Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

mattsfriendfriend    

Rank #10319 on Content
no avatar Level 0 Comments: Untouched account
Offline
Send mail to mattsfriendfriend Block mattsfriendfriend Invite mattsfriendfriend to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/03/2012
Last Login:7/13/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#10319
Highest Content Rank:#10283
Highest Comment Rank:#22332
Content Thumbs: 19 total,  57 ,  38
Comment Thumbs: 21 total,  23 ,  2
Content Level Progress: 42.37% (25/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 47.27% (26/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:0
Content Views:6126
Total Comments Made:28
FJ Points:43

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

latest user's comments

#56 - Yes thanks. I always thought it was Arnold in that for some reason.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on New Gamecube Controller... 0
#57 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
Probably because when body building is mentioned, Arnold pops up in most of people's minds.

Glad to be of service, cheers!
#54 - That was a legendary response time. Thank you soo much.  [+] (3 new replies) 05/31/2014 on New Gamecube Controller... 0
#55 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
Is it what you were looking for, tho?
#56 - mattsfriendfriend (05/31/2014) [-]
Yes thanks. I always thought it was Arnold in that for some reason.
#57 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
Probably because when body building is mentioned, Arnold pops up in most of people's minds.

Glad to be of service, cheers!
#51 - Please does anyone have the gif of him with Arnold flexing. I …  [+] (5 new replies) 05/31/2014 on New Gamecube Controller... 0
#53 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
This isn't with Arnold, but it's something.

i.imgur.com/HYpFZCP.gif
#54 - mattsfriendfriend (05/31/2014) [-]
That was a legendary response time. Thank you soo much.
#55 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
Is it what you were looking for, tho?
#56 - mattsfriendfriend (05/31/2014) [-]
Yes thanks. I always thought it was Arnold in that for some reason.
#57 - looka (05/31/2014) [-]
Probably because when body building is mentioned, Arnold pops up in most of people's minds.

Glad to be of service, cheers!
#1600 - Comment deleted 03/28/2014 on FJ March 27th Update -1
#41 - You've missed out about half of the repost which adds to the joke. 11/12/2013 on Joke - Admin pls no ban +5
#118 - That goalie is being assaulted by a shadow! 11/05/2013 on He came prepared 0
#125 - Weight is measured in Newtons whereas mass is measured in kilograms.  [+] (1 new reply) 10/22/2013 on Metric 0
User avatar #127 - lorkhan (10/22/2013) [-]
What you are saying may be right, but we do weight ourselves with kilograms and such.
#113 - So then people should start asking for mass rather than weight… 10/22/2013 on Metric 0
#107 - Yea, that is true, but they are not the same thing. Whilst the…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/22/2013 on Metric 0
User avatar #109 - dedaluminus (10/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, but "newton" sounds too much like a fig cookie or an old man. It doesn't have the authoritative weight sorry sorry had to of the word "kilogram."
#113 - mattsfriendfriend (10/22/2013) [-]
So then people should start asking for mass rather than weight. Which was my original point, as saying actual weight is pointless.
#97 - Weight in Kilograms? At least get it right. I get annoyed…  [+] (11 new replies) 10/22/2013 on Metric +2
User avatar #121 - lorkhan (10/22/2013) [-]
I think weight is used with kilograms.
#125 - mattsfriendfriend (10/22/2013) [-]
Weight is measured in Newtons whereas mass is measured in kilograms.
User avatar #127 - lorkhan (10/22/2013) [-]
What you are saying may be right, but we do weight ourselves with kilograms and such.
User avatar #102 - dedaluminus (10/22/2013) [-]
Since mass and weight are both based on the constant gravitational field of Earth, in any application outside of aerospace mass and weight are effectively the same thing.
User avatar #115 - vapaus (10/22/2013) [-]
I am either extremely wrong with my definition of mass, or you are.
My understanding of mass has no connection with gravity whatsoever, therefore no matter the location, it is unchanged as long as the object has preserved its form. The introduction of gravity with mass only then would be equivalent to weight. In order for those two to be exactly the same can only be found in a gravitational pull of 1 m/s^2. Though more properly we instead view Newtons to be more accurate a definition of weight while the kilogram effects only mass. I have been severely confused for quite a bit of time on how kilograms can be used as both weight and mass without a proper disconnect, and hope to hear one eventually as google has failed to prove me wrong.
User avatar #220 - xdeathspawnx (10/22/2013) [-]
Because gravity is constant on all of Earth, the ratio of mass to weight on all of earth is also constant, making mass and weight effectively the same thing on all parts of the earth. The difference between them would only matter if you were at a place with a different amount of gravitational pull than the earth.
User avatar #117 - dedaluminus (10/22/2013) [-]
You are right, mass is not based on gravity. I worded that strangely. But since the kilogram, a measurement of mass, was originally based upon the weight of a thing (an iron-palladium weight, originally) in Earth's gravity, there was no effective disconnect between it as a measurement of mass or one of weight until space travel became possible. It is technically incorrect to weigh things in kilograms, but only in a way that matters to a very few select people. If you say that something weights 1.2 kilos, that's immediately recognizable.
#119 - vapaus (10/22/2013) [-]
Thank you, I feared my brash chunk of words would be received negatively. Pleasant day to you.
#107 - mattsfriendfriend (10/22/2013) [-]
Yea, that is true, but they are not the same thing. Whilst they are directly proportional, they are still different in what they mean. It would still be better, regardless of the majority of people thinking weight is measured in grams, for them to know there is a difference.
User avatar #109 - dedaluminus (10/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, but "newton" sounds too much like a fig cookie or an old man. It doesn't have the authoritative weight sorry sorry had to of the word "kilogram."
#113 - mattsfriendfriend (10/22/2013) [-]
So then people should start asking for mass rather than weight. Which was my original point, as saying actual weight is pointless.
[ 28 Total ]

user's friends

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
 Friends (0)