Why does no one ever mention Kittan sacrificing himself to destroy the Death Spiral Machine?

Why does no one ever mention Kittan sacrificing himself to destroy the Death Spiral Machine?

admin needa to delete them himself...add to the controversy...

I personally liked it more when everyone knew what was going on, because then each succeeding game stacked on to the enjoyment.

the winner of any game of Mao gets to arbitrarily make a new rule he doesn't have to reveal save for penalizing someone for breaking it in succeeding games.

But then you don't get the enjoyment of goading over everyone else's frustration for having to learn it from scratch...

admin needa to delete them himself...add to the controversy...

We do not need more games like skyrim. At all.

why do you hate skyrim?

Not him, but I too dislike skyrim. It's just so shallow.
None of the NPC's have any life to them, the main quest feels like a chore, Alduin is a joke, the dungeons are way too similar in many ways, draugrs everywhere, elements from previous games were removed, such as spell-crafting, classes I know this one is very subjective , a lot of skills, and so on. The guild quests were also very disapointing. Do five quests and you were the leader of the faction, even though the people in guild just met you. Oh, and you could become the leader of every guild at the same time.

There were many great things about the game too, but over all it's just so plain. It was vast as an ocean, but deep as a puddle.

what did you guys dislike skyrim so much? honest question, i personaly liked it more then oblivion, never played fallout so, no opinion

A lot of people disliked Skyrim? I find that hard to believe.

And it's most likely he's complaining about comparing two different franchises with two (somewhat) different gameplay styles (Elder Scrolls and Fallout).

I am complaining about the playstyles.

In New Vegas, while admittedly not a deep combat system, you had to be smart about it, you had limited AP and you had to make it count with VATS, whereas in Skyrim, you swing, get a breath, swing, get a breath, burn'em with magic, drink a potion, swing, win at life.

I prefer New Vegas's (slightly) tactical playstyle over Skyrim's "swing and be king" playstyle.

now i remembered why i disliked oblivion so much, it was the leving system, it was so retarded...

-what do you mean by factions exactly? like the companions and shit?

-i must be the worst player ever then, because freaking adept kicks my ass regularly

-point taken

-some makes sense, others dont, you not knowing about the war is kinda stupid

- since im playing squishy meeles, i have that done to me alot,(i even have a mod to stop that from hapenning to me)

-i do not normaly play mages, so i was kinda glad i could simply use it whenever i wanted

well that was my take on it, i think a lot of newcomers liked skyrim more then oblivion because it was simplyfied... meh, i may buy oblivion again and play it, although i might have some issues with

-the wheel minigame(seriusly who thought that was a good idea?)

-camera zooming in so close when i wanna chat with somebody(mah imergion)

-broken leving systems

or maybe i buy fallout 3 after im done with fallout 4 and wait for the mods to come out, who knows

I'm personally not salty against Skyrimjob, but to prefer Skyrim's playset over New Vegas is simply absurd.

meh, the popato faces and the freaking wheel linda did put me off... and also the fact the camera zooms at the face of the guy you are talking about kinda threw me off (in oblivion, not Fallout)

That was because of limitations of the engine. The game mechanics and side quests were way better.

The whole point of Mao is that no ones supposed to know how to play it. I learned the rules at one point, but then you start to realize that it's only ever a special sort of person who plays a game centered around "us vs. them" exclusion.

It's fun as balls if you play with a tight knit group after multiple games, though, because then what you're making fun of is actually good natured.

I personally liked it more when everyone knew what was going on, because then each succeeding game stacked on to the enjoyment.

the winner of any game of Mao gets to arbitrarily make a new rule he doesn't have to reveal save for penalizing someone for breaking it in succeeding games.

But then you don't get the enjoyment of goading over everyone else's frustration for having to learn it from scratch...

admin needa to delete them himself...add to the controversy...

Yeah, the game's really tough if you don't learn to use both weaknesses instead of just one, since (as we just talked about) there are enemies with no elemental weakness.

Hold down the button to change targets to see what type of enemy you're facing. Then go to the artes menu and look, especially the martial arts when not armatized and the hidden arts when armatized. Each one tells you what they do bonus damage to. Find one(s) that does bonus damage to the enemy type that you're fighting and use it in your combo. Different armatizations have different enemy type advantages, so I usually do this right at the start of the battle and select the armatization with the earliest damage type advantage.

Elemental weakness is still important, of course, but even if they have an elemental weakness you can get a bigger power combo by hitting them with both the correct element and the correct enemy type instead of just one or the other.

Skills are totally up to preference IMO. Certainly can't go wrong with spamming stats. Other than the obvious stuff (Fire damage on Layla, Water on Mikleo, vs Dragon when you're fighting a dragon, etc) I like all the blast gauge increasing skills. You can get to the point where every attack you dodge gives you nearly a full blast gauge. But they're all good. Right now I'm trying to see if I can get enough damage-negation and defense-healing to make it so that blocking attacks always heals me.

Except the idea that you have to give away your freedom in exchange for security is a stupid notion not based in actuality. The U.S. Constitution Not the United States how it is, but how it's supposed to be is a good example of a government that provides security without sacrificing freedom as per my definition of freedom.