Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

mexicoman

Rank #4468 on Content
mexicoman Avatar Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to mexicoman Block mexicoman Invite mexicoman to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:12/11/2010
Last Login:12/24/2014
Location:Washington
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4468
Comment Ranking:#15039
Highest Content Rank:#4463
Highest Comment Rank:#8067
Content Thumbs: 1806 total,  2210 ,  404
Comment Thumbs: 1435 total,  2002 ,  567
Content Level Progress: 73% (73/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 87% (87/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:135412
Times Content Favorited:109 times
Total Comments Made:681
FJ Points:3202
Favorite Tags: the (8) | game (5) | You (4) | for (3) | a (2) | are (2) | black (2) | do (2) | in (2) | kill (2) | Lost (2) | omegle (2) | on (2) | tags (2) | this (2) | to (2) | your (2)

latest user's comments

#40707 - Why do you refuse to use recreational drugs? Does you…  [+] (28 new replies) 07/11/2013 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #40740 - feelythefeel (07/11/2013) [-]
I refuse to use them for similar reasons to oxan, although maybe not as extreme. I'll still let others enjoy stuff like alcohol and even marijuana if they really want to.

It depends. Although I would never use it myself, I support the decriminalization of marijuana. As for other drugs, not so much.
User avatar #40708 - oxan (07/11/2013) [-]
I refuse to use recreational drugs as they snare the senses and enslave the brain.

I support the continuing restriction of drugs and the prosecution of dealers. I'm more in favour of rehabilitation of users. I support continued efforts to gradually phase out tobacco use, and advocate increasing the drinking age to 21 (I'm Australia, by the way) and efforts to suppress underage drinking.
User avatar #40834 - mexicoman (07/12/2013) [-]
Drugs can enslave your brain but quite frankly that isn't a guarantee with even the harder drugs. They may snare your senses but as a marijuana user I can attest that its sensory afflictions are positive and do not last very long, making them perfect for personal leisure time.
#40713 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40806 - naxo (07/11/2013) [-]
Some choices need to be restricted, just because they're personal doesn't make them inherently good..

If I chose to rape someone, or inject heroin, I'd be making a personal choice.. Luckily these things are illegal and I have been educated regarding the consequences.

I think education and restriction should go hand in hand in attempting to phase out certain aspects of society.
#40807 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40808 - naxo (07/11/2013) [-]
Really? For what reasons?

Personally I think all recreational drugs should be illegal and I have a lot of problems with the nature of the pharmaceutical industry as well..
#40809 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40810 - naxo (07/12/2013) [-]
But where do you draw the line?

Would you let people take PCP? Krokodil? Oxi? Bath Salts?
#40811 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40814 - naxo (07/12/2013) [-]
And why do you think people should be able to choose to take these drugs? They have no positive effects, heroin destroys lives and that's about it.

Would you allow it because you think that anyone who chooses to take heroin deserves to suffer the effects of heroin (/heroin addiction)
User avatar #40836 - mexicoman (07/12/2013) [-]
Explain to me why your personal preferences should be the law of the land? Why is it that you get to decide for me what I can and can't do with my body that I alone own?
User avatar #40860 - naxo (07/12/2013) [-]
Same reason there are laws in almost all societies that prohibit people doing certain things to themselves.

Also because your decisions on what you do with your body have an effect on the people around you and not only yourself.

If you can isolate yourself to the point that no one knows of your existence, then feel free to take all manner of drugs. However, while you are part of a family, a community, a society, you need to stick to the rules of that group.

I am stating my opinion on what I believe the rules should be for a hypothetical society, in which I create the rules (or at least the ones relating drug use).
User avatar #40881 - mexicoman (07/12/2013) [-]
You misunderstand the law and what its there for. The law is meant to protect people from victimization. Drug laws do not fulfill this function. My smoking a joint in no way leads to anyone else being afflicted. Its just me on the couch listening to Pink Floyd. You would put me in jail for this?
User avatar #41330 - naxo (07/14/2013) [-]
Perhaps it has no repercussions for anyone other than you. However, if you are in the percentage that develops anxiety, depression or psychosis, then it begins to affect the people around you.

There have been a number of studies showing a relationship between attempted suicides and cannabis use. I think it's pretty clear that suicide is a negative thing and that the law should work to reduce suicide rates..
User avatar #41489 - mexicoman (07/16/2013) [-]
No, the law is not meant for social engineering. Its mean to protect people from victimization. I don't believe that anyone's right to do something should be influenced by the worst worst possible outcomes of such a thing. The law should only influence people's rights when they impede on the rights of others. If im on my property and im getting stoned because I like it, it is no business of yours. It isn't the governments business either. I would argue against your vague mention of a statistic that correlates suicide with cannabis use, but that would just deviate from the real point. Cigarettes are objectively worse for you than marijuana, but I would still die for the liberty that allows people to smoke them. Its not up to me or the majority of people to say that someone can't smoke a cigarette, it is their choice and they will smoke it if they want to. What you advocate for ultimately builds open disrespect for the law, because it imposes upon people ridiculous standards. When you have a people that mistakes the law's standard for the standard of ethics, that brings you problems. Im not asking you to do any drugs, im not even asking you to be happy about it. Im just asking you to leave drug users alone, and to stop advocating this legal harassment and perpetuation of a corrupt prison industrial complex. Just leave drug users alone, that shouldn't be a heavy request.
User avatar #41538 - oxan (07/16/2013) [-]
>No, the law is not meant for social engineering.
Actually, acting as a mechanism for social change is one of the purposes for law.
User avatar #41580 - mexicoman (07/16/2013) [-]
That's not correct. I know it can look that way when you consider the civil rights movement, the abolition of slavery, and the gay marriage movement but it isn't. Because social engineering is defined by merriam websters dictionary as "management of human beings in accordance with their place and function in society : applied social science", and that doesn't fit what those events did to change things. What those events were really amounted the deconstruction of institutionalized persecution. It was the ending of forms social engineering through subjugation when you think about it. This wasn't the management of human beings, this was halting the actions of people who were trying to do that themselves.
User avatar #41595 - oxan (07/16/2013) [-]
I'll concede that acting as a mechanism for social change is different from social engineering. However, what you have described is the law acting as a mechanism for social change. Thus, I believe my point remains.
User avatar #41637 - mexicoman (07/16/2013) [-]
Social change insofar as you would expect from an institution designed to protect people's freedoms and protect people from force. Those instances were just the law finally doing its job. Just because the law changed to compensate for progress in human tolerance for those changes does not really mean much other than to say its sad that people for so long artificially changed the nature of the justice system to fit their prejudices. The law might change society, but that is not its purpose.
#40816 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40780 - oxan (07/11/2013) [-]
They should go hand in hand, restrictions an education.
#40783 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40785 - oxan (07/11/2013) [-]
Or we can avoid it completely?
#40787 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40794 - oxan (07/11/2013) [-]
Use generally increases in poorer areas, it's mostly a symptom of capitalism. It's like the annexation of East Germany: drug use spiked significantly.
#40795 - jewishcommienazi has deleted their comment.
User avatar #40796 - oxan (07/11/2013) [-]
The only 'legit' dealer should be the state, and it should distribute drugs at a high rate, and only as part of a rehabilitation program.

But yes, illegal dealers should be severely punished.
#40706 - Zimmerman is a bad liar. He tried hiding all the funds he'd be…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/11/2013 on Politics - politics news,... -1
User avatar #41015 - undeadwill (07/13/2013) [-]
why Martins DNA had never been found on his gun and why he had been stalking the kid for the crime of walking home.
>Shot in self defense close range
> Stalking, he's neighborhood watch and the cops don't do shit.
#40712 - pebar (07/11/2013) [-]
have you seen the prosecution?
#14 - I like it. Its hard to distinguish which DLC gives what becaus…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/09/2013 on so uuh 0
User avatar #15 - ktbmnf (07/09/2013) [-]
that is a lot to mull over, thanks
#135 - Mfw this doesn't work on my laptop 07/04/2013 on Typing 0
#32 - I just throw random **** together. Except for Dae… 06/29/2013 on Skyrim +3
#33 - Head Cheese 06/28/2013 on Art +12
#8 - Nope Nope Nope 06/11/2013 on yo dawg, we heard you liked... +1
#33 - The instructions were not clear enough, I ended up with my dic… 06/06/2013 on ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD ! -1
#671 - It isn't about 'punishment', it is about the incapacitation of…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/10/2013 on Norwegian Prison +4
#685 - anonymous (05/10/2013) [-]
It isn't about how nice it is, it is about how much you pay for someone who broke the law.
#81 - Stupidest isn't a word? 05/02/2013 on Rape Me +1
#69635 - You ******* sold some poor girl crystal meth out … 05/02/2013 on Advice - love advice,... 0
#28266 - I agree, **** them and their authoritarian-supply…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2013 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #28291 - oxan (05/02/2013) [-]
That was one helluva sentence.
#70 - Perhaps so, but to see you tout that the message in this conte… 04/29/2013 on Imagine 0
#69 - Some morals are subjective, genocide is not. What the japanese… 04/29/2013 on Imagine 0
#39 - I don't think the troops are baby killers, if they weren't the… 04/29/2013 on Imagine +1
#36 - The citizens are wrong in many regards, not voting, not taking…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +1
User avatar #37 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
I believe you should put yourself in the boots of the soldiers out there.
Sure it is easy to say they are fucking baby killers and what not, but they are in knee high in stress and shit. Guerrilla warfare is a very hard thing to combat, so why take chances?
User avatar #39 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
I don't think the troops are baby killers, if they weren't the troops it might be me overseas. Some share more of a burden than others, but these aren't Nazi's fighting for a toxic ideology. They are people like you or me who were stripped of their individuality and rebuilt into a collective that they don't get to control. They did this not because they want to cause harm (though some may have), they did it because they were told it was the honorable thing to do, and were afflicted by the other lies meant to take advantage of good intentions. We had a military that fought the real evils of the world, but you and I both know that to say that today reeks of naivete and ignorance.

But there is no excuse for those high on the chain of command, the president, and congress. Their overt role in this makes them clearly not fit to govern anything, and that is why I am ashamed.
#33 - An America where the people have less blood on their hands, fo…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +1
User avatar #35 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
Ashamed of the military and government?
I am more ashamed at the citizens of America.
User avatar #36 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
The citizens are wrong in many regards, not voting, not taking the time to educate themselves, distracting themselves from the real issues with a superficial culture as they turn a blind eye to so goddamn much.

But they aren't the ones pulling the trigger, or issuing the orders. The perpetrators are human beings, making conscience decisions to do wrong, and the American people nine times out of ten didn't tell them to do it. The general would not say "Fuck you, that is an illegal order", the president would not say "Fuck you, the lives of others and the name of America is worth more than that", they all play ball.
User avatar #37 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
I believe you should put yourself in the boots of the soldiers out there.
Sure it is easy to say they are fucking baby killers and what not, but they are in knee high in stress and shit. Guerrilla warfare is a very hard thing to combat, so why take chances?
User avatar #39 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
I don't think the troops are baby killers, if they weren't the troops it might be me overseas. Some share more of a burden than others, but these aren't Nazi's fighting for a toxic ideology. They are people like you or me who were stripped of their individuality and rebuilt into a collective that they don't get to control. They did this not because they want to cause harm (though some may have), they did it because they were told it was the honorable thing to do, and were afflicted by the other lies meant to take advantage of good intentions. We had a military that fought the real evils of the world, but you and I both know that to say that today reeks of naivete and ignorance.

But there is no excuse for those high on the chain of command, the president, and congress. Their overt role in this makes them clearly not fit to govern anything, and that is why I am ashamed.
#32 - To say it is total ******** is total *****…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +5
#68 - hockeynerd (04/29/2013) [-]
If I could live in a peaceful place, hell yes I would. But, since the beginning of mankind, evil has always had a presence. And always will.
User avatar #70 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to see you tout that the message in this content is 'bullshit' because there will always be squabble and sorrow is shameful. You just come across as some whiny contrarian who doesn't like the smell of hippies when you throw some flabby argument like that out onto the public square.
#30 - Martin Luther King was not your average Jesus pushing preacher…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +2
User avatar #71 - majortomcomics (04/29/2013) [-]
I never said I disagree with the Manhattan Project.
User avatar #56 - icefried (04/29/2013) [-]
Objectively evil?
No such thing. Morality is subjective and so are the concepts of good and evil.
User avatar #69 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
Some morals are subjective, genocide is not. What the japanese did in Nanking was wrong, Mussolini was a fascist who stifled his own people, Hitlers third reich perpetrated the worst systematic genocide in recent history. These are not fictional character assassinations drummed up to rile up the allies, and they are not moral grey areas. Anyone who tries to say otherwise is an incorrect dick, with shoddy morals. The worst the allies had done to my knowledge, were the Russian labor camps and American internment of the Japanese (which was a means of keeping the japanese under surveillance basically, not a hateful death machine). So in spite of the fact that the allies had dirty hands, it was not even close to equivocating with the wrongs of the axis. Just because your morals differ from mine does not mean that we are on equal footing, and that 'its just too subjective to declare one way or the other'. Sure, the Nazi's saw themselves as justified. They weren't stroking their beards and sipping the blood of their slain victims like sociopathic villains, but that does not pardon them from the title of 'evil', that they earned.
#29 - I don't know why this got so many red thumbs, I understand tha…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +1
User avatar #34 - richardbatsbak (04/29/2013) [-]
Same here. What we need is religious values. Helping other people, respect,.. not churches and other useless shit
#28 - You seem to have a lack of understanding with regard to the Un…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/29/2013 on Imagine +2
User avatar #31 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
What do you think that would accomplish?
User avatar #33 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
An America where the people have less blood on their hands, for one. I personally would love to not be ashamed of my military and government.

A world where just maybe arbitrary military action is not tolerable (I would think thats something we should strive for).

A world where muslims do not get to have another good reason to hate us every other day. Leading to less in the line of terrorism.
User avatar #35 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
Ashamed of the military and government?
I am more ashamed at the citizens of America.
User avatar #36 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
The citizens are wrong in many regards, not voting, not taking the time to educate themselves, distracting themselves from the real issues with a superficial culture as they turn a blind eye to so goddamn much.

But they aren't the ones pulling the trigger, or issuing the orders. The perpetrators are human beings, making conscience decisions to do wrong, and the American people nine times out of ten didn't tell them to do it. The general would not say "Fuck you, that is an illegal order", the president would not say "Fuck you, the lives of others and the name of America is worth more than that", they all play ball.
User avatar #37 - Cobaltsushi (04/29/2013) [-]
I believe you should put yourself in the boots of the soldiers out there.
Sure it is easy to say they are fucking baby killers and what not, but they are in knee high in stress and shit. Guerrilla warfare is a very hard thing to combat, so why take chances?
User avatar #39 - mexicoman (04/29/2013) [-]
I don't think the troops are baby killers, if they weren't the troops it might be me overseas. Some share more of a burden than others, but these aren't Nazi's fighting for a toxic ideology. They are people like you or me who were stripped of their individuality and rebuilt into a collective that they don't get to control. They did this not because they want to cause harm (though some may have), they did it because they were told it was the honorable thing to do, and were afflicted by the other lies meant to take advantage of good intentions. We had a military that fought the real evils of the world, but you and I both know that to say that today reeks of naivete and ignorance.

But there is no excuse for those high on the chain of command, the president, and congress. Their overt role in this makes them clearly not fit to govern anything, and that is why I am ashamed.
#27 - I love **** like this 04/29/2013 on Imagine +3
#1161 - Hey man, anything to help me pick up white women. 04/17/2013 on Don't reply to this content 0
#17 - Micford Jackley 04/16/2013 on The Codfather +2
#22 - Fire/Fighter 04/15/2013 on Witty title +33
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - sirbonzaiatak (03/25/2011) [-]
LMAO at your post!!! Check out mine and thumb please :)

http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1869232/Weekly+Funny+1/
User avatar #1 - iMJesus (03/11/2011) [-]
Lmfao at your post bro, thumbed up, can you thumb this up for me?
http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1796542/Epic+Breakup/
 Friends (0)