Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

misterjollie    

Rank #13148 on Comments
no avatar Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to misterjollie Block misterjollie Invite misterjollie to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/27/2012
Last Login:10/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13148
Highest Comment Rank:#4648
Comment Thumbs: 1324 total,  1731 ,  407
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 4% (4/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:394
FJ Points:1356

latest user's comments

#142 - Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.  [+] (1 new reply) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +2
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
#138 - It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him …  [+] (3 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +2
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
#136 - So if you are willing to admit your opinion had no validity th…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +2
User avatar #137 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
But the fact you assumed both of our opinions were based on the same thing, sexual attractiveness, was false.
#138 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him disgusting and unattractive. You shifted that argument to sexual attraction after that. The ensuing argument lead you to say and i quote directly from you " you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness." which is basically you saying you can't judge Arnold in the first place, meaning your original statement holds no value and i was simply trying to point that out to you.
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
#130 - Not all bi's or men are all attracted to the same thing either…  [+] (9 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +2
User avatar #135 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Exactly, I ws just saying my opinion, I also said each person has individual sexual tastes, but you previously assumed straight men could say something is sexually attractive to women, even though they can't. The reason I said my opinion is because the content implied all people either liked Arnold's body or cuntbags who thought his body is disgusting. I do not, I simply think it is very unattractive, according to the content, that makes me inadequate and I just wanted to point that out, also, this is funnyjunk, anyone can say their opinion for any reason.
#141 - kingderps (10/11/2014) [-]
You said your opinion!? On funnyjunk?! Oh man, big mistake.
User avatar #143 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
I know, I just don't care.
#136 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
So if you are willing to admit your opinion had no validity then why bother defending it in the first place? If i can say an opinion for any reason I was also never wrong to begin with.
User avatar #137 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
But the fact you assumed both of our opinions were based on the same thing, sexual attractiveness, was false.
#138 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him disgusting and unattractive. You shifted that argument to sexual attraction after that. The ensuing argument lead you to say and i quote directly from you " you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness." which is basically you saying you can't judge Arnold in the first place, meaning your original statement holds no value and i was simply trying to point that out to you.
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
#123 - As a straight man I can look at another man's body and judge h…  [+] (12 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +3
#128 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
No, no you cannot, as not all women are attracted to the same thing, you can only make that decision for yourself, and if you're not sexually attracted to someone, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness. You can judge how good they look, how handsome they are, how beautiful they are, how toned they may be, but for the simple fact of sexuality, you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness.
#130 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Not all bi's or men are all attracted to the same thing either. if you're choosing to go with this course for your point then there was never a reason for you to comment with your opinion in the first place since you said it can't apply to any one but yourself.
User avatar #135 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Exactly, I ws just saying my opinion, I also said each person has individual sexual tastes, but you previously assumed straight men could say something is sexually attractive to women, even though they can't. The reason I said my opinion is because the content implied all people either liked Arnold's body or cuntbags who thought his body is disgusting. I do not, I simply think it is very unattractive, according to the content, that makes me inadequate and I just wanted to point that out, also, this is funnyjunk, anyone can say their opinion for any reason.
#141 - kingderps (10/11/2014) [-]
You said your opinion!? On funnyjunk?! Oh man, big mistake.
User avatar #143 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
I know, I just don't care.
#136 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
So if you are willing to admit your opinion had no validity then why bother defending it in the first place? If i can say an opinion for any reason I was also never wrong to begin with.
User avatar #137 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
But the fact you assumed both of our opinions were based on the same thing, sexual attractiveness, was false.
#138 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him disgusting and unattractive. You shifted that argument to sexual attraction after that. The ensuing argument lead you to say and i quote directly from you " you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness." which is basically you saying you can't judge Arnold in the first place, meaning your original statement holds no value and i was simply trying to point that out to you.
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
User avatar #129 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
By the way, that picture is unrelated
#120 - There are plenty of straight men are comfortable enough with t…  [+] (14 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +4
User avatar #122 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
No, I said SEXUALITY BASED opinion, based on his sexual attractivness, while anyone can have an opinion on anyone's body, and can find it_ AESTHETICALLY ATTRACTIVE_, what I was saying is I can base it on weather my dick is hard or not, do I want to fuck him, which is how straight men judge women physically. They can appreciate someone's attractiveness, but would not not genuinely find it sexually attractive, not that it isn't a valid opinion, just that it is a non-sexual one. Which, when it comes to bodies, is what being attractive is about, at the base level. For instance, I could say a non-gendered person looks amazing, but I would not be able to judge how sexually attractive they are, as I would not be sexually attracted to them.
#123 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
As a straight man I can look at another man's body and judge how sexually attractive he'd be to women. So in essence straight men can judge another man's sexual attractiveness even though it doesn't pertain to us.
#128 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
No, no you cannot, as not all women are attracted to the same thing, you can only make that decision for yourself, and if you're not sexually attracted to someone, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness. You can judge how good they look, how handsome they are, how beautiful they are, how toned they may be, but for the simple fact of sexuality, you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness.
#130 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Not all bi's or men are all attracted to the same thing either. if you're choosing to go with this course for your point then there was never a reason for you to comment with your opinion in the first place since you said it can't apply to any one but yourself.
User avatar #135 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Exactly, I ws just saying my opinion, I also said each person has individual sexual tastes, but you previously assumed straight men could say something is sexually attractive to women, even though they can't. The reason I said my opinion is because the content implied all people either liked Arnold's body or cuntbags who thought his body is disgusting. I do not, I simply think it is very unattractive, according to the content, that makes me inadequate and I just wanted to point that out, also, this is funnyjunk, anyone can say their opinion for any reason.
#141 - kingderps (10/11/2014) [-]
You said your opinion!? On funnyjunk?! Oh man, big mistake.
User avatar #143 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
I know, I just don't care.
#136 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
So if you are willing to admit your opinion had no validity then why bother defending it in the first place? If i can say an opinion for any reason I was also never wrong to begin with.
User avatar #137 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
But the fact you assumed both of our opinions were based on the same thing, sexual attractiveness, was false.
#138 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him disgusting and unattractive. You shifted that argument to sexual attraction after that. The ensuing argument lead you to say and i quote directly from you " you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness." which is basically you saying you can't judge Arnold in the first place, meaning your original statement holds no value and i was simply trying to point that out to you.
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
User avatar #129 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
By the way, that picture is unrelated
#116 - I wasn't aware "bi's" were the authority of attractiveness.  [+] (17 new replies) 10/11/2014 on You Can Do It! +40
#119 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
I was just clearing up because I know people will assume I can't be attracted to him because I'm a guy, and most guys are straight. I never even implied it made me any more viable as a source of opinion, just that I am attracted to that gende,r therefore, I can have a sexuality based opinion.
#210 - geril (10/11/2014) [-]
#120 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
There are plenty of straight men are comfortable enough with their sexuality to be a judge for another man's attractiveness. By saying only "you" as a bi are sexually attracted to men and therefore can judge their attractiveness is essentially saying only men like you can be a judge of such things and you are in fact wrong.
User avatar #122 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
No, I said SEXUALITY BASED opinion, based on his sexual attractivness, while anyone can have an opinion on anyone's body, and can find it_ AESTHETICALLY ATTRACTIVE_, what I was saying is I can base it on weather my dick is hard or not, do I want to fuck him, which is how straight men judge women physically. They can appreciate someone's attractiveness, but would not not genuinely find it sexually attractive, not that it isn't a valid opinion, just that it is a non-sexual one. Which, when it comes to bodies, is what being attractive is about, at the base level. For instance, I could say a non-gendered person looks amazing, but I would not be able to judge how sexually attractive they are, as I would not be sexually attracted to them.
#123 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
As a straight man I can look at another man's body and judge how sexually attractive he'd be to women. So in essence straight men can judge another man's sexual attractiveness even though it doesn't pertain to us.
#128 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
No, no you cannot, as not all women are attracted to the same thing, you can only make that decision for yourself, and if you're not sexually attracted to someone, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness. You can judge how good they look, how handsome they are, how beautiful they are, how toned they may be, but for the simple fact of sexuality, you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness.
#130 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Not all bi's or men are all attracted to the same thing either. if you're choosing to go with this course for your point then there was never a reason for you to comment with your opinion in the first place since you said it can't apply to any one but yourself.
User avatar #135 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Exactly, I ws just saying my opinion, I also said each person has individual sexual tastes, but you previously assumed straight men could say something is sexually attractive to women, even though they can't. The reason I said my opinion is because the content implied all people either liked Arnold's body or cuntbags who thought his body is disgusting. I do not, I simply think it is very unattractive, according to the content, that makes me inadequate and I just wanted to point that out, also, this is funnyjunk, anyone can say their opinion for any reason.
#141 - kingderps (10/11/2014) [-]
You said your opinion!? On funnyjunk?! Oh man, big mistake.
User avatar #143 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
I know, I just don't care.
#136 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
So if you are willing to admit your opinion had no validity then why bother defending it in the first place? If i can say an opinion for any reason I was also never wrong to begin with.
User avatar #137 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
But the fact you assumed both of our opinions were based on the same thing, sexual attractiveness, was false.
#138 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
It was not false. You started by saying as a bi you found him disgusting and unattractive. You shifted that argument to sexual attraction after that. The ensuing argument lead you to say and i quote directly from you " you can't judge how sexually attractive they are to someone, only to yourself, and if you aren't sexually attracted to them, then you can't, since you are judging for yourself, and don't find them sexually attractive, you can't judge their sexual attractiveness." which is basically you saying you can't judge Arnold in the first place, meaning your original statement holds no value and i was simply trying to point that out to you.
User avatar #139 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
The thing is I could find him attractive and I do not, therefore to me, he is not sexually attractive
#142 - misterjollie (10/11/2014) [-]
Now that's a perfectly valid opinion because it pertains only to you.
User avatar #144 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
Yes.
User avatar #129 - timmity (10/11/2014) [-]
By the way, that picture is unrelated
#56 - ..Meanwhile in OP's bathroom 06/14/2014 on best soap ive ever seen !! 0
#61 - Truth. 05/03/2014 on (untitled) 0
#372 - Don't be. 05/03/2014 on Horror movies +2
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/22/2012) [-]
User avatar #1 - castellandraco (06/29/2012) [-]
yo yo yo yo dawgs upload a picture fo your avatar
 Friends (0)