|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
| Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie |
OfflineSend mail to mllerayael Block mllerayael Invite mllerayael to be your friend flag avatar
not really much to say i am not really special but not really average
latest user's comments
|#59338 - well thanks to pirate bay i wouldnt be paying for it (not beca… [+] (1 new reply)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59335 - yep :) and since the concept of being a weirdo is based entire… [+] (6 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#15778 - seriously??? i know americans like their guns but guns should … [+] (11 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Politics - politics news,...||-5|
#15780 - anonymous poster (12/15/2012) [-]
"so logically take away the guns from everyone and there would be alot less "everyone for them selves" bullshit "
Yeah, the logical solution would be to remove every gun from America. It'll be easy, just like it was for us to take drugs away from everyone.
#15781 - mllerayael (12/15/2012) [-]
really so why do you feel the need to have guns? and i'm not saying it would be easy but over here guns are illegal and there is alot less shooting as a result and a hell of a lot less gun related crime and less deaths related to it
yes the logical solution would be to make it as difficult as possible to kill other people because i'm very sorry but i can't help but think that a nation who hands out guns to every tom dick and harry has some serious problems you don't know who is getting them what idiot would give a schizophrenic a gun?
#15786 - anonymous poster (12/15/2012) [-]
Because making guns illegal in the US won't do anything. Unlike the UK, there are so many guns circulating illegally here at the hands of gangs and criminal organizations. A gun ban will only disarm the law-abiding populace, leaving them at the mercy of these scum. The police can't protect all of us all the time and collecting all of these illegal guns would require a Police State, a very brutal and dictatorial form of government. It would be a naive move to sacrifice freedom and dignity just for a false sense of security. This is why gun bans can work in the UK but no the US.
I don't disagree with gun regulations here in the US, but an outright ban is essentially signing many parts of the country over to drug lords. If the US government bans guns, then they better be prepared to set up gang extermination squads or something along that line.
#15787 - mllerayael (12/15/2012) [-]
personally i could never equate guns with freedom i can only equate them with death and pain because that is all they ever cause i'm not saying that a gun ban would work because obviously its gotten to the point that they are everywhere in the US but the sale of them should be much more restricted and if gangs and drug lords are such a big problem in the US don't you think that just handing them guns makes things worse now anyone can become a criminal or a murderer easily and i don't see the logic in that
Your government should really start tackling crime seriously if things are really so out of hand
i would just point out that obviously my perspective is so different when i have grown up in a reasonably gun free society,
a police society is hardly a brutal and dictatorial form of government as it is in effect in france and they manage fine with it, france is certainly not a dictatorial form a government ad neither is it here in the UK
it goes against my normal intentions to be so judgmental but my god how can you attach guns to dignity and freedom? it makes no sense what so ever you are handing the ability to torture and kill to everyone and forcing anyone who has very little income to be at the mercy of anyone who can afford a gun. Personally i consider your opinion incredibly ignorant since you consider guns to give people freedom and dignity when it only encourages crime and fear of everyone around you. Sorry normally i wouldnt be so harsh but guns are something i have a very low opinion of.
I sure as hell didnt feel safe in the US and the idea of everyone having a gun terrifies me it would be the end of civilised society and the beginning of another dictatorship.
#15789 - anonymous poster (12/15/2012) [-]
Not banning guns doesn't equate to handing these gangs and cartels guns because THEY ALREADY ACQUIRE THEM ILLEGALLY TO BEGIN WITH. Purchasing a gun legally means that it is licensed and registered. The majority of people who seriously want to commit a crime will get their gun illegally so it can't be traced.
I attach guns to dignity and freedom only when they are in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Being disarmed in a land so full of gangs and organized crime just equates to submitting to the criminals who show no regard for the law. The people become victims-in-waiting because they have no means to protect themselves.
If France and the UK have the levels of freedom they do, then they obviously AREN'T police states. The Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Cuba serve as much better historical examples of police states. Unless you have an overpowered police force or a secret police enacting repressive control over the populace, then you're not in a police state.
"everyone having a gun terrifies me it would be the end of civilised society and the beginning of another dictatorship. "
Perhaps you have forgotten that disarming the populace of their guns has also led to the beginnings of dictatorship in parts of the world. Look at how things were with Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot. They disarmed the populace so that they could rule with a murderous iron fist.
#15791 - mllerayael (12/15/2012) [-]
By your logic that would make the entire EU a dictatorship since they disarmed the whole of Germany? and that the UK could become one any day now lol
You are right the UK and France arent police state however the US is considered to be one. And if what you said is true (which it isn't exactly since there is alot more to a police state than what you said) then every country with police can be considered a police state.
France is under military control just the same as Nazi Germany was does that make them a dictatorship no evidently not
I am beginning to think you are very closed minded as you just assume that without guns the USA will descend into a dictatorship when the majority of countries remain free without them you are looking at a very very small collection of dictatorships and labelling their rise as due to the lack of guns when it was alot more political than that and throughout history tyrants have been over thrown long before the invention of guns and afterwards with or without them.
The majority of guns that gangs your right are illegal as they have been stolen in house robberies and the like now a simple mugging can easily become a murder
i suppose you would consider it justice though for a man with nothing who broke into your house to be shot? or he would consider it easy since even if you wake up you have basically handed him the key to ending your life
law abiding citizen? there is no such thing everyone in their lifetime has broken a law.
why should you have a gun and not someone else? why should you be able to "defend" yourself just because you have the money to be able to do so? if the situation ever arose would you honestly use your gun to protect your fellow man? at the risk of your family? that is how dictators rise they attack your family whether you have a gun or not. Disarming the populace afterwards is a simple tactical move.
#15795 - anonymous poster (12/15/2012) [-]
" you are very closed minded as you just assume that without guns the USA will descend into a dictatorship"
In your previous post, you just assumed that WITH guns the USA will descend into a dictatorship. Does that not make you "closed-minded" as well? Don't call me closed-minded when you yourself don't even try to understand the points I am making. Maybe I am closed-minded, but at least I'm not being a hypocrite.
throughout history tyrants have been over thrown long before the invention of guns and afterwards with or without them.
Tell me, do you think a populace without guns would be able to take on a tyranny that has fully automatic firearms and explosive projectiles?
"The majority of guns that gangs your right are illegal as they have been stolen in house robberies"
No, the majority of guns they have were trafficked from Mexico.
"i suppose you would consider it justice though for a man with nothing who broke into your house to be shot?"
Well it certainly wouldn't be justice if I had nothing to defend myself with and was shot dead by the home invader.
"law abiding citizen? there is no such thing everyone in their lifetime has broken a law. "
There's a fine difference between people who try to live within the law and those who have a blatant disregard for any law at all.
"if the situation ever arose would you honestly use your gun to protect your fellow man?" Yes, I would if I had an open opportunity. You seem to believe that we should all just submit to lawless aggressors. If people have no right to defend themselves against an aggressor, then they have no rights at all.
#15797 - mllerayael (12/15/2012) [-]
no i never sid that i said that if you handed guns to everyone then it would descend into chaos until a dictorship arose which given human nature and its past is a perfectly viable assumption
have you never heard of guerrilla warfare there are many ways to take down a tyrannical dictatorship without guns, it just requires good tactics.
Perhaps i was wrong on that count (mexico) and conceed.
Home invaders rarely use guns in the UK as they have not escalated that far however it is quite common in the US as they consider it needed to not be shot if they are discovered. The main difference between home invaders in the UK and the US in the UK they run and no one is hurt.
there is not much of a line between them as everyones veiw on the law is subjective to their perspective and upbringing, I have very little regard for the laws on smoking weed, some would consider that to be complete disregard for the law where as others who have grown up around guns their whole life even if they are illegal consider them to be an everyday item.
You took this last part out of context : "if the situation ever arose would you honestly use your gun to protect your fellow man? at the risk of your family? that is how dictators rise they attack your family whether you have a gun or not. Disarming the populace afterwards is a simple tactical move". You talk as though dictators are lurking behind every corner waiting for you. I clearly don't believe in not defending yourself which is why i say you are closed minded since you assume the only way to protect yourself is violence and guns when i thought we lived in a civilised society (the UK and the US) where democracy rules? Any dictator that come into power would have been voted for in the first place as we depend on democracy and there exist laws the government must follow should someone try and take democracy away from us.
#15824 - paintbucket (12/16/2012) [-]
when someone breaks into my house, i want to make sure i kill them.
because the prisons are over populated, and he wasn't using his life for any good anyway.
and i'm perfectly within my right to do so.
also dead people can't sue you, which is a nice plus.
just wanted to inject that into this argument.
|#59318 - it was going well until i started to think about various ways … [+] (2 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59316 - really calling someone a weirdo on funnyjunk? isnt that like c… [+] (8 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#43288 - uuuuuuh ed? if your not i know someone who has a pretty s… [+] (2 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
#43331 - anonymous poster (12/15/2012) [-]
part of me always loved to be an individual. I always thought it would pay off. but I never developed skills. I was so stupid I thought being nice was the way but the truth is being nice only works if you have skills. otherwise people wont care about you at all. All people care about are the results
#43332 - mllerayael (12/15/2012) [-]
i thought that a while ago since loads of people just walked all over me for being nice but i decided it wasnt worth taking their opinion in account because well frankly i dont like them and i wont waste effort changing myself for them
sorry i realise it may have come off a bit over the top or judgmental when i don't know anything about you but i just can't help but want people to be happy.
you're only 27 there's still time to learn skills and do whatever you like with your life,
please don't give up on being nice because of dicks who put you down, we are so few as it is and when it does pays off its so worth it
I wouldn't say i have any skills either :)
|#43284 - aw dude sorry didnt see this better luck for the future you se… [+] (6 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
#43523 - gggman (12/16/2012) [-]
Can't reply to the other comment... But you too huh, I feel the same with the girl i like here. Wanna move on, but also don't. I was led on while she figured shit out with this other guy, all the while saying she didn't want to figure it out with him.. idk what else to do but wait. At least she's still talking to you right?
#43487 - gggman (12/16/2012) [-]
Friendzone. Okay hear me out, stick with it. I know there's some bad stories about it but in the long run, it always ends up the best. Be that guy for her, help her with everything no guarantees, but she might end up realizing you're probably better. If not fuck it, there's girls everywhere and she sounds like a good friend to have anyways am I right?
#43514 - dubslao (12/16/2012) [-]
I have tried to help with everything, I've always been nice and if I'm even mean or a jackass, I don't mean it and am 200% kidding.
I really hope it's not the friendzone, it doesn't seem like it honestly, but it might be and I really hope it's not.
And I don't think she'll realise I'm better anytime soon. Apparently she's been completely leading me on, only to tell me she loves my best friend.
I honestly want to be completely done with her, but I honestly just... can't.
|#43283 - as long as it put nicely then yes just try and be romantic as possible||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
|#43282 - why is skype better?||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
|#43281 - been there, i tried just experimenting to see what i prefered …||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
|#43280 - shrug it off nothing makes a girl happier than when a guy is c…||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||+2|
|#43279 - expect to pay throught the nose, i don't know how much it cost…||12/15/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||+2|
|#59314 - i have been thinking about learning to use photoshop but i loo… [+] (18 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59311 - *tourism lol||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59310 - thats pretty much exactly what i thought call you may hav… [+] (1 new reply)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59309 - is a pretty good site i used to use it all about exchanging c…||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59308 - hello :)||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59307 - na everyone has a type its not as shallow as you would think y…||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59306 - i would kill my mother so i could spend the last week with my …||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#59305 - probably means you feel like your going no where in life and s…||12/15/2012 on Social Board||0|
|#277 - as do i :) ooooh purty car nice choice [+] (3 new replies)||12/14/2012 on mllerayael's profile||0|
|#275 - pic pretty relevant we have an accord :D [+] (5 new replies)||12/14/2012 on mllerayael's profile||0|
|#43109 - thank god we are seperated by oceans (i'm assuming) then [+] (1 new reply)||12/14/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|
|#690 - how are you? thought i'd check in since your so special ;) lol [+] (1 new reply)||12/14/2012 on benfordham's profile||0|
|#43108 - I'm in my second year of psychology and frankly i thought we w…||12/14/2012 on Advice - love advice,...||0|