I'm sorry I was not aware that me not acknowledging the fact that life is dependent on water makes my theory pseudo-scientific. I didn't know you didn't consider that common knowledge.
This is not a hypothesis about an experiment, it is a theory. It is based on scientific fact, and it does make sense. With that said, I never said it was the truth, in fact, I started by saying it was a theory, and that word implies that it is far from being regarded as the truth.
Me sharing my idea is not a provocation of crude and mildly insulting attempts to make yourself seem smart.

"Theory," in a scientific sense, is a system of ideas intended to explain something. Theories are not "far from being regarded as the truth." Quite the contrary, theories are heavily evidenced, factually based explanations of things. The Theory of Evolution is a scientific FACT. It's also a theory. Gravity is a theory, but it's also a fact.

I didn't say it was far from a fact, I said it was far from being regarded as one, as it hasn't been proven. I can't go around and tell this to people as if it were true, as I currently have no way to prove it 100%.
The Theory of Evolution that explains how organisms genetically develop through generations is a fact, but it started as just a theory, and then was found to have been truthful all along, but it wasn't always regarded as a fact.
Our current Theory of Evolution isn't necessarily factual though, as many cladograms could be incorrect.
I am aware that a truth exists regardless of speculation.

:3