lordrainbowtron
Rank #17883 on Comments
Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry Offline
Send mail to lordrainbowtron Block lordrainbowtron Invite lordrainbowtron to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 12/18/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #17883 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #6901 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 350 total,
397 ,
47 |
| Content Level Progress: | 6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 20% (2/10) Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 127 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Total Comments Made: | 87 |
| FJ Points: | 262 |
latest user's comments
| #18 - Comment deleted | 11/10/2015 on Take two cringe | 0 |
| #5 - But none of them were Lacey tho [+] (1 new reply) | 11/10/2015 on Mean Girls | 0 |
| | ||
| #11 - **** , I commented as anon so everything I said instantl… | 11/09/2015 on Retard finds the secret milk | +1 |
| #1722 - Thank you for that | 10/20/2015 on Roll for your new girlfriend | +1 |
| #1712 - **** now everyone knows my fetish | 10/20/2015 on Roll for your new girlfriend | 0 |
| #1711 - **lordrainbowtron used "*roll picture*"** **lordrainbowtron… [+] (3 new replies) | 10/20/2015 on Roll for your new girlfriend | +6 |
| | ||
| #8 - Picture | 10/12/2015 on the fj cocktail | +1 |
| #105 - It is comparable because neither party is given a choice befor… [+] (9 new replies) | 10/12/2015 on Milo being awesome part 2 | +50 |
| #345 -
whatareyouon (10/12/2015) [-]   "similar, close, near" those words do not mean the same you absolute retard. #127 -
anon (10/12/2015) [-] dont try to argue circumcision on circlejerkjunk. all of them are misinformed, and basically bizarro feminists on the subject because of a lack of choice, despite its blatant health benefits for infants and toddlers, then later in life for grown men. You do realise the foreskin is still attached to the head of the penis until puberty? So no extensive cleaning has to be done until it detaches and is able to be retracted fully and if by that age you are unable to clean your own dick, whether you have or don't have a foreskin is the least of your worries. | ||
| #90 - It actually doesn't pose any health risks if you are able to u… [+] (28 new replies) | 10/12/2015 on Milo being awesome part 2 | +100 |
| #151 -
imgood (10/12/2015) [-] Circumcision might have various health benefits, including: Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. Washing beneath the foreskin of an uncircumcised penis is generally easy, however. Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections are more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on. Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Circumcised men might have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Still, safe sexual practices remain essential. Prevention of penile problems. Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis can be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis. Decreased risk of penile cancer. Although cancer of the penis is rare, it's less common in circumcised men. In addition, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of circumcised men. copy pasted from the mayo clinic, it's more than just hygiene related  >From the mayo clinic Nice. What I'm reading here is no instance of the word 'significant' so there's no definite cause and effect. I can promise you that the last point is correlation, and as for the HIV one, people are idiots. They fuck whatever they want. That's like saying a woman with brown nipples is more likely to have aids. For you to get an STI you have to do things with someone who has an STI. The opening at the end of your dick is no less vulnerable. Phimosis is the only legitimate concern on that list, and it isn't super common. For most people with uncut dongles, the only concern is hygiene. If you clean shit up, you won't get your shit fucked up. and YES it does do something during intercourse. it makes it so that there's less pulling on the skin, because there's 'extra' skin, and allows for a male and female to enjoy the 'stretching' feeling rather than the male getting the 'pulling' feeling. of course, this only happens with unprotected sex, so, biologically, the only kind that matters. If it had no purpose, there would be lower frequencies of it in the population. some females also enjoy it more because 'it feels like theres something else (more) in there'. women who don't enjoy it, don't because they associate uncut with unclean, even though 'intact' is far more proper, because we were fucking born with it. Stop the stigma. Stop cutting dicks. And before you bring up the appendix, as a counter argument to the above, It had a use, because it was involved in our diet. Now it doesn't because our diet mainly consists of different shit now.  Do you have a dick? Easier hygiene? How fucking hard is it to pull the foreskin down? Even a fucking monkey can do it. #330 -
deutschblut (10/12/2015) [-]  Jewish doctors pushed this idea in America so all American men with have penises like kikes. Typical fucking kike. They will take 10% off everything. Even your cock! #423 -
anon (10/12/2015) [-] Wrong, what you describe is secondary to physiological adherences and is a normal process of penile maturation. In phimosis, the foreskin is actually too tight, it is clearly pathological. Most of these problems are solved by performing basic hygiene. #386 -
thedancingfool (10/12/2015) [-]  Circumcision comes from desert-dwelling people who lacked access to such things as soap and plentiful, clean water so I guess it made sense, at the time, to remove some excess skin to help with hygiene problems. Plus, if I remember right, the original procedure was removing a small amount of redundant skin rather than the scalping that currently constitutes circumcision. And all those Mayo Clinic findings are very small changes in chance that occur over a population, that is, you need hundreds of thousands of men to 'show' statistical significance. And before some knob-gobbler (pun intended) asks for a citation--suck on this: www.cirp.org/library/disease/cancer/ And what kind of study you need to do to figure out if circs are good or not: statistics.about.com/od/Glossary/a/What-Is-A-Statistical-Population.htm I just don't understand parents who want to mutilate (and I don't use that word lightly) their son. Most arguments I hear amount to: 'I don't want his dick to look weird', to 'Everyone else does it', to the truly disturbing 'So it will look like his dad's'.  People are fucking stupid. "Dur, it's too hard to clean my junk, I'll just mutilate it and chop a part off! Dur..." Ears get infections too. Should you cut off your ears?  yeah using that logic most kids should have their ears cut off. Going back to vaginas, seems like women have a hard time keeping them clean. so lets find something down there to cut off. #105 -
lordrainbowtron (10/12/2015) [-] It is comparable because neither party is given a choice before their body is altered #345 -
whatareyouon (10/12/2015) [-] "similar, close, near" those words do not mean the same you absolute retard. #127 -
anon (10/12/2015) [-] dont try to argue circumcision on circlejerkjunk. all of them are misinformed, and basically bizarro feminists on the subject because of a lack of choice, despite its blatant health benefits for infants and toddlers, then later in life for grown men. You do realise the foreskin is still attached to the head of the penis until puberty? So no extensive cleaning has to be done until it detaches and is able to be retracted fully and if by that age you are unable to clean your own dick, whether you have or don't have a foreskin is the least of your worries. | ||
| #91 - Comment deleted | 10/11/2015 on Super Powers | 0 |
