lolollo
Rank #275 on Comments
Level 363 Comments: FJ Noble Online
Send mail to lolollo Block lolollo Invite lolollo to be your friend flag avatar
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Age: | 23 |
| Date Signed Up: | 2/18/2010 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #275 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #2335 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #76 |
| Content Thumbs: | 915 total,
1197 ,
282 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 74888 total,
87029 ,
12141 |
| Content Level Progress: | 10% (1/10) Level 82 Content: Srs Business → Level 83 Content: Srs Business |
| Comment Level Progress: | 23% (230/1000) Level 363 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 364 Comments: FJ Noble |
| Subscribers: | 7 |
| Content Views: | 33090 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 63 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 15716 |
| FJ Points: | 29658 |
| Favorite Tags: | Bacon (5) | lol (5) | comic (3) | Pokemon (3) | the (3) | alchemicfreak (2) | College (2) | funny (2) | game (2) | math (2) | nicolas cage (2) | Sammich (2) | sex (2) |
Pictures
- Views: 4335
149 11
Total: +138
Comments: 11
Favorites: 8
Uploaded: 10/08/11
dumb bitch - Views: 6537
140 39
Total: +101
Comments: 20
Favorites: 6
Uploaded: 05/19/10
Clever comic title! - Views: 6829
73 13
Total: +60
Comments: 6
Favorites: 7
Uploaded: 05/23/15
College Pt. 2 - Views: 4183
77 22
Total: +55
Comments: 36
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 05/14/10
Took me all night to do this - Views: 2554
57 4
Total: +53
Comments: 6
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 09/18/11
Why pandora! - Views: 819
24 10
Total: +14
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 11/03/11
High School
GIFs
- Views: 18051
445 19
Total: +426
Comments: 40
Favorites: 31
Uploaded: 05/22/15
College
user favorites
Monkey bread
LEWD GreenTeaNeko...
Inside out
star wars spoilers
How to commit crimes
Tiny Hero
I Want To Tell You
Real Assassins...
*cute moth noises*
4chordlatest user's comments
| #15 - And you're a colossal idiot for thinking your plan of action i… | 8 hours ago on Vaccines | 0 |
| #220 - Except I wouldn't? You do realize that the more presumptions … | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #219 - Not everyone who has a contrary opinion to yours is an idiot, … | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #218 - Both sides blatently lie. Your point? | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #217 - "Sick strawman" You one of those retards to… | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #216 - That makes it legal to occur, but the point you made was that … [+] (1 new reply) | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #221 -
sircool (8 hours ago) [-] in terms of when the united states bared immigration based on nationality, note all of these were during times of war which the united states might technically be in. Presidential Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 or the Alien and Sedition Acts. Used in WW I and WW II. It was used to bar immigration from the countries america was at war with at the time. sadly it was used also to imprison, and deport citizens from these countries, deportation used after the war. counterproductive I don't understand. in the modern world, it's an ideology that is toxic and anti- every moral the western world holds true to itself. the best way of stopping an ideology is stopping its spread completely. unconstitutional would imply they're already citizens of the united states. a country should have no power or say over some one who isn't party of its citizenry. | ||
| #215 - That's not what it is at all, I don't give a **** what … | 8 hours ago on Huh imagine that | 0 |
| #112 - Yep, and the rest of the nation gets their freedom to judge yo… [+] (2 new replies) | 16 hours ago on Huh imagine that | -1 |
| #115 -
anon (16 hours ago) [-] The point is you don't go to a speech where there are no questions and then try and yell your way into a debate. That's why they were removed, not their religion. It's always just outright lying wherever possible to label whoever they don't like as racist to dismiss the points rather than actually discuss them. That's not what it is at all, I don't give a shit what the race of the person they throw out is, what I care about is the fact that you ought to be confident enough in your ideals to be able to debate them, regardless of when it comes up. To avoid a debate all because "this isn't a debate, this is a hugbox!" is a little suspicious. | ||
| #111 - Racism is discriminating someone on their nationality you … [+] (1 new reply) | 16 hours ago on Huh imagine that | -2 |
| #110 - "I don't see the issue with it, though, other presidents … [+] (4 new replies) | 16 hours ago on Huh imagine that | -3 |
 no, I just threw a lot of information out there, some bits you might argue against, others not. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182 (3) Security and related grounds (iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible. www.pewglobal.org/2006/05/23/where-terrorism-finds-support-in-the-muslim-world/ 25% of the islamic world openly supports radical terrorism according to Pew research. 7% of that is part of the population that does it, not just support it. it is an ideology that promotes the overthrowing of secular or nonislamic governments for one that is. so yes, there are grounds for baring of immigration. That makes it legal to occur, but the point you made was that other presidents have done so. There's also the issue that Trump wouldn't be doing it based on country of origin, but on a religion. If it were the former, I'd like to be told about it, because I'm seriously hoping he's not serious about that. Doing it based on religion is a) a little counterproductive and b) really unconstitutional. #221 -
sircool (8 hours ago) [-] in terms of when the united states bared immigration based on nationality, note all of these were during times of war which the united states might technically be in. Presidential Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 or the Alien and Sedition Acts. Used in WW I and WW II. It was used to bar immigration from the countries america was at war with at the time. sadly it was used also to imprison, and deport citizens from these countries, deportation used after the war. counterproductive I don't understand. in the modern world, it's an ideology that is toxic and anti- every moral the western world holds true to itself. the best way of stopping an ideology is stopping its spread completely. unconstitutional would imply they're already citizens of the united states. a country should have no power or say over some one who isn't party of its citizenry. #181 -
anon (15 hours ago) [-] Don't bother, whenever this guy gets BTFO he just stops replying and acts like you're too ignorant to understand why he's actually right. | ||
user's friends
apchabraja
badboywantsu
balatro
cabooodle
Crownowa
delightedreaper
effgerald
firstdodobird
flaminscull
Forfunaccount
jmawardi
jonnyfrosty
juggernog
kinginyellow
knux
kodiaxeattacks
Krags
mrmojito
nommas
purpleday
reeno
sketchysketchist
smileulzAnonymous comments allowed.
44 comments displayed.
#52
-
lolollo ONLINE (09/27/2015) [-] Homebased
You act as though I can't get the last word in a petty fight. You know nothing.
You act as though I can't get the last word in a petty fight. You know nothing.
#49
-
gugek (12/30/2014) [-] Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#41
-
bible (12/09/2014) [-] You seem like a decent person. Just keep being awesome, be kind to others and try to be as kind as plausible to others and I assure it will come back around to you.
#38
-
nuclearnacho (09/15/2014) [-] I know you're probably tired as hell of this by now, but reading the comment thread from on whether or not that one post was racist raised some questions, one of which I'm very curious about.
If you were given a bowl of spaghetti, and the option to use either a fork or a pair of chopsticks, which would you pick?
If you were given a bowl of spaghetti, and the option to use either a fork or a pair of chopsticks, which would you pick?
#33
-
icheatjews (04/20/2014) [-] funnyjunk.com/I+m+So+Smart+Please+Notice+Me/funny-pictures/5107122/
These faggots must be stopped... Join the cause
Do it for the kids
These faggots must be stopped... Join the cause
Do it for the kids
#23
-
extooso (10/24/2013) [-] casprizzle wehn you read this i want you to know that i love you <3 casprizzle
#21 to #20
-
whitenerdy (11/23/2012) [-] The phrase "Tits or gtfo" was originally used for situations like this, when a female used her dominance though her gender to make other people seek her attention.
And yeah, the comic where she promoted that it's hard for her to get boys when she was horny, or when she made a comic about how Europe have a low attention span and called it "European style!" that really rustled my jimmied beyond my normal infuriated level.
And yeah, the comic where she promoted that it's hard for her to get boys when she was horny, or when she made a comic about how Europe have a low attention span and called it "European style!" that really rustled my jimmied beyond my normal infuriated level.
#4
-
Crownowa (12/17/2011) [-] One positive thing of our conversation was finding a flaw in the system go figure. Just remember that sleep if for the weak ;)
#9 to #9
-
Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-] Haha don't be. It's not like I come on this site to actually try and prove a point or to act myself or find friends to add on facebook. I treat it as a filtered version of 4chan. I've only recently started taking the approach I had with you to see how people react and it caused a ********* . I'll remember it for later when I find something amusing to comment on again.
#10 to #10
-
lolollo ONLINE (12/18/2011) [-] I feel less bad now, I'm in a discussion with (several) someone over how exactly females get friendzoned if the guys are the ones who initiate the "relationship" possibility and getting flack for it. Do you know? I wondering exactly how a girl gets friendzoned. Does she have to be the one to ask for the relationship? I can imagine the random comment made by the guy, but how often does that happen?
#11 to #11
-
Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-] No need to feel bad at all. It's like feeling bad for not being able to get 4chan to count to 10 :) Interesting. Usually it would be the person asking for a relationship who get friendzoned. Unless we say that someone's general comments friendzone someone else before there is even a chance of asking for a relationship. But if a man asks a woman for a relationship, if she says yes, then wouldn't they start dating? If they/he/she "just want to be friends" later then that's not friendzoning. There are times when someone asks another out but actually has no intention of dating (perhaps the person has been dared or has a bet or just wants to troll the other person) and then puts the person in the friendzone after the agreement of starting a relationship. I don't see that happening often though, usually the let-down is something much worse that friendzoning.
#15 to #13
-
Crownowa (12/21/2011) [-] Ha well I find it easier to stop and be logical than to try and make **** up to get on people's nerves, especially when its such a clearcut question as that :) Oddly enough, I had a course about Modes of Reasoning that could have asked similar questions. You may enjoy that kind of course.
