Yes! And if i recall correct it was the first to emerge. They did work a lot on improvements and started getting new heroes on their own.
Idk why but out of the 3 (HoN, LoL and DOTA2), HoN kept true to the original DOTA and was and still is easy on the eyes.

Asian rainforest conservation loses a lot of funding because their poserchild is gone

Alternatively, they gain a lot of funding, because they can now say 'Look at this adorable little Red Panda. Do you want it to go the way of the regular panda? gib mone'

They are a failed segment of the bear population that we prop up anyway for sentimental reasons.

Same reason welfare exists, basically.

We call different species of monkey different subspecies for being less different than the differences between an Asian man and an African one.

The "all one species" is progressive horseshit. It's politically correct 'science' that is not backed up by facts or taxonomic distinctions. In fact, the man behind the "Out of Africa" theory has since retracted his original theory, and replaced it with a new one that he believes more accurately represents the genetic realities of human. That theory separates us all into four distinct species of human. Do you think that got any media coverage? Of course not.

Want proof that you're being fed politically influenced facts instead of real science?

Consider dogs.

No dog trainer on the planet would ever tell you that every dog is as smart as every other dog. Some dogs are extremely intelligent. Others are as stupid as a sack of rocks. That's just the kind of dog they are. Sames species, but different breed. No one will ever try to argue that a golden retriever isn't smarter than a pug. It is a well established fact that this is true, and we know it to be true for dogs, horses, cats, parrots, pigs, monkeys, apes, and every other type of animal you care to name.

So why does science pretend that every single breed of human being is exactly the same? Why is the official scientific answer to, if I may reuse the example earlier, whether an Asian is smarter than an African, "of course not, don't be silly?" Asians test better on IQ scores and SATS than Africans do. Even Africans who are raised outside of Africa in first world nations with a good upbringing don't score on the same level. They don't do as well academically, nor do they manage as well financially or in terms of employment.

If it were any other species, we would say "obviously the Asian breed is smarter than the African one. It's simple." But because humans are involved, suddenly the issue of intelligence is a sacred thing that cannot be infringed or questioned.

Why?

Because it would be politically incorrect to do so. Because we have allowed progressives to change the definition of "racist" from "hating someone else based on their race" to "acknowledging that there are any differences in race whatsoever." Since no one wants to be racist, everyone now pretends that there are no differences, even when there clearly are.

I care about mine and my own. If another type of human couldn't hack it or compete, that's natural selection. Do you shed any tears for Neanderthals? No? Why? Because they are conveniently long dead, and thus do not tug on your heartstrings? Isn't that just admitting that you make decisions based on emotional appeals, and not logical ones? If the Black Lives Matter activists actually cared about black lives, why are they not protesting the rampant slavery that takes place in Africa?

At the end of the day, this isn't about racism or sexism or discrimination of any sort. This is about complacency and ignoring the truth that is right in front of you.

Answer me one last question. Let's put everything we've just set up aside for a moment, and assume that every single race is equal.

If they are, then why does Affirmative Action exist? It's not a radical idea to state that coddling a single person makes them less effective a person in the long run. It's a well known fact. So why is it suddenly okay if we do it to many people? What changes when it is done on a large scale? Why is that any different?

One more. Look at Africa today. There is no stable infrastructure, and society is imploding.

Do you know why there is no farming? Because we give them free food. Farmers can't compete with free.

Do you know why the population is out of control? Because we gave third world people first world meds.

Is Africa better off on international welfare, or would you agree that we should just leave them alone and let them sort it out?

Welfare is a poison. It is a compassion that kills both sides of the exchange for no gain.

Only European whites have Neanderthal DNA. It is generally accepted that this is where red hair comes from. Do your research and come back later when you know what you're talking about.

There isn't a base race. There are four distinct races of human.

>2015
>No TL;DR version

While I do hate mosquitoes, I must admit you raise a valid point.

He's a Fuck Mothering Vampire.

I just noticed that, fuck you for pointing it out, I was fine before and now I'm itchy