x
Click to expand

mcginley

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:5/31/2011
Last Login:2/23/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2859
Comment Ranking:#8470
Highest Content Rank:#680
Highest Comment Rank:#5304
Content Thumbs: 6743 total,  7350 ,  607
Comment Thumbs: 932 total,  1165 ,  233
Content Level Progress: 95% (95/100)
Level 160 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 161 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 185 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 186 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Subscribers:8
Content Views:439167
Times Content Favorited:391 times
Total Comments Made:294
FJ Points:6955
Favorite Tags: booty (37) | dat (37) | all (35) | game (5) | Got (4) | of (4) | thrones (3) | Dog (2) | Hockey (2) | mfw (2) | nope (2) | reaction (2) | the (2) | troll (2)

Funny Text/Links

Funny Pictures

1 2 > [ 11 Funny Pictures Total ]

Funny Videos

Funny Gifs

1 2 3 4 > [ 22 Funny Gifs Total ]

latest user's comments

#16 - I guess orange really is the new black. 02/18/2015 on Rosa Parks +2
#168 - It's just the amount I heard. To be honest, I'm not really sur…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/09/2015 on Muhammad Sex Simulator 2015 +1
User avatar #173 - mrturferpop (02/09/2015) [-]
(Not the ball game, the ball game looks more enjoyable)
User avatar #169 - mrturferpop (02/09/2015) [-]
Oh please, I've literally seen student projects done better than this.
#157 - I never said it wasn't important to them. It's still not more …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/09/2015 on Muhammad Sex Simulator 2015 0
User avatar #171 - scorcho (02/09/2015) [-]
It's not a life though. A funeral is a ritual honouring the deceased, nothing more. I didn't say kill a man. Learn english maybe, too.
#156 - "You can't judge people by their beliefs."  [+] (1 new reply) 02/09/2015 on Muhammad Sex Simulator 2015 +7
User avatar #271 - quadroller (02/09/2015) [-]
What makes you think you can?
#153 - Equating some old garbage book to someone's life? Haha, oh wow.  [+] (3 new replies) 02/09/2015 on Muhammad Sex Simulator 2015 +3
User avatar #154 - scorcho (02/09/2015) [-]
to them it is important. Who are you to judge? What have you done with your life that you can so easily dismiss the believes of so many people?
User avatar #157 - mcginley (02/09/2015) [-]
I never said it wasn't important to them. It's still not more important than someone's life, though. If you seriously don't understand that some archaic book isn't more important than the lives of people, you simply like empathy and are even less than those savages you defend.
User avatar #171 - scorcho (02/09/2015) [-]
It's not a life though. A funeral is a ritual honouring the deceased, nothing more. I didn't say kill a man. Learn english maybe, too.
#146 - I can't believe that trash took $400k to make. I've seen bette…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/09/2015 on Muhammad Sex Simulator 2015 +4
User avatar #151 - mrturferpop (02/09/2015) [-]
Can you find me a source on where it states how much she spent to make that?
The last guy I talked to (who fucking defended it with "you try to do better") said it was 200k
User avatar #168 - mcginley (02/09/2015) [-]
It's just the amount I heard. To be honest, I'm not really sure it's accurate. There's no way in hell someone spent $400k on something that looks like an n64 game. Wu's game looks like some student project.

Ballance Clone V0.5 - Blender Game Engine
User avatar #173 - mrturferpop (02/09/2015) [-]
(Not the ball game, the ball game looks more enjoyable)
User avatar #169 - mrturferpop (02/09/2015) [-]
Oh please, I've literally seen student projects done better than this.
#105 - "They started being connected to the movement when they … 02/09/2015 on Smash The Patriarchy 0
#72 - Why? Because a lot of people who are anti-GG are huge lolcows …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/08/2015 on Smash The Patriarchy +2
#73 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
"a few people who aren't connected to the movement"

They started being connected to the movement when they started trying to SWAT people who opposed it. I'd say that's a pretty strong connection.

I'm not saying everyone involved in GG is that dumb, but you have to be pretty dumb to align yourself with a movement with, as I mentioned before, no leaders, no code of conduct, no rules, and no entry requirements.

How can you possibly deny that some of these assholes are supporters of GamerGate when literally the only required proof that they support GamerGate is 'They said they supported of GamerGate'? You must be lying to yourself if you honestly think that there's no hint of GG-related motivation in exclusively targetting anti-GG people with this shit.
User avatar #105 - mcginley (02/09/2015) [-]
"They started being connected to the movement when they started trying to SWAT people who opposed it. I'd say that's a pretty strong connection."

Common interest != affiliation.

"How can you possibly deny that some of these assholes are supporters of GamerGate"

Proof that they're connected to GG outside of correlation? Your logic that "trolls attacking anti-GGers = they must be GGers themselves" is extremely flawed. Do you know why they aren't attacking GGers? Because GGers aren't casting a spotlight on themselves to publicly play the role of professional victims. The likes of John Flynt (Brianna Wu) and Anita Sarkeesian are, thus they get attacked by /baphomet/. I mean, you're basically saying that because the two groups don't like the same group, then the two groups (/gg/ and /baph/) are the same. They aren't. One exists to combat what they perceive as injustice and dishonesty in gaming media, and the other exists to troll. You're trying to boil things down to black and white terms and a false dichotomy when there's a ton of grey in the middle and multiple different views. /baphomet/ not liking anti-GG leaders (aka people who make themselves easy targets) doesn't automatically make them pro-GG.

I apologize for any and all previous insults or harsh words, but I really think you should reconsider your position when it's based solely on fallacious arguments.
#68 - /baphomet/ has nothing to do with GG, genius. They're just a b…  [+] (17 new replies) 02/08/2015 on Smash The Patriarchy +2
#70 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
"/baphomet/ has nothing to do with GG" Then how come they're trying to get people who are anti-GG swatted?

I get that there's an element of 'for the lulz' and all that but why would they specifically target people who were anti-GamerGate unless they were pro-GamerGate? Hell, targetting anti-GG people at all is proof enough, can you really blame anyone for not coming to the conclusion that those who are against anti-GG are pro-GG?

You can't just magically pretend that every single asshole who does something that's pro-GG and asshole-ish doesn't represent GamerGate. It's a movement with no rules, no leader, no widely stated goals and no entry requirement after all.
#82 - drackmore (02/08/2015) [-]
> Hell, targetting anti-GG people at all is proof enough
Funny, Brianna Wu did the same thing. She went on 4chan posting as an Anon posting her information trying to get 4chan to dox and harass her

> It's a movement with no rules, no leader, no widely stated goals
And if for even a moment you were making any point you threw it all out the window.
Yeah we have no leader but we do have figure heads that come to mind when you say GG, same with Anti-GG. We do have rules, they're mainly things called common sense I know thats quite a concept to grasp but once you get the hang of it it's not that hard to do, maybe in the future you'll be able to grasp such an amazing concept. , We do have goals, they've been the same since the very beginning and that was rooting out bullshit in gaming journalism, and no requirement is a lot better than being an insane jackass with your head up your ass Sorry I mean typical tumblr feminist.

If you want to be stupid, fine. But don't try and spout stupid shit and be a coward hide.

TLR You stupid fuck how can you be this dense.
#86 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
I say GamerGate has no rules and no leader, you say all my points went straight out of the window... even though GamerGate has no rules and no leader. You have 'figureheads' yeah, but so what? I never said you didn't. And half of those figureheads are just massive dickheads anyway (Mike Cernovich, anyone?) so you're not doing a great job of painting GG in a positive light.

"We do have goals," Calling bullshit. You personally might have goals but they vary from person to person. Aside from incredibly vague stuff like 'Exposing corruption' or 'Ending censorship' then some people's goal of GamerGate is to put Gawker out of business, some people want anti-GG figures to kill themselves, there are no widely-agreed upon goals, so no, you are full of shit.

"We do have goals!" Wrong. "They've been the same since the very beginning!" Wrong, since GG all started with the Zoe Quinn incident. "We do have rules!" Really? All of you? How can you speak on the behalf of an entire movement filled with people who each have a different idea of what the movement is, shit-for-brains?

Don't be such a whiny accusatory cunt when all of your points are bullshit.
#89 - drackmore (02/08/2015) [-]
You've not really posted anything to comment against, I mean you're wrong and a coward hiding behind anon even though its quite odd how everyone that talks contradictory to you gets thumbed down shortly before you post, Keavy.

Its obvious you're not going to listen to reason, so I'm just going to leave this here and let you think what you want. Also I found the feminist.
#92 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
I disprove all your points so you just roll out the 'well you're not going to listen to reason!' card?

What you mean is that unlike you I'm not going to accept baseless sources as proof, I'm not going to ignore everything negative that GG does, and I'm not going to magically pretend that a leaderless internet group of anons with no entry requirements is going to have rules or any kind of organization (and if you think otherwise... what's wrong with you???)

Christ, does it upset you that much that I'm showing that everything you say is BS?
#91 - Keavy (02/08/2015) [-]
??

I keep an eye on GG content and without wanting to start an argument I've noticed a trend of GG supporters who accept stories (such as this very content) that have no discernible source whatsoever. I tend to thumb them down they are very stupid.

Also I don't want to directly support the anon ('whiny accusatory cunt' is a bit harsh for me) but you said you have goals and he's got a point when he says that GG does NOT have any widely-agreed upon goals.

Looks like you're just backing out of a losing argument here tbh.

Anyway, don't disturb me again, Super Monkey Ball Deluxe speedrun from AGDQ 2015 was just uploaded.

I don't mean for that to sound rude
#85 - drackmore (02/08/2015) [-]
> Hell, targetting anti-GG people at all is proof enough
>Funny, Brianna Wu did the same thing. She went on 4chan posting as an Anon posting >her information trying to get 4chan to dox and harass her
Funny thing to add, Phil Fish another Anti-GG also was "hacked"
Care to guess by who? Protip: himself.

If it isn't clear by now, Anti-GG is basically ran by a bunch of loons who are not above lying to get their way.

And lets not forget all the bullshit they started by attacking charitiable groups that supported women making videogames because they accepted money from 4chan and GG supporters.

Or the fact that Anti-GG supporters mailed death threats, syringes, and other hateful things to Pro-GG supporters.

Long story short, both sides have assholes. But it seems to me that Anti-GG has pulled far more dirty shit than the group they're against, a group that wants to call out bullshit in gaming journalism
#95 - Keavy (02/08/2015) [-]
Wait, hold on, you've lost me.

Brianna Wu and Phil Fish do dodgy stuff and therefore you feel perfectly justified in saying that Anti-GG is basically run by a bunch of loons.

But there were hundreds of death/rape threats to Zoe Quinn, Felicia Day got doxxed, anti-GG people have been swatted, and you chalk that up to a few bad eggs who in no way represent the movement?

The hell kind of logic is that, man?
User avatar #98 - holycrapimacupcake (02/08/2015) [-]
People on the pro-gg side have had the exact same things happen to them. Lizf620 was doxxed to the point where she feared for her childrens lives. Hell someone sent her a picture of herself covered in jizz. Shit happens on both sides, beg to distance yourself from both because both sides are filled with morons.
#88 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
"all the bullshit they started by attacking charitable groups"

Either provide sources or stop spouting your recycled unproven and almost-certainly false bullshit.
#90 - drackmore (02/08/2015) [-]
www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-fine-young-capitalists--2
This was the charity. 4chan raised a fuckton of money, got Vivian James made and Anti-GG supporters attacked it and had it removed.
#93 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
Nobody every attacked The Fine Young Capitalists.

The closest that happened was their page went down after someone tweeted a link to them and they got flooded with visitors.

Learn to fact-check, dumbass.
#87 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
#94 - Keavy (02/08/2015) [-]
You should tone down the douche-iness if you want people to listen to you, but damn I like that picture.
User avatar #72 - mcginley (02/08/2015) [-]
Why? Because a lot of people who are anti-GG are huge lolcows who are extremely easy targets for baphomet. The simple fact of the matter is that they don't even give a fuck about GG, they just want to troll people. And, when SJWs on the anti-GG side present themselves as massively easy targets, of course they're going to go after them.

"You can't just magically pretend that every single asshole who does something that's pro-GG and asshole-ish doesn't represent GamerGate. It's a movement with no rules, no leader, no widely stated goals and no entry requirement after all."

Yes, which totally justifies blaming everyone over the actions of a few people who aren't even connected to the movement. Are you seriously this dense?
#73 - anonexplains (02/08/2015) [-]
"a few people who aren't connected to the movement"

They started being connected to the movement when they started trying to SWAT people who opposed it. I'd say that's a pretty strong connection.

I'm not saying everyone involved in GG is that dumb, but you have to be pretty dumb to align yourself with a movement with, as I mentioned before, no leaders, no code of conduct, no rules, and no entry requirements.

How can you possibly deny that some of these assholes are supporters of GamerGate when literally the only required proof that they support GamerGate is 'They said they supported of GamerGate'? You must be lying to yourself if you honestly think that there's no hint of GG-related motivation in exclusively targetting anti-GG people with this shit.
User avatar #105 - mcginley (02/09/2015) [-]
"They started being connected to the movement when they started trying to SWAT people who opposed it. I'd say that's a pretty strong connection."

Common interest != affiliation.

"How can you possibly deny that some of these assholes are supporters of GamerGate"

Proof that they're connected to GG outside of correlation? Your logic that "trolls attacking anti-GGers = they must be GGers themselves" is extremely flawed. Do you know why they aren't attacking GGers? Because GGers aren't casting a spotlight on themselves to publicly play the role of professional victims. The likes of John Flynt (Brianna Wu) and Anita Sarkeesian are, thus they get attacked by /baphomet/. I mean, you're basically saying that because the two groups don't like the same group, then the two groups (/gg/ and /baph/) are the same. They aren't. One exists to combat what they perceive as injustice and dishonesty in gaming media, and the other exists to troll. You're trying to boil things down to black and white terms and a false dichotomy when there's a ton of grey in the middle and multiple different views. /baphomet/ not liking anti-GG leaders (aka people who make themselves easy targets) doesn't automatically make them pro-GG.

I apologize for any and all previous insults or harsh words, but I really think you should reconsider your position when it's based solely on fallacious arguments.
#19 - As a Stars fan, this post pleases me. 02/05/2015 on Best fans ever 0
[ 272 Total ]

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)