Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to lunacy Block lunacy Invite lunacy to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||6/08/2011|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Content Thumbs:||352 total, 530 , 178|
|Comment Thumbs:||2251 total, 3391 , 1140|
|Content Level Progress:|| 20% (2/10) |
Level 35 Content: Peasant → Level 36 Content: Peasant
|Comment Level Progress:|| 50% (50/100) |
Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower
|Times Content Favorited:||5 times|
|Total Comments Made:||957|
I do comments and stuff.
latest user's comments
|#150 - Its okay buddy, funnyjunk is here for you. Bring it in everybody.||02/14/2013 on My feels story||+2|
|#17 - **** that. My children will have proper childhoods. I will not… [+] (20 new replies)||02/14/2013 on Babies and gentlemen||+129|
#222 - anon (02/14/2013) [-]
this has been said by probably all parents in the world
words are one thing, but doing it properly outside of the internet is the other thing
#214 - anon (02/14/2013) [-]
Keep dreaming bro, I thought almost the same, never happen. I ended up playing LOL with my son(7 y old) every evening and he's already through his 2nd tablet.
Sorry to ruin your dream, but these are the days we're living in.
#213 - boydaranga (02/14/2013) [-]
Wot about single player non online computer games. like games like the old harry potter games, dungeon siege, pokemon, mario, charlie the duck, worms (I grew up with all of these, except pokemon and mario, i just think it's cruel not to let them play those at least, i was never interested myself but it seems alot of people grew up with it.)
#72 - lunacy (02/14/2013) [-]
I disagree. I think it'd be close minded to just go with the flow and do what every parent is gonna do and just give their kids unnecessary electronics. And like I've been saying all over this thread. Its only while they are children (which pretty much means 12 and under) and it's not like I'm gonna keep them from all things technological. I just plan on minimizing their interaction with technology for the early years of their life so they have a chance to be children and use their imagination. And the reason why I say "the way I grew up" is because my best memories are from playing outside with my siblings and friends, not watching TV or playing video games in the living room, which I did too.
#46 - lunacy (02/14/2013) [-]
Not really, I mean its only for a few years. They'd start playing games at what? 6? 8?I'm just trying to hold off until they are around 12.
I wouldn't have a problem with them playing games at a young age, if it wasn't something that they'd get hooked on and spend all their time doing.The problem with how advanced video games are now-a-days, they aren't something you pick up casually, once you start playing, it's kind of something you do almost every day. I just don't want to deal with fighting my kids to get them to go play outside because they wanna sit on their butts and game. Once they get to be teenagers, they can sit on their butts and game all they like, what else do they have to do?
|#12 - This is so true is hurts.||02/14/2013 on Pre-rendered trailers vs...||+10|
|#43 - "Everything gay " should be "everything obnoxi…||02/13/2013 on Powerpuff Sluts||+3|
|#36 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||02/13/2013 on How to be a spy||+12|
|#113 - I'm gonna go ahead and break the cycle and say that I use the …||02/13/2013 on Nice Try magical fairy...||+1|
|#370 - 2720 calories per person: Except America is over here eating w…||02/13/2013 on More surprising facts!||0|
|#1720 - **lunacy rolled a random image posted in comment #20 at If…||02/13/2013 on How Your Pet Sees You||0|
|#11 - This looks like a map for blackops. O_o||02/13/2013 on perfect timing.||+1|
|#34 - Which fallout is best fallout and why? [+] (13 new replies)||02/12/2013 on Evolution According to Fallout||+2|
#76 - thamuz (02/13/2013) [-]
Once I started looking at the story,Fallout 3s was a turd. So many plotholes..New Vegas was uch better in terms of the story,most of the way. There needed to be a lot more expansion on some characters(Like Ulysses and Joshua Graham and some of the companions) There was so much room. But the Devs I feel rushed new Vegas to beat the baby of Skyrim.
BOth are amazingly good games(even more so on PC with mods) but they have their highs and lows. Enviroment? Fallout 3 wins by a huge margin. Gameplay? new Vegas. DLCs? A bit of both. I loved the Sierra Madre and Old World Blues.
I honestly hope that they learned and make Fallout 4 the best of both. Strong gameplay and a strong storyline. Something easily done if Obisidan sticks to storyline and Bethseda sticks to the codework.
#72 - fizzor (02/12/2013) [-]
I've only played 3 and New Vegas. Story-wise, I'd pick 3. I liked it because it was simple, and yet it managed to keep you going as you ventured forth on your quest on finding your father, and ultimately, deciding the fate of Capital Wasteland. However, New Vegas had better weapons in large quantities, more perks and traits to choose from, more levels the more DLC's you have, with the possibility of having a max level cap of 50, while in F3 the max level cap was only 30, and the ability to choose from either siding with House, the NCR, Caesar's Legion, or with none of the aforementioned, and just dominating everything by yourself gave you more choices and more possible endings. It's hard to pick between the two, to be honest.