Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

If you assume that when I say "liberty over security" I mean 0 security, then I get to assume that you mean 0 liberty.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

But if I were to live under a dictatorship I'd rather be dead anyways.

If you assume that when I say "liberty over security" I mean 0 security, then I get to assume that you mean 0 liberty.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

Then I'll have died with honor rather than surviving as a pussy.

But if I were to live under a dictatorship I'd rather be dead anyways.

If you assume that when I say "liberty over security" I mean 0 security, then I get to assume that you mean 0 liberty.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

I'll just shoot them, seeing as I have the freedom to posses weapons for self defense.

Then I'll have died with honor rather than surviving as a pussy.

But if I were to live under a dictatorship I'd rather be dead anyways.

If you assume that when I say "liberty over security" I mean 0 security, then I get to assume that you mean 0 liberty.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

I was rushing through so I was pretty under-leveled and I was playing on moderate. Didn't wait until I finished the story and sidequests and such like I probably should have. He basically one-shot everybody if I didn't all divide.

And not sure what you mean by 'he's not weak to anything.' He doesn't have an elemental weakness, but he counts as a crustacean, so you can still power-combo him pretty hard with appropriate move / gear / titles. Actually, armatizing with Mikleo only gives you trinity shot to power-combo him, and since you can't self-combo after trinity shot that was one of the slowest ways you could have gone about killing him. If you were just using regular hidden artes, you went about it the slowest way you possibly could have.

Yeah, the game's really tough if you don't learn to use both weaknesses instead of just one, since (as we just talked about) there are enemies with no elemental weakness.

Hold down the button to change targets to see what type of enemy you're facing. Then go to the artes menu and look, especially the martial arts when not armatized and the hidden arts when armatized. Each one tells you what they do bonus damage to. Find one(s) that does bonus damage to the enemy type that you're fighting and use it in your combo. Different armatizations have different enemy type advantages, so I usually do this right at the start of the battle and select the armatization with the earliest damage type advantage.

Elemental weakness is still important, of course, but even if they have an elemental weakness you can get a bigger power combo by hitting them with both the correct element and the correct enemy type instead of just one or the other.

Skills are totally up to preference IMO. Certainly can't go wrong with spamming stats. Other than the obvious stuff (Fire damage on Layla, Water on Mikleo, vs Dragon when you're fighting a dragon, etc) I like all the blast gauge increasing skills. You can get to the point where every attack you dodge gives you nearly a full blast gauge. But they're all good. Right now I'm trying to see if I can get enough damage-negation and defense-healing to make it so that blocking attacks always heals me.

Then I choose liberty over security.

I'll just shoot them, seeing as I have the freedom to posses weapons for self defense.

Then I'll have died with honor rather than surviving as a pussy.

But if I were to live under a dictatorship I'd rather be dead anyways.

If you assume that when I say "liberty over security" I mean 0 security, then I get to assume that you mean 0 liberty.

My philosophy is that something can only be considered a freedom if it doesn't take away the freedoms of others, so it's not like there would be a freedom of murder or anything like that.

I never said I'm anti police. The police are needed, but they shouldn't overstep their bounds, nor should we give them the authority to take away our freedom unless we've done something wrong.

Explain your reasoning. Do you mean the Government as the third party? I never said I'm anti government either.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.

That's funny, my philosophy class is going over this book right now. Hobbes makes some pretty compelling arguments that an authoritarian government is better than anarchy.

Rance! the animation I think

I'm guessing that it's ancestors were smiling at it

Haha, I was laughing so hard I lost the fight the first time I saw that (that fucker does some damage if you don't all-divide.) I'll go with 'endeared' on that one. They kept it away from the main story and put it in Katz Korner where a silly scene like that belongs, and it certainly was a cute homage to Xilia 2.

But yeah, as funny as it was, it's also so cheesy you can't help but wince a little. That's one of those parts of the game that you don't want anybody to see you playing.

I was rushing through so I was pretty under-leveled and I was playing on moderate. Didn't wait until I finished the story and sidequests and such like I probably should have. He basically one-shot everybody if I didn't all divide.

And not sure what you mean by 'he's not weak to anything.' He doesn't have an elemental weakness, but he counts as a crustacean, so you can still power-combo him pretty hard with appropriate move / gear / titles. Actually, armatizing with Mikleo only gives you trinity shot to power-combo him, and since you can't self-combo after trinity shot that was one of the slowest ways you could have gone about killing him. If you were just using regular hidden artes, you went about it the slowest way you possibly could have.

Yeah, the game's really tough if you don't learn to use both weaknesses instead of just one, since (as we just talked about) there are enemies with no elemental weakness.

Hold down the button to change targets to see what type of enemy you're facing. Then go to the artes menu and look, especially the martial arts when not armatized and the hidden arts when armatized. Each one tells you what they do bonus damage to. Find one(s) that does bonus damage to the enemy type that you're fighting and use it in your combo. Different armatizations have different enemy type advantages, so I usually do this right at the start of the battle and select the armatization with the earliest damage type advantage.

Elemental weakness is still important, of course, but even if they have an elemental weakness you can get a bigger power combo by hitting them with both the correct element and the correct enemy type instead of just one or the other.

Skills are totally up to preference IMO. Certainly can't go wrong with spamming stats. Other than the obvious stuff (Fire damage on Layla, Water on Mikleo, vs Dragon when you're fighting a dragon, etc) I like all the blast gauge increasing skills. You can get to the point where every attack you dodge gives you nearly a full blast gauge. But they're all good. Right now I'm trying to see if I can get enough damage-negation and defense-healing to make it so that blocking attacks always heals me.

How the fuck would they even have 134 in 60min.

Thats one every like 27seconds. That's an hour of basically constant orgasm. What the hell, my dick would fall apart if that happened to me.

It's possible, if practiced enough a woman can cum in 10-15 seconds and don't have "reload time" but by the end she probably looked like she ran a marathon and her pussy probably was on fire for days.

Women are able to orgasm very quickly through the clitoris, and only require a few seconds of breather time to cum again, and thats only sometimes.

That's why the man only managed 16..

I mean getting conned out of something is essentially being stolen from, where as this is buying a product from a company who makes more content for consumers at a high quality based on the money that they make.

You're telling me that just about any purchase I make at any point in time that is not a necessity is because of brainwashing. I bought the emote for the same reason that I bought the beanie that I'm wearing, not for any practical purpose this hat would never keep me warm, but because it has a cow on it and I liked it. Purchasing small things that don't have realistic implications on anything aren't a result of brainwashing, but a simple and inexpensive way to bring joy oneself instead.

I mean getting conned out of something is essentially being stolen from, where as this is buying a product from a company who makes more content for consumers at a high quality based on the money that they make.

Or is it just fantasy?

Caught in a land slide

No escape from reality.

open your eyes
look up to the skies and seeeeeeeeeee

I'm just a poor boy, I need no sympathy.

Cause I'm
Easy come
Easy go
Little high
Little low

Anyway the wind blows, doesn't really matter to me,
to me

MAMA, just killed a man!

Put a gun against his head
Pulled my trigger, now he's dead

Mama, life had just begun

It's not brainwashing, the emotes are a completely unnecessary to the game and thus can be sold at no consequence to those not wanting to pay for them. It's like buying skins in other games, such as LoL.

You're telling me that just about any purchase I make at any point in time that is not a necessity is because of brainwashing. I bought the emote for the same reason that I bought the beanie that I'm wearing, not for any practical purpose this hat would never keep me warm, but because it has a cow on it and I liked it. Purchasing small things that don't have realistic implications on anything aren't a result of brainwashing, but a simple and inexpensive way to bring joy oneself instead.

I mean getting conned out of something is essentially being stolen from, where as this is buying a product from a company who makes more content for consumers at a high quality based on the money that they make.

Yes.