x
Click to expand

mattymc

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/05/2011
Last Login:5/06/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1379
Highest Content Rank:#2201
Highest Comment Rank:#599
Content Thumbs: 5295 total,  6043 ,  748
Comment Thumbs: 16426 total,  18001 ,  1575
Content Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 150 Content: Faptastic → Level 151 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 94.2% (942/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:0
Content Views:171585
Times Content Favorited:121 times
Total Comments Made:3046
FJ Points:19465

latest user's comments

#53 - but, its a baby's dick, why does it need to be seen by anyone …  [+] (9 new replies) 03/20/2015 on Middle east photoshops our... +1
User avatar #54 - funnytime (03/20/2015) [-]
it only becomes controversial and morally questionable if people really value things as right and wrong. why is a naked baby more problematic than a naked animal? both can show genitals, but both dont inherit sexual thoughts (thats the problem here) on their own. nirvanas cover is not displayed in any sexual way. people only start feeling guilty after many reports about cp and stuff and dont want to be connected to such thoughts. they try to avoid it completely, even if its nothing sexual, because otherwise they would feel guilty.

ill be honest, if i would have never heard of pedos or cp as a whole, it would never come to my mind why such a cover like nirvanas could be controversial. its all just in our heads because the moral-guilt-train is running in our heads and there is nothing that is bad objectively. a babys dick is like an elephants dick or a ducks beak as long we dont think about it in a sexual way. dont get me wrong, cp should be illegal no matter what, but there is a line where normal people get accused being abnormal like taking baby photos.

remember to reflect why you think what you think from time to time. usually most thoghts and values we inherit are not ourselves and not always "right" or "wrong". always an interesting matter.
#97 - englman (03/20/2015) [-]
While I agree with you on some of the stuff you say, I just don't want to see baby-cock, and I don't think that makes me "small minded" in the slightest. Are you small minded because you simply don't want to see someone's great grandmother getting out of the shower? Of course not, some people just aren't comfortable seeing certain things.
User avatar #98 - funnytime (03/20/2015) [-]
what you mean is maybe something different. we might compare it to these pony reaction pics we once had here massively or these old memes. many people started to think it ruins their day seeing such a pony or meme. once the majority is for or against something, many more individuals will think the same way too. the interesting thing is, that there is no individual reason for rejection. it just gets rejected because the majority rejects it and humans try to assimilate.

of course there are things like gore or seeing people in pain/despair, humans usually reject naturally, because we reflect it on ourselves instantly and feel the pain too.

now ask yourself this: why is seeing human genitals problematic for you?
there are many sweatbaths without closing or nudism campsites or beaches where noone bats an eye if others are naked or not. it is all in our heads, that seeing genitals is something we should avoid or feel bad about. its up to us what we do with that knowledge.
User avatar #99 - englman (03/20/2015) [-]
No, no, I completely understand what you're saying and where you're coming from. I guess what I'm saying is "Am I not allowed to NOT want to see certain things despite this train of thinking?" I would say I understand what you're saying, as I've thought this way before too. However, application of a train of thought isn't always as easy as simple recognition/contemplation of it, ya know?
User avatar #100 - funnytime (03/20/2015) [-]
my intention of the first post was to make people question why they try to reject things. for a little kid natural things like nudism arent a problem. when we grow up we adopt mindsets like these rejections. it may become problematic when it comes to forced censorship.

in a further thought we can assume that rejecting minorities is based on the same phenomenon. it is not that everyone hating a minority has had a problem with objectivly, it is more like an adoption of thoughts and values of the surrounding people.

i dont want to say someone is not allowed to not think in a way, but i would like to see people realise that it is usually not their own mindset and that this collective thinking can end up in unnecessary censorship or even hate without personal reasons.

User avatar #101 - englman (03/20/2015) [-]
I understand, I personally think people get a little too weird about certain things too, and also believe people should question why they think what they do. However, while I was in my class earlier today, I thought of something interesting. I'm a Biology Major, so I couldn't help but eventually approach this conversation from an Evolutionary stand-point. What if, the reason people generally tend to be uncomfortable when seeing naked children, is because we're supposed to? Just as we're "supposed to" become aroused when seeing an attractive member of the sex that we're interested in?

I thought of it like this; What if we get uncomfortable when seeing a naked child, because we developed that certain level of distaste for them Evolutionarily? Otherwise, perhaps we would attempt to mate with them (causing OBVIOUS problems to arise). So we simply developed an uncomfortable feeling towards seeing them in that way, at least until their sexual characteristics and ability to successfully yield offspring developed? (which the lack of sexual characteristics may also be attributing to our basic feeling of distaste towards them.)

I feel like this is plausible and reasonable logic to add to the topic and to potentially defend my stance on not wanting to see baby-cocks lol.
User avatar #102 - funnytime (03/20/2015) [-]
i dont think we can think about a rejection of a babys body as evolutionary. clothes are very new from an evolutionary point of view and rejecting a babys body would become a serious problem when it comes to give the baby breast milk or warming it when its cold. kids had to stay near their parents because this was the best way to protect them. if there was disgust when seeing a baby (all were naked), it wouldnt have worked for sure. if all man and woman tryed to look away from their naked babys, most would have ended dead. it is important to look after babys all the time. even if only all woman were the ones carrying the babys, if men were disgusted by a naked baby, how would they get close to woman once they had a child, carrying it all the time?

even if disgust might be a factor protecting babys from sexual thoughts, why should this disgust only be applied for babys? what else is there that forces us to look away naturally, since else we would start having sexual thoughts about it? i cant come up with even one thing. animals, a hole in a tree, a wooden stick, whatever it is that could thought about sexually, none of this inherits disgust or forces us to look away. it is just something that is there and nothing more connected to it.

therefore i am still convinced that trying to avoid seeing a naked baby wouldnt have worked out in an evolutionary sense and that its a farily new thing formed within our society.
User avatar #103 - englman (03/20/2015) [-]
Hmm.. Perhaps. Certainly something interesting to think about, at the very least.

Thank you for the conversation
User avatar #104 - funnytime (03/20/2015) [-]
having something to think about, to get a new view for the world and oneself, can cause a better understanding for things happening in this world (and even us).

i want to thank you too for this constructive exchange of thoughts. it is rare to have such a conversation on this board.
#61 - Damn Right 03/20/2015 on thanks obama +18
#21 - She make a man wanna speak spanish, como se llama? bonita 03/20/2015 on Tom and.. who? 0
#41 - and so is any lesbian looking at this as a stright guy..… 03/20/2015 on it only took them 700 episodes +18
#24 - I hate that Im complimenting a loathesome asshole, but I almos… 03/19/2015 on Bieber gets owned 0
#65 - The tits are good but that is one hell of a pretty face and th… 03/19/2015 on Tittle +7
#120 - I've noticed an odd trend lately. Im aware that human sexualit…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/19/2015 on Gay +1
User avatar #161 - SonofChuck (03/19/2015) [-]
Here's my two cents, now honestly, it's never really occurred to me whether or not gay people have straight thoughts, sincerely has never crossed my mind. I think it may be because as a straight man I am the scum of the earth and must be destroyed I tend to think of things from a straight perspective, for example I've found myself wondering if there are men out there that I'd go gay for *cough*Ryan Reynolds*cough* . But now that you've brought it up I don't see any reason why gay people wouldn't have the occasional straight thoughts.
User avatar #141 - holywars (03/19/2015) [-]
I have also noticed tits double standard. I blame sjw
#142 - holywars (03/19/2015) [-]
*this. Goddamn you Freud!!!
Gif purely for viewing pleasure. Straight up plot
#16 - A crossover, though unlikely would be the dankest episode of a…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/19/2015 on St Patrick's Day: Shit's... +2
#17 - dankest (03/19/2015) [-]
Hell yeah it would.
#82 - dont you mean "unzip"? still a good joke 03/19/2015 on Connan 0
#28 - Some might say that when you censor someone, you fear what the… 03/18/2015 on Begin construction of the... +5
#26 - I got one, What is brown and is often wiped off of people'…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/18/2015 on Connan +22
User avatar #44 - isthisfunnyornah (03/18/2015) [-]
How do your tell a male chromosome from a female chromosome?


You pull down it's genes.
#82 - mattymc (03/19/2015) [-]
dont you mean "unzip"? still a good joke
User avatar #45 - isthisfunnyornah (03/18/2015) [-]
That's how I got my restraining order from an it
#61 - They added more flavor to the cheese and sauce and now they br… 03/18/2015 on u mad bro 0
#32 - the fact that there is even a 5th wave of the movement speaks …  [+] (1 new reply) 03/18/2015 on Preach it, Sister! -1
#36 - Ken M (03/18/2015) [-]
2 Actually. The first was an attempt to gain rights for Native Americans...which was a train wreck.
#10 - If you aint no punk, get a pre-nup 03/18/2015 on (untitled) 0
#13 - thank you for making me crave a double down, they dont even ma…  [+] (10 new replies) 03/18/2015 on u mad bro +3
User avatar #14 - watshisface (03/18/2015) [-]
I work for KFC... Sadly no. You can get their new popcorn chicken tho, shits absolutely dank
#16 - friendofaf (03/18/2015) [-]
New popcorn chicken? What's different about it?
#18 - watshisface (03/18/2015) [-]
Before they were breaded wimpily, its ike the difference between old dominos and new dominos. I used to work at chick fil a too and these are even danker than the Fil-As
#19 - friendofaf (03/18/2015) [-]
I haven't heard of dominos changing anything

I want some popcorn chicken now though
although I already ate a massive breakfast from Hungry jacks
burger king if you're not in Australia
It was 8 dollars because I took advantage of the HJS free shit app on mine and my mates phone plus they have promotions for things
Why the fuck are you still reading?[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
#61 - mattymc (03/18/2015) [-]
They added more flavor to the cheese and sauce and now they brush the crust with garlic butter, aint nothing better at 2am
#21 - watshisface (03/18/2015) [-]
Dominos had a little campaign about 6 years ago where they severely revamped their product and then publicly smeared how shitty their old pizzas were and how much better their new ones are. And I already loved their old pizzas so this was a confusing time.

Well try em out later, itll be a life changing experience

Hungry jacks is something completely different here Lol

idk I think guys talking this long over text without it being an argument is kinda fruity


#22 - friendofaf (03/18/2015) [-]
I hope the chicken effects kfc in my region. By fruity do you mean gay? I don't really have a firm definition on the word
#23 - watshisface (03/18/2015) [-]
It should, the change happens only a month ago here in the states however... And yes fruity, sweet, gay, fag are all synonymous
#35 - friendofaf (03/18/2015) [-]
Well not sweet doesn't seem like a synonym. I'm pretty sure that just means nice and pleasant to be around. Also those synonym rolls looks absolutely amaze
User avatar #62 - watshisface (03/18/2015) [-]
Haha believe it or not, if a guy under 45 calls you a sweet, he's calling you gay over here
#29 - i would pay full price for a faithful adaptation of the Apocal… 03/18/2015 on What Would Jesus Do? 0
#75 - how many were there?  [+] (1 new reply) 03/18/2015 on Sizeism 0
#76 - gangbangtime (03/18/2015) [-]
2. You can check who voted on your comments.
#62 - Now I really wanna watch Enemy at The Gates again 03/17/2015 on Blue Butterfly +1
#37 - Private Liberal arts college?  [+] (3 new replies) 03/17/2015 on Sizeism +2
#61 - gangbangtime (03/17/2015) [-]
KEK
Mad libruls thumbing you down.
#75 - mattymc (03/18/2015) [-]
how many were there?
#76 - gangbangtime (03/18/2015) [-]
2. You can check who voted on your comments.
#34 - Bitches don't know about fat shaming fridays 03/17/2015 on Sizeism 0
#12 - Not now chief, Im in the ****** zone 03/17/2015 on Drink +4
#6 - FJ when a new meme comes around 03/17/2015 on (untitled) 0
#10 - ah i miss 2007  [+] (2 new replies) 03/17/2015 on Drink +9
#11 - willys (03/17/2015) [-]
Fuckin' skanks
#12 - mattymc (03/17/2015) [-]
Not now chief, Im in the fuckin zone
#49 - Every single one of my friends in both the armed forces and th…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/17/2015 on Unfortunate truth +1
#52 - jdizzleoffthehizzl (03/17/2015) [-]
It's the people I'm in the military with that wouldn't question an illegal/immoral order that I'm worried about. Those people are one of the main reasons I'm getting out asap
#122 - Not that any person with a middle school or above education co… 03/17/2015 on niggerbitch "Nook"... 0

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 650
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
 Friends (0)