logiblack

Rank #4794 on Content
logiblack Avatar Level 264 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to logiblack Block logiblack Invite logiblack to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/10/2011
Last Login:1/29/2015
Location:Germany
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4794
Comment Ranking:#5347
Highest Content Rank:#1847
Highest Comment Rank:#1912
Content Thumbs: 2693 total,  3330 ,  637
Comment Thumbs: 7179 total,  8397 ,  1218
Content Level Progress: 63% (63/100)
Level 120 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 22% (22/100)
Level 264 Comments: Pure Win → Level 265 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:2
Content Views:222053
Times Content Favorited:305 times
Total Comments Made:1933
FJ Points:8538
Favorite Tags: i (2) | of (2) | the (2)
I'm just a guy seeking pleasure in the simple things of life. Grateful for the wealth I do have, thankful for the diseases I don't.

Don't aim to outshine the stars - aim to shine along with them. Unseen and yet adding to the beauty that is the world.

Besides that I'm also pretty cool. Yo.

latest user's comments

#68 - I neevr said our difference was in how it works. Squids ar… 11/07/2014 on the beak from a giant squid 0
#11 - This does kinda look crazy to me. 11/07/2014 on Is Mandy Moore the only... +2
#46 - Don't forget that they got eyes even more efficient than ours.…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/07/2014 on the beak from a giant squid 0
#59 - anonymous (11/07/2014) [-]
Actually, both squid and human eyes work the same way. www.d.umn.edu/~olse0176/Evolution/octo.html
User avatar #68 - logiblack (11/07/2014) [-]
I neevr said our difference was in how it works.
Squids are in that way more efficient, that the nervecords go other ways and are better aligned as with humans.
The problem with our nervecords is, that they run in front of our receptors.
Means that there is less space on the receptorwall and the light reaching it is somehwat lesser because they have to get through the nerves.
This is the cause for the blind spot a human eye has. We have a spot which should normally be in our field of view that we do not see.
The squid eye on the other hand evolved in the better, more efficient way.
The nervecords are running behind the receptorwall - not hindering the light, and not needing a blind spot.

Sorry if there are any linguistic-mistakes, I'm dead-tired and am too lazy to look up the vernacle for evolutionary biology. I may or may not be writing in complete nonsense. Short:
Squid-eyes don't have a blind spot like we humans have, because of the way the nerve-cords are aligned. Thus they are more efficient - and not of the same build as the human eye.
#25 - Who are you to judge? Are you free of sin? 11/07/2014 on Feminism +1
#13 - Nyanpasu~!  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2014 on Heil sempai 0
User avatar #14 - PetrifiedPsycho (11/05/2014) [-]
Nyanpasu~!
#224 - You might laugh, but that one is gramatically more correct tha…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2014 on Marvel and Attack on Titan... +1
User avatar #225 - pootismang (11/05/2014) [-]
Absolutely amazing.
#223 - Yes. And like I said: It either J ae ger. Or J ä ger. … 11/05/2014 on Marvel and Attack on Titan... 0
#58 - It's either Jaeger or Jäger. Don't mix both!  [+] (5 new replies) 11/04/2014 on Marvel and Attack on Titan... +3
#140 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
Jaeger and Jäger are the same fucking thing, cunt.
User avatar #223 - logiblack (11/05/2014) [-]
Yes. And like I said:
It either Jaeger. Or Jäger.
But not both of them mixed together. Jäeger is wrong.
#91 - pootismang (11/04/2014) [-]
Jaeaeäger?
#224 - logiblack (11/05/2014) [-]
You might laugh, but that one is gramatically more correct than Jäeger.
Whilst ae = ä for Umlaut-free people what you did was basically Jäääger. A Jäger with a long pronounciation on ä.
but ae ≠ äe (following ä ≠ äe).


If we change the ä in Jäeger to the equivalent ae it would be Jaeeger - and that would be pronounced quite different!
User avatar #225 - pootismang (11/05/2014) [-]
Absolutely amazing.
#10 - Picture 11/04/2014 on Ah, the Nostalgia +1
#56 - Well, I see value in it. But yea - it does sound kinda silly. …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/03/2014 on questions 0
User avatar #61 - theodordronen (11/04/2014) [-]
I should probably point out that the "he" is more or less me when I did a bit of philosophy. And don't get me wrong I love philosophy myself.

It's just the smugness of people who've had one class and think they understand the workings of the world, because they can stump people with sayings like that.
#46 - I'm not even a philosphy student and I fully graps what he wan…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/03/2014 on questions +2
User avatar #52 - theodordronen (11/03/2014) [-]
The point is not to grasp it, but to see any value in it
User avatar #56 - logiblack (11/03/2014) [-]
Well, I see value in it. But yea - it does sound kinda silly.


He IS right that the human values and treasures the language far too much and holds it in too high esteem.

To what lengths does a human go to get a few false nice words? To get some respect and status in speech alone? To avoid being a bitch? To not become a douchebag? To not be associated with the right-wing? To be associated with some donorcircles giving food to some people, but denying it to others?

I agree. And give a shit - but one does not need to go around tell it to people not willing to spend the time for this. I like philosophy - it does sound silly most of the time but it does hold some serious meaning to it. And it doesn't actually help you in life but you feel you understand the big picture a bit better. It's helping to feel empathy. To understand why your opponent acts the way he does. It's not necessarily psychology you need to understand the people.
User avatar #61 - theodordronen (11/04/2014) [-]
I should probably point out that the "he" is more or less me when I did a bit of philosophy. And don't get me wrong I love philosophy myself.

It's just the smugness of people who've had one class and think they understand the workings of the world, because they can stump people with sayings like that.
#21 - Fake! Not even one "Oops! Sorrey!" or "Ah d… 11/02/2014 on Chivalry Ain't Dead 0
#106 - Those 'hotdogs' are actually nothing but Wieners. There ar…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/30/2014 on Its just a fatass +1
User avatar #124 - fuzzysixx (10/30/2014) [-]
I don't really cold dogs, but nothing wrong with them. The worst part of this, isn't in the .gif. I would try what the gif shows, a small portion of course. She later covers it in chocolate bars and donuts.
#73 - Click on the purple part of nekaz rolled image it's 'im… 10/30/2014 on Mjolnir 0
#61 - Why are you applying to job per Iphone/smartphone? 10/30/2014 on Siri names 0
#23 - Reich is actually more the righ of right with the sh of … 10/29/2014 on Fourth Reich +3
#121 - I am a step ahead of you! My head said seven of blue. 10/26/2014 on [magic] 0
#37 - Yea! We need some ways to piss off users and reduce the tr… 10/23/2014 on items for user comments -2
#44 - The bagpipeist. Of course I wouldn't shoot a person w…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/23/2014 on Manly Men 0
User avatar #153 - bagpipe (10/24/2014) [-]
<3
#19 - Comment deleted 10/21/2014 on Have you seen Ralph? +1
#199 - I'm first. Believe me. I know the system. 10/21/2014 on admin first post challenge +2
#15 - Oh, I C now. 10/21/2014 on Despicable Me 0
#13 - July 20th? Have you tricked me or is this not the ticket t…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/20/2014 on Despicable Me +1
#14 - psychadelicace (10/20/2014) [-]
07 - July
20 - 20th
69 - 1969
<3
User avatar #15 - logiblack (10/21/2014) [-]
Oh, I C now.
#28 - Nobody expects the spanish inquisition! 10/19/2014 on Gates of hell open up on... 0
#55 - The trolls are named Olog -hai though. Because Olog means Tro… 10/19/2014 on Jimmy Carr 2 +1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 650 / Total items point value: 1150

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#79 - logiblack (06/30/2014) [-]
Wh-who are you people?
#75 - logiblack (05/29/2014) [-]
Wh-who are you people?
 Friends (0)