have a reason to steal.

#134 - kalaark (01/17/2016) [-]
"This is my last comment, since I don't care what you think." *Proceeds to reply with another comment*

Anyway, I dunno about that meter long line, considering they were six time felons...
#81 - stealingbikes (01/17/2016) [-]
#79 - kingderps (01/17/2016) [-]
Just stop
User avatar
#71 - quantumranger (01/17/2016) [-]
Also I would think people desperate enough to break and enter are going to be desperate enough to kill if it comes down to it
User avatar
#70 - quantumranger (01/17/2016) [-]
Why are you so fucking angry, dude? The crux of your argument is that burglars are generally nonviolent, and then try to prove this by saying they would have 'just' knocked the kid out. The only reason I commented originally is because you were so fucking angry about it. Are you a thief? Is that it? Pissed that people think you and yours are violent? I want to say 'u mad?' but it wasn't my intention to troll.
#36 - facepalmftw (01/17/2016) [-]
100x this
#46 - **mooghens used "*roll picture*"** **mooghens rolled image…  [+] (1 reply) 01/12/2016 on howhot.io +1
User avatar
#58 - Silver Quantum (01/12/2016) [-]
well that's what you get when you travel in the future