| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
moofinbanana
| Rank #1037 on Comments Offline Send mail to moofinbanana Block moofinbanana Invite moofinbanana to be your friend flag avatar |
|
latest user's comments
| #570 - Reagan fought against gun control even though he was shot. | 05/20/2013 on Gun Control? | -1 |
| #15 - Saying every gun owner is a premeditated murderer is like sayi… [+] (14 new replies) | 05/19/2013 on well... black person | -10 |
| A car's primary purpose is transportation. That's why they were made - fast, efficient transportation. A gun's primary purpose is to... They were made to... I don't know a lot about guns so I can't say for sure. Care to fill in the blanks? #58
-
winglit (05/19/2013) [-] To ensure Survival, or to fight for what you believe in. You should never be afraid of the gun, a gun is just a tool, an extension of the self, and if you're truly that worried you will be shot, then take up a gun of your own and be prepared to fight for your own life, and the lives of others. #45
-
N. Korean citizen (05/19/2013) [-] Propel a projectile at fast speeds using a explosive charge? Like fireworks #42
-
gasmastero (05/19/2013) [-] kill or maim. Aggressively or in self defense, that is up to the user. so anyone taking martial arts intends to assault someone. and shooting as a sport and hunting for sport are unheard of I'm not denying the collection of guns or using them for sport/hunting (though I don't understand collecting them if you don't plan to use them for sport/hunting). The guns I'm concerned about are the ones you're not allowed to use for hunting or sport. I'm not a fan of people buying guns for the sake of having a gun. Martial arts was used for combat, but then essentially rendered less useful due to advancements in war technology (and just technology). Now it's used (or supposed to be used) for self-defense. I've been to a few classes, and they always stress not to go beat up someone for the hell of it. Guns for self-defense is something I don't understand, either. Hell, you have a chance of killing a motherfucker when you don't mean to. For self-defense, you could learn to buy/effectively use a non lethal weapon. You damage the other guy without killing him, and then you can be free to go. Please, please, please correct me where I'm wrong. I wish to broaden my understanding and shit. I don't see how making guns illegal will impede criminals. Pot is outlawed federally, yet it is still prominent enough in society for stoners to be stock characters in pop culture. But most proponents of gun restriction criticize that that argument as being the same as saying "because criminals will break laws and honest people will follow them, let's have no laws". I honestly don't really have strong feelings on this issue and honestly I don't even own a gun despite the side I'm on. It might stop over a long period of time. Some bad people buy guns because it's available, and are too lazy to go out and find a dealer of the sort. People caught with guns get their guns taken away and stuff. If criminals try to break in a store, that's when someone uses their less than lethal weapons to stop them without killing them. I don't really mind, either. But it's something I thought about recently. well were i live they are taking action and offering government refunds to people who turn in their weapons. The problem is that apparently a group of thugs hang out around the collection agency and write down the license plates of the people who go in. Afterwards they follow them home then break into their house. A lot of the laws backfire fast. Not everyone who buys a gun will use them to kill someone. In fact the vast majority will not. That's the point. Not every analogy needs to be perfect. | ||
| #55 - **moofinbanana rolled a random image posted in comment #2 a… | 05/19/2013 on It was not the best of days | 0 |
| #8 - Picture | 05/18/2013 on the gig | +26 |
| #24 - This was my first shiny I say on my game, killed it without ev… | 05/18/2013 on The Problem With Repels | +3 |
| #23 - Nevermind, there's also one from 4th Gen. | 05/18/2013 on The Problem With Repels | 0 |
| #22 - Only one is from 2nd Gen. The rest are from 5th Gen. [+] (2 new replies) | 05/18/2013 on The Problem With Repels | +2 |
| | ||
| #63 - I like how when people defend the owner of Abercrombie and Fit… [+] (15 new replies) | 05/18/2013 on Know the difference. | +110 |
| With EA, the issue is exploiting and trying to milk customers as much as possible. With A&F, it's simply not wanting to associate their brand with fat people. #164
-
N. Korean citizen (05/18/2013) [-] Last time I checked, A&F doesn't ask full price for a product then contact you one month after the purchase and ask for an additional $10 if you want the sleeves. The difference is one is choosing a target audience and the other is ripping people off. They're both douchebags but at least A&F isn't just trying to rip people off. You're paying for a logo, it's not uncommon, plus A&F clothing didn't become popular for no reason, they do tend to be higher quality (not saying one way or the other if the quality alone justifies the price of some of their products). Also, their men's t-shirts start at about 15$ and go up to only about 40$ at most with graphics. A plain t-shirt from them will only cost you about an average of 20-30$. it doesn't get higher quality than good 100% cotton shirt; quality of a shirt only goes to a certain point, they just double the threads and sand their shirts so they are fuzzier(softer) Durability alone doesn't equal quality in clothing. Durability, comfort and looks are what determine the quality of clothing. i'm just saying they shouldn't be so expensive. i've had a nike shirt for about 4 years and it is still good. i think it was like 15 bucks They're overpriced but as I said, you pay for a logo. Hollister for example is owned by A&F, it's a cheaper alternative (albeit targeted towards teens more than anything) made with the same standards as the parent company's clothing but without the same logo, those shirts cost 30$ a the top of the chart, most of them are about 15-20$. If A&F's pricetag isn't considered a rip-off, then I don't know what is. But they dropped that in exchange for micro-transactions in their games. www.gamespot.com/news/ea-consumers-enjoying-and-embracing-microtransactions-6404525 #67
-
atlasandpbody (05/18/2013) [-] | ||
| #3 - I thought it said Holocaust Water... | 05/17/2013 on Nature is awesome | +3 |
| #17 - >Logic >Pokemon Pick one. | 05/16/2013 on Team Aqua learns the sciences | 0 |
| #64 - "This is going up your ass!" | 05/15/2013 on The science! | +1 |
| #13 - How'd he know the door closed? It's not like he could… [+] (11 new replies) | 05/15/2013 on Houston, we have a problem... | +31 |
| hes on the moon, not in outer space. theres not the same vacuum so youre saying that the same vacuum in space takes place on the moon? #21
-
N. Korean citizen (05/15/2013) [-] | ||
| #2 - Picture | 05/15/2013 on Scary for Goomba | +1 |
| #11 - Piltover Customs Blitzcrank is black. He can even perform drive-bys. | 05/15/2013 on Shaco is black | +1 |
| #16 - What about female Blastoise? [+] (2 new replies) | 05/15/2013 on How.. Does it.. Oh god... | +39 |
| I laughed so fucking hard at that Gif, you made my day. Check it out! | ||
| #93 - Women complain when men think of them as sex objects. … | 05/14/2013 on Im ready for the Feminazis | +7 |
| #141 - People will kill people no matter what their beliefs are. | 05/13/2013 on And you have nerve enough... | +1 |
| #130 - Queen "Bloody" Mary wanted to turn England back to R… [+] (1 new reply) | 05/13/2013 on And you have nerve enough... | +2 |
| | ||
| #19 - Super Mario Kart (SNES) Mario Kart 64 (Nintendo 64) … [+] (1 new reply) | 05/13/2013 on I'm not sure what I... | +1 |
| #192 - It depends on the Gen. In Generation 2 games, it was based on… | 05/12/2013 on Glimmering monsters | 0 |
| #73 - >Logic >Pokemon Pick one. [+] (2 new replies) | 05/12/2013 on Poke-Science | +44 |
| | ||
| #22 - Luckily, the first shiny I caught was this beast of a pokemon. | 05/11/2013 on Glimmering monsters | +1 |
| #21 - I mean, look at this shit. You can barely even tell which one… [+] (1 new reply) | 05/11/2013 on Glimmering monsters | +7 |
| | ||
| #20 - My first shiny has a fucking Sunkern... You can barel… [+] (5 new replies) | 05/11/2013 on Glimmering monsters | +28 |
| Togepi. I hatched that fucking egg in gold, and i never knew for the longest time what the sparkles were | ||
| #7 - Hufflepuff symbol isn't a Hufflepuff... | 05/11/2013 on Ravenclaw | +3 |
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

