marcx
Rank #6842 on Comments
Online
Send mail to marcx Block marcx Invite marcx to be your friend | Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Consoles Owned: | PS3,360, Wii, Gba, Ds, 3ds, N64,Gamecube, Ps2,psp,psx, nes, gen |
| Video Games Played: | too many to lsit |
| X-box Gamertag: | Marcx987 |
| PSN: | MarcX2X |
| Date Signed Up: | 9/09/2011 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| Location: | NJ |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #6842 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #3506 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #3445 |
| Content Thumbs: | 463 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 1979 |
| Content Level Progress: | 40% (4/10) Level 42 Content: Sammich eater → Level 43 Content: Sammich eater |
| Comment Level Progress: | 16% (16/100) Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 33340 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 55 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 969 |
| FJ Points: | 2047 |
latest user's comments
| #7 - lol and who the king of the retards | 12/25/2015 on Merry Christmas, FJ! | 0 |
| #71 - cattleya love me big ass and tits will drown in them | 12/25/2015 on Post Ur Anime Milfs | 0 |
| #187 - always need more legally purchased games | 12/25/2015 on Christmas Giveaway | 0 |
| #55 - would u rather have a car with high milage and one previous ow… | 12/24/2015 on High Mileage Slut | +1 |
| #63 - Comment deleted | 12/24/2015 on new years eve radio show | 0 |
| #58 - tis ok we all make mistakes | 12/16/2015 on Explaining A Movie plot Badly | +1 |
| #56 - this one is in content already [+] (2 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Explaining A Movie plot Badly | 0 |
| #70 - this dude prolly wish he signed in | 12/16/2015 on Twins | +3 |
| #299 - ribbitribbit | 12/15/2015 on comment here if you want a... | 0 |
| #532 - **** it | 12/13/2015 on Mods give funny ban message | 0 |
| #65 - im black hook a bro up | 11/29/2015 on knight tux | 0 |
| #62 - does no on realize this isnt dorkly its college humour instead… | 11/26/2015 on Dorkly's Getting Weird | 0 |
| #83 - my graphics card while rendering all this [+] (3 new replies) | 11/19/2015 on Liquid Dissolution | +3 |
| im using a school laptop from 2010 and im using google chrome with 11 tabs open, one of them being netflix. so dont give me that excuse | ||
| #92 - depends on what ur trying to do. if want to just loose weight.… | 11/18/2015 on Losing Weight Again | +1 |
| #64 - straightsavage.jpg | 11/18/2015 on Anon is old | 0 |
| #28 - it would but over all firefox is better ram wise than chrome b… | 11/17/2015 on mp4 movies fixed | 0 |
| #195 - Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply) | 11/17/2015 on NOTHING WRONG | 0 |
| #200 -
fuckoatmeal Comment deleted by marcx | ||
| #17 - exactly wiki had the proper facts. so when he changed it no lo… | 11/16/2015 on woo | 0 |
| #14 - you've never tried to argue with a woman before impossible to … [+] (2 new replies) | 11/16/2015 on woo | 0 |
| #16 -
anon (11/16/2015) [-] >facts and logic don't work >OP changes wiki facts to take away her facts. wat. | ||
| #119 - also mp4s | 11/15/2015 on 2spoon? | 0 |
| #118 - >> to 89, >> to 91, yea having same issue. firefo… | 11/15/2015 on 2spoon? | 0 |
| #9 - admin's wife left him. too much tiem on fj so hes board and re… | 11/14/2015 on Snail moving mechanism sped... | 0 |
| #9 - >> #8 , u win this round . anythign is better than cross… | 11/14/2015 on Wait for it | +2 |
| #102 - yea but without religion as a scapegoat everything they would … [+] (21 new replies) | 11/14/2015 on Pray for Paris | 0 |
| kingderps bulwark Alright, I get it, you guys think religion is a terrible crime perpetrated by humanity on it's self. If it weren't some fanatical religious person it would be a fanatical citizen of the neighboring country. People are violent. They use religion as a scapegoat for their violence and you people let them do it. Can we please just come out and say what it is? Some people are assholes and they'll use whatever reason they can to justify their assholeness. I guess when entire countries go to war with other countries there are no assholes involved in the process, and everything they're doing to justify their asshole tendencies are totally illegal. And the groups of assholes are really small and spread out with no central command structure. But since they use religion as their cover/scapegoat/justified excuse, a lot of people let them get away with it. And isn't it kinda odd how so many of them are muslim? I mean, stereotypes grow from experience. We've seen muslims commit one terror attack after another, why wouldn't we think they could do it again, and expect them to? Sure, people are assholes, but it just confuses me why the batch isn't more mixed up. Why isn't some random guy from around the street blowing shit up? Why is it, that the worst people christianity has to offer these days, is KKK and Westboro? I mean sure, they assholes and I don't like them, but they stick to hate speech and don't blow shit up, because someone doesn't agree with them. You can insult Westboro, and they might picket your fucking funeral. Insult islam, and you might get shanked in the street or have your country blown up. Right now it's the Muslims. Years ago it was the Russians. Then it was the Chinese briefly. In 50 years it'll be some other group of asshats. Just my personal experience. That's how the world spins man. Groups of people take turns being assholes. Look at your history. Most of the time it's one major group who's causing all the distress in the world. I'm not talking about yesterday. I'm talking about years ago. Russia has absolutely killed civilians before. Remember, from before they changed their name? Based on what? Countries have banned religion before and spawned no end of fanatics. Atheists have run into churches before and killed everyone they could lay eyes on. Fanatics will always exist. We were talking about weather or not people would still be assholes in a world without religion. Yes, in this case people used their religion as a scapegoat to kill other people. At least, that's been my point this entire time. I disagree. People are violent in my experience regardless of their ideology. Every day you sit across the table from a psychopath. That person has something that will set them off. Maybe it's their religious beliefs, maybe it's their political leanings, maybe they're racist. Everyone has something that they'll kill for and then sleep like a baby later that night. Alright, and you don't get that I disagree with you. Without religion people would be just as violent. That's my opinion on the matter. Since there is no definitive evidence to back up either of our claims this comes down to an argument between two opinions. In a world without religion there would be exactly as much violence as there is in a world with religion. That's my point. Are we talking about two different things? Real quick, because I feel like we're talking about two different things here. #223 -
kingderps (11/15/2015) [-] We are, you are talking about one thing and I asked this "Do you think if that attack had not gone through on Paris that another group of people would have attacked?" You haven't answered the question. Also claiming that there would be exactly as much violence is a positive claim and the burden of proof is on you. I disagree with that assumption because it sounds retarded, but I'll gladly change my mind you you show evidence. I really doubt that some other group would have attacked Paris if the extremists hadn't done it. I didn't realize you were actually serious about asking the question though, since its such a specific thing. I doubt that some other group was busy planning to attack and making the same plan, rubbing their hands together and cackling maniacally only to be beaten to the punch. That's just too montey python for me. Hey, you're the one who claimed that the world would be less violent without religion. I said I happen to disagree with you. Neither of us have the ability to actually prove our positions because neither of us have been to an alternate reality where religion doesn't exist. I don't think you can prove one way or another this point. I just happen to disagree with you. #233 -
kingderps (11/16/2015) [-] I was serious about the question. The reason why is because if you think that: "In a world without religion there would be exactly as much violence as there is in a world with religion" Now if another group had not attacked Paris, year to date there would have been less violence in the world. So the logic of your claim is false. I agree that without religion people will probably still form dogmatic groups and find reasons to kill each other, but, there is no evidence to say that this would happen to the degree that it would compensate for all religious violence if religion was removed from the equation. A point you'll agree with; Stalinism was a Secular Ideology that killed many people. Now do you think that Secular ideologies like that are being held back by religious fanatics and if religion was to disappear, those secular ideologies would emerge and fill in the gaps? If so, where would they come from? Why would they do it? The hard truth is that Religion is a powerful tool and it have consequences when misused. A better argument for you to make would be that religion does more good than harm, I would still disagree, but I could at least respect that position. So what, violence has to be spread out in exactly the same pattern all the time? That just doesn't work. That's like trying to follow a photon. You can't do it because observing it changes it. Even the slightest change to the world would cause different things to happen. A lack of religion isn't a small change. It's a big one. If religion stopped existing tomorrow, I'll bet you would get about 24 hours of peace. There is no evidence to say that violence would not continue on the scale that it is currently enjoying. Logic can't come in to play because neither of us have an example from witch to base our claims. We're literally just going to go back and forth with this until one of us gets tired. You're suggesting that for my claim to be of merit the world would have to be exactly the same in every way except that religion wouldn't exist. I think that's too far even for you. Come now. Sure, Paris may not be attacked. We may not loose 120 lives at the same time, on the same day in the same place, but there would still be an equal measure of assholes in the world. Just because they use religion as their cloak doesn't mean they would be normal adjusted people without religion. They would still be the same people, assholes with a different cause. I do genuinely believe that religion does more good than harm. Of all the hundreds of religions around the world, how many are openly killing people? How many religious leaders are demanding that their congregation go out and kill people, then hand out guns after the sermon is over? #235 -
kingderps (11/16/2015) [-] This comes down to blunt logic. You said that " there would be exactly as much violence" There was an attack that was 100% rooted on a religion. Not having religion would mean that attacks like that wouldn't happen. You can't have a dialogue with that kind of terrorist, you convert or die, "death to the infidel" they say, that's the reality of it. An asshole you can at least bargain with. You can't bargain with assholes. They are either an asshole or they are not. There's not much room for middle ground. You either want to kill people for their beliefs or you don't. Political beliefs or religious beliefs. Look at all the wars (or, peace keeping) taking place around the world. How many of these conflicts are rooted in religion? | ||
| #4 - shh not everyone knows im hiding in the shadows | 11/14/2015 on marcx's profile | 0 |
